Binance Square

hacken

16,064 views
34 Discussing
BlockchainBulletin-VlikeVn
ยท
--
Crypto audits create a false sense of security as Q3 losses to hackers reach $1.18 billion, Hacken warns - 77% of Q3 losses were due to compromised suppliers, delayed fixes, or systems outside the latest security review. - Total Q3 losses to hackers reached $1.18 billion. - Hacken warns that crypto audits can give investors a false sense of security. #BinanceSquare #CryptoNews #Hacken #SecurityAudit $btc $eth #vlikevn Titanbot Source: CoinDesk
Crypto audits create a false sense of security as Q3 losses to hackers reach $1.18 billion, Hacken warns

- 77% of Q3 losses were due to compromised suppliers, delayed fixes, or systems outside the latest security review.
- Total Q3 losses to hackers reached $1.18 billion.
- Hacken warns that crypto audits can give investors a false sense of security.
#BinanceSquare #CryptoNews #Hacken #SecurityAudit

$btc $eth

#vlikevn Titanbot

Source: CoinDesk
ยท
--
Bullish
Bluechip has just audited $USDT with Hacken. Result: 3.3/10 on security. CRITICAL. $91B in Tron controlled by only 2 keys. No timelock. No delay. No quantum protection. 2 keys = $91B RISK. Meanwhile, the solution is already LIVE: @NaorisProtocol ๐ŸŸข Sub-Zero Layer LIVE - quantum-secure TODAY ๐ŸŸข Swarm AI: 10k+ nodes validating 24/7 ๐ŸŸข Zero single-point failure USDT 2 KEYS = $91B RISK vs NAORIS QUANTUM-SECURE TRUST LAYER The market hasnโ€™t priced it yet. $22M circulating supply. This is early. DYOR, but Q-Day doesnโ€™t wait until 2029. #Naoris #PQC #USDT #Bluechip #Hacken
Bluechip has just audited $USDT with Hacken.

Result: 3.3/10 on security. CRITICAL.

$91B in Tron controlled by only 2 keys.
No timelock. No delay. No quantum protection.
2 keys = $91B RISK.

Meanwhile, the solution is already LIVE:

@NaorisProtocol
๐ŸŸข Sub-Zero Layer LIVE - quantum-secure TODAY
๐ŸŸข Swarm AI: 10k+ nodes validating 24/7
๐ŸŸข Zero single-point failure

USDT 2 KEYS = $91B RISK
vs
NAORIS QUANTUM-SECURE TRUST LAYER

The market hasnโ€™t priced it yet.
$22M circulating supply. This is early.

DYOR, but Q-Day doesnโ€™t wait until 2029.

#Naoris #PQC #USDT #Bluechip #Hacken
โš ๏ธ Is it safe to hold USDT after the Hacken report? Hacken discovered a potentially serious risk in the USDT management system. On the TRON network, about $91.3 billion USDT are controlled through a 2-of-3 multisig scheme. This means: for administrative actions, any two of the three keys are sufficient. If two keys are compromised, an attacker could potentially: ๐Ÿ”‘ mint new USDT ๐Ÿ”’ freeze addresses โš™๏ธ change contract parameters. And most importantly โ€” there is no built-in timelock or mechanism to cancel such changes. That is, an administrative operation has no mandatory waiting period during which it could be stopped. An additional risk is that part of the keys is reused in other networks. ๐Ÿ“‰ Hacken rated the cybersecurity of USDT only 3.3/10. But an important clarification: there are no signs of a hack at the moment. This is about a detected architectural risk, not about the theft of $91 billion. For me, the main takeaway is: USDT is not just a โ€œdigital dollar.โ€ Behind it is a centralized administration system, and the security of the issuerโ€™s keys is critical. #USDT #Tether #Tron #Hacken #CryptoSecurity
โš ๏ธ Is it safe to hold USDT after the Hacken report?
Hacken discovered a potentially serious risk in the USDT management system. On the TRON network, about $91.3 billion USDT are controlled through a 2-of-3 multisig scheme. This means: for administrative actions, any two of the three keys are sufficient.
If two keys are compromised, an attacker could potentially:
๐Ÿ”‘ mint new USDT
๐Ÿ”’ freeze addresses
โš™๏ธ change contract parameters.
And most importantly โ€” there is no built-in timelock or mechanism to cancel such changes. That is, an administrative operation has no mandatory waiting period during which it could be stopped.
An additional risk is that part of the keys is reused in other networks.
๐Ÿ“‰ Hacken rated the cybersecurity of USDT only 3.3/10. But an important clarification: there are no signs of a hack at the moment. This is about a detected architectural risk, not about the theft of $91 billion. For me, the main takeaway is: USDT is not just a โ€œdigital dollar.โ€ Behind it is a centralized administration system, and the security of the issuerโ€™s keys is critical.

