Maryvanna

#USNationalDebt
📈 Current Status of US National Debt (as of June 2025)
- Total Debt: $36.21 trillion, comprising:
- Debt Held by the Public: $28.95 trillion (80% of total)
- Intragovernmental Debt: $7.26 trillion (20% of total) .
- Recent Changes:
- Increased by $1.56 trillion YoY (4.71% growth) .
- Growing at $4.27 billion per day ($49,431 per second) .
- Per Capita Burden:
- $106,447 per person or $273,904 per household .
- Debt-to-GDP Ratio: 124.3% (projected to hit 148% by 2034 under current policies) .
---
⏳ Historical Trends and Drivers
Key Growth Periods:
- COVID-19 Pandemic: Debt surged due to relief spending, with FY2020 deficit hitting 16% of GDP .
- Tax Cuts and Wars: Reagan-era military spending (1980s) and Bush/Obama-era responses to the 2008 financial crisis accelerated debt accumulation .
- Recent Legislation: The 2025 "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" could add $3.1–$3.8 trillion to debt over a decade .
Structural Issues:
- Aging Population: Rising Social Security and Medicare costs strain trust funds, increasing intragovernmental debt .
- Interest Rate Shifts: Average interest on debt rose from 1.84% (2020) to 3.36% (2025), amplifying borrowing costs .
---
🔧 Components and Management
Debt Composition:
| Security Type | Value (Trillions) | Share of Public Debt |
|-------------------|------------------------|--------------------------|
| Treasury Notes | $14.89 | 51.44% |
| Treasury Bills | $6.00 | 20.73% |
| Treasury Bonds | $4.98 | 17.20% |
| Other Securities | $3.08 | 10.63% |
Accounting Challenges:
- Intragovernmental Debt: Includes IOUs to programs like Social Security ($7.26 trillion), but these are liabilities to future taxpayers .
- Data Discrepancies: Some datasets exclude Federal Financing Bank debt, causing inconsistencies .
---
⚠️ Economic Impacts
1. Interest Costs:
- 2025 Interest: Projected at $952 billion (3.2% of GDP), surpassing defense spending .
- 2035 Projection: Nears $1.8 trillion annually .
2. Consumer Effects:
- Higher Borrowing Costs: Each 1% rise in debt-to-GDP may increase 10-year Treasury yields by 0.02 points. A jump to 130% debt-to-GDP could push mortgage rates to 7.6% .
- Wealth Erosion: Rising yields reduce bond portfolio values and curb stock market growth .
3. Fiscal Constraints:
- Interest consumes funds for critical programs (e.g., infrastructure, education) .
- Reduced capacity to respond to crises (e.g., pandemics, recessions) .
---
🔮 Future Projections
- Debt Milestones: Expected to hit $37 trillion by October 2025 .
- Long-Term Trajectory: Debt could reach 172% of GDP by 2054 without policy changes .
- Interest Burden: Cumulative interest payments may total $13.8 trillion from 2026–2035 .
---
💡 Policy and Market Risks
- Credit Rating: Moody's downgraded the U.S. in 2025, signaling heightened default risk .
- Bond Market Volatility: Weak Treasury auctions (e.g., May 2025) reflect investor skepticism about debt sustainability .
- Legislative Uncertainty: Unfunded tax cuts or spending hikes could accelerate debt growth .
---
💎 Conclusion: A Call for Fiscal Reform
The U.S. debt crisis is a slow-motion emergency with profound implications:
- Immediate: Every household effectively owes $273,904 .
- Structural: Interest costs could dwarf all non-Social Security spending within a decade .
- Systemic: High debt may trigger bond market crises, as seen in Greece (2010) .
Solutions require bipartisan action: Revenue reforms, entitlement adjustments, and deficit-neutral legislation. Without intervention, debt will erode economic resilience and living standards. As economist Douglas Holtz-Eakin warns, it’s "eating away at the foundation" of U.S. prosperity .

#SwingTradingStrategy
Mastering Swing Trading in 2025: Strategies, Tools, and Risk Management
Swing trading targets short-to-medium-term gains (typically days to weeks) by capitalizing on price swings within established trends. Unlike day trading (intraday) or position trading (months/years), it balances active involvement with reduced time commitment, making it ideal for traders seeking profits without constant screen monitoring .
---
I. Core Principles of Swing Trading
1. Capture "Swing Highs/Lows":
- Uptrends: Buy at swing lows (support), sell at swing highs (resistance).
- Downtrends: Short-sell at swing highs, cover at swing lows .
2. Trend Alignment:
Trades succeed best when following the broader market trend ("buy the dip" in uptrends; "sell the rally" in downtrends) .
3. Technical Analysis Focus:
Relies on chart patterns, indicators, and volume analysis rather than fundamentals .
---
II. Stock Selection Criteria
Key factors for identifying swing trading opportunities:
| Factor | Ideal Profile | Tools/Sources |
|------------------|-----------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
| Volatility | High price movement (≥3% daily swings) | Beta >1, historical volatility |
| Volume | Avg. daily volume >500k shares | Finviz, Trade Ideas |
| Trend Strength | Clear uptrend/downtrend (higher highs/lows) | Moving averages (50/200-day SMA) |
| Catalysts | News events, earnings reports, sector momentum | News scanners, social sentiment tools |
Example: Stocks like NVIDIA or Tesla often fit this profile due to high volatility and liquidity .
---
III. Essential Indicators & Tools
1. Trend Identification:
- Moving Averages: Golden Cross (50-day SMA > 200-day SMA) signals bullish trends (78% historical success) .
2. Momentum/Oscillators:
- RSI: Oversold (<30) or overbought (>70) conditions signal reversals.
- MACD: Bullish crossover (MACD line > signal line) confirms entry points .
3. Volume & Bands:
- Bollinger Bands: Price touching lower band suggests oversold bounce.
- Volume Spikes: Confirm breakout validity (e.g., +150% avg. volume) .
Best Platforms: Webull (charting), Finviz (stock screening), Trade Ideas (real-time alerts) .
---
IV. High-Probability Strategies
1. Chart Pattern Breakouts:
- Double Bottoms/Inverse H&S: 70–80% success rate when aligned with uptrends .
- Entry: Buy above resistance; Exit: Target = pattern height + breakout point.
2. Pullback Trading:
- In uptrends, buy dips near 50-day SMA or Fibonacci 61.8% retracement.
- Example: AAPL bounce at $216 support during 2025 rally .
3. Momentum Swings:
- Ride strong trends using RSI (45–55 for re-entries) and MACD histogram turns.
4. Mean Reversion:
- Fade extremes: Buy when RSI <30 in uptrend, sell when RSI >70 .
---
V. Risk Management
- Stop-Loss Placement:
- Long trades: Below recent swing low.
- Short trades: Above recent swing high .
- Position Sizing: Risk ≤2% of capital per trade.
- Profit Targets: 3:1 reward-to-risk ratio (e.g., risk $1 to gain $3) .
- Overnight Risk Mitigation: Hedge with options or reduce position size before high-impact news .
---
VI. Time Frames & Workflow
- Optimal Holding Period: 2–14 days .
- Chart Analysis: Daily charts for trend, 4-hour/1-hour for entries.
- Daily Routine:
1. Scan for gappers/news catalysts (pre-market).
2. Review watchlist for pattern/indicator triggers.
3. Set alerts at support/resistance levels.
---
VII. Advantages & Challenges
| Pros | Cons |
|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| Less time-intensive than day trading | Overnight/weekend gap risk |
| Captures multi-day trends | Emotional discipline required |
| Avoids pattern day trader rules | Misses long-term bull markets |
---
VIII. Getting Started
1. Learn Basics: Master candlestick patterns, support/resistance, and indicators.
2. Paper Trading: Practice 2–3 months (use thinkorswim or TradingView).
3. Start Small: Begin with 1–2 positions, focusing on high-volume stocks.
4. Refine Strategy: Backtest using historical data (e.g., MACD + RSI combo showed 73% win rate ).
> 💡 Key Insight: In 2025, AI-driven tools (e.g., sentiment analyzers, pattern scanners) enhance setup identification, but human judgment remains critical for context .
Swing trading thrives in volatile markets—combine technical rigor, strict risk rules, and continuous adaptation to capitalize on 2025’s opportunities. For deeper dives, explore courses on Udemy or platforms like IG .

