metaio102

Today is another enjoyable 8415 🤣
If Virtual Yapping is not tier scoring, I'll just eat it!

Basically, the number 8415 has maintained for many days now. If we calculate scores based on dynamic standards, my tweet data from the past few days must be randomly changing. Normally, the calculated score should also be random. According to my current understanding of the scoring calculation rules, the overall calculation rules for Virtual Yapping should belong to a comprehensive weighted scoring system, and this system is unrelated to the Kaito rankings. Some users not on the Kaito list still have high scores. For registered users, tier scoring is used, and scores are allocated based on the built-in system rankings. The allocation mechanism adopts a fixed quota system, where different rankings correspond to different scores. So it’s easier to understand why Yapping scores have always been 0; it's because the daily comprehensive ranking has not reached the “basis” for the system to distribute points. Currently, the lowest Yapping score I see is about the 250 tier; I previously thought it was a “registration system.” It still appears to be a ranking system, but the ranking is determined by a comprehensive coefficient. The significance of “persistence” lies not in being registered by the system but in improving the overall comprehensive ranking coefficient.

Yesterday's $VADER Yapping score was about 500 points, which is lower compared to before. According to the latest score allocation mechanism, the top 1000 users each day will receive VADER Yapping scores.

The current algorithm mechanism actually breaks down into three systems' Agent comprehensive scores.
1️⃣ Yaps scoring is determined according to Kaito's algorithm.
2️⃣ Arbus scoring is calculated according to the Arbus algorithm.
3️⃣ VADER Agent scoring is based on its own algorithm.
In terms of weight, the first two account for 70%. VADER Agent accounts for 30%. For new users, VADER has more advantages.

Actually, everyone feels it’s quite competitive; if the above assumptions are correct. Then for Virtual Yapping, the advantage of old users is actually “safety net.” Currently, if we calculate based on the overall score total, the earlier one outputs Virtual-related content, the more Yapping tier scores they can get, and if they output Virtual-related content later, unless the content quality is relatively high, the overall score increase speed is rapid and they have a place in the daily ranking, will they obtain corresponding scores. This assumption can also be proven through side factors, for example, a user who hasn’t output Virtual-related content for a period still can obtain Yapping scores, even seeing an increase in scores. This indicates that the current ranking system uses a certain time period as a calculation basis, where the ranking during that period determines the scoring factors.

VADER's scoring is because it’s a newly launched mechanism, so it has more advantages for new users. Actually, I basically update daily, so I wouldn’t say it’s particularly competitive. Some brothers who just started yapping actually output VADER more frequently than I do. Correspondingly, their VADER Yapping scores are also higher than mine, and currently, with the rising $VADER staking rate, more and more users are yapping. The ranking volatility is large, resulting in significant daily changes in the VADER Yapping scores. Next week should be a watershed; once the leaderboard appears, it will only get more competitive. Smart individuals should increase their output frequency these days to gain an early advantage in the rankings.

Back to the old topic of the weight issue between Chinese and English, actually, the yapping users in the Chinese area are indeed fewer compared to the English area. The initial assumption is that when the AI algorithm scores Agents, the language learning and recognition logic is based on English logic, and English grammar is easier for the system to learn. In the Chinese area, sometimes references and memes are preferred, which may seem like high-quality and in-depth articles to us, but AI algorithms may not necessarily understand them. There’s also the issue of high-frequency word stacking; if we look at individual tweets, an overabundance of homogenized content may lead the algorithm to “downgrade” the score. It seems we are always talking incessantly, but in the eyes of AI, it might just be too much nonsense. Ultimately, the quality of the article's content still relates to the so-called “interpersonal relationship governance.” Although it reduces the weight on likes, comments, and shares, taking Kaito as an example, the way ICT and ECT acquire scores is not the same, and the criteria for determining if an article has quality may differ for different users. But if AI itself has autonomous “evaluation” of articles, then what needs to be studied is how to make AI like it. 🤣

In the past two days, I have been complaining about the point system of Vader Yapping. Due to the black box nature, my account is basically in a 'ban' state. I originally thought that Virtual @virtuals_io was M attribute, and cursing a few times wouldn’t give any points.
Yesterday, @VaderResearch mentioned the issue of fixing it for the first time in the $VADER points topic on the fourth day. The community should have this kind of 'transparency' because trust is the cornerstone of community development.

From the user's perspective, the points given in the first two days were indeed a bit exaggerated. Even with a relatively high base score, the points I received were very low. As a result, I intended to change the daily topic from 'Newcomer Post' to something else in the early stages. Through the data testing over the past two days, I found that the points have shown significant positive corrections.

Below is my Yapping data for 4 days since @Vader_AI_ launched Vader Yapping points.
I have drawn the following conclusions and thoughts for everyone's Yapping reference:

1️⃣ From the Virtual Yapping data, I can see that I have three days with a score of 8415, and one day the data was good at 9277. This actually corresponds to the reward level of Yapping, which means that the final ranking of good or bad data is not determined by daily data, because my daily tweet data actually varies quite randomly. It can only indicate that my Yapping rewards are in 'a certain tier,' and the tier is ranked based on a comprehensive calculation of historical data. Users in the same tier have consistent Yapping amounts. Otherwise, my score should also vary randomly, and the probability of having three consecutive 8415s is lower than winning the lottery.

2️⃣ The above Vader Yapping points and staking technology are 10,000 $VADER, which corresponds to approximately 500 points. This means that my real points for the past four days are 700, 200, 1300, and 2000. From my own perception, there must have been a problem in the first two days; otherwise, with a reward base of 1.25 existing and continuously outputting, the probability of a decrease instead of an increase is almost zero. A positive growth should never encounter a deduction. The data from yesterday to today confirms this statement, with continuous growth. The feeling of going from 0 to 1 is the source of motivation for Keep Building. So 'perseverance' is still very important.

3️⃣ Of course, it is worth noting that @VaderResearch also mentioned that starting yesterday, VADER Yapping rewards the top 1000 users.

Assuming a real gradient hypothesis, for example, if my current real Yapping points are 2000, then under the same staking conditions, the VADER score higher than mine must be ranked higher in the VADER leaderboard, which results in points above mine.

Although I shed envious tears 😭, I still want to tell this part of users to cherish the opportunity. This means that under the current algorithm, your content needs to be of higher quality than mine. If VADER's content continues to grow in daily output, then Virtual Yapping may not be that important to you, and Vader Yapping is your path.

