After much anticipation, it has finally appeared!

After experiencing various "doubts" from the community, the official team of Virtual has also responded. I must say the reaction was quite swift, so let me interpret the tweet according to my understanding.

Firstly, it is true that the project party can earn high scores through project tokens. Given that the lower the market value, the more points are earned, it can be inferred that project parties that do not do anything may actually benefit more. In a sense, reality can be biased. The first response to the incident is to require the project party to disclose the developer's holdings. This self-proofing process inevitably raises new "doubts." For some suspicious transactions through wash trading and access, what is the status if the corresponding wallet has not self-proven? Is it a presumption of innocence or a one-size-fits-all approach? This also tests the management team of Virtual. After all, targeting a certain address as a "witch hunt" is not difficult.

For the holdings disclosed by the project party's platform, corresponding points are awarded. If not disclosed, the project will no longer receive points. It can be assumed that most can provide the Dev's wallet, and the difficulty in resolving the incident is how to identify real and fake Dev wallets and the actual flow of funds. The most important way to gain the community's trust should be to let community members know which project parties failed to disclose Dev wallets in a timely manner, allowing users to "avoid pitfalls." Stay away from bad Devs while staking highly transparent Devs.

A small step for Virtual, a giant leap for community fairness!

For all Vader Yapping enthusiasts, another point worth noting is that the $VADER leaderboard is now online and can be queried through the community's official website.

This morning, I took a quick glance at the leaderboard and must say it is quite friendly to new users. Many users' followers actually haven't broken a thousand, and some haven't even reached a hundred. The rankings are all within the top 100 of Vader Yapping, with the common factor being multiple discussions about @Vader_AI_. It truly has managed to keep the chatter going. Although the number of views isn't very high, the current mechanism is that as long as you contribute enough, you will definitely make the list 🤣. Most of the top 100 have a mental share of over 0.2%. The good news for everyone is that you can copy the homework; at least in the short term, while it hasn't been optimized, you can "roll up."

Although the clear calculation factors are shown in the picture below, there are still some discrepancies at the moment. If you want to push for the VADER Yapping leaderboard, you should take advantage of this time window. After all, the actions of those on the leaderboard are basically clear, and users with a large base of followers and interactions have the ability to seize the opportunity. As for future optimizations, based on past experience, it will definitely be done. The current strategy should be to focus on volume in the early stage and quality in the later stage. Ensure your advantage as much as possible. I myself am not on the list yet, but I plan to give it a try and start pushing 🤣. I hope everyone will show mercy.