#XSuperApp represents a transformative digital platform model that consolidates diverse services—from payments and messaging to e-commerce and transportation—into a single, integrated application. Below is a detailed analysis of its core characteristics, examples, benefits, challenges, and future trajectory.
---
1. Definition and Core Concept
A super app functions as an "all-in-one" ecosystem where users access modular services (miniapps) within a primary platform. Key attributes include:
- Unified Platform: Combines core features (e.g., messaging or payments) with third-party miniapps (e.g., food delivery, ticket booking) .
- Personalization: Uses AI to tailor experiences based on user data (e.g., transaction history, location) .
- Seamless Integration: Single sign-on (SSO) enables frictionless switching between services .
---
2. Leading Examples
Super apps dominate in Asia but are expanding globally:
| App | Origin | Key Services | User Base |
|---------------|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------|---------------------|
| WeChat | China | Messaging, payments, public services, e-commerce | 1.3B+ users |
| Grab | Singapore | Ride-hailing, food delivery, financial services | 180M+ in SEA |
| Tata Neu | India | Retail, travel, utilities, finance | India's first super-app |
| SuperApp TNET | Georgia | Tickets, payments, vehicle/fine management | 2M+ users |
| Uber | Global | Ride-hailing, food/grocery delivery, travel | Expanding globally |
---
3. Key Features
- Core Service Hook: Starts with an essential function (e.g., WeChat began as messaging; Grab as ride-hailing) .
- Miniapp Ecosystem: Hosts lightweight third-party services (e.g., Alipay’s 120,000+ lite apps) .
- Unified Identity: Single profile for all services (e.g., SSO, digital wallets) .
- Data Synergy: Integrates user behavior across services for hyper-personalization .
---
4. Benefits
- For Users:
- Convenience: Avoids app clutter (e.g., SuperApp TNET replaces 9+ platforms) .
- Cost Savings: Unified transactions reduce fees .
- For Businesses:
- Lower Acquisition Costs: Access to built-in user bases (e.g., WeChat’s $240B in 2020 miniapp transactions) .
- Cross-Selling: Users discover services organically (e.g., Gojek users ordering food via ride-hailing app) .
---
5. Challenges and Criticisms
- Privacy Risks: Centralized data increases breach vulnerability (e.g., Tokopedia’s 91M-user leak) .
- Regulatory Scrutiny: Western regulators oppose "closed ecosystems" (e.g., Apple/Google app store policies) .
- Performance Issues: Slower than single-purpose apps due to complexity .
- Over-Reliance: Account bans/loss disrupt multiple services (e.g., China’s Sitong Bridge protest) .
---
6. Implementation Approaches
- Customer-Facing: Focus on lifestyle integration (e.g., WeChat, Grab) .
- Employee-Facing: Enterprise tools (e.g., Me@Walmart for scheduling/payroll) .
- Technical Architecture:
- Modular Design: Miniapps built independently (e.g., Ionic Portals for native/web integration) .
- Low-Code Platforms: Accelerate miniapp deployment (e.g., Gartner’s composable business strategy) .
---
7. Regional Adoption Drivers
- Asia’s Dominance: Fueled by mobile-first populations, unbanked users (73% in SEA), and government support (e.g., China’s digital ID integration) .
- Western Evolution: Slower due to regulatory hurdles but emerging via fintech (e.g., Revolut’s banking/crypto services) .
---
8. Future Outlook
- By 2027, >50% of the global population will use super apps daily .
- Expansion into metaverse/IoT (e.g., WeChat’s AI-driven immersive experiences) .
- Enterprise Adoption: Composable apps for workflows (e.g., YUM! SuperApp’s 23K+ restaurants) .
---
Conclusion
#XSuperApp represents the convergence of convenience and digital ecosystem power, though its success hinges on balancing innovation with privacy/regulatory compliance. As Gartner notes, its modular architecture will redefine both consumer and enterprise mobile experiences by 2030 . For businesses, adopting a miniapp-centric model (e.g., via Boxo’s integrations) offers a strategic path into this $715B market .

