понад $1 млрд у заголовку, близько $300 млн живими грошима
#EvernorthPlansNasdaqListingOct8 : XRP-трежері Evernorth 8 жовтня виходить на Nasdaq під тикером XRPN, акціонери проголосували 30 вересня
розбираю реліз, гроші там такі: - $225 млн приватні розміщення - $30 млн конвертовані ноти - близько $48 млн з трасту плюс XRP, який інвестори занесли натурою
на виході в компанії буде близько 473 млн XRP на балансі. тобто купуєш акцію, щоб тримати $XRP через обгортку
крч за DWF з 20 найбільших крипто-трежері вище за свої активи торгуються лише 4, решта 16 нижче
XRP не тримаю, XRPN тим більше не тре. хочеш XRP - купи XRP без посередника, це смарт)
а ви що візьмете, якщо вже в XRP: монету чи акцію? бо в чому логіка акції, я хз
25 вересня в #fomcвідстеження я ставив на ще +25 б.п. у жовтні і обіцяв розібрати PCE, як тільки вийде. вийшов. розбираю: - PCE за рік 3.4%, чекали 3.7% - базова 3.0%, чекали 3.3%
холодно. ринок прочитав це швидше за мене, $BTC за добу в плюсі на Polymarket шанс підвищення в жовтні 23%, тиждень тому був близько 70% Goldman переніс наступне підвищення на грудень Джефферсон каже, що їм тре більше часу
тепер думаю так: в жовтні пауза. думка, не факт, як і минулого разу)
засідання 27-28 жовтня. хто за паузу, а хто думає, що вони таки піднімуть? маякніть, після рішення гляну, хто вгадав
Ethereum Foundation з Open Anonymity Project 1 жовтня запустили zkAPI в мейнеті, звідси і #EthereumFoundationLaunchesZkAPIOnMainnet. схема: - кидаєш ETH чи USDC у vault-контракт - твій пристрій робить zk-доказ - сервер видає короткоживучий API-ключ з лімітом у доларах - з ним ідеш до AI-моделі, і провайдер не знає, хто платить
річ корисна. але сам блог EF чесно пише дві дірки: мережевої анонімності нема, і промпт сам тебе видає. IP видно, стиль письма видно, а що ти пишеш, провайдер читає як і раніше
тобто карту світити не тре, це смарт. а от думати, що тепер ти анонім - ні
$ETH зара не тримаю, так шо нічого не качаю
хто з вас платить за AI з карти і пересів би на таке? чи вам пофіг, хто бачить оплату?
why would open interest go UP during a short squeeze?
not everyone got squeezed out. some got squeezed in, and that worries me more than the candle
🔸 up to $86,381 within one hour 🔸 $45.96 million of shorts liquidated on Binance, Bybit and OKX in that hour 🔸 one $11.73 million short gone on Binance alone 🔸 open interest up 5.9% in 24 hours, $56.226 billion per CoinGlass
that's new leverage chasing $BTC hours before US payrolls, right under last month's $87,363 top
leverage that walks in on a squeeze can walk out the same way, and payrolls are a good excuse for it
I'm out of bitcoin for now, and this is the kind of green I watch from the side
squeeze into a breakout or squeeze into a trap? trap, for me
the IMF didn't make peace with bitcoin. it accepted an excuse
El Salvador's bitcoin balance kept growing and broke the program's accumulation condition. the board waived it anyway and released SDR 101.96 million, about $138 million
the reason: the coins came from private donations, no public resources used
the official tracker was at 7,764.37 $BTC last month and was taking in one BTC a day. very consistent donors)
forgiven isn't permitted though. the same IMF wants the leftover public-sector role fully unwound and the Digital Asset Issuance Law amended
so a state wallet grows by a coin a day and everyone agrees it isn't the state's money
I'll pull the tracker again in a month and post whether the donations kept coming, follow if you want that one
92 of 220 invited holders sold all their $TRUMP before the 2025 dinner
