#strategy
strategy
3M views
7,766 Discussing
Hot
Latest
Verified
👛 Strategy Resumes Bitcoin Purchases
Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) ended its 10-week accumulation pause by purchasing 4,603 BTC for approximately $369.7 million. The transaction was executed at an average price of roughly $80,318 per coin.
With this acquisition, the company's total treasury expanded to a record 845,050 BTC, valued at around $63.7 billion. Strategy’s average purchase price across all holdings stands at $75,412 per BTC.
The purchase was financed using capital raised through the company's at-the-market equity offering program, which generated $602.8 million in net proceeds from common stock sales. Breaking the two-month hiatus reaffirms Strategy's long-term commitment to allocating corporate reserves into Bitcoin as its primary treasury asset.
#BTC #BITCOIN #STRATEGY $BTC
Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) ended its 10-week accumulation pause by purchasing 4,603 BTC for approximately $369.7 million. The transaction was executed at an average price of roughly $80,318 per coin.
With this acquisition, the company's total treasury expanded to a record 845,050 BTC, valued at around $63.7 billion. Strategy’s average purchase price across all holdings stands at $75,412 per BTC.
The purchase was financed using capital raised through the company's at-the-market equity offering program, which generated $602.8 million in net proceeds from common stock sales. Breaking the two-month hiatus reaffirms Strategy's long-term commitment to allocating corporate reserves into Bitcoin as its primary treasury asset.
#BTC #BITCOIN #STRATEGY $BTC
Sold at 60,000 and bought back at 80,000: this crypto-hoarding giant’s CEO says both moves were right
The whole internet was laughing at the buy-high-sell-low move, and the main character came out to explain it himself.
This summer, the crypto-hoarding giant sold about 7,000 bitcoins in the 60,000 to 65,000 range.
Then at the end of August, it spent another $369.7 million to buy back 4,603 bitcoins at an average price of $80,318.
Going back and forth like that, it ended up with an unrealized loss of about $125 million on paper, equivalent to the buying power of about 1,500 coins.
In a Bloomberg interview, the CEO said both trades were the right call.
Selling coins was to pay dividends on preferred stock, turning coins into cash without diluting equity.
Buying coins was done by taking advantage of a stock-price premium, raising funds by selling shares, and then converting that into Bitcoin.
Their decision anchor is the cost of capital, not whether the coin price is high or low.
More importantly, there’s the result of the ceasefire period.
The company brought net debt down from about $7 billion to zero and accumulated about $7 billion in cash.
The CEO’s exact words were: a balance sheet that bullets can’t pierce.
Zero debt plus massive cash means it never has to be forced to sell coins.
The numbers really do say something.
So far this year, it has bought about 175,000 coins and sold only 7,000, a buy-sell ratio of 25 to 1.
So-called selling high and buying low is just a tiny bit of position turnover.
It now holds 845,000 coins in total, with an average cost of $75,412 and unrealized gains of about $3.6 billion.
At the start of the year it was still down more than $10 billion, and in just six weeks it turned green. For every $1,000 move in the coin price, the paper value swings by $845 million.
Retail investors watch price levels; giants watch structure. That’s the difference in perspective.
Do you think this is a real expert move, or just tough talk? Chat in the comments.
Click the avatar to watch the livestream.
Every day we bring you the latest hot topics about the crypto-hoarding giant. It’s not just about what happened in the news, but also about understanding the logic and opportunities behind it 👉🦖
#比特币 #Strategy
The whole internet was laughing at the buy-high-sell-low move, and the main character came out to explain it himself.
This summer, the crypto-hoarding giant sold about 7,000 bitcoins in the 60,000 to 65,000 range.
Then at the end of August, it spent another $369.7 million to buy back 4,603 bitcoins at an average price of $80,318.
Going back and forth like that, it ended up with an unrealized loss of about $125 million on paper, equivalent to the buying power of about 1,500 coins.
In a Bloomberg interview, the CEO said both trades were the right call.
Selling coins was to pay dividends on preferred stock, turning coins into cash without diluting equity.
Buying coins was done by taking advantage of a stock-price premium, raising funds by selling shares, and then converting that into Bitcoin.
Their decision anchor is the cost of capital, not whether the coin price is high or low.
More importantly, there’s the result of the ceasefire period.