#PowellRemarks
📊 Key Highlights of Powell's Remarks and Fed Decision (June 2025)
💰 1. Interest Rates Unchanged
- The Federal Reserve maintained the benchmark interest rate at 4.25%-4.50%, marking the fourth consecutive hold since January 2025 .
- Powell emphasized a "wait-and-see" stance, stating the Fed is "**well positioned to wait**" for clearer economic signals before adjusting policy .
⚠️ 2. Tariff Impact on Inflation
- Powell warned that tariffs will cause a "meaningful increase in inflation" in coming months, as businesses pass costs to consumers. He noted: "**Everyone is forecasting a meaningful increase in inflation from tariffs**" .
- The full effect is not yet visible, as goods in stores today were imported before recent tariffs. Inflation expectations for 2025 were revised up to 3.1% (from 2.8%) .
- Near-term inflation expectations have risen due to tariffs, though longer-term outlooks remain anchored at 2% .
📉 3. Economic Growth and Stagflation Risks
- Growth downgraded: The Fed cut its 2025 GDP forecast to 1.4% (from 1.7%), citing tariff uncertainty and Middle East conflicts .
- Stagflation concerns: Policymakers foresee slower growth alongside persistent inflation. Unemployment is projected to rise to 4.5% (up from 4.4%) .
- Powell acknowledged the economy shows "**no signs of weakening**" now but noted risks from trade policies and geopolitical turmoil .
🎯 4. Divergent Rate-Cut Outlook
- The "dot plot" shows deep divisions:
- 7 of 19 officials expect no rate cuts in 2025 (up from 4 in March).
- Majority still projects two cuts (median forecast: 3.875% by year-end) .
- Powell downplayed conviction in projections: "**No one holds these rate paths with a great deal of conviction**" . Markets see only a 10% chance of a July cut .
💹 5. Market and Political Reactions
- Stocks erased gains post-announcement, with the S&P 500 dipping 0.03% as Powell’s tariff warnings sparked sell-offs .
- Trump criticized Powell hours before the decision, calling him "**stupid**" and blaming high rates for "**costing the country a fortune**" .
- Powell deflected political pressure, stressing the Fed’s focus on "**a good, solid American economy**" .
💎 Key Quotes from Powell
> "**We expect a meaningful amount of inflation in the coming months** due to tariffs."
> "**We are well positioned to wait** to learn more about the likely course of the economy."
> "**Someone has to pay for the tariffs**... ultimately, some of it will fall on the end consumer."
📈 Economic Projections Summary
Table: Fed Revisions (March vs. June 2025 Projections)
| Indicator | March 2025 | June 2025 | Change |
|---------------------|----------------|---------------|------------|
| GDP Growth | 1.7% | 1.4% | ↓ 0.3 pp |
| Core Inflation | 2.8% | 3.1% | ↑ 0.3 pp |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4% | 4.5% | ↑ 0.1 pp |
| Fed Funds Rate (EoY)| 3.875% | 3.875% | Unchanged |
Source:
🔮 Outlook Ahead
The Fed’s path hinges on tariff implementation, geopolitical stability (e.g., Israel-Iran conflict), and labor market resilience. While some analysts (e.g., Goldman Sachs) expect cuts to resume in late 2025 if inflation cools , others warn of a "**no-rate-cut environment**" (Morgan Stanley) . Powell’s message is clear: Patience outweighs premature action amid unprecedented uncertainty.

#CryptoStocks
Based on the latest market trends and regulatory developments, here's an analysis of top crypto stocks and key market catalysts for 2025:
🏆 Top Crypto Stocks to Watch
1. Coinbase (COIN)
- Seeking SEC approval for tokenized equities (blockchain-based stock trading), positioning it against Robinhood and Schwab .
- Holds an inactive broker-dealer license (acquired 2018), potentially accelerating market entry if approved .
- Regulatory tailwinds: Trump administration dropped 2023 SEC lawsuit against Coinbase .
2. MicroStrategy (MSTR)
- Largest corporate BTC holder: 439,000 BTC ($48B+ at current prices) .
- Stock surged 400% YTD; Benchmark analysts raised price target to $650 .
- Set to join Nasdaq 100, boosting institutional visibility .
3. Bitcoin Miners
- Core Scientific (CORZ): Up 320% YTD, diversifying into AI via cloud client CoreWeave .
- Hut 8 (HUT): Active in AI infrastructure; issued bonds to accelerate BTC purchases .
4. Amplify ETF (BLOK)
- Diversified exposure to crypto stocks (e.g., 4.67% in CORZ, 4.16% in HUT) .
- Anticipating IPOs of pure-play crypto firms like Circle and Figure Technologies .
---
⚡ Key Market Catalysts
- Tokenized Assets: Explosive 37% QoQ growth in tokenized real-world assets; Coinbase’s equity tokenization could disrupt traditional trading .
- Pro-Crypto Regulation: SEC dropped lawsuits against Coinbase/Binance; new crypto task force forming rules .
- Spot ETF Expansions: Ethereum, Solana, and XRP ETFs likely in late 2025, mirroring Bitcoin’s $38.7B institutional inflow .
- Stablecoin Growth: AUM hit $218B (+13% QoQ), enhancing crypto-fiat integration .
---
⚠️ Risks & Challenges
- Regulatory Gaps: Tokenized equities lack global standards; SEC approval for Coinbase uncertain .
- Market Volatility: Crypto remains highly speculative; Litecoin (LTC) flagged as overhyped despite 30% YTD gain .
- Economic Sensitivity: XRP’s cross-border payment use vulnerable to trade tariffs .
---
💎 Top Cryptos Driving Stock Performance
| Crypto | 2025 Catalysts | Stocks Leveraged |
|-------------|--------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
| Bitcoin | U.S. strategic reserve plan (1M BTC purchase) | MSTR, CORZ, HUT |
| XRP | Potential ETF approval ($8B inflow projected) | Ripple-partnered companies |
| Ethereum| SEC staking guidance (boosts ETF prospects) | COIN, ETH-focused miners |
---
💡 Strategic Outlook
- Short-term: Focus on miners with AI diversification (e.g., CORZ, HUT) and BTC-heavy stocks like MSTR.
- Long-term: Coinbase’s tokenized equities could redefine stock trading if SEC-approved. Regulatory clarity under Trump administration remains the critical variable .
> 💡 Pro Tip: Monitor SEC announcements on tokenized equities (Coinbase) and spot ETF approvals (Solana/XRP) for entry points.

