Flammable and Explosive!!!

This is really outrageous. I thought the calculation of $VADER Yapping points based on the official published formula the day before yesterday was already quite absurd, but I didn't expect the points updated last night to be even more abstract.

The @Vader_AI_ Vader points from the day before yesterday were 1207 points, with a stake of 10,000 $VADER yielding about 500 points. The actual points obtained through Yapping were around 700 points. Yesterday's Vader points were 786 points, and if we remove the staked 500 points, the actual Vader Yapping points were just over 200 points.

This is really vastly different from the official description. I still remember the official announcement of a 1.25x coefficient reward for continuous Yapping, but according to actual calculations, it’s clearly not there. To be honest, I really don't know how to reconcile this statement; I would like to call myself the first person to reverse score.

Yesterday, I also asked Teacher Kailin @kaylyn_0x, and his score difference was also significant. From 8000 points on the first day to 1000 points on the second day. I really think it’s too abstract; in theory, the algorithm's initial phase should be a gradual accumulation process, but the Vader Agent's algorithm is quite difficult to understand. How can we break through the algorithm and the black box?

Continuous building leads to this?

In response to this situation, @VaderResearch provided the explanation: Due to us rewarding more viewers today, the Vader Yapping points you received may be less than yesterday.

Isn't it ridiculous? Don’t you check what you say? Going from 9000 points to 8000 points is a bit less than yesterday. Going from 8000 to 1000 is also a bit less? Where is your algorithm? Where is your calculation formula? Where is all the information you publicly announced? Are you really playing that game where the final explanation rights belong to the organizer?

Back to the hottest topic recently, $IRIS, which last night also staged a “True and False Monkey King” trio. Are we small but have big dreams?

To ride the wave of $IRIS, they are really going all out, either the same avatar or a similar name. But after shouting for so long, everyone basically knows that it’s actually on ETH, after all, it’s the first project of Virtual on ETH.

Although many brothers made mistakes, fortunately, the official corrected the errors in a timely manner and returned the corresponding points. In comparison, it can be considered an indirect loss mitigation.

Currently, $IRIS has already over-recruited 18X. My own strategy is to go all in after obtaining the points this afternoon. Although I thought that if calculated by average points return, it might not be as good as tomorrow's hackathon project $BAIBY, but after all, it is the first project on Eth. If Virtual continues to make efforts in the Eth ecosystem in the future, then choosing to participate in $IRIS will definitely not be wrong. After all, there are precedents for quality projects on Base, although the unlocking time is 182 days, there might also be subsequent airdrops and other gameplay. It is suggested to take a look at the secondary market when it opens, considering cost-effectiveness. Some large holders with high points will surely choose to dump TP immediately upon seeing the 182-day lockup period, as the cost-effectiveness is much higher in comparison. If you really want to buy in, either you are a capable scientist who gets in immediately and arbitrages, or you wait for the large holders to dump and then buy in during the dip. This is of course my own idea, and specific operations still depend on the actual situation.