Additionally, it has been announced that a Yapping leaderboard will be prepared before next week. The rules will be more 'transparent,' and users can refer to the style of discussions about Virtual or VADER on the leaderboard for 'imitation learning' to make the algorithm favor you more.
I hope everyone can gain something from participating in Virtual.

The Binance BSC ecosystem has launched the MVB Phase 8 project MEET48 @meet_48, which has performed quite well, especially since it holds the top position in the AI + FANS sector. During the research on the project, it was found that the proportion of female users is quite high, and there are even many community women who are actively supporting, creating a very positive community atmosphere. The project boasts a team of over 500 people, making it one of the leading teams in the field. MEET48 can be considered one of the largest Web3 application teams in the Blockchain sector.

As the first AI idol platform in the BNB Chain ecosystem, MEET48 represents a true fan economy. The traditional business logic of fan economy is 'idol-fan-goods/performance', where idols monetize through concerts and peripheral IP licensing. Fans invest most of their emotions in their idols, while MEET48 transforms this investment into co-creation. Actions such as voting, ranking, and charting are linked to actual earnings, which can determine the growth path of virtual idols; in other words, it truly realizes that water can carry a boat and overturn it, as the success of idols relies on fan support. The rewards for fans are closely related to the success of the idols.

The architecture of MEET48 on the platform can actually be divided into three layers: the first layer provides content through idol dynamics, live broadcasts, training processes, etc. The second layer is the interaction layer supported by social tasks like voting, ranking, and liking. The third layer consists of the trading layer made up of support coins, NFTs, and tokens. With 'emotion-driven + on-chain empowerment' as its core, it ushers the fan economy into the era of 'value co-creation'.

On the technical side, MEET48 utilizes self-developed multi-dynamic large models to drive the platform's development in AI UGC, lowering the entry barriers for user-generated content and stimulating users' creative enthusiasm. The large model can integrate multi-modal data such as voice, actions, and expressions, allowing one-click content generation for virtual performances. At the same time, the Maas editor can integrate model invocation, editing, and styling into a full-process editing tool, enabling users to create independently from home. Centered on AI UGC, MEET48 has completely built a content incubation platform, forming a new business model centered on users, with AI as a tool and virtual idols as carriers. AI is no longer just an auxiliary tool in work but has become more of a 'content partner' for users, allowing everyone to realize their own star dreams.

There is also much to look forward to for future projects. After MEET48 issues its tokens, it plans to optimize the Mars Protocol launch platform, and it also plans to launch a limited test of the 'AI Dance Troupe', along with two Web3 games, 'Bounty Hunter' and 'Chain Tycoon'. The AI Dance Troupe will create a large community game ecosystem using $IDOL and virtual music and dance LLM and AI Agent technology, with the game primarily utilizing $IDOL as the main token, and limited testing will start in Q3. As a global AI-driven Web3 ecosystem covering entertainment, social interaction, creation, and assetization, the project's subsequent progress is worth looking forward to!

Let me report to all the spiritual shareholders about yesterday's operations!

In terms of investment strategy, I chose to go all-in the moment the points were credited yesterday. I went all-in with the 164009 points I recently accumulated through my Yapping account and invested them all in $IRIS, receiving a total of 48007 coins in the end.

💰 $IRIS Earnings
Project investment was 8 Virtual, returned 2.56 Virtual
Actual deduction 5.44 Virtual, calculated at yesterday's average price of 2.1U
Actual cost is approximately 11.4U
Received 48007 $IRIS
📈 Currently can sell for 2351.5U
Based on the yesterday's average selling peak market value of 80M, can sell for 3761.6 U
💥 Current ROI = 206.2X 80M ROI = 329.9X

🧠 Let’s review yesterday's operations along the timeline
18:00 After receiving the tokens, I joked in the group about the M attribute of $VADER, after all, the points given just a couple of days ago were really too few. Yesterday was relatively better. Although @Vader_AI_ only gave 1861 points, removing the staked 500 points, the actual was 1300 points. Much more than the 200 points from the day before, I am already satisfied with the growth. I don’t know if my complaints about @VaderResearch had any effect, but anyway, system optimization is good for everyone.

Around 20:00, before the market opened, I discussed my strategy with @famer_dy, the small farmer teacher, and it can be considered as a unity of knowledge and action. As soon as the market opened, I put the coins into LP immediately, and after about an hour, I could gain around 30% profit.
Yesterday also saw the launch of an update for Yapping's earnings, and later I reinvested part of the tokens from the profits.
The current state is holding coins without staking. After all, 180 days does feel a bit too long, and many teachers around me also immediately sold off to choose TP10 days. However, for this Yapping account, I had previously staked a bunch of other coins, and the cost of TP10 days is indeed a bit high. My main account staked Virtual as a hedge, and I might choose to wait for the coin price to rise to send myself into a small black room.

Based on my understanding of Virtual, it is the first project of ETH. There should be movements in the future, whether it’s airdrops or other rewards. Otherwise, it would directly become a liquidity deadlock. After all, everyone is not foolish and there's no need to be so obsessed with “paper wealth.” To be honest, I really can’t hold on to tokens for half a year, and in the case of no hedging, three months is about my limit. The remaining profit funds are planned to be directly exchanged for Virtual to continue staking. Today the price of Virtual also dropped, and some users chose to take profits and exit. The future strategy should be to reinvest profits into Virtual for short-term staking to earn Vevirtual rewards, and wait for Virtual prices to rise for proportional hedging. Regular Virtual airdrops subsidize my hedging costs.

As for $VADER, I'm still considering whether to add a bit more. Currently, the staking volume is indeed very high, and most of it is for a year. However, I still need to see the future ecological positioning. Let’s encourage each other!

Flammable and Explosive!!!

This is really outrageous. I thought the calculation of $VADER Yapping points based on the official published formula the day before yesterday was already quite absurd, but I didn't expect the points updated last night to be even more abstract.

The @Vader_AI_ Vader points from the day before yesterday were 1207 points, with a stake of 10,000 $VADER yielding about 500 points. The actual points obtained through Yapping were around 700 points. Yesterday's Vader points were 786 points, and if we remove the staked 500 points, the actual Vader Yapping points were just over 200 points.
This is really vastly different from the official description. I still remember the official announcement of a 1.25x coefficient reward for continuous Yapping, but according to actual calculations, it’s clearly not there. To be honest, I really don't know how to reconcile this statement; I would like to call myself the first person to reverse score.