#GENIUSActPass
The GENIUS Act (*Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins*), a landmark bipartisan bill establishing the first federal regulatory framework for stablecoins, passed the U.S. Senate on June 17, 2025. Below is a detailed analysis of its key aspects, implications, and next steps.
---
📜 1. Bill Overview & Key Provisions
The GENIUS Act aims to regulate stablecoins—cryptocurrencies pegged to assets like the U.S. dollar—by setting standards for issuers and enhancing consumer protections:
- Federal Oversight: Creates a dual regulatory system where banks and nonbanks can issue stablecoins under federal supervision .
- Reserve Requirements: Issuers must back stablecoins 1:1 with cash, U.S. Treasuries, or other "safe assets" to prevent collapses like Terra-Luna (2022) .
- Anti-Money Laundering (AML): Mandates compliance with AML and Bank Secrecy Act rules .
- Bank Safeguards: Prohibits yield-bearing stablecoins to protect traditional banks from disintermediation and bars nonbanks from accessing Federal Reserve master accounts .
- Disclosure Rules: Requires Congress members and executive officials to disclose stablecoin holdings >$5,000 (*excludes President/VP*) .
Table: Key Requirements for Stablecoin Issuers
| Requirement | Banks | Nonbanks |
|------------------------|-----------|--------------|
| Reserve Backing | Yes | Yes |
| AML Compliance | Yes | Yes |
| Fed Master Account | Eligible | Prohibited |
| Yield Offerings | Prohibited| Prohibited |
---
⚖️ 2. Political Journey & Vote Breakdown
- Bipartisan Support: Passed 68-30, with all Republicans (except Rand Paul and Josh Hawley) and 18 Democrats in favor .
- Committee Approval: Advanced through the Senate Banking Committee in March 2025 with unanimous GOP support and 5 Democratic votes .
- Controversial Delays: Democrats initially blocked the bill in May 2025 over ethics concerns tied to former President Trump's crypto ventures. Negotiations added stronger bankruptcy protections and transaction monitoring rules to secure passage .
---
⚠️ 3. Controversies & Criticisms
- Trump Conflict of Interest: Democrats (led by Sen. Elizabeth Warren) criticized exemptions allowing Presidents/VP to profit from stablecoins. Trump holds a stake in World Liberty Financial (issuer of USD1 stablecoin), earning $57.35M in 2024 .
- Big Tech Fears: Critics warn the bill enables companies like Amazon or Meta to issue stablecoins, risking financial system exploitation .
- Insufficient Ethics Guardrails: Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) argued the bill "supercharges corruption" by not restricting presidential financial interests .
---
➡️ 4. Next Steps & House Challenges
The bill now moves to the Republican-led House, where hurdles include:
- Reconciling with STABLE Act: The House's alternative bill (STABLE Act) differs on issuer licensing and may be merged with broader crypto market legislation (CLARITY Act) .
- Timeline Pressure: President Trump aims to sign a bill before Congress's August recess .
- Industry Lobbying: Crypto advocates (e.g., Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong) push for quick adoption, while banks seek stricter commerce-banking separation .
---
🌍 5. Global & Market Implications
- Dollar Dominance: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent projects the U.S. stablecoin market could grow from $250B to $3.7T by 2035 .
- Competitive Edge: Supporters argue the bill positions the U.S. as a crypto leader against foreign rivals .
- Industry Response: Circle's IPO surged post-vote; firms like Walmart and DTCC explore stablecoin issuance .
---
💬 6. Stakeholder Reactions
- Proponents:
- Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC): "Brings clarity to a sector clouded by uncertainty" .
- Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY): Addresses the "wild West" of crypto with consumer safeguards .
- Opponents:
- Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA): "Weak bill supercharges corruption" .
- ICBA (Community Bankers): Warns of risks to traditional banks but acknowledges "critical guardrails" .
---
🔮 Conclusion: A Fragile Path Forward
The GENIUS Act marks a historic step toward crypto legitimacy but faces turbulence in the House due to ethics gaps and competing bills. If enacted, it could reshape digital payments while testing regulatory balance between innovation and accountability. Stakeholders should monitor House negotiations closely—final legislation will hinge on reconciling security, politics, and market ambitions.
For ongoing updates, track #GENIUSActPass and official Senate Banking Committee releases .

📊 The main events of the crypto ripe for June 18, 2025

💹 General market dynamics
- Capitalization Cryptonnoye exceeded $ 3 trillion , preserving the ascending trend after the rally. Bitcoin dominance (BTC) is 60–62%.
- Key prices :
- Bitcoin (BTC): ~ $ 110 000 (+0.8% per day), approaches the historical maximum.
- Ethereum (ETH): ~ $ 2,600 (+1.2%) - growth is supported by the development of Defi and Stayking after the upgrade of the Pectra network.
-Ripple (XRP): ~ $ 2.40 (+5%)-the maximum growth among top assets due to the launch of the first ETF and settlement of the judicial dispute with the SEC.
- Index of fear and greed is in the zone of "greed", which reflects the optimism of investors.

🚀 Launching the first XRP ETF and the expansion of altcoin funds
- XRP ETF started on June 18, becoming the first exchange fund for this asset. This is a consequence of the removal of regulatory risks after the settlement of the SEC lawsuit.
- A wave of applications for new ETF : submitted > 30 applications in SEC for funds for altcoins (including Solana, Cardano, Dogecoin). The closest candidates for approval - Litecoin and Solana .
- Coinshares applied to Solana-ETF with stakeing , which will strengthen the institutional demand for SOL.