#USDT #Tether #Tron #Hacken #CryptoSecurity
My Spot Portfolio
95 / 300
Minimum 10USDT
7D PNL
(USDT)
-55.51
7D ROI
-8.64%
AUM
$11026.53
Win Rate
26.56%
ยท
--
What if I told you that the fate of $91 billion depends on just two signatures? ๐Ÿคฏ The cybersecurity guys at #Hacken dissected $USDT under a microscope and found a few โ€œinterestingโ€ surprises. Spoiler: thereโ€™s nothing decentralized about it. Hereโ€™s what you should know: ๐Ÿ”ด On TRON, half of all the USDT supply (~$91.3B) runs on it. This is governed by a 2-out-of-3 scheme. Meaning a hacker only needs to steal TWO keys to gain control of this amount. ๐Ÿ”ด Ethereum, Avalanche, and Celo use the same sets of keys (a 3-out-of-6 scheme). Compromising three signers puts multiple networks at once at risk. ๐Ÿ”ด Freezing funds or issuing new tokens can be done instantly. Thereโ€™s no time delay (no timelock) to give you a chance to stop the hack. ๐Ÿ”ด Smart contracts technically donโ€™t restrict issuance. If theyโ€™ve gathered enough signatures for a quorum, tokens can be printed without limitsโ€”without any on-chain checks of the actual dollar reserves. #Tether is convenient and liquid, but itโ€™s a 100% centralized machine that runs on trust in a handful of people. Donโ€™t put all your eggs in one basket! Which stablecoin do you trust most for storing capital: USDT, USDC, or maybe DAI? {future}(ETHUSDT) {future}(SOLUSDT) {future}(TRXUSDT)
What if I told you that the fate of $91 billion depends on just two signatures? ๐Ÿคฏ

The cybersecurity guys at #Hacken dissected $USDT under a microscope and found a few โ€œinterestingโ€ surprises. Spoiler: thereโ€™s nothing decentralized about it.

Hereโ€™s what you should know:
๐Ÿ”ด On TRON, half of all the USDT supply (~$91.3B) runs on it. This is governed by a 2-out-of-3 scheme. Meaning a hacker only needs to steal TWO keys to gain control of this amount.
๐Ÿ”ด Ethereum, Avalanche, and Celo use the same sets of keys (a 3-out-of-6 scheme). Compromising three signers puts multiple networks at once at risk.
๐Ÿ”ด Freezing funds or issuing new tokens can be done instantly. Thereโ€™s no time delay (no timelock) to give you a chance to stop the hack.
๐Ÿ”ด Smart contracts technically donโ€™t restrict issuance. If theyโ€™ve gathered enough signatures for a quorum, tokens can be printed without limitsโ€”without any on-chain checks of the actual dollar reserves.

#Tether is convenient and liquid, but itโ€™s a 100% centralized machine that runs on trust in a handful of people. Donโ€™t put all your eggs in one basket!

Which stablecoin do you trust most for storing capital: USDT, USDC, or maybe DAI?
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
โšก๏ธ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Trusted by the worldโ€™s largest crypto exchange.
๐Ÿ‘ Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number