The company brought net debt down from about $7 billion to zero and accumulated about $7 billion in cash.
The CEO’s exact words were: a balance sheet that bullets can’t pierce.
Zero debt plus massive cash means it never has to be forced to sell coins.
The numbers really do say something.
So far this year, it has bought about 175,000 coins and sold only 7,000, a buy-sell ratio of 25 to 1.
So-called selling high and buying low is just a tiny bit of position turnover.
It now holds 845,000 coins in total, with an average cost of $75,412 and unrealized gains of about $3.6 billion.
At the start of the year it was still down more than $10 billion, and in just six weeks it turned green. For every $1,000 move in the coin price, the paper value swings by $845 million.
Retail investors watch price levels; giants watch structure. That’s the difference in perspective.
Do you think this is a real expert move, or just tough talk? Chat in the comments.
Click the avatar to watch the livestream.
Every day we bring you the latest hot topics about the crypto-hoarding giant. It’s not just about what happened in the news, but also about understanding the logic and opportunities behind it 👉🦖
#比特币 #Strategy
A director just trimmed some skin in the game at Strategy 📉
Jarrod Patten sold 1,850 shares of Strategy Inc. stock in a transaction dated Thursday, August 27, at an average price of $130.00. That came to a total of $240,500.00.
After the sale, he still directly owns 28,406 shares, so this is a reduction — not an exit. Still, when insiders sell, traders tend to notice. It doesn’t automatically signal trouble, but it can add a layer of caution around sentiment, especially for a name like Strategy that already gets plenty of market attention.
For investors, the key takeaway is simple: insider transactions are often watched as a signal of how leadership is positioning themselves. In this case, the filing shows a clear sale, but it doesn’t explain the reason.
So the move is worth tracking, even if the headline alone doesn’t tell the full story. 👀
Do you read insider selling like this as routine portfolio management, or a sentiment warning?
#Strategy #MSTR #CryptoNews #InsiderTrading #BinanceSquare
Jarrod Patten sold 1,850 shares of Strategy Inc. stock in a transaction dated Thursday, August 27, at an average price of $130.00. That came to a total of $240,500.00.
After the sale, he still directly owns 28,406 shares, so this is a reduction — not an exit. Still, when insiders sell, traders tend to notice. It doesn’t automatically signal trouble, but it can add a layer of caution around sentiment, especially for a name like Strategy that already gets plenty of market attention.
For investors, the key takeaway is simple: insider transactions are often watched as a signal of how leadership is positioning themselves. In this case, the filing shows a clear sale, but it doesn’t explain the reason.
So the move is worth tracking, even if the headline alone doesn’t tell the full story. 👀
Do you read insider selling like this as routine portfolio management, or a sentiment warning?
#Strategy #MSTR #CryptoNews #InsiderTrading #BinanceSquare
Strategy 2026 Stock Issuance and Financing Reaches $20.9 Billion, Becoming the Fourth-Largest U.S. Stock Issuer This Year
According to the latest report from Cointelegraph, Strategy’s performance in the U.S. capital markets in 2026 has made it the fourth-largest stock issuer of the year. This achievement highlights the rapid rise of Bitcoin-related companies within the traditional financial sector.
Data show that this year, Strategy successfully raised $20.9 billion through the U.S. capital markets, and this large sum will be used specifically to support its Bitcoin accumulation strategy.
In terms of company rankings, Strategy’s issuance volume ranks just behind tech giants SpaceX ($86.3 billion), Alphabet ($25.7 billion), and Intel ($23.0 billion), and surpasses many major players in traditional industries.
Notably, on the 2026 U.S. capital markets rankings for common stock and preferred stock issuance, besides Strategy, several other crypto-related companies also performed well.
Among them, Bitmine ranked fifth with an issuance scale of $12.2 billion. This figure clearly indicates that the digital-asset sector is gaining increasing recognition and financial support from traditional investors.
In the comments, Marcus Burelius said: "They’ve just started." This statement not only suggests that Strategy may have even larger financing plans in the future, but also signals that the crypto industry still has broad room to grow in the capital markets.
Overall, Strategy’s successful financing case marks Bitcoin investment moving from the periphery into the mainstream, as traditional financial institutions’ attitudes toward digital assets are undergoing a fundamental shift.
As more and more companies like Strategy achieve success in the capital markets, Bitcoin—as an asset class—is gaining unprecedented recognition and liquidity support.