📈 Growth of tokenized real assets (RWA)
According to Coingecko, the RWA sector reached $ 225 billion of capitalization:
- Steabelcoins (USDT, USDC): growth by 76% ($ 97 billion), control 93.5% market.
- tokenized treasury bonds : growth by 544.8% ($ 4.7 billion). The BlackRock*Buidl product captured 44%** market in 10 months.
- commodity tokens (gold): capitalization $ 1.9 billion (+67.8%), leaders - Tether Gold (Xaut) and Pax Gold (Paxg).
🏛️ Institutional investments and macrofactors
- Microstrategy increased BTC reserves to $ 63.4 billion , investing additional $ 1 billion .
- The largest btc-usetf (ISHHARES BITCOIN TRUST) attracted $ 12 .5 billion in 2025.
- The weakness of the US dollar - the key driver of the BTC growth (+13% since the beginning of the year). Geopolitical tension in the Middle East has not yet affects BTC, which does not respond either as a “risky” or “protective” asset.

📉 Technical analysis Bitcoin
- The current price : $ 106.950 (correction after a rebound from resistance $ 108,000 ).
- Key levels :
- Support: $ 106.270 and $ 105,300 .
- Resistance: $ 108,200 and $ 109,870 (historical maximum).
- indicators :
- RSI (30 min): 42.5 (neutral-medweight).
- Macd: Bear intersection.
- VWAP: Consolidation about $ 106,500 .

💎 top-3 coins by dynamics
1. XRP : +5% (launching ETF, legal clarity).
2. Steabelcoins : capitalization growth of $ 97 billion.
3. Tokenized bonds : Growth of 544.8% - a new trend of the institutional market.

💎 Conclusion : Crypto -novel saves a bull trend thanks to institutional products (ETF, RWA) and macroeconomic factors. Key growth points - approval of new ETF and adaptation of regulatory frames .

#FOMCMeeting
Here are the key details about the current FOMC meeting (June 17–18, 2025), based on the latest information:
⏰ 1. Meeting Schedule & Key Events
- Dates: June 17–18, 2025 (today and tomorrow) .
- Policy Statement Release: Wednesday, June 18, at 2:00 p.m. ET .
- Chair Powell's Press Conference: Wednesday, June 18, at 2:30 p.m. ET .
📉 2. Interest Rate Decision
- The Fed is highly likely to maintain rates at the current range of 4.25%–4.50%, unchanged since December 2024 .
- Market odds of a cut are near 0% for June and only 13% for July .
📊 3. Focus: "Dot Plot" Projections
- This meeting includes the Summary of Economic Projections (SEP), or "dot plot," revealing Fed officials' rate forecasts for 2025–2026 .
- Key expectations:
- Fewer rate cuts in 2025: Likely reduced from two cuts (projected in March) to just one cut by year-end .
- Higher inflation: Forecasts may rise to 3.0%–3.3% (from 2.8%) due to tariff impacts .
- Slower growth: GDP projections could be downgraded to 1.3% (from 1.7%) .
🏛️ 4. Political Pressure & Uncertainty
- President Trump has publicly criticized Fed Chair Powell, demanding "a full percentage point cut" and calling him a "numbskull" for resisting .
- New tariffs and fiscal policies are complicating the Fed's outlook, creating "uncomfortable purgatory" between inflation risks and growth concerns .
📈 5. Market Impact
- Stocks: A shift to one 2025 cut could trigger a ~1% S&P 500 sell-off; holding at two cuts may lift markets .
- Bonds: Futures traders price in a 60% chance of a cut by September, with 88% odds of at least two cuts by December .
🗓️ Upcoming 2025 FOMC Meetings
Table: Key remaining meetings this year :
| Meeting Dates | Special Notes |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| July 29–30 | No dot plot or press conference scheduled |
| September 16–17* | Includes dot plot & press conference |
| October 28–29 | No dot plot or press conference |
| December 9–10* | Includes dot plot & press conference |
💡 Key Takeaway
Today's meeting sets the stage for future policy amid high uncertainty. While no immediate rate cut is expected, the dot plot revisions and Powell's commentary on tariffs, inflation, and political pressure will drive market sentiment. The Fed's next realistic window for cuts is September or December .

#TrumpBTCTreasury
The #TrumpBTCtreasury represents a significant development in both corporate cryptocurrency adoption and U.S. digital asset policy, involving coordinated actions between Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG) and the Trump administration. Here's a comprehensive analysis:
⚙️ 1. TMTG's Bitcoin Treasury Strategy
- SEC Approval & Funding: On June 13, 2025, the SEC declared effective TMTG's registration for a $2.3 billion Bitcoin treasury deal. This followed a May 30 private placement with ~50 institutional investors, raising $2.44 billion ($1.44B from stock sales + $1B convertible notes), yielding net proceeds of $2.32B for Bitcoin purchases .
- Custody & Scale: Crypto.com and Anchorage Digital will custody the Bitcoin, positioning TMTG among the top U.S. public company Bitcoin holders .
- Rationale: CEO Devin Nunes framed Bitcoin as an "apex instrument of financial freedom," aiming to counter "politically motivated debanking" and expand TMTG's fintech brand, Truth.Fi .
🏛️ 2. U.S. Government's Strategic Bitcoin Initiatives
President Trump established national crypto reserves via a March 2025 executive order:
- Strategic Bitcoin Reserve: Holds forfeited Bitcoin as a non-sellable national asset, treating it like "digital gold" .
- Digital Asset Stockpile: Manages other forfeited cryptocurrencies (e.g., Ethereum), allowing potential sales .
- Policy Goals: Aims to position the U.S. as the "crypto capital of the world" and rectify past $17B losses from premature Bitcoin sales .
💹 3. Market Impact and Corporate Context
- Stock Reaction: TMTG's stock fell 8.3% on the deal announcement (May 27) due to shareholder dilution concerns .
- Financial Position: Bitcoin will supplement TMTG's existing $759M in liquid assets, despite Truth Social's $31.2M Q1 2025 loss .
- Industry Trend: Parallels MicroStrategy's Bitcoin acquisition strategy, reflecting a corporate shift toward crypto treasuries .
🔮 4. Future Expansion
- ETF Plans: TMTG filed for a spot Bitcoin ETF on June 5, 2025, seeking to "reflect the performance of Bitcoin" .
- Synergies: The Bitcoin treasury supports Truth.Fi's payment systems and a planned "utility token," aligning with Trump's national crypto reserve vision .
💎 Key Comparative Table: TMTG vs. U.S. Government Bitcoin Strategies
| Aspect | TMTG | U.S. Government |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| Funding Source | $2.32B from institutional investors | Forfeited assets from legal proceedings |
| Bitcoin Management | Held on balance sheet for flexibility | Permanent reserve (no sales permitted) |
| Primary Objective | Expand fintech services and counter debanking | Establish U.S. as global crypto leader |
| Custody Partners | Crypto.com, Anchorage Digital | Department of the Treasury |
⏳ Timeline of Key Events
- March 2025: Trump signs executive order creating U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve .
- May 27: TMTG announces $2.5B Bitcoin treasury plan; stock drops 8.3% .
- May 30: TMTG closes $2.44B offering .
- June 5: TMTG files for Bitcoin ETF .
- June 13: SEC declares treasury registration effective .
💎 Conclusion
The #TrumpBTCtreasury symbolizes a dual-track strategy: TMTG leverages Bitcoin to bolster its financial and ideological stance, while the administration institutionalizes Bitcoin as a sovereign asset. This synergy underscores a transformative shift in corporate and national digital asset policies, though TMTG's profitability challenges and market skepticism remain hurdles. Future developments, like TMTG's Bitcoin ETF, will test this strategy's broader impact .