Yesterday, I also asked Teacher Kailin @kaylyn_0x, and his score difference was also significant. From 8000 points on the first day to 1000 points on the second day. I really think it’s too abstract; in theory, the algorithm's initial phase should be a gradual accumulation process, but the Vader Agent's algorithm is quite difficult to understand. How can we break through the algorithm and the black box?
Continuous building leads to this?

In response to this situation, @VaderResearch provided the explanation: Due to us rewarding more viewers today, the Vader Yapping points you received may be less than yesterday.

Isn't it ridiculous? Don’t you check what you say? Going from 9000 points to 8000 points is a bit less than yesterday. Going from 8000 to 1000 is also a bit less? Where is your algorithm? Where is your calculation formula? Where is all the information you publicly announced? Are you really playing that game where the final explanation rights belong to the organizer?

Back to the hottest topic recently, $IRIS, which last night also staged a “True and False Monkey King” trio. Are we small but have big dreams?
To ride the wave of $IRIS, they are really going all out, either the same avatar or a similar name. But after shouting for so long, everyone basically knows that it’s actually on ETH, after all, it’s the first project of Virtual on ETH.
Although many brothers made mistakes, fortunately, the official corrected the errors in a timely manner and returned the corresponding points. In comparison, it can be considered an indirect loss mitigation.

Currently, $IRIS has already over-recruited 18X. My own strategy is to go all in after obtaining the points this afternoon. Although I thought that if calculated by average points return, it might not be as good as tomorrow's hackathon project $BAIBY, but after all, it is the first project on Eth. If Virtual continues to make efforts in the Eth ecosystem in the future, then choosing to participate in $IRIS will definitely not be wrong. After all, there are precedents for quality projects on Base, although the unlocking time is 182 days, there might also be subsequent airdrops and other gameplay. It is suggested to take a look at the secondary market when it opens, considering cost-effectiveness. Some large holders with high points will surely choose to dump TP immediately upon seeing the 182-day lockup period, as the cost-effectiveness is much higher in comparison. If you really want to buy in, either you are a capable scientist who gets in immediately and arbitrages, or you wait for the large holders to dump and then buy in during the dip. This is of course my own idea, and specific operations still depend on the actual situation.

Since Bnalpha has deepened its collaboration with Sonic SVM @SonicSVM, it has recently started paying attention to projects on Sonic. When looking at the infrastructure of an ecosystem, aside from the liquidity of trading Dex, the most important aspect is to examine its own DeFi ecosystem.

Currently, projects that appear to have good quality include @chaos_Fi, after all, it is the champion of the Sonic Mobius hackathon, and Sonic SVM is a project within the Solana ecosystem @Solana_zh. It has become one of the highlights of the LSD protocol within the Sonic ecosystem, driven by StaFi LSaaS technology. Users can stake SONIC to obtain tradable sSONIC, achieving dual benefits of staking and liquidity.

In the ecosystem, it also solves the problem of 'prepayment' in games, in cooperation with FoMoney. By integrating sSonic as a payment currency, users can stake Sonic on the front end to obtain sSonic. This means that while users earn staking rewards from Sonic, they can seamlessly integrate into various GameFi and DeFi applications within the SONIC network. Users ultimately make seamless payments on the front end, with settlements done through Sonic's staking rewards on the back end. The existing GameFi games typically involve depositing coins into an account and interacting directly when needed, and there is always a concern about not being able to withdraw to the chain at times, with funds often being in excess. This effectively locks up funds for the ecosystem without usage, but users lose the staking rewards during that period. With the technological push from Chaos, it is extremely friendly to gamers. However, it remains uncertain whether more people will impulsively spend due to this mechanism.

Currently, the best way to participate in Chaos, I believe, is to earn $CHAOS and IDO allocation through Zealy tasks. The total rewards include airdrops of 10 million Chaos and 20% IDO eligibility.

Currently, there are only over 3000 users on the Zealy leaderboard, which is not particularly competitive for participation. In terms of task types, after completing the basic tasks, the subsequent ones are mainly simple daily check-ins for points and social tasks on Twitter.
Basic tasks
1️⃣ Join DC
2️⃣ Join TG
3️⃣ Follow Twitter
4️⃣ Submit the wallet for staking sonic
Subsequent tasks can generally only be interacted with after wallet submission.
Tasks include daily check-ins, Sonic checks, liking and retweeting on Twitter, adding symbols to Twitter names, adding '$sSONIC' to X bio, and further Zealy follow tasks from partners and user invitations.
Those interested can participate!

Virtual I have been tortured a thousand times, yet I treat Virtual like my first love

$VADER started the day before yesterday, and the scores came out yesterday 🤣 I can finally understand what @VaderResearch said about the Cookie ranking and the actual ranking of VADER Yapping being vastly different. I was secretly pleased to see Cookie's ranking still in the top spots before the scores came out, but how painful it was afterwards. Now, all I want is for Cookie to take me off the leaderboard 😭

"To make someone perish, one must first make them crazy"

In fact, my Virtual Yapping score has always been relatively high, even after the algorithm changed, I still earn over ten thousand points almost every day. In my “self-smart” attempt to discuss various topics related to $VADER ahead of time, I still thought I was in the top ranks until the scores came out, and I ended up as a “failed art student”.

I got all the questions right and understood all the question meanings. Yet I ended up with a score of 0! Compared to the high scores of other teachers, I am just that $VADER newcomer. Yesterday, after removing the 500 points from $VADER's score, my actual VADER Yapping score is 700 points.

Many teachers were scoring between 7,000 to 8,000 points yesterday, and I even compared with Teacher Kailin @kaylyn_0x. According to the currently published VADER Yapping algorithm, it is very likely that I was black-boxed.

On Kaito's ranking, I am basically similar to Teacher Kailin, both around the fortieth position. If we compare the basic scores of Yaps, I am indeed higher than him. My Arbus score is around 100 points, which should be higher than other users.
These two items' total score accounts for about 70% according to @VaderResearch's statement. The remaining 30% weight comes from the Agent evaluation score, and I believe my content data is still okay, but the score is indeed very low.

In fact, according to the current coefficient of 1.25, the gap will be very large. A low initial score, even with a high coefficient, means that the subsequent score growth is no match for the “top student” on the first day. However, it also serves as a reminder for me to correct my position. Starting today, I will begin to update the growth of my VADER Yapping score, striving to break through the black box through adjustments in my content on @Vader_AI_. Let's see how much I can grow from 700 points. At the same time, I can also build and construct Virtual with more newcomers!

