Fragrant Warning, VADER's Guardian!

Who can resist 20,000 $VADER points a day! Since the revision, it has basically stabilized at over 10,000 points every day, which is simply a blessing for those who enjoy earning points. Everyone invests time and energy, and the ultimate goal is still to harvest. Compared to a certain project next door, I feel that at least Virtual hasn't disappointed people as much. It won't play so-called word games with the numbers. So far, the feedback mechanism and team responses can be considered swift.

In fact, @Vader_AI_'s efficiency in making money may be much worse than before, but the output has become a habit, writing a little bit of nonsense every day to earn points. Chatting with community friends, and a pleasant day passes. Everyone's different thoughts on the project and different investment strategies create the ecosystem of Virtual.

Currently, the leaderboard of VADER is also reset every day, requiring a continuous flow of Yapping every day. For the ecosystem itself, it is a form of positive incentive; currently, the most gratifying thing is that the total amount of points earned daily is gradually becoming deflationary.

Yesterday it officially dropped below 300 million, and the distribution of Yapping also decreased from 2.36% to 2.18%. Although the total amount of points earned has decreased, from an ecological perspective, deciding to deflate the total amount of points when there are no quality projects is a firm decision. At least the large allocations are on DAB, and many users may not be very sensitive to the overall data but will pay a lot of attention to their DAB score. Once the score drops, the doubts about large-investment players in the community will follow. I previously saw discussions about how Virtual needs to demonstrate the determination to make tough decisions. Currently, their strategy is basically to dilute the high proportion of points in a certain weight type through multi-dimensional point statistics.

The positioning of DAB is more like a balancing mechanism within the ecosystem, dynamically balancing the distribution relationship between various weight factors through the daily DAB weight. This makes users feel “incomprehensible” from both feedback mechanisms and incentive levels, continuously providing freshness to the community during this research process. It allows the project to develop sustainably in a state of equitable distribution. @VaderResearch allows community participants to gradually become builders, enabling them to participate in the project in a way they find comfortable. It is not a rigid rule, but rather a balancing relationship where the strong remain strong.