#CardanoDebate
The #cardanodebate reflects Cardano's pivotal crossroads, centering on treasury management, governance efficacy, technical scaling, and ADA's valuation. Here's a structured analysis based on current developments:
1. Treasury & Stablecoin Liquidity Proposal ($100M Debate)
- Proposal: TapTools team suggested deploying 140M ADA (~$100M) from the treasury to boost stablecoin liquidity (e.g., USDM) and strengthen DeFi.
- Arguments For:
- Charles Hoskinson advocates gradual OTC sales/algorithms (e.g., TWAP) to minimize market impact.
- Aims to solve Cardano's "stablecoin depth deficit" and generate non-inflationary treasury revenue.
- Arguments Against:
- Influencers like @cardano_whale warn of front-running and ADA price suppression, estimating potential sell pressure could drop prices to $0.50.
- Suggests crypto-backed stablecoins (e.g., ObyUSD) as a lower-risk alternative.
- Market Impact: ADA dropped 6% to $0.64 amid the debate, with resistance at $0.68 and support at $0.62.
Table: Key Viewpoints on Treasury Proposal
| Stakeholder | Position | Key Argument |
|------------------|--------------|------------------|
| Charles Hoskinson | Support | OTC/algo sales prevent market disruption |
| @cardano_whale | Opposition | Front-running risks and excessive sell pressure |
| Community | Divided | Long-term DeFi growth vs. short-term price stability |
⚖️ 2. Governance Challenges
- Constitutional Enforcement: A separate ₳50M DeFi proposal was rejected for "metadata mismatches," highlighting rigid constitutional checks.
- SPO Voting Crisis: The Plomin hard fork (Protocol Version 10) stalled as 83.13% of SPOs failed to vote, risking upgrade delays .
- Contrasting Outcomes:
- The smaller ₳1.5M Amaru node upgrade passed with 90% approval, showing consensus on core tech.
- Community debates center on balancing strict governance vs. agility.
⚙️ 3. Technical Developments
- Node Diversity: Amaru (Rust-based node) and Leios (scaling solution) progressed at the April 2025 workshop, aiming to reduce reliance on Haskell.
- Scaling & Interoperability:
- Hydra L2 achieved sub-second transactions in tests, targeting mass-market dApps.
- Mithril aims to accelerate node syncing for better UX.
- 2025 Roadmap Goals: Focus on usage growth, developer onboarding, and funding clarity :
- Simplify tooling and SDKs.
- Enhance L1 capacity (Leios) and interoperability.
- Launch Cardano-native stablecoins.
📈 4. Price Catalysts & Risks
- Bullish Drivers:
- Institutional Adoption: Franklin Templeton runs Cardano nodes, hinting at tokenized products/ETFs (71% SEC approval odds per Polymarket).
- Technical Setup: ADA trades in a "Golden Fibonacci Zone" ($0.64–$0.69). A breakout above $0.72 could target $1.00–$2.04.
- Whale accumulation ($20M ADA withdrawn from exchanges).
- Bearish Risks:
- Governance friction undermining investor confidence.
- Low transaction volume and RSI at 38 signaling weak momentum.
- Macro headwinds (e.g., Fed policy).
💎 5. Ecosystem Growth vs. Valuation Realism
- $5 ADA by 2025?: Experts deem this aggressive but possible if:
- Hydra scaling succeeds.
- Stablecoin adoption (e.g., MiCA-compliant USDM) boosts DeFi TVL.
- Resistance at $0.75 breaks.
- Hurdles:
- Current TVL ($600M) trails rivals.
- Requires real-world utility beyond speculation.
Table: ADA Price Scenarios
| Catalyst | Bullish Scenario ($1+) | Bearish Scenario (<$0.60) |
|--------------|----------------------------|-------------------------------|
| Governance | Efficient large-budget approvals | Continued constitutional gridlock |
| Adoption | Franklin Templeton products launch | Slow dApp/user growth |
| Technical | Hydra/Mithril mainnet success | Scaling delays |
| Macro | ETF approval | Crypto-wide liquidity crunch |
✨ Conclusion: Cardano's Crossroads
The #cardanodebate underscores Cardano's struggle to balance decentralized governance with execution efficiency. While institutional interest and scaling solutions like Hydra offer a path to $1+ ADA, treasury disputes and SPO apathy threaten near-term stability. Success hinges on:
- Finalizing the $100M proposal via OTC mechanisms to avert sell pressure .
- Streamlining governance participation (e.g., DRep delegation) .
- Delivering on 2025 goals like stablecoin integration and developer onboarding .
Cardano's promise remains intact, but resolving these debates is crucial for translating technical prowess into sustainable growth.