Currently, the track popularity of Depin remains high, and I am also looking for projects that can navigate through bull and bear markets. What is often mentioned by everyone is Building, but what exactly needs to be built in the Depin track? Undoubtedly, it is infrastructure construction, and I have looked at many projects. I am particularly interested in decentralized cloud infrastructure platforms.

As we all know, the core needs for web3 are decentralized computing, storage, and networking. Decloud is the most fundamental infrastructure. Simply put, Decloud is the 'water, electricity, and gas' in the real world. The synchronization of blockchain nodes relies on storage and bandwidth, and the currently popular AI project deployments also require GPU services. The most used dapps also need servers to support them, and all these demands can be met through full-stack decentralized cloud.

The most important aspect of full-stack decentralized cloud is that it can cover all components such as computing, storage, networking, data, identity, and security without relying on centralized cloud vendors. Independent projects exist for each individual need, and I have summarized them for everyone.

The project that can simultaneously accommodate all the above needs and operate independently, at present, seems to be ICN @ICN_Protocol, especially since on May 22, the backer of Xiaomi, NGP Capital, strategically invested in ICN with a valuation of $470 million. Speaking of NGP, one cannot help but mention its historical investment targets; well-known projects like Lime, Helium, Xiaomi, and others all have its presence. The main investment rounds are generally in A-C rounds, mainly covering areas such as cybersecurity, edge cloud, industrial technology, and enterprise software. Professionals do professional work; this principle holds true. Take Helium for instance, a very high-quality and feasible project in the Depin field, with a current market value of $540 million. If Helium is the starting point of NGP's investment in the depin field, then ICN must be its transformative turning point, as they choose to bet on the 'decentralized cloud computing' track this time.

ICN's strength comes not only from powerful investment institutions but also more from its own cash-generating capability. According to publicly disclosed information, by 2024, there will be over 1,000 paying enterprise users, generating annual revenue exceeding $5 million. This achievement could be considered a startup unicorn in web2 and is not the PPT project that everyone has in mind. After all, in the last round, many PPT projects had strong background investments but have yet to materialize. However, infrastructure that supports centralized storage, settlement, and networking is something people can see and verify. The logic of investment is just that; seeing is believing, and hearing is knowing. The most important thing is visibility.

In fact, after careful study, it is not an exaggeration to say that ICN is akin to AWS for web3; currently, ICN is one of the closest projects to a full-stack DeCloud project, with a three-layer structure that is both decentralized and enables efficient collaboration.
1️⃣ Resource Provision Layer Scaler Node can provide physical computing resources (CPU/GPU), storage (NVMe), bandwidth, and other basic services for Web3 applications and AI models, offering a true operating environment.
2️⃣ Protocol Security Layer HyperNode can ensure quality control over the resource provision layer, not providing computing resources itself but can monitor, verify, and penalize independent nodes. This maximally ensures the transparency and stability of resource scheduling during ICN's operation.
3️⃣ Developer Deployment Layer Builder SDK allows quick deployment of decentralized services on ICN, ensuring future ecological diversity and compatibility.

ICN's ability to connect physical resources, network services, and application combinations is the core of building a 'decentralized AWS' for Web3.

Recently, their token $ICNT is also approaching TGE; those who have not participated in the galaxy missions and testnets can take part in the recent 'mouth-holding'. Register on the official website https://t.co/PR0R6bdsC2, select the country, link your old wallet, and then complete Twitter tasks and DC tasks. Follow up by tweeting with the #ICNTWorldDomination tag.
Those interested can follow their official Twitter @ICN_Protocol and Chinese official Twitter @ICN_China.

#ICNT World Domination: Mission 02 is LIVE!

I've joined the @ICN_Protocol mission 🌎

Dropped my dot. Claimed my zone.

Join now and stand a chance to earn your share of 10,000 $ICNT 👇

https://world.icn.global

#ICNTSignalWars #ICNTWorldDomination

2025-06-10 09:42

WOW WOW WOW ⚡️

It feels like Virtual @virtuals_io is about to win big this time! As the first token $IRIS launched on ETH by Virtual, it has certainly captured a lot of attention.

Whether it’s the interaction with the ETH Foundation or @VaderResearch giving $IRIS a TIER 1 rating, it leaves a lot of room for imagination. After waiting so long, something big has finally arrived! Coupled with the roundtable discussions and recent comments from the SEC along with the current market enthusiasm, it seems to have all the right timing and advantages.

Right now, I personally feel a bit of FOMO and am thinking of putting all my recent points “in play”, estimating a shallow 100X which would be around a 20M market cap, should not be a big problem. Meanwhile, @VaderResearch also mentioned wanting to achieve the highest pre-sale allocation possible in a short time, and staking $VADER is the best choice.

Speaking of $VADER, it basically follows well-known rules. A few days ago, @VaderResearch already hinted at the rules. Virgen points will be distributed based on the quality of the previous day's posts. If points were earned through Vader Yapping the previous day, that day’s Vader Yapping points will receive a 1.25x multiplier. This is what has been emphasized as “consistency”; fishing for three days and drying nets for two days will break the multiplier chain. So what everyone needs to do is persistently “talk it out” every day.

Additionally, the core considerations of Vader are as follows:
1️⃣ User rating (based on the number of smart fans)
2️⃣ Post rating (based on quality and relevance)
Vader Yap rating = User rating * 70% + Post rating * 30%
User rating is primarily based on Kaito's algorithm, with Kaito’s core logic being smart fans and smart participation. However, since some users do not have Yps points, the current user rating algorithm for Vader combines Kaito data with @arbusai data. The average of these two metrics serves as the user rating.
Currently, post ratings are executed based on Virtual's own Yap evaluation agent, so this part of the algorithm remains a black box.

Although the Cookie leaderboard does not represent our actual Vader Yapper ranking for distributing rewards, I still secretly rejoice at being in the top ten of the overall VADER leaderboard 🤣 The official ranking will also be launched later, so stay tuned!

Official Announcement! The era of Virtual Zui Lu 2.0 has officially begun!

Yesterday was also the last day of the Zui Lu 1.0 era, and I safely scored 8900 points. I recently averaged the last seven days, and it's about 10,000 points per day. I'm quite looking forward to the points after the launch of Zui Lu 2.0 today, but I guess the data will probably come out tomorrow; theoretically, it should be higher than my current score. After all, if it’s Yapping score + VADER staking score + VADER Vapping score, it’s like getting three benefits from one.