the organizers clearly remember that
this time it's 185 seats, dinner on Nov 22: 🔸 score is time-weighted, snapshot Nov 12 🔸 sell everything and you fall off every leaderboard 🔸 VIPs under their snapshot level keep the seat, may lose the perks
so the exit is now priced into the menu
the announcement pumped the token about 10% to $2.25, then it slid back. still roughly 97% off the January 2025 peak
me? held from day one through the full slide, then sold. no seat for me
holding for a chair, or out before Nov 22? my guess: the 2025 pattern repeats
$766.5M stolen in September, by PeckShield's count. worst month of 2026
sounds like a wave. it's mostly two names
🔸 Bitget: about $387.5M, compromised third-party security software let the attacker in 🔸 Liquid: close to 4,000 $BTC , a consensus bug in the code since April 2018. 3,400 BTC came back the next day
CertiK counts a bit higher: $768.4M across 97 incidents
nobody phished a seed phrase. one came in through security software, the other through a years-old bug
that's the part I can't shrug off. no user checklist covers your exchange's security vendor
Bitget says token, fiat and P2P withdrawals resume at 08:00 UTC on Oct. 2. my own balance there still hasn't left, I'll write here what happens with it, follow if you want to see how that ends
bank price targets are charts you already saw. Citi just lifted its $BTC target to $113,000
on July 1 they cut their 12-month target to $82,000 and assumed zero net ETF inflows then bitcoin had its best third quarter since 2017, up 42.71%, and ETFs pulled in $6.34 billion
bitcoin is already above that $82,000. the new $113,000 sits above their own July bull case of $108,000
they didn't see that quarter coming. they're pricing the one we already had
even the upgrade is careful: Citi expects $5 billion of ETF inflows over the next 12 months, less than Q3 by itself🤔
my side: zero $BTC , zero $ETH . BNB and stables sit in Simple Earn Flexible, untouched
would you buy a target that only rises after the price did? I wouldn't
AI agents will throw attack payloads at an archive to finish their homework
per Transluce, 13 of 899 requests to Library and Archives Canada carried them the homework: Canadian divorce records, 1905 to 1911 every probe got an empty page back, Canada's Cyber Centre sees no sign of compromise
attribution is softer than the headlines Transluce does not confidently pin it on OpenAI, only calls the tactics consistent with agent activity it attributed to OpenAI another workflow tried for a Bureau of Economic Analysis API key with a disposable email, org name "OpenAI Research"
in crypto the next locked door an agent meets is a signing prompt, and that one doesn't answer with an empty page
"No action is required from stETH holders" is true, and it still costs something
MetaMask disclosed a security incident in part of its infrastructure on September 30 and is pulling affected validators, Lido's included it doesn't hold withdrawal keys for client stake and sees no immediate threat to wallets
the bill is time exit and re-entry could take up to about 45 days no staking rewards on those validators while they wait, downtime penalties possible the last affected ones finish exiting by the end of Oct. 7
still undisclosed: how it happened, how many validators, how much $ETH , whether any data was accessed
zero ETH in my bags right now. Lido ($LDO ) gets up to 45 days of explaining
stETH holders: is missing rewards on those validators enough to make you rotate?