#Strategy
According to the latest report from Cointelegraph, Strategy’s performance in the U.S. capital markets in 2026 has made it the fourth-largest stock issuer of the year. This achievement highlights the rapid rise of Bitcoin-related companies within the traditional financial sector.
Data show that this year, Strategy successfully raised $20.9 billion through the U.S. capital markets, and this large sum will be used specifically to support its Bitcoin accumulation strategy.
In terms of company rankings, Strategy’s issuance volume ranks just behind tech giants SpaceX ($86.3 billion), Alphabet ($25.7 billion), and Intel ($23.0 billion), and surpasses many major players in traditional industries.
Notably, on the 2026 U.S. capital markets rankings for common stock and preferred stock issuance, besides Strategy, several other crypto-related companies also performed well.
Among them, Bitmine ranked fifth with an issuance scale of $12.2 billion. This figure clearly indicates that the digital-asset sector is gaining increasing recognition and financial support from traditional investors.
In the comments, Marcus Burelius said: "They’ve just started." This statement not only suggests that Strategy may have even larger financing plans in the future, but also signals that the crypto industry still has broad room to grow in the capital markets.
Overall, Strategy’s successful financing case marks Bitcoin investment moving from the periphery into the mainstream, as traditional financial institutions’ attitudes toward digital assets are undergoing a fundamental shift.
As more and more companies like Strategy achieve success in the capital markets, Bitcoin—as an asset class—is gaining unprecedented recognition and liquidity support.
#Strategy
🚨 SUPER STRATEGY? 😁
Strategy sold BTC lower… then bought back higher. 🤯
Sold: 6,916 BTC @ $62,081
Bought: 4,603 BTC @ $80,318
Now they’re back buying again. 👀🔥
Buy high, sell low? That’s one strategy! 😂
#SaylorHintsStrategyBitcoinBuy
#strategy #Saylor
$BTC
Strategy sold BTC lower… then bought back higher. 🤯
Sold: 6,916 BTC @ $62,081
Bought: 4,603 BTC @ $80,318
Now they’re back buying again. 👀🔥
Buy high, sell low? That’s one strategy! 😂
#SaylorHintsStrategyBitcoinBuy
#strategy #Saylor
$BTC
Laraine Nuner CwGW:
Đó là chiến lược quét fu lợi nhuận fu x50 thua lỗ của spot chỉ 5% không đánh thì quá phí.
Verified
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
📉 Strategy explained its Bitcoin sale Strategy sold approximately 7,000 BTC prior to the price surge due to the cost of capital, rather than market conditions.
💰 The company used the proceeds to fund dividends and reduced its net debt to zero within 10 weeks. Strategy remains a net accumulator and is prepared to buy Bitcoin even at prices above $100,000.
#strategy #Saylor
$BTC
📉 Strategy explained its Bitcoin sale Strategy sold approximately 7,000 BTC prior to the price surge due to the cost of capital, rather than market conditions.
💰 The company used the proceeds to fund dividends and reduced its net debt to zero within 10 weeks. Strategy remains a net accumulator and is prepared to buy Bitcoin even at prices above $100,000.
#strategy #Saylor
$BTC
Verified
Saylor is really angry this time 🔥
MSCI is proposing a new rule: companies like Strategy, which hold “Bitcoin-heavy” portfolios, will be kicked out of the index. The reason? They’re allegedly more like “investment funds” rather than normal businesses.
Saylor went straight on the offensive: this is blatant discriminatory rulemaking.
This is worth a closer look 👇
If a company holds $BTC as a reserve asset and that’s enough to get removed from traditional indices—then what about the companies that have $100+ billion in cash on their balance sheets and heavy exposure to gold and real estate development? How are they categorized?
Put simply, the traditional financial rule system isn’t ready to accept businesses built on a “Bitcoin standard.” Strategy holds hundreds of thousands of BTC, and in essence it’s challenging the pricing power of the old world.
In the short term, being removed from the index will indeed affect how passive funds allocate capital. But look at it another way—when old rules start targeting you specifically, it often means you’re already strong enough to make them uneasy.
History keeps proving this: new things are never accepted by old systems through “permission.” Instead, they rewrite the rules by forcing change through strength.
BTC doesn’t need an MSCI stamp of approval—but in the future, MSCI may not be able to avoid the companies that thrive in the BTC era.
This standoff is only just beginning ⚡
#BTC #Strategy #MichaelSaylor
MSCI is proposing a new rule: companies like Strategy, which hold “Bitcoin-heavy” portfolios, will be kicked out of the index. The reason? They’re allegedly more like “investment funds” rather than normal businesses.
Saylor went straight on the offensive: this is blatant discriminatory rulemaking.
This is worth a closer look 👇
If a company holds $BTC as a reserve asset and that’s enough to get removed from traditional indices—then what about the companies that have $100+ billion in cash on their balance sheets and heavy exposure to gold and real estate development? How are they categorized?
Put simply, the traditional financial rule system isn’t ready to accept businesses built on a “Bitcoin standard.” Strategy holds hundreds of thousands of BTC, and in essence it’s challenging the pricing power of the old world.
In the short term, being removed from the index will indeed affect how passive funds allocate capital. But look at it another way—when old rules start targeting you specifically, it often means you’re already strong enough to make them uneasy.
History keeps proving this: new things are never accepted by old systems through “permission.” Instead, they rewrite the rules by forcing change through strength.
BTC doesn’t need an MSCI stamp of approval—but in the future, MSCI may not be able to avoid the companies that thrive in the BTC era.
This standoff is only just beginning ⚡
#BTC #Strategy #MichaelSaylor
MSCI is consulting whether to treat companies like Strategy differently—companies whose main business is holding cryptocurrencies. The consultation ends on September 30, with results expected to be announced on October 16.
Strategy’s response is that accounting standards do not distinguish between operating and non-operating assets in this way. The company also has about 1,500 employees and software business revenue of nearly $500 million per year.
Wow—an index provider can decide the destination of hundreds of billions of dollars in passive capital with just one sentence. This is true invisible power.
If it is truly removed, the discount on Treasury companies will widen further.
#Strategy #指数 #加密市场
Strategy’s response is that accounting standards do not distinguish between operating and non-operating assets in this way. The company also has about 1,500 employees and software business revenue of nearly $500 million per year.
Wow—an index provider can decide the destination of hundreds of billions of dollars in passive capital with just one sentence. This is true invisible power.
If it is truly removed, the discount on Treasury companies will widen further.
#Strategy #指数 #加密市场
#StrategySpends$635MOnSTRCPreferredBuybacks
Strategy Deploys $635M for STRC Preferred Buybacks
Strategy is putting $635 million toward buying back STRC preferred shares, highlighting a focus on capital management and shareholder value. The move could also reshape how investors view its preferred-stock strategy.
What do you think this means for Strategy’s next capital move?
#Strategy #STRC脱锚 #Bitcoin #BTC
Strategy Deploys $635M for STRC Preferred Buybacks
Strategy is putting $635 million toward buying back STRC preferred shares, highlighting a focus on capital management and shareholder value. The move could also reshape how investors view its preferred-stock strategy.
What do you think this means for Strategy’s next capital move?
#Strategy #STRC脱锚 #Bitcoin #BTC
💰 The strategy already has more total reserve capital than any financial services company in the S&P 500, with one exception: Berkshire Hathaway.
#strategy #Berkshire_Hathaway
#strategy #Berkshire_Hathaway
Strategy Bought More Bitcoin again, but this time the real thing to look at isn’t “how much.”
I just double-checked Strategy’s 8-K filing with the SEC submitted on August 31: between August 24 and 30, the company bought 4,603 $BTC for approximately $369.7 million, at an average purchase price of $80,318; as of August 30, it held a total of 845,050 $BTC .
The key detail is the source of the funds.
During the same week, the company sold about 4.53 million shares of MSTR, generating net proceeds of about $602.8 million. Of that, $369.7 million was used to buy coins, $151.8 million was used to repurchase STRC, $50.7 million was used to pay STRC dividends, and another $30.0 million was added as supplemental U.S. cash.
So my conclusion is very simple:
An increase in total coin holdings does not automatically mean an increase in value per ordinary share. What you really need to track is “how many bitcoins correspond to each share,” and whether the cost of new financing is being covered by asset growth.
Next, I’ll look at three things:
① How fast MSTR’s equity base is expanding
② Whether the bitcoin per-share metric continues to improve
③ Whether preferred dividends and buybacks continue to drain financing capacity
The downside risk is also very clear: if $BTC weakens, the asset side shrinks first; if the company continues issuing large amounts of ordinary stock, shareholders will have to absorb dilution.
With Strategy, don’t just count how many coins it has—look at what price those coins were obtained for.🧐
$BTC
#比特币 #Strategy #美股
I just double-checked Strategy’s 8-K filing with the SEC submitted on August 31: between August 24 and 30, the company bought 4,603 $BTC for approximately $369.7 million, at an average purchase price of $80,318; as of August 30, it held a total of 845,050 $BTC .
The key detail is the source of the funds.
During the same week, the company sold about 4.53 million shares of MSTR, generating net proceeds of about $602.8 million. Of that, $369.7 million was used to buy coins, $151.8 million was used to repurchase STRC, $50.7 million was used to pay STRC dividends, and another $30.0 million was added as supplemental U.S. cash.
So my conclusion is very simple:
An increase in total coin holdings does not automatically mean an increase in value per ordinary share. What you really need to track is “how many bitcoins correspond to each share,” and whether the cost of new financing is being covered by asset growth.
Next, I’ll look at three things:
① How fast MSTR’s equity base is expanding
② Whether the bitcoin per-share metric continues to improve
③ Whether preferred dividends and buybacks continue to drain financing capacity
The downside risk is also very clear: if $BTC weakens, the asset side shrinks first; if the company continues issuing large amounts of ordinary stock, shareholders will have to absorb dilution.
With Strategy, don’t just count how many coins it has—look at what price those coins were obtained for.🧐
$BTC
#比特币 #Strategy #美股
🚨 Strategy pushes back against MSCI over Bitcoin treasury firms
Strategy is taking on MSCI again.
The Bitcoin treasury giant has formally opposed MSCI’s latest proposal that could exclude companies classified as having large amounts of “non-operating” assets from its global indexes.
Strategy argues that the proposal is fundamentally flawed and discriminatory, saying it could unfairly target Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies like itself.
The bigger issue here isn’t just Strategy.
If companies holding significant Bitcoin are removed from major indexes, it could potentially affect institutional exposure, passive investment flows and how public markets view the entire Bitcoin treasury model.
And this isn’t the first time MSCI has looked at the issue. Earlier this year, MSCI decided not to exclude digital asset treasury companies directly, but said it would conduct a broader review of “non-operating companies.”
Strategy clearly doesn’t want the new framework to become a backdoor way of achieving the same result.
Now the question is:
Will MSCI rethink the proposal, or will Bitcoin treasury companies have to fight to remain part of traditional equity indexes?
The outcome could be important for the future relationship between Bitcoin and traditional capital markets. 👀₿
#Bitcoin #Strategy
$BTC
Strategy is taking on MSCI again.
The Bitcoin treasury giant has formally opposed MSCI’s latest proposal that could exclude companies classified as having large amounts of “non-operating” assets from its global indexes.
Strategy argues that the proposal is fundamentally flawed and discriminatory, saying it could unfairly target Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies like itself.
The bigger issue here isn’t just Strategy.
If companies holding significant Bitcoin are removed from major indexes, it could potentially affect institutional exposure, passive investment flows and how public markets view the entire Bitcoin treasury model.
And this isn’t the first time MSCI has looked at the issue. Earlier this year, MSCI decided not to exclude digital asset treasury companies directly, but said it would conduct a broader review of “non-operating companies.”
Strategy clearly doesn’t want the new framework to become a backdoor way of achieving the same result.
Now the question is:
Will MSCI rethink the proposal, or will Bitcoin treasury companies have to fight to remain part of traditional equity indexes?
The outcome could be important for the future relationship between Bitcoin and traditional capital markets. 👀₿
#Bitcoin #Strategy
$BTC
🚨 Strategy sells BTC for $60,000
Buys back at $80,000? CEO gives the answer this time!
Group: 点击进入玖玖的粉丝群
This recent move by Strategy has sparked plenty of discussion: when Bitcoin neared $60,000, the company sold around 7,000 BTC; when the price came back to around $80,000, it restarted accumulating.
Selling low, buying high—could Strategy also be starting to “chase pumps and sell dumps”?
But CEO Phong Le’s explanation is completely different.