Today, $VADER is officially starting. In fact, I mentioned a couple of days ago that everyone should pay attention to the following keyword tags: $VADER, @VaderResearch, @Vader_AI_. Those who understand, understand. To give a simple example, if a project is going to launch PRE TGE on Kaito, the rankings for the initial launch stage have already been established. This means that during the process of the project team connecting with Kaito for the launch, they have already pre-inserted the corresponding keywords to match Kaito's algorithm. It was also mentioned that the current Yapping score besides referencing Kaito's open protocol also has Virtual's own algorithm.

So if the Yapping score of $VADER is recalculated, the official announcement is that it starts today; in fact, the system's initial data capture time should be before the official calculation starts today, allowing for a pre-learning process for the algorithm.

To put it plainly, if the tweets from the past couple of days contain the aforementioned keywords, they may have already been prioritized for learning by the system's algorithm, leading to a higher corresponding score yield. The real battle has actually already begun; it does not start calculating from today. Calculation does not equal inclusion; once included by the system, scores will naturally accrue. So if you want to roll with $VADER starting today, make sure to mention the above keywords as much as possible to strive for early inclusion by the system and thus gain benefits.

The principle is consistent with Kaito's Yaps score and Yapping score; the hardest part is actually breaking zero. The biggest difference in breaking zero is the difference between being included and not being included. If there are points, then they must have been included by the system's algorithm, which reflects on Kaito as an increase in YAP score and reflects on Virtual as an increase in Yapping score starting from zero.

If you are already staking $VADER, remember to bind your Twitter account. Make sure to start adding the above tags from today. Get the results of Zui Lu through the triple benefit!

Basically, the current focus on Virtual @virtuals_io is still on "mouth play". Obviously, this is also the best posture for small investors to "turn the tables". Compared to long-term staking of Virtual/VADER, or staking Aixbt, the participation method of mouth play is actually more suitable for ordinary people. With extremely low investment costs and the recent newcomer entry Buff, the cost-performance ratio is definitely maximized.

It has also been mentioned before that the current algorithm has changed. Recently, I asked a few large holders around me, and basically, their points are being diluted every day. But for newcomers, the experience is completely different; most of the continuously outputting newcomer points are slowly increasing.

Of course, there is also a set of data worth noting, which is a table drawn based on statistics from the Points page. The most important variable factor is the total points across the network, which is why points are not valuable. At the beginning of May, the total points across the network were only around ten million, while in June, the total points across the network basically maintained around 170 million. The source of point "inflation" is mainly due to the increase in the total amount of distributable points across the network, leading to an increase in the points users receive, while the proportion remains nearly unchanged. When users have more points, the over-subscription rate for project investment is not the traditional IDO platform's monetary over-subscription, but rather the over-subscription ratio for points investment. After all, the calculation logic of Virtual is based on the proportion of points invested / total investment amount, so sometimes it is not that the project is getting worse, but that the increasing number of points has changed the supply and demand relationship, causing points to become inflated.

Regardless of whether the total amount of points continues to increase in the future, what users should focus on is the overall distribution ratio. Currently, the fixed ratio every day is 5% for $VADER holders and 20% for Vevirtual holders, with fluctuating ratios in Yapping points and daily active rewards. However, from the ratio of the last seven days, it is clear that the total amount of Yapping points across the network is in an upward phase, meaning that participation in Yapping is increasing and the ratio is gradually increasing. This is why it is said that the most suitable way for retail investors to participate currently is "mouth play", after all, the way most people can make money is by doing right-side trading, looking for certain opportunities.

Frankly speaking, the current certain opportunity is definitely in "mouth play". Including the $VADER mouth play model that will be implemented tomorrow, under the dual mouth play model of Yapping point rewards + $VADER point rewards, there will be more breakthrough methods for personal point growth. Moreover, $VADER may not have Yapping volume in the early stage, as some Yapping users did not choose to stake, which naturally filtered out some users. The so-called phase two opening actually needs to clarify the position of $VADER in the ecological niche. In simple terms, $VADER is the "key fuel" and "admission ticket" that connects AI Agent usage, platform governance, incentive distribution, and strategy participation within the Virtuals ecosystem.
Let’s work together!

Currently, the algorithm black box of Virtual @virtuals_io is quite obvious, as previously mentioned in tweets. Setting aside personal points and reduced earnings, the influx of people relying on word-of-mouth to participate in projects in the overall ecosystem is visibly 'increasing'. Whether it’s through word-of-mouth construction or deep personal financial participation, everyone has their own choices. Regardless of the correctness of the investment method, the bonus points of the ecosystem itself are worth thinking about.

As we all know, the current types of points can be roughly divided into two categories:
1️⃣ Daily point distribution
2️⃣ Daily activity bonuses
Taking daily point distribution as an example, $VADER, Yapping, Referral, and veVIRTUAL correspond to four different groups of people.

Frankly speaking, Virtual has now entered the second stage. I believe that $VADER has already become the 'main theme' of the second stage, as discussed in yesterday's analysis of the new VADER policy. When even word-of-mouth has thresholds, and VADER becomes the ticket, its position in the ecological niche has qualitatively changed. As @VaderResearch said, I am also a creator, so I value and appreciate the daily work of creators. If the first stage treats Virtual as the main theme, then the importance of VADER in changing the ecological niche in the second stage is even more evident; obviously, both users and project parties benefit from this. It's clear that after the launch of VADER's plan yesterday, the token data for Virtual and VADER both showed significant changes, marking a node for the transition between old and new users.

As for Yapping, I saw Vader's reply under the tweet yesterday. The current point algorithm, besides referencing Kaito's open protocol, also has Virtual's own algorithm. Seeing this reply, it's easy to understand why users not on Kaito's list still have many points, or why there are cases where points suddenly multiplied after being relatively low for a few days. There are also instances where points are given without any updated tweets.
In simple terms, Yapping is also a dual mechanism. If Kaito is on the list, there will definitely be a certain amount of base points used for protocol transmission as the base value for Yapping points, and on top of that, Virtual has its own algorithm distribution mechanism that can dynamically balance/intervene users' acquisition of Yapping points. This is actually beneficial for users with a lower base, as they can earn points through creation without having to compete for Kaito's ranking. Of course, the most important thing in this process is persistence.