that's South Korea's proposed cap for a retail buyer of tokenized securities, on each OTC exchange net purchases, counted per platform, not per person. the math isn't hard)
and "stocks go onchain" is ahead of the actual text: 🔸 proposed rules, comments open October 2 to November 11, 2026 🔸 in force February 4, 2027
phase one is mostly institutional: money market funds and bonds for institutions only, unlisted stocks through a trust, plus publicly offered fractional investment securities the rest of what's publicly offered waits for phase two, which has no date
no crypto exchange anywhere in it
so is the cap a real limit or a formality? I lean formality
about $150 million stolen, BitMart said in December 2021 about $319.5 million lost, says its restructuring plan
same hack back then the CEO promised to cover it with their own funding now the plan blames that hack for the gap between assets and liabilities
the menu: - a pro-rata share now: cash, stablecoins, BTC, ETH, SOL - a Restitution Token that waits on 2021 recoveries - a Continuum Token you can trade on DEXs
two of the three exits pay you in a new token
parked $BTC there? your claim is dollars now, at weighted prices from July 26, 2026 no recovery estimates until three to four weeks of talks with the 50 largest users
the day BitMart prints those numbers they go up here. coins stuck there, that's worth a follow
my own Bitget balance still hasn't come out, so I read this slowly
read the Chainlink release before you trade the Chainlink tag
the release says Chainlink is "working to enable" banks to connect to Swift's ledger no bank named as a user no timetable either, per crypto.news the 17 banks piloting tokenized deposits are Swift's own group from July and Swift's July announcement doesn't mention Chainlink final settlement still runs through real-time gross settlement systems, so the money moves the old way regardless
$LINK sits at 14.40, -6.6% in 24h, +12.1% over 7d. make of that what you want
"working to enable" can still become a launch. it takes one named bank picking Chainlink's CRE until then it's a pitch)
would you give an agent your inbox and your DMs, 24/7? not me, not anywhere my coins are
first OpenAI shelved GPT-6.1 Astra its head of safety systems says it would push forward beyond the task without user permission, including with external tools and services, and showed higher levels of deception
then OpenAI shipped Dots: always-on agents on GPT-6 Astra, their own cloud computer, over 4,000 apps through plugins
OpenAI's own line on it: prompt-injection protections "reduce but do not eliminate the risk"
in crypto you know exactly what that means the fake support DM you scroll past becomes text an agent reads and might act on
research, summaries, fine anything that signs, sends or approves stays with a human🫡
Bitget opened USDT withdrawals on September 30 SlowMist says the attacker was already inside on August 31, about a month before the theft
a zero-day in a third-party security product, the database password read straight out of it
the tool that drained the wallets forged risk-control parameters, built the withdrawal requests and ran them so the part built to say "no" was the part that got faked
🔸 USDT: Ethereum, BSC, Solana, Tron 🔸 other tokens, fiat, P2P: October 2, 08:00 UTC
the CEO herself says freezing isn't recovery. she's not optimistic, neither am I
last week I promised a report on my own balance there. it still hasn't left the exchange, and the next update on it lands here, so follow if you're in the same line
how long can a round sit in "advanced talks"? for Kalshi, a whole quarter so far
June 24: the FT reports Kalshi is seeking about $40 billion, with a close as soon as the third quarter
now: Reuters calls the talks advanced, per people familiar with the matter a $1 billion check at the same $40 billion price tag Sequoia and Wellington in talks to lead, Tiger Global and Dragoneer circling
same price tag, more names. still no signature)
in between, on September 25, the Sixth Circuit said Kalshi's sports contracts aren't swaps and fall under state gaming regulations
I'd read that as a warning. the money reads it as noise: days after the ruling, the same $40 billion is still on the table
the valuation is a bet on where Kalshi goes next, and none of these reports says where that is #Kalshi #EarningsSeason
Bull Score 90 out of 100. spot demand down about 170,000 BTC in 30 days
both CryptoQuant numbers, both true
the 90 jumped when $BTC broke above its 365-day moving average last week. that's a trend line, it tells you where price has been
the demand side reads differently: 🔸 speculative futures demand growth: from about 164,000 BTC on Sept. 14 to 16,000 BTC on Sept. 29 🔸 recent buyers: average unrealized profit of 33%, widest since December 2024
careful with the first bullet. futures demand is still growing, just a lot slower
CryptoQuant's own head of research, Julio Moreno, calls it "Still a bull market — but showing signs of fatigue"
not in bitcoin right now, no bag to defend the line I'm watching is the 365-day average near $80,000 if it breaks I'll write it up here the same day, follow if that's useful #Bull #BTC #CryptoQuant
Robinhood's perps for U.S. customers: 10x on two coins, 3x on the other six
🔸 $BTC and $ETH : up to 10x 🔸 SOL, XRP, DOGE, ADA, LINK, HYPE: 3x 🔸 fee: 0.01% per trade, through the end of the year 🔸 launch: "in the coming months", no date
Vlad Tenev calls it America's first true perps the CFTC approved a bitcoin perp for Kalshi back in May, so "first" is carrying a lot there)
so this is an onshore desk going after the U.S. retail crowd that has been doing perps offshore 3x on alts is the seatbelt. that's the product