比特币难民营

$BTC has been thinking about the relationship between Bitcoin and gold recently. Why hasn't Bitcoin become an asset to combat inflation? Let's start with the conclusion: Bitcoin's nature is inherently anti-inflationary; this has always been its intrinsic property and has never changed. So why has it performed so poorly this year? The core reason is that virtual currencies have been taken over by Wall Street. Financial assets controlled by European and American capital are inevitably influenced by the tides of the dollar. This is why the cryptocurrency market has increasingly become strongly correlated with the US stock market. Currently, it seems that the same group of people is manipulating both the US stock market and the cryptocurrency market.
What would allow the cryptocurrency market to develop its own trends, even surpassing gold? We can only glimpse the future through history, and gold is the best analytical target. The fact that gold can currently break free from the dollar's tides is due to multiple forces competing for the asset, rather than simple control by Wall Street. They all once wanted to use gold to back their own currencies. After achieving their goals, they attempted to sever ties with gold to control this market, thereby impacting gold's market. However, the ultimate result was their failure. They sold gold at high levels during the 1970s, which only had a temporary impact on gold's market. Ultimately, gold still demonstrated its original anti-inflationary properties. Consequently, Wall Street lost control over gold.
Therefore, they are now laying out the next asset to back their currencies. But can this asset support the qualifications for such backing? There are not many assets left that can resist inflation and have strong consensus. Stocks, gold, and Bitcoin are certainly core anti-inflationary assets.

$NB This robot is amazing, reverse order clamping 7u

#plasma $XPL
The project party with such a grand vision for the airdrop made me follow suit, only to hit me with a blow to the head. I can't understand what this is all about? Is there still value investing in the crypto world? Should we give a little breathing room to conscientious project parties? This ecological coin I can't hold onto, yet selling it feels like missing out on the future. Where is the next opportunity for sudden wealth in the crypto world?

@Plasma

Looking back at the development trajectory of Morpho, I believe it represents a new way of thinking in DeFi—not solving old problems through 'disruption,' but extending the system's lifespan through 'refinement.' It has not chosen to burn money, engage in airdrops, or marketing wars; instead, it has won a good reputation through mechanism improvements and structural optimizations. In an industry filled with restlessness and short-term stimuli, this 'slow logic' has become a rare quality. Perhaps this is Morpho's true advantage. It has not loudly proclaimed its intention to change the world, yet it has silently changed the underlying logic of DeFi lending. It has made capital flow more efficiently, risk allocation more precise, and has prompted developers to rethink what a 'lending protocol' should look like. I have always believed that in the crypto world, the deepest moat is not code, nor capital, but the trust and order that time accumulates. Morpho is accumulating this long-term trust in a low-key yet continuous manner. Perhaps this is its most unique strength: not chasing trends, not spinning myths, but focusing solely on making the system better, more stable, and more enduring. @Morpho Labs 🦋 #Morpho $MORPHO

#linea $LINEA
I have held Linea for a month, and the result has been a complete loss. Considering it is developed by the same team as Metamask, and they are also actively expanding application scenarios. It can still be worth considering to try it out, after all, interacting with Metamask on the Linea chain has a 2x bonus. Overall, I wouldn't trade just to earn points. I’m just moving some of the trades from the exchange to the chain. If there are gains, that’s great; if not, there won’t be much loss.


@Linea.eth

$BTC Does everyone have this feeling? The cryptocurrency market seems to be a leading indicator of the economy?

$AT
Share some recent experiences in grabbing alpha.
First, we need to analyze Binance's goals and policy direction.
In summary: grab people, grab funds, grab projects.
Airdrop direction should lean towards new users, controlling the overall earnings of old users and compliant multi-account players, which is basically the whitelist mechanism.
First, let's talk about grabbing people.
Although many studios have joined, it is undeniable that a significant number of genuine new users have indeed increased. This is why we see the current phenomenon of difficulty in grabbing. The rules of alpha are clear, obviously designed to cater to new or small capital users. However, the number of airdrop shares is limited, and to enhance the experience for newcomers, we cannot distribute too little. Therefore, studios must firmly crack down on this, and the airdrop quantity for old players must also be controlled. Maintaining old users is one of their objectives, so they need to control the direction of airdrops. First come, first served is a relatively good solution. Occasionally allow old users to grab some, but not to the point of starving them. This way, we can prevent the loss of old users while benefiting newcomers.
Grabbing funds.
This is the core reason for exchanges to maintain old users. Funds on Binance have good liquidity, and on the other hand, having funds naturally leads to trading, thus providing depth in orders.
Grabbing projects.
With users and funds, there will naturally be no shortage of project parties. Moreover, it is necessary for the project parties to be able to make money; otherwise, who would come to Binance for benefits?
Understanding Binance's goals makes it easy to speculate on their next actions.
1. Raising the threshold for balances is not possible.
2. Cracking down on studios and technology is necessary.
3. With conclusive evidence, recovering earnings is also inevitable.