Referral can also be considered a relatively new metric, and of course, many projects continuously offer new user rewards. For the platform, a steady influx of new users is the cornerstone of its development. Previously, Virtual relied on self-motivation, and most users joined the ranks of Virtual through the community and Vapping. Since the introduction of Referral two weeks ago, more people have been discussing Virtual. Naturally, for users with many accounts, the introduction of Referral also increases the behavior of 'nesting dolls'. Without increasing the number of base accounts, they can still earn more rewards. After all, first-level referral rewards are 20%, and second-level referral rewards are also 5%.

veVIRTUAL was the mainstay in the first stage. As everyone knows, the way to obtain veVirtual is by staking Virtual. The first stage saw a bulldozer-like rise in Virtual, increasing the influx from the external market into the Virtual ecosystem. Under the lock-up mechanism, the circulation of virtual tokens in the external market decreased while the number of participants increased, resulting in a steady rise in token prices.

Daily activity bonuses are roughly divided into two categories:
1️⃣ Trading
2️⃣ Staking

In fact, I do not oppose the act of trading points; it’s just that after the current mechanism change, there are indeed more and more people spamming points, and many projects can spam a large number of points at a very low cost. Everyone knows that the purpose of point trading is to increase market liquidity. The demand for 'prosperity' can indeed be understood, but would changing to LP rewards or altering point distribution weight ratios, thereby increasing new token rewards, make it feel more 'prosperous'? Or should we directly eliminate old tokens based on a survival of the fittest approach?

On the staking front, the most discussed aspect is 'paper wealth'. It seems that there are a lot of profits, but how much can actually remain during the yellow lock period? Of course, there are users who spam TP, doing only 2-3 rounds a month. However, most users still choose to stake, and the staking rewards have not, despite the coefficient increase, determined the rise of staking points based on testing. Thus, the value of users staking so many tokens, in a sense, 'locking up', is quite worth considering.

Although everyone's operational strategies are different, the ultimate goal is to 'profit'. As a platform, Virtual clearly cannot satisfy everyone. However, the principle of making a decision and sticking to it is something everyone understands, but the variability of the final results and the randomness of the process are not so perfect. For new users, a 'all-in' strategy is clearly much more advantageous than participating in projects. If they encounter some poorly rated projects, the user's 'sense of participation' will be very poor. Of course, I also hope everyone finds their own path to growth. The road is long and obstructed, so let’s walk and cherish it!

Daily Virtual @virtuals_io Review

Intuitively feeling the dilution of front-row Yapping. The data comparison from yesterday shows a point difference of 1,356,305 compared to the day before. The Yapping ratio also increased from 2.71% the day before to 2.77%. Even though the score ratio has improved and the Yapers leaderboard hasn't changed, the points, although above 10,000, have still decreased. In other words, the point rewards for front-row Yapping are gradually being diluted. Of course, the recent scores of new back-row users are rising, and since there is no leaderboard data for comparison, we can tentatively consider that the reward ratio for the back-row has improved from the perspective of score growth. For new Yapers entering the scene, this is also a friendly development.

At the same time, yesterday @VaderResearch also released the latest Yapping event, mainly about the VADER YAPPING launching on Monday.
1️⃣ Today, 2% of Virgen Points will be allocated to Virtuals Yappers.
2️⃣ In addition to the 2% Virgen Points allocation, there will be an additional 1% Virgen Points allocated to VADER Yappers.
3️⃣ VADER Yappers will also receive 20% of the $VADER staker airdrop reward pool.

How to become a VADER Yapper?

1️⃣ Stake at least 10,000 $VADER (currently around 360U) through the official website and lock it for 360 days.
2️⃣ Register on Kaito Yaps (even if you don't have a Kaito score, that's fine; this is mainly for point distribution and to let Kaito include you).
3️⃣ Bind on the Yapping page of the Vader official website.
Link: https://t.co/pruXHifdFY
Note: You need to bind the corresponding wallet and Twitter for Virual. After staking, you can't join Vader Yapping immediately; the system updates about twice a day. You can join after the update is complete.
4️⃣ In your daily Yapping tweets, add tags like $VADER or @VaderResearch or @Vader_AI_.

I have to say @VaderResearch really knows how to play; Vader Yapping tweets and points will start being recorded from next Monday. They may have tasted success with Virtual's Yapping and are now reversing course to incentivize $VADER while not forgetting the Vigen ecosystem. It's a chess game that he has revitalized. Currently, using the points calculator on the Vader official website, the daily point earnings from staking 10,000 $VADER for 360 days is roughly between 404-49. The average monthly points are around 12,000, and with regular airdrops, it can be considered 'both eating and taking'; the most important thing is that through VADER staking, you can obtain entry tickets for VADER Yapping, which is a strong binding relationship.

It seems that the path of starting from zero to earn points is about to change again.
It has already evolved into starting from zero to earn Virtual points 👉 Investing Virtual points to obtain tokens 👉 Staking tokens to earn daily points, cycling the staked points and Yapping points into the next project 👉 Waiting for the staked tokens to unlock, selling the staked tokens for VADER 👉 Acquiring more than 10,000 VADER, staking for 360 days to activate VADER Yapping 👉 At this point, the point acquisition channels are Virtual Yapping points + VADER Yapping points + Staking points 👉 If continuing to cycle, converting points to cash as Virtual 👉 Continuous reinvestment of Virtual hedging.......
I can hardly imagine; they really know how to play! 🤣

Daily Virtual @virtuals_io Review

Yesterday's points also unexpectedly decreased, but Kaito's Yapers ranking rose by 3 places, currently ranking 46th on the 30D list. Yesterday, Yapping accumulated a total of 10,291 points, fortunately stabilizing above 10,000 points. Recently, the growth rate of new Yappers has been quite fast, with many coming to report good news. Personally, I feel quite good, after all, water can carry a boat and also capsize it.

Currently, the state of Virtual resembles a ' besieged city', where outsiders want to come in, and insiders want to get out.

Outsiders: The biggest influencing factor is us, the talkers. Every day, there are overwhelming virtual articles, ranging from beginner guides, daily reviews, project analyses to advanced tutorials. Especially when showcasing achievements, there are tens to dozens of times more articles. It makes people feel itchy, but they also wonder if it's too late to get involved now, as most users have already more or less achieved the so-called results. Although it’s all paper wealth before the yellow lock, the daily accumulation of points and the growth in token prices after fundraising ends provide a positive feedback from the project as long as one gets onboard. However, the requirements for capability are also rising, with more and more 'scam' projects emerging, making it very likely to choose wrong due to 'information gaps'. Originally, blind investments focused more on multiplication, where there are people, there are rivers and lakes; where there is heat, there are high multipliers. Eventually, it evolved to not just using the over-funding multiplier as the sole indicator, but refined to the ratio of points per unit after the project starts. Up to now, the practice has become to research first, then get onboard, with the overall ecosystem becoming increasingly mature. Various channels for acquiring points are emerging, and under the same funding conditions, different operational methods yield different results. We have basically transitioned from the endless dividends of the first stage to the 'intellectual combat' of the second stage.

