You can't have both fish and bear's paw

The "8415" curse has been broken, and the new king VADER has successfully ascended to the throne!

After a steady increase in points during the first half of June, the 8415 of Virtual Yapping has been looming over me for a long time. I don't even need to check the Yapping score daily; I just need to look at the VADER score to get a rough idea of the daily points situation.

Since VADER went live, the 8415 has remained stable, but the VADER points have hardly been given. Previous posts have mentioned that the initial score incentives for $VADER had issues with the algorithm, and most of the community was overshadowed by the automatic reply bots, causing truly quality content to be ignored and buried. Since VADER announced its revision two days ago, a new opportunity has emerged.

Speaking from my own score experience, I feel a strong positive feedback and am full of confidence. At least my persistence has been rewarded. Although I have basically been hovering around the 30-40th position in the @Vader_AI_ rankings, I do feel inferior compared to the efforts and depth of content from the top ranks. It's evident from the scores that since the VADER points have increased, it could be due to the addition of tags. This has led to a consistent decline in Virtual's points.

This indirectly proves that the algorithms for Virtual and VADER are actually two different logics. If one wants to improve scores on both ends, the approach is likely to focus on each one's growth points.

1️⃣ Virtual's focus must be on the net buying coefficient. The original base score is around ten thousand points even at the top. But if the coefficient is added, the score basically starts at double, making it very cost-effective.

2️⃣ VADER's current focus is on the threshold + tags. At this stage, the number of people Yapping on VADER must be less than those on Virtual Yapping, after all, there is a threshold for holding $VADER. On this basis, adding tags becomes particularly important. Try to eliminate other cryptocurrencies or special tags, otherwise it may lead to ineffective engagement.

Although I never thought of breaking away from "8415" in this way, the result is still acceptable. After all, it's more than what was given before, and there's a high probability that Virtual won't be as competitive going forward, so let's work hard to build VADER!