#IsraelIranConflict
⚔️ Comprehensive Analysis of the Israel-Iran Conflict (June 2025)

🔥 1. Scale and Nature of Israeli Strikes (Operation Rising Lion)**
- **Unprecedented Direct Attacks**: On June 13, 2025, Israel launched "Operation Rising Lion," its largest direct assault on Iran since the Iran-Iraq War. Over 200 Israeli aircraft struck **>100 targets** across Iran, including nuclear facilities, missile sites, and military leadership residences. The operation involved **330+ munitions** and combined airstrikes with Mossad sabotage missions .
- **Covert Operations**: Mossad established a **clandestine drone base near Tehran** and smuggled precision weapons into Iran to disable air defenses pre-emptively. Commandos targeted missile launchers and nuclear scientists in coordinated raids .
- **Targeted Leadership Decapitation**: Strikes killed Iran's top military leaders, including:
- **Hossein Salami** (IRGC Commander-in-Chief)
- **Mohammad Bagheri** (Armed Forces Chief of Staff)
- **Six nuclear scientists**, including Fereydoon Abbasi (former atomic energy chief) .
☢️ **2. Nuclear Facilities and Strategic Targets**
- **Natanz Uranium Enrichment Site**: Suffered significant damage to underground centrifuges and electrical systems, crippling Iran's uranium enrichment capabilities. The IAEA confirmed no radiation leaks but noted "structural compromise" .
- **Broader Nuclear Program Strikes**: Khondab, Khorramabad, and Tabriz nuclear/research facilities were hit. Iran had recently installed advanced centrifuges and announced a new enrichment facility before the attacks .
- **Missile Infrastructure**: Dozens of ballistic missile launchers and radar systems in western Iran were destroyed to degrade retaliation capacity .

⚰️ **3. Human and Infrastructure Impact**
- **Casualties**: Iranian sources report **78+ deaths and 329+ injuries**, including civilians in residential areas like Tehran's Shahrak-e Mahallati .
- **Leadership Crisis**: Iran appointed **Brig. Gen. Mohammad Pakpour** as new IRGC head hours after Salami's death, indicating urgent restructuring .
- **Civilian Trauma**: Residents described "ground-shaking explosions" and collapsing buildings. Social media showed widespread structural damage in Tehran .

🌍 **4. Geopolitical Context and Triggers**
- **Nuclear Tensions**: Strikes followed the IAEA's June 12 declaration that Iran was "non-compliant" with nuclear obligations after amassing **409 kg of 60%-enriched uranium** (near-weapons-grade). Iran had just announced new centrifuges .
- **U.S. Ultimatum**: President Trump had set a **60-day deadline** (expiring June 12) for Iran to accept nuclear limits. He later called the strikes "excellent" and warned of "more brutal" attacks if no deal is reached .
- **Proxy War Escalation**: Israel exploited Iran's weakened regional position after crippling proxies (Hezbollah/Hamas). Recent assassinations of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh (July 2024) and Hezbollah commanders fueled tensions .

💥 **5. Iranian Retaliation and Regional Response**
- **Initial Counterstrikes**: Iran launched **~100 drones** at Israel, all intercepted by Israeli/Jordanian defenses. Tehran denied this, signaling possible disinformation .
- **Supreme Leader's Threat**: Khamenei vowed "bitter and painful punishment," framing the attack as a "genocidal crime" .
- **Axis of Resistance**: Iran may leverage proxies (Houthis, Iraqi militias), but their capabilities are diminished after Israeli operations in Gaza/Lebanon .

🌐 **6. International Reactions**
- **U.S. Position**: Officially denied involvement but acknowledged Israel's "self-defense" justification. Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned Iran against targeting U.S. interests .
- **Global Condemnation**:
- **UN**: Secretary-General Guterres demanded "maximum restraint" .
- **Oman**: Mediator of U.S.-Iran talks, called strikes "reckless escalation" .
- **Saudi Arabia**: Criticized violation of sovereignty .
- **Economic Fallout**: Oil prices **surged 8%**; airlines diverted Middle East flights; Israel closed embassies globally .

🚨 **7. Implications and Future Scenarios**
- **Prolonged Campaign**: Netanyahu declared operations would continue "for as many days as it takes," urging Israelis to prepare for extended shelter stays .
- **Nuclear Deal Collapse**: U.S.-Iran talks (scheduled June 15 in Oman) are likely scuttled. Iran may accelerate nuclear efforts or withdraw from non-proliferation treaties .
- **Regional War Risks**: Potential Hezbollah rocket barrages, Houthi attacks on shipping, or Iraqi militia strikes could draw in U.S. forces .
📅 Key Events Timeline (2024–2025)
| **Date** | **Event** | **Significance** |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
| **Apr 2024** | Israeli strike on Iranian consulate in Damascus | Killed Quds Force commanders; triggered proxy attacks |
| **Oct 2024** | Mutual Israel-Iran missile strikes | First direct state-to-state attacks |
| **Jul 2024** | Assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran | Heightened proxy tensions |
| **12 Jun 2025**| IAEA declares Iran "non-compliant" on nuclear obligations | Final trigger for Israeli strikes |
| **13 Jun 2025**| Operation Rising Lion launches | Largest attack since Iran-Iraq War |

💎 Conclusion
The conflict marks a **paradigm shift** from proxy warfare to direct state confrontation. Israel aims to permanently cripple Iran's nuclear/military capabilities, while Iran faces existential pressure to retaliate without triggering wider conflict. Global stability hinges on whether diplomatic channels (e.g., Oman-mediated talks) can resume amid escalating violence. For now, regional war remains a tangible risk, with oil markets and security alliances already destabilized .

> ✨ **Insight**: Israel's operation exploits a rare window of Iranian vulnerability—economic sanctions, degraded proxies, and leadership disarray—to enforce its "red line" against nuclear weapons. Success hinges on sustaining damage faster than Iran can rebuild.