Insiders: The biggest influencing factor is the price of Virtual tokens. I remember when I first got involved with Virtual, the token price had already risen, hovering around 1.5, and I was somewhat late to the party. Later, when the price reached 2.5, I felt like I was the chosen one. Until today, the price fell back to 1.8, feeling like it came but also didn't come. During this price cycle, I basically only invested in a few projects and spent most of the time waiting! Waiting for points while researching projects. For those who are locked in, two years can basically be regarded as returning to zero, making it nearly impossible to balance costs, and there’s no way to hedge long-term. More choices in two years feel like a game, a all-in bet hoping to mine back the capital. If the project continues strongly, it relies on investment to recoup costs; if joined late, the profit can only rely on usual point output & airdrops and the 'residual value' after two years. When the token price falls, most people's operations and mindset will definitely be affected, and the first reaction is definitely to escape to break even.

Personal Insight
Everyone's initial intention to participate in Virtual must be to make money, either by genuinely investing funds or by just talking it out like me. Of course, the latter's investment return ratio seems to be the highest at the moment. From the perspective of project ecosystem development, I sincerely hope that more Yapers can gain more Yapping. After all, hard work should naturally yield rewards; everyone is quite busy and rejects manipulation, rejects empty promises, and rejects delayed feedback, after all, everyone is quite busy and needs positive, timely feedback to please themselves. If you do not want to invest capital or only want to invest a small amount, you must join the ranks of talkers; it’s never too late to talk it out, and recently, people have been getting results one after another. Of course, many who invest real money may have some prejudice against talking it out, but if you think from another angle, everyone is just using different methods to build, as the saying goes, those with money contribute money, and those with strength contribute strength; community voice/market heat is also an intangible asset.

Currently, I am using cyclical operations more in talking it out. Essentially, I accumulate Yapping points through talking it out. Find quality projects for an all-in bet, immediately stake after completing the all-in, calculate the yellow lock time, lift the stake in advance, sell tokens during the yellow lock period, exchange tokens for Virtual while hedging, and conduct short-term staking of Virtual to continuously earn points. The strategy for purchasing Virtual is roughly similar; a more aggressive approach could convert into Virtual-based hedging to maintain profit margins, with the balance point being to return to cost outside of hedging fees. Through multi-account operations, account A can sell uniformly while waiting for TP, while accounts B, C, and D can continue the cycle. Regardless of bull or bear, the first essential of project investment is to protect the principal, and this is very important.

Daily Virtual @virtuals_io Review

Yesterday got better too, following the 9673 points earned the day before. I once felt that the algorithm had changed, but yesterday still gave 11220 points. Currently, Kaito's Yapers ranking is still in the top 50. Overall, there hasn't been any significant change.
From the feedback I've received in private conversations about Yapping scores, interacting with users on the leaderboard indeed helps in acquiring Yapping points. Recently, many have been gradually breaking zero. @xnm05010 said, if I reply to her, I'll get an additional 500 points. Not sure if that's meant to comfort me 🤣

Looking back at yesterday's $ASYNC, I personally did not participate.
The actual oversubscription rate was about 9.2 times, with the average launch price around 4M.
Overall returns were about 20X, though it peaked at 6M today, most people certainly chose to stake. It feels a bit like picking a general among the short ones, with recent “hot” projects experiencing varying degrees of rug pulls. It seems like people are investing just to invest, many large holders are actually not focused on “hype” but rather on the points/U ratio; perhaps everyone thinks that 1 point/0.03U or higher is very cost-effective. My personal investment strategy is basically not to go all in until the last moment, maintaining a rhythm of observing more and acting less.

Yesterday, I also discussed the current staking mechanism with @sleepingatnoon, and it really feels interesting.
If anyone is testing, feel free to share as well; if the tests yield good results, it could significantly alter investment strategies.
1️⃣ The ratio of token holding amount to total amount, whether a higher ratio yields more points.
2️⃣ The total market value of held tokens, whether a larger market value yields more points.

In short, whether we can pick up garbage to exchange for high cost-performance staking points depends on the test results. I am also testing, but the daily data feels quite unstable. So I plan to set up a few new accounts today to test point yields. Of course, one variable in this is the tiered earning of points; at a certain amount, the high and low of point acquisition will definitely reach a balance point. It feels like the gameplay of Virtual is becoming more interesting, with diversified investment strategies gradually taking shape.

Daily Virtual @virtuals_io Review

Yesterday, Yapping points reached 9673, which is indeed a decline compared to the previous 11000 points. It feels like the current strategy for virtual has turned into 'sharing the wealth'. It’s quite gratifying to see more and more Yapers breaking zero. From a data perspective, Virtual is certainly not just about looking at Kaito rankings. The previous points were part of an upward phase, taking about a week to rise from 2000 to 10000 points, during which my Kaito ranking fluctuated considerably and wasn’t particularly stable. Currently, my ranking on the virtual leaderboard in Kaito is roughly in the top 50, which is definitely an improvement compared to before. However, the points instead seem to be rewards, likely indicating that the current distribution mechanism has also changed.

Yesterday, I saw many teachers leaving messages about their earned points. There are quite a few around 7500 to 8000 points. I specifically checked the leaderboard, and they are mostly not on it. Some have gradually broken zero, and most of the consistently outputting points are on an upward trend.

Based on the points acquisition data, the following summary can be made:
1️⃣ Currently, the Kaito leaderboard does not seem to be the decisive factor for acquiring Yapping points.
2️⃣ For the system feedback mechanism, it may be that the chances of earning points increase with interaction + continuous output.
3️⃣ For verifying other top-level Yapers on the leaderboard, yesterday's points were generally lower compared to before. This may indicate a change in the system's distribution method for Yapping points.
4️⃣ The premise for new users to earn Yapping points is to be recorded by the system; it may require a few days of continuous output and user interaction, making it easier for the system to capture them, and once points are earned, they will continue to grow.
5️⃣ There’s no need to overly fixate on Kaito leaderboard rankings; even the off-list scores can be several thousand. Just do good deeds and don’t ask about the future.

Of course, brothers in need of mutual help can @ me anytime; I’m happy to assist.

Regarding project research and investment, one must admit when wrong. Yesterday, I pushed the TweetBounty from Hackerthon 5. I must say the project is a good one, but last night some teachers uncovered that it was a fake. Upon looking at the Twitter, team, and official website, there are indeed some issues.
The Twitter registration date is May 2025, and the first tweet was posted on May 18, 2025.

The team members’ Twitter accounts basically have no project-related tweets, and the early tweets were mostly retweets. In the following days, they gradually posted project-related content, likely indicating that the accounts were purchased. Moreover, subsequent account posts are all consistent.

After multiple verifications, the true creator of TweetBounty is @ParadigmEng420, not the members currently appearing in the project.
Actually, since it is the virtual Hackerthon 5, there should be records left during the competition. The team can be contacted for confirmation before deciding whether to go to the launch pad. Most users, upon seeing the project, already have little understanding of it, and will naturally be misled by incorrect information. At the same time, it is hoped that virtual can add some review processes, as everyone is quite averse to attention diversion. What was said yesterday about the investment strategy in TweetBounty has 'failed', and recently I am carefully looking at other quality projects.

Daily Virtual @virtuals_io Review

Yesterday's Yapping points earned were 11230, which is basically flat compared to the previous day's Yapping points of 11240. Currently, the points acquisition on Yapping may have reached a bottleneck for me personally.

In terms of positive feedback, the project has actually provided quite a lot. I saw @vvickym2's tweet yesterday. On May 31, 1300 Pts were awarded, and on June 1, 6500 Pts were given directly, which can be said to be rapid progress. Although the algorithm is still a black box, as long as we persist in producing results, it certainly won't be too bad. There are also a number of brothers interacting below my tweet, and their scores are also steadily rising. If you need interaction, feel free to @ me.

The point that needs attention at this stage has been mentioned in previous tweets, which is the issue of point "inflation." As new users flow in, there will also be old users flowing out. The high coefficient points generated by large holders staking affect the overall point system of the platform. Currently, there is a serious polarization, as the saying goes: "the droughts die of thirst and the floods die of drowning." Some large holders even expressed that they have "points that cannot be spent," while most players' situation is that "there are not enough points to spend." I previously had the idea to monitor a batch of high-point addresses, but over time, it has indeed appeared that they have points that cannot be spent, and some large holders can participate in every project, with some even able to fill the allocation ratio completely. However, the biggest advantage of these accounts for the project is that they have become the cornerstone, as their costs for TP would be much higher than ours.

For the strategy of new participants, I personally believe that it is still important to steadily accumulate points daily. When key projects come, one can go all in more directly while not dispersing attention. This way, one can achieve good results, and when the project quality is good, it can also hold on.

Recently, points can also be accumulated, and I suggest everyone pay close attention to TweetBounty @Tweetbounty_ which will go live in three days.
Coinbase Developer Platform AI Hackathon Second Prize
Virtuals Hackathon Fifth Place

Hackathon! Those who understand, understand! The projects that previously participated in the Virtual Hackathon and won have performed quite well, with Solace's recent returns being around 150X.
Let's strive together!

Daily Virtual @virtuals_io Review

The keyword for point acquisition is "sustained growth," and yesterday officially broke through 11,000 Pts! The score for Yapping is 11,240 points. Compared to yesterday, Yapping's score has also increased.

One point worth noting is that the daily airdrop ratio of Yapping points is currently on the rise, which means Yapping's weight in the project is becoming increasingly important. This also means more opportunities for ordinary people. Specific data statistics can be referenced from the daily Global Points leaderboard. The data for Yapping distribution over the past seven days is as follows:

Yapping points have visibly increased; seven days ago, Yapping was distributing about 2 million points daily across the network. Until yesterday, the daily distribution of Yapping points has reached 4.36 million.

Due to the increase in the total amount of virtual staking, the total amount of distributed points has also grown, and in the future, points may continue to be in a growth state for a certain period. In fact, the focus is on the distribution ratio across the network. The high or low ratio values can indicate trends and the project's expectations for the overall operational status. For long-term users, it is possible to supplement where points are lacking and obtain as many virtual points as possible. Since the total amount of Virtual points distribution has increased, the later expectations for project point investments also need to be raised, as there is a kind of inflation mechanism in place. For example, the current 15X oversubscription is roughly equivalent to the original 12X oversubscription rate.

The previous projects generally had a ratio of around 0.03 U/point, and as points increase later, the profit ratio will also decrease. If one wants to maintain the original yield, they need to increase their "market share" and engage in "symbiosis" according to the mechanism. Let's encourage each other with Yappers!

Daily Virtual @virtuals_io Review

Yesterday's keyword for earning points was 'new high', and the continuous building has ultimately paid off. After the algorithm change, it took about a week to transition from 2000 to 10000 points. Currently, it has stabilized above 10000 points, and yesterday I achieved a new high of 10970 points.

From my personal perspective, the ranking of virtuals on Kaito is just a basic factor determining the virtual score. Most of the heat online yesterday was focused on Loud, which also topped Kaito's prestige leaderboard. My personal ranking in virtuals has decreased compared to the previous days, yet my score has increased instead. There should be a certain coefficient of enhancement in the specific score calculation. The main way to earn points remains through token staking, which is also the cornerstone for the project's sustainable and stable development. In fact, the total amount of Yapping can basically be calculated daily.

In the global leaderboard distribution chart, we can calculate the daily total score of Yapping. This actually provides a certain reference value for us in earning points. For instance, the total points across the network yesterday were 170654061 Pts, of which Yapping accounted for 2.14%. Therefore, the total Yapping points in the entire network amount to 3651996.91 Pts. My personal score is 10970 points, which accounts for only 0.3% of the total network, indicating there is still room for improvement.

For those brothers with fewer Yapping points, it is likely that they have not been recorded by the system. It does not mean that writing one article guarantees full recording by the system to obtain points; continuous building is necessary to receive ongoing positive feedback. Now, daily reviews of Virtual have basically become a habit. Continuous building and reflection are essential. Finding a set of gameplay that suits oneself in the project is the source of personal persistence. If any brothers who have not earned points wish to be recorded or want to improve their existing Yapping scores, feel free to @ me. I will respond earnestly, and I am currently on the Virtual leaderboard; according to Kaito's interaction scoring principles, I should be able to help everyone. Let's encourage each other!