Whether the current alpha can be sustained depends on whether there is a continuous influx of funds as fertilizer, including funds from project parties and new users; otherwise, this game will come to a sudden stop. It will revert to staking as required and trading competitions as usual, which is the norm.
Currently, the priority is to ensure not to leave the table, maintain a certain score, and see what Binance's next policy will be. After all, old users are also something they must maintain. Generally, Big Brother won't let old players suffer losses; at most, the earnings may not be as high as before. Especially for compliant multi-account players, if earnings continue to decline, it won't be too late to consider shifting. The only advantage old players have is funds and information asymmetry; if Binance doesn't distribute, they can go somewhere else to make money.

aop has刷了144万，really不想停。
大概算一下，today新增实刷6.5w，磨损大概12u，还有8天时间，就算每天不再新增加，8天后也是96u。抛去前面的沉没成本，结果也是反撸。并且越到后面不增加是不可能的，因此成本更高。
再计算积分成本，按我正常16+3来计算，8天增加的积分16，散户抢不到的概率大，只能领一段或者TGE，所按空投价值50u来计算，大概是保本。万一行情不好或者空投价值30u或者被插针，或者后面大家都加大交易量，大概率还得亏本。风险太大了，再刷aop下去没意义，还不如暂时观望一下，先维持刷低保。看币安新政策怎么处理。$AOP

Can Binance's self-packaged beth also be liquidated? My 50% staking rate can also be forcibly closed. How can users still trust this?

Chicken Brother is impressive, one of the few reliable experts in the crypto world

#BNB创新高
Can BNB really leave the Binance exchange platform?

With BNB hitting new highs, someone has to talk about the risks. Since the beginning of this year, Big Brother has been emphasizing that Binance and BNB are two independent platforms. I don't know why Big Brother keeps highlighting this matter every time. Recently, it was emphasized again that the use of BNB for transaction fees on the Binance exchange is just one use case of BNB. Is the recent popularity of BSC due to its own merits? Do users and project parties really value BSC or Binance exchange? For the past few months, the funding for each alpha airdrop has been in the tens of millions. Although on one hand it's sponsored by project parties, is there Binance behind the scenes pushing it? So whether alpha can continue, users actually have no confidence in their hearts. But none of this is important.
What matters is:
With such a clear division between BNB and Binance, is it to prepare for pushing Binance to Nasdaq in the future? The future listing of Binance is highly probable, but how to handle the users holding BNB? Because of this, even if BNB skyrockets, I dare not take a heavy position.

$BNB

Is this thing being shipped? $ASTER

It is explained that there are very few people who actually take advantage of the situation, as long as the project party does not add robots to inflate the numbers.

Is there a DingTalk or WeChat group notification?

$SOMI #Somnia
Originally wanted to strive for a 200% investment return, but luckily I did a hedge. I want his interest, while others want your principal. I can never control my hands, and in the end, I still closed all positions, and won't engage in such high-risk operations anymore.
Today is a day of oscillation and pullback, but overall still bullish in the long term ᜊ•ᴗ•ᜊ I personally believe that the range of 1.140 - 1.550 USD will become the key battlefield determining the future trend of SOMI.

How will this thrilling long-short game end? Can SOMI rebound from the current price level and continue the previous upward momentum? Or will it continue to decline, opening up a deeper adjustment? The market is holding its breath, and every investor is closely watching this "peak showdown" in the cryptocurrency field.
$SOMI
@Somnia_Network

Can't grab it even if I ask the kids for help, let alone middle-aged people. Binance doesn't care about those who violate the rules.

bnb

bnb

eth

The airdrop collection time has been changed to random, within a random time of 1 to 2 minutes. This way, bots can only slow down. If a bