#kimiai
kimiai
3,151 views
27 Discussing
Hot
Latest
·
--
Article
Did Dark Side of the Moon (Kimi) technology breakthrough trigger an AI stock selloff?<t-6/>#KimiAI K3’s weight files are still silently on the servers, but the markets in San Francisco and New York have already woken up. Moonshot has laid 2.8 trillion parameters on the table—one million tokens of context window like an endless sheet of paper, with the words: “The frontier is no longer an American monopoly.” The Nasdaq drops one percentage point, and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index sinks as well—not because Kimi isn’t good, but because it’s too good, making the $450 billion in AI capital expenditure look like a gamble. What Huang Jen-hsun said about the “AI Factory” still rings in the ears, but the tokens coming out of that factory suddenly carry a China price tag: three dollars for one million inputs, and fifteen dollars for one million outputs. Corporate CFOs start running the numbers; and while they’re doing the math, Nvidia’s shareholders get nervous first.
Did Dark Side of the Moon (Kimi) technology breakthrough trigger an AI stock selloff?
<t-6/>#KimiAI K3’s weight files are still silently on the servers, but the markets in San Francisco and New York have already woken up. Moonshot has laid 2.8 trillion parameters on the table—one million tokens of context window like an endless sheet of paper, with the words: “The frontier is no longer an American monopoly.” The Nasdaq drops one percentage point, and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index sinks as well—not because Kimi isn’t good, but because it’s too good, making the $450 billion in AI capital expenditure look like a gamble. What Huang Jen-hsun said about the “AI Factory” still rings in the ears, but the tokens coming out of that factory suddenly carry a China price tag: three dollars for one million inputs, and fifteen dollars for one million outputs. Corporate CFOs start running the numbers; and while they’re doing the math, Nvidia’s shareholders get nervous first.
883
3
47
883
·
--
Bearish
$BNB dropped from its $580 support toward the $565 range following a tech market sell-off triggered by China's Moonshot AI unveiling its massive 2.8-trillion parameter model, Kimi K3. 🤯?#KimiAI #moonshot
We note a tight trading range between $574 and $584. Failure to break out above the $589 neckline could risk a deeper correction down toward support zones around $535 to $515.
#bStocksonBinance
I'm still holding onto it. Though feeling #BEARISH📉
$BNB dropped from its $580 support toward the $565 range following a tech market sell-off triggered by China's Moonshot AI unveiling its massive 2.8-trillion parameter model, Kimi K3. 🤯?#KimiAI #moonshot
We note a tight trading range between $574 and $584. Failure to break out above the $589 neckline could risk a deeper correction down toward support zones around $535 to $515.
#bStocksonBinance
I'm still holding onto it. Though feeling #BEARISH📉
We note a tight trading range between $574 and $584. Failure to break out above the $589 neckline could risk a deeper correction down toward support zones around $535 to $515.
#bStocksonBinance
I'm still holding onto it. Though feeling #BEARISH📉
1
118
🤖 KIMI: WHERE CAN THE SAFETY BE BYPASSED
FACT
In July 2026, the British company Mindgard discovered a way to bypass the protections of Moonshot’s Kimi K2.6 and K3 Swarm models. After jailbreaking, they started answering prompts that were supposed to be blocked—especially those related to biological weapons and killings.
Mindgard informed Moonshot on July 27. Public material appeared on September 12. Moonshot told the BBC that it is discussing the results with researchers and welcomes independent testing.
MECHANISM
Jailbreaking is not a “trick question,” but an attempt to bypass guardrails—rules that limit a model’s behavior.
The key distinction here is:
“the model doesn’t know” ≠ “the model knows, but is not supposed to reveal it.”
That’s why safety should be viewed as a chain:
MODEL RULES TOOLS ACCESS ACTION CONTROL
CONSEQUENCE
For open-weight models, the problem is more complex: they can be run independently of the developer’s initial environment.
And if an AI agent has access to code, files, a browser, or APIs, the risk shifts from “what will it say?” to “what will it be able to do?”
DVA CONCLUSION
Safe behavior ≠ a safe model.
The key question for the future of AI is:
WHO CONTROLS THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN CAPABILITY AND PERMISSION?
#AI #KimiAI #CyberSecurity #DVA #BTC
🤖 KIMI: WHERE CAN THE SAFETY BE BYPASSED
FACT
In July 2026, the British company Mindgard discovered a way to bypass the protections of Moonshot’s Kimi K2.6 and K3 Swarm models. After jailbreaking, they started answering prompts that were supposed to be blocked—especially those related to biological weapons and killings.
Mindgard informed Moonshot on July 27. Public material appeared on September 12. Moonshot told the BBC that it is discussing the results with researchers and welcomes independent testing.
MECHANISM
Jailbreaking is not a “trick question,” but an attempt to bypass guardrails—rules that limit a model’s behavior.
The key distinction here is:
“the model doesn’t know” ≠ “the model knows, but is not supposed to reveal it.”
That’s why safety should be viewed as a chain:
MODEL RULES TOOLS ACCESS ACTION CONTROL
CONSEQUENCE
For open-weight models, the problem is more complex: they can be run independently of the developer’s initial environment.
And if an AI agent has access to code, files, a browser, or APIs, the risk shifts from “what will it say?” to “what will it be able to do?”
DVA CONCLUSION
Safe behavior ≠ a safe model.
The key question for the future of AI is:
WHO CONTROLS THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN CAPABILITY AND PERMISSION?
#AI #KimiAI #CyberSecurity #DVA #BTC
FACT
In July 2026, the British company Mindgard discovered a way to bypass the protections of Moonshot’s Kimi K2.6 and K3 Swarm models. After jailbreaking, they started answering prompts that were supposed to be blocked—especially those related to biological weapons and killings.
Mindgard informed Moonshot on July 27. Public material appeared on September 12. Moonshot told the BBC that it is discussing the results with researchers and welcomes independent testing.
MECHANISM
Jailbreaking is not a “trick question,” but an attempt to bypass guardrails—rules that limit a model’s behavior.
The key distinction here is:
“the model doesn’t know” ≠ “the model knows, but is not supposed to reveal it.”
That’s why safety should be viewed as a chain:
MODEL RULES TOOLS ACCESS ACTION CONTROL
CONSEQUENCE
For open-weight models, the problem is more complex: they can be run independently of the developer’s initial environment.
And if an AI agent has access to code, files, a browser, or APIs, the risk shifts from “what will it say?” to “what will it be able to do?”
DVA CONCLUSION
Safe behavior ≠ a safe model.
The key question for the future of AI is:
WHO CONTROLS THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN CAPABILITY AND PERMISSION?
#AI #KimiAI #CyberSecurity #DVA #BTC
1
635
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Trending Topics
1
#AmazonPlansToSell$8BNvidiaChips
19 views
10 Discussing
2
#NEARFallsToAround$4.70Down14%
25,003 views
44 Discussing
3
#EthereumFoundationLaunchesZkAPIOnMainnet
17,611 views
301 Discussing
4
#EvernorthPlansNasdaqListingOct8
35,688 views
285 Discussing
5
#SECProposesCryptoCustodyFramework
33,667 views
243 Discussing
6
#IMFApproves$139MDisbursementToElSalvador
23,469 views
18 Discussing
7
#AnthropicTargetsIPOAsSoonAsMidNovember
25,581 views
237 Discussing
8
#EtherGains70.9%InQ3
231,057 views
1,548 Discussing
9
#TreasuryLetsStatesFileStablecoinCertificationsEarly
17,704 views
113 Discussing
10
#US10YearYieldNears5.3%
190,262 views
1,388 Discussing