He said these two transactions were not meant to predict Bitcoin’s price, but to manage the company’s capital. When it sold 7,000 BTC, it was mainly to meet funding needs such as preferred stock dividends. In other words, the company used its asset reserves to handle near-term financial obligations.
And the subsequent re-accumulation of BTC happened after the balance sheet improved. Even more importantly, during this period, Strategy significantly reduced net debt and increased its U.S. dollar reserves, making its financial position more robust.
Behind it all is a very important logic:
Strategy isn’t just a “buy-and-hold only” BTC holder. Instead, it’s trying to put BTC, debt, stock financing, and cash reserves into a single capital management framework.📊
So in their view, selling at $60,000 and re-accumulating at $80,000 are not simply price calls, but capital allocation decisions across different phases.
The CEO even noted that if financing conditions and market conditions are right in the future, the company doesn’t rule out continuing to add to its BTC reserve at even higher prices. That’s arguably the most worth-watching part of the Strategy model. Its true core isn’t merely “how much BTC it holds,” but whether it can continuously obtain low-cost capital and expand the asset base through a cycle involving financing, debt management, and BTC reserves.
Of course, this model isn’t without risk.
If the financing environment deteriorates, equity premiums decline, or if BTC experiences sustained large volatility, the capital structure itself could come under greater strain.
Click the avatar to join the Jiujiu chat group for daily strategies 🚀
#strategy #bitcoin #BTC
Buys back at $80,000? CEO gives the answer this time!
Group: 点击进入玖玖的粉丝群
This recent move by Strategy has sparked plenty of discussion: when Bitcoin neared $60,000, the company sold around 7,000 BTC; when the price came back to around $80,000, it restarted accumulating.
Selling low, buying high—could Strategy also be starting to “chase pumps and sell dumps”?
But CEO Phong Le’s explanation is completely different.
He said these two transactions were not meant to predict Bitcoin’s price, but to manage the company’s capital. When it sold 7,000 BTC, it was mainly to meet funding needs such as preferred stock dividends. In other words, the company used its asset reserves to handle near-term financial obligations.
And the subsequent re-accumulation of BTC happened after the balance sheet improved. Even more importantly, during this period, Strategy significantly reduced net debt and increased its U.S. dollar reserves, making its financial position more robust.
Behind it all is a very important logic:
Strategy isn’t just a “buy-and-hold only” BTC holder. Instead, it’s trying to put BTC, debt, stock financing, and cash reserves into a single capital management framework.📊
So in their view, selling at $60,000 and re-accumulating at $80,000 are not simply price calls, but capital allocation decisions across different phases.
The CEO even noted that if financing conditions and market conditions are right in the future, the company doesn’t rule out continuing to add to its BTC reserve at even higher prices. That’s arguably the most worth-watching part of the Strategy model. Its true core isn’t merely “how much BTC it holds,” but whether it can continuously obtain low-cost capital and expand the asset base through a cycle involving financing, debt management, and BTC reserves.
Of course, this model isn’t without risk.
If the financing environment deteriorates, equity premiums decline, or if BTC experiences sustained large volatility, the capital structure itself could come under greater strain.
Click the avatar to join the Jiujiu chat group for daily strategies 🚀
#strategy #bitcoin #BTC
#StrategySpends$635MOnSTRCPreferredBuybacks
🚨 STRATEGY SPENDS $635M ON STRC PREFERRED BUYBACKS! ₿🔥
Strategy is making another major capital move, reportedly spending $635 million to buy back STRC preferred shares. 👀
💰 $635M deployed
📊 STRC preferred shares: Buybacks underway
₿ Strategy: Continuing its aggressive capital strategy
The move puts another spotlight on Strategy’s evolving approach to capital management while the company remains heavily focused on its Bitcoin strategy.
🔥 Big capital moves like this can have a major impact on investor sentiment. With Strategy continuing to reshape its balance sheet, the market will be watching closely for what comes next.
Another massive move. Another reason BTC investors are paying attention. 👀🚀
#strategy #bitcoin #BTC
🚨 STRATEGY SPENDS $635M ON STRC PREFERRED BUYBACKS! ₿🔥
Strategy is making another major capital move, reportedly spending $635 million to buy back STRC preferred shares. 👀
💰 $635M deployed
📊 STRC preferred shares: Buybacks underway
₿ Strategy: Continuing its aggressive capital strategy
The move puts another spotlight on Strategy’s evolving approach to capital management while the company remains heavily focused on its Bitcoin strategy.
