github

🚨 Microsoft researchers identified a vulnerability in Anthropic’s Claude Code GitHub Action that may have exposed credentials used in software pipelines.

Anthropic patched the flaw on May 5 following a responsible disclosure through HackerOne.

As AI-powered coding tools see wider adoption, securing the software supply chain remains a growing priority.

#CyberSecurity #AI #DevSecOps #GitHub

These free projects on GitHub can really save you from burning cash on monthly software fees.

TradingAgents: An AI multi-agent quant trading framework.
LibreChat: An interface that connects to ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.
HyperFrames: A HeyGen alternative.

Follow me to keep discovering more hidden gems; the next one is going to blow your mind!

#GitHub #开源项目 #AI tools

⚠️ALERT: HACKERS CLAIM MASSIVE INTERNAL GITHUB SOURCE CODE LEAK

The cybercriminal group TeamPCP has taken responsibility for leaking GitHub's internal systems and stealing data linked to approximately 4000 private repositories that allegedly contain the platform's proprietary source code and internal files.

Reports indicate that the group is trying to sell the dataset on dark web crime forums for over $50,000.

While #GitHub has confirmed that they are investigating unauthorized access to the internal repositories, developers are urged to carefully review and change their API keys if present in those repos.
$BTC $WLD $ETH

GitHub Internal Breach Alert 🚨: TeamPCP claims exfiltration of ~4,000 private repos via a malicious VS Code extension on an employee device.
• No customer data leaked (yet).
• Supply chain attacks are the new norm.
• Action: Audit your extensions, rotate secrets, and enforce endpoint security.
Don't be the weakest link. 🛡️
#GitHub #CyberSecurity #TeamPCP #DevOps #SecurityAlert

🚨 Developers are freaking out after reports of a massive GitHub breach started spreading online.

A hacker group called “TeamPCP” claims it broke into GitHub’s internal systems and accessed data connected to nearly 4,000 private repositories. The leaked information allegedly includes internal company files and even parts of GitHub’s proprietary source code. 😳💻

And it gets worse.

The group is reportedly trying to sell the stolen data on underground cybercrime forums for more than $50,000. That alone has sparked major concern across the tech world. 🔥

GitHub says it’s investigating the unauthorized access, but developers aren’t waiting around. Many are already rushing to change API keys, secure repositories, and remove sensitive credentials before things spiral further. ⚠️🔐

If these claims are confirmed, this could turn into one of the biggest security scares the developer community has seen in years. One exposed token or private key can open the door to much larger attacks, which is why cybersecurity experts are telling users to act fast and stay alert.

#GitHub #CyberSecurity #DataBreach

$GTC
$PHB
$EDEN

Just came across this and it gave me a cold sweat: it's not that the model wrote a faulty piece of code, but rather that the code agent might have handed over the keys.

The news is pretty straightforward.
Decrypt quotes that Microsoft researchers have pointed out a vulnerability in Anthropic's Claude Code, where attackers could manipulate the AI programming agent through prompt injection to steal credentials from GitHub.
The players here are not small projects, but rather Microsoft, Claude Code, and GitHub in this developer infrastructure chain.

Veteran traders have seen this script before; what's truly scary is not whether 'AI will make mistakes,' but rather 'what permissions has AI already obtained?'
Once tools like Claude Code are integrated with code repositories, the boundary of permissions extends beyond just chat windows to repositories, keys, commits, CI/CD, and developer identities.
Prompt injection → AI agent mis-execution → GitHub credential leak; once this chain is established, the risk shifts from the model layer to the software supply chain layer.

The trading implication isn't about immediately slapping a bearish label on a particular coin.
The more direct impact is that the AI coding agent and developer security sector will need to be repriced.
On-chain projects heavily rely on GitHub, automated deployments, open-source collaboration, and key management. If it's proven that development workflows can be exploited through prompt injection, wallets, audits, contract tools, and AI agent frameworks will be forced to put 'permission isolation' on the table.

This isn't a retreat from the AI narrative; rather, it's a transition from the flashy tech phase to a validation phase.
An agent that can write code is attractive, but one that can avoid messing with keys is the one that deserves to enter production environments.