#TrumpTariffs ### 📌 Overview of Trump Tariffs (2025)
President Trump's second-term tariffs represent a significant shift in U.S. trade policy, aiming to protect domestic industries and address trade imbalances. Implemented through executive actions starting January 2025, these measures include broad-based tariffs and targeted duties, facing legal challenges and economic debates. Key sources include Tax Foundation, Penn Wharton Budget Model (PWBM), and Congressional Budget Office (CBO) analyses .
---
### 📅 Key Tariff Measures and Timeline
1. Universal "Reciprocal Tariffs":
- A baseline 10% tariff on nearly all U.S. imports effective April 5, 2025, termed "Liberation Day" tariffs. Higher rates (11–50%) apply to 57 targeted countries, with China facing up to 145% .
- Exemptions: Auto imports from Canada/Mexico (under USMCA) and certain energy goods .
2. Sector-Specific Tariffs:
- Steel/Aluminum: 50% (doubled from 25% in March 2025) .
- Autos: 25% global tariff .
- China-Specific: 10–145% rates, citing fentanyl and national security concerns .
3. Recent Developments (June 2025):
- Trump announced unilateral tariff rates for trading partners will be set by late June 2025, ahead of a July 9 deadline for higher duties .
- Courts invalidated "fentanyl" and "reciprocal" tariffs in May 2025, but collections continue pending appeals .
---
### 📉 Economic Impact
#### Macroeconomic Effects
- GDP and Wages:
- Short-term: PWBM projects a 0.8% GDP reduction in 2026; long-term models show a 6% GDP decline and 5% wage drop by 2054 if tariffs persist .
- Household Cost: Average tax increase of $1,445 per household in 2026, with middle-income families facing $22,000 lifetime income loss .
- Revenue vs. Growth:
- Tariffs could raise $2.0–$5.2 trillion over 10 years (conventional basis), offsetting deficits but shrinking the economy. Dynamic models account for reduced imports and lower revenue ($4.5 trillion) .
#### Inflation and Market Response
- CPI Delay: May 2025 data showed muted inflation due to businesses using pre-tariff inventories. Analysts warn of price spikes once inventories deplete .
- Retaliation: China imposed 125% tariffs on U.S. goods; the EU, Canada, and others targeted $330 billion in U.S. exports, potentially reducing GDP by 0.2% .
#### Industry-Specific Consequences
| Industry | Impact |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Manufacturing | Higher raw material costs (e.g., steel/aluminum tariffs); supply chain delays increase production expenses . |
| Agriculture | Retaliatory tariffs reduce exports (e.g., soybeans, pork); equipment costs rise due to import taxes . |
| Retail | Slim margins force price hikes on consumer goods; shortages possible . |
| Construction | Steel/aluminum tariffs inflate project costs by 15–20% . |
---
### ⚖️ Legal and Policy Challenges
- Court Rulings:
- U.S. Court of International Trade deemed "IEEPA tariffs" (used for Canada/Mexico/China) unconstitutional in May 2025. If upheld, revenue could fall by $1.4 trillion, and GDP loss would reduce to 0.2% .
- Political Criticism:
- Regressivity: Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA) notes tariffs act as a "sales tax," disproportionately burdening low/middle-income households .
- Revenue Use: Tariff funds may offset tax cuts for wealthy households and spending reductions (e.g., Medicaid) .
---
### 🛠️ Business Mitigation Strategies
Businesses are advised to:
1. Diversify Suppliers: Shift sourcing from tariff-affected countries (e.g., Vietnam or domestic options) .
2. Restructure Contracts: Renegotiate supplier terms and clarify liability for tariffs .
3. Hedge Currency Risks: Address exchange rate volatility from trade uncertainty .
4. Leverage Incentives: Utilize state-level subsidies for onshoring production .
---
### 🔮 Future Outlook
- Negotiations: Deals with the UK (May 2025) reduced auto tariffs but retained the 10% baseline. Similar talks with the EU are pending .
- Uncertainty: Economic policy uncertainty reached post-COVID highs, potentially reducing investment by 4.4% in 2025 .
- Projections: The OECD and Federal Reserve downgraded growth forecasts, with recession risks rising if tariffs persist .
---
### 💎 Conclusion
Trump's tariffs mark a protectionist overhaul with mixed outcomes: revenue gains and deficit reduction versus significant economic contraction and equity concerns. Legal appeals and upcoming unilateral rate announcements (late June 2025) will shape their longevity. Businesses should prioritize agility, while households may face higher costs as inventory buffers fade .

As of June 11, 2025, the situation in the crypto market is characterized by the following key trends and events:
---
### 🚀 Bitcoin (BTC): consolidation at historical highs
1. Price levels and dynamics:
- BTC is trading around $109,000–109,700, facing resistance in the $110,000–111,000 zone.
- A historical record has been set: the price has held above $100,000 for 30 consecutive days, confirming the strength of this level as psychological support.

Choosing a cryptocurrency that can reach $1 depends on many factors: current price, total supply, market capitalization, tokenomics, utility, demand, and project potential. The key point: it is easier to reach $1 if the token initially costs pennies and has a reasonable (not astronomical) supply.

List of key events in the crypto industry for May 26, 2025, and the upcoming days. Data is current as of May 2025.
---
## 📅 Crypto Events: May 26, 2025 (Monday)
### 🔥 1. Network Update: Arbitrum Odyssey Phase 3
- Date: May 26, 2025
- Description: Launch of the third phase of the dApp usage incentivization program on Arbitrum.

Short-term forecast (for the coming days – 1 month) for the GUN coin (Gunther Protocol).
---
## 📊 Short-term forecast GUN/USD for 1–4 weeks (March 2025)
> Date of analysis: April 1, 2025
> Data source: Binance, KuCoin, TradingView (pair GUN/USDT), on-chain data and project news
> Status: Active DeFi token, average liquidity

Let's take a look at the current price and forecasts for SOLV (Solv Protocol Token) for 2025.
### 📊 Approximate price range for SOLV (at the beginning of 2025):
- Minimum: $0.01 – $0.02
- Average level: ~$0.04
- Optimistic scenario: up to $0.08 – $0.10 (with increased interest in DeFi and NFT bonds)
---
## 🔍 Where to check the current price:
- [CoinGecko — SOLV](https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/solv-protocol)

Analysis of the cryptocurrency Pepe (PEPE)
Pepe is a meme token inspired by the iconic internet meme featuring Pepe the Frog. It was launched in April 2023 and quickly became one of the most popular meme coins after projects like Dogecoin and Shiba Inu. Below is a detailed analysis of the PEPE token.