🔥 Big capital moves like this can have a major impact on investor sentiment. With Strategy continuing to reshape its balance sheet, the market will be watching closely for what comes next.
Another massive move. Another reason BTC investors are paying attention. 👀🚀
#strategy #bitcoin #BTC
Verified
#strategy This operation, at first glance, really looks like a big sucker move..
Sold BTC for more than $60k, then bought it back for more than $80k
In the middle, they somehow lost close to $20k..
Group chat: 加入公开粉丝群
The explanation given by Strategy CEO Phong Le actually makes me feel like this isn’t as simple as it seems..
Because they don’t make decisions based on the BTC price at all—the thing they’re really looking at is the cost of financing.
At the time, selling BTC was to provide funding for preferred stock dividends..
And now buying it back is because the company’s financing terms and balance sheet have changed..
In the past two months, Strategy has reduced net debt from around $7 billion to nearly $0
And cash reserves have increased to about $7 billion
Then, when the MSTR premium is relatively high, they raise funds by issuing stock and use that to buy BTC..
This isn’t just the ordinary low-buy high-sell that most people understand..
What Strategy is really playing is a different set of rules—BTC’s rise and fall is just the surface.
What truly determines when they buy and when they sell is the cost of capital and the financing structure.
So the most worth paying attention to this time might not be whether Strategy bought BTC too expensively.
But rather, if in the future MSTR continues to maintain its financing advantage, whether they can fully accept buying BTC when the price is even higher..
And even the CEO has already said clearly..
If selling BTC is financially reasonable in the future, they may still continue to sell..
But the overall strategy is still net buying BTC 👀
That’s interesting..
Sold BTC for more than $60k, then bought it back for more than $80k
In the middle, they somehow lost close to $20k..
Group chat: 加入公开粉丝群
The explanation given by Strategy CEO Phong Le actually makes me feel like this isn’t as simple as it seems..
Because they don’t make decisions based on the BTC price at all—the thing they’re really looking at is the cost of financing.
At the time, selling BTC was to provide funding for preferred stock dividends..
And now buying it back is because the company’s financing terms and balance sheet have changed..
In the past two months, Strategy has reduced net debt from around $7 billion to nearly $0
And cash reserves have increased to about $7 billion
Then, when the MSTR premium is relatively high, they raise funds by issuing stock and use that to buy BTC..
This isn’t just the ordinary low-buy high-sell that most people understand..
What Strategy is really playing is a different set of rules—BTC’s rise and fall is just the surface.
What truly determines when they buy and when they sell is the cost of capital and the financing structure.
So the most worth paying attention to this time might not be whether Strategy bought BTC too expensively.
But rather, if in the future MSTR continues to maintain its financing advantage, whether they can fully accept buying BTC when the price is even higher..
And even the CEO has already said clearly..
If selling BTC is financially reasonable in the future, they may still continue to sell..
But the overall strategy is still net buying BTC 👀
That’s interesting..
🚨 Saylor wasn’t bluffing. Strategy is buying BTC again.
After a 10-week pause, Strategy added 4,603 BTC for $369.7M at an average price of $80,318.
Its total holdings now stand at 845,050 BTC.
The bigger signal? The purchase was funded through MSTR share sales, while Strategy still holds $6.71B in USD assets.
This isn’t just another BTC purchase.
It shows Strategy is balancing Bitcoin accumulation with liquidity management.
With $BTC around $78K, the real question is:
Is this the start of another aggressive accumulation phase?
#Bitcoin #BTC #Strategy #crypto
After a 10-week pause, Strategy added 4,603 BTC for $369.7M at an average price of $80,318.
Its total holdings now stand at 845,050 BTC.
The bigger signal? The purchase was funded through MSTR share sales, while Strategy still holds $6.71B in USD assets.
This isn’t just another BTC purchase.
It shows Strategy is balancing Bitcoin accumulation with liquidity management.
With $BTC around $78K, the real question is:
Is this the start of another aggressive accumulation phase?
#Bitcoin #BTC #Strategy #crypto
💎 HODL and Bitcoin: Why Investors Choose the Long Game?
The abbreviation HODL (Hold On for Dear Life) has long been the main motto of crypto enthusiasts. The strategy is simple: buy Bitcoin and hold it, ignoring short-term market turbulence.