#AI #GitHub

Generated using Claude Opus 4.8 model. Claude is AI and can make mistakes. Please double-check responses.

🤖 Corporations are starting to restrict AI usage for employees!

While everyone feared AI would replace workers, many companies that massively adopted it are now facing a different problem:

⚠️the costs are exploding

💻 #Microsoft reportedly canceled most Claude Code licenses for engineers after months of active use and pushed teams back toward #Github Copilot CLI because token costs became too expensive.

🖨 #NVIDIA admitted the same issue. VP Bryan Catanzaro said compute expenses for AI tools are already exceeding employee costs for his team.

🚖 Uber burned through its entire 2026 AI budget in just 4 months:

▪️ 84% of engineers actively used Claude
▪️ 70% of new code was AI-generated
▪️ some employees reportedly consumed $500–$2K monthly in AI costs
▪️ Uber’s #CTO spent $1,200 during a single 2-hour demo session

The next AI race may not be about building the smartest model…

…but building one cheap enough that companies can actually afford to use it at scale. 🤔
#TRXSurgesAbove0375NewYearlyHigh @WISE PUMPS

GITHUB BREACH RATTLES DEV SECURITY FOR $BTC 🛡️

GitHub disclosed unauthorized access to internal repositories following a malicious VS Code plugin attack on an employee device. The company says the incident appears limited to internal repository theft, with the attacker’s claim of roughly 3,800 repositories broadly aligned with its investigation.

For crypto markets, the key issue is infrastructure trust. GitHub has removed the plugin, isolated endpoints, rotated critical keys, and continues log analysis. Traders should monitor whether any downstream developer, exchange, or protocol exposure emerges before assuming broader market impact.

Not financial advice. Manage your risk.

#CryptoSecurity #GitHub #BTC #CyberSecurit #BinanceSquar

🛡️

$BNB SECURITY ALERT JUST HIT THE DEV STACK 🚨

CZ flagged it hard: if an API key is sitting in code, even inside a private repo, review it and replace it immediately. GitHub is investigating unauthorized access to internal code repositories, while stating there is no current evidence that customer-stored enterprise, organization, or external repo data was compromised.

This is a clean risk-control warning for builders, funds, bots, and trading desks.

API exposure can turn into instant damage.
Rotate keys. Lock permissions. Monitor activity.
Security is alpha when markets move fast.

Not financial advice. Manage your risk.

#Binance #CryptoSecurity #BNB #GitHub #CryptoNews

⚡

Grafana Repository Breach: Extortion Fails and Security Prevails 🛡️

Even giants face tests, but true strength shows in how they confront challenges.

Recently, the popular data analysis platform Grafana encountered a security incident after unauthorized access to its environment on GitHub. The attacker managed to obtain an access token that allowed them to upload some of the company’s proprietary code.

However, here’s the brighter and more important side of this story:

Your data is safe: Investigations have conclusively confirmed that no customer data or personal information was compromised.

Business continuity: Operational systems and services were not affected in any way.

No succumbing to extortion: The attacker attempted to extort the company, demanding a ransom to keep the code from being published, and Grafana's response was decisive: "We won’t pay."

The company faced the situation with transparency and immediately began a digital forensic analysis to identify the source of the leak, while strengthening its security measures to ensure this doesn’t happen again.

The takeaway here? Trust isn’t built by the absence of mistakes, but by how they’re handled and prioritizing user protection.

💬 Share your thoughts in the comments: What do you think of Grafana's decision to refuse the ransom? Do you believe transparency in security incidents boosts user trust or undermines it?

#Grafana #CyberSecurity #Github #CryptoNews #BinanceSquare

THE MOST ACTIVE CRYPTOS BASED ON #GITHUB DATA FOR THE LAST 3 MONTHS

$LINK $BTC $STORJ
- by Cryptogics

THE MOST ACTIVE CRYPTOS BASED ON #GITHUB DATA FOR THE LAST 9 MONTHS

$BTC $LINK $STORJ
- by Cryptogics