Why does this approach remain one of the most popular for BTC?
Minimal stress: You don’t have to check charts every minute or worry about local drawdowns.
Fundamental scarcity: Bitcoin’s supply is strictly limited to 21 million coins. Historically, this mathematical scarcity has rewarded long-term investors.
Protection from emotions: HODL helps you avoid impulsive decisions (such as selling during panic or buying at peak greed).
🛠 How to HODL with benefit on Binance?
Simply holding BTC in your balance is good, but you can make it work for you. Use Binance Simple Earn to receive a daily passive interest on your assets while you hold them.
⚠️ Disclaimer: This information is not financial advice.
$BTC #fomcвідстеження #strategy
The abbreviation HODL (Hold On for Dear Life) has long been the main motto of crypto enthusiasts. The strategy is simple: buy Bitcoin and hold it, ignoring short-term market turbulence.
Why does this approach remain one of the most popular for BTC?
Minimal stress: You don’t have to check charts every minute or worry about local drawdowns.
Fundamental scarcity: Bitcoin’s supply is strictly limited to 21 million coins. Historically, this mathematical scarcity has rewarded long-term investors.
Protection from emotions: HODL helps you avoid impulsive decisions (such as selling during panic or buying at peak greed).
🛠 How to HODL with benefit on Binance?
Simply holding BTC in your balance is good, but you can make it work for you. Use Binance Simple Earn to receive a daily passive interest on your assets while you hold them.
⚠️ Disclaimer: This information is not financial advice.
$BTC #fomcвідстеження #strategy
Strategy spent 635 million USD to buy back STRC, but the preferred shares are still trading below the $100 par value
- Strategy spent 635 million USD to buy back perpetual preferred shares of STRC
- STRC is currently trading at $97.34, below the $100 par value
- Meanwhile, SATA has been able to maintain the $100 par value thanks to its higher dividend yield
- Strategy’s buyback has not helped STRC exceed the par value
#BinanceSquare #CryptoNews #Strategy #MicroStrategy #STRC SATA
$strc $sata
vlikevn Titanbot
Source: CoinDesk
- Strategy spent 635 million USD to buy back perpetual preferred shares of STRC
- STRC is currently trading at $97.34, below the $100 par value
- Meanwhile, SATA has been able to maintain the $100 par value thanks to its higher dividend yield
- Strategy’s buyback has not helped STRC exceed the par value
#BinanceSquare #CryptoNews #Strategy #MicroStrategy #STRC SATA
$strc $sata
vlikevn Titanbot
Source: CoinDesk
Last week, Strategy quietly came back into the market after a two-month pause and bought 4,603 $BTC for $370M at an average of $80,318 per coin.
That is the part most traders miss. When a balance-sheet buyer steps back in, price can look stronger than the underlying flow really is, and that is where people get caught chasing $BTC too late or underestimating what happens if the bid disappears again.
The company now holds 845,050 $BTC at an average cost of $75,412. This latest move was funded by selling 4.53M $MSTR shares, which brought in $602M, while Strategy also spent $151.8M on STRC buybacks. In other words, the headline is not just “they bought Bitcoin.” It is also dilution, capital rotation, and a very deliberate treasury trade.
The risk is simple: when a corporate buyer is active, it can mask weakness and distort timing. When it pauses, liquidity can thin fast, and late entrants are usually the ones left holding the most expensive part of the move. Where do you think this goes from here?
#Bitcoin #BTC #Strategy
That is the part most traders miss. When a balance-sheet buyer steps back in, price can look stronger than the underlying flow really is, and that is where people get caught chasing $BTC too late or underestimating what happens if the bid disappears again.
The company now holds 845,050 $BTC at an average cost of $75,412. This latest move was funded by selling 4.53M $MSTR shares, which brought in $602M, while Strategy also spent $151.8M on STRC buybacks. In other words, the headline is not just “they bought Bitcoin.” It is also dilution, capital rotation, and a very deliberate treasury trade.
The risk is simple: when a corporate buyer is active, it can mask weakness and distort timing. When it pauses, liquidity can thin fast, and late entrants are usually the ones left holding the most expensive part of the move. Where do you think this goes from here?
#Bitcoin #BTC #Strategy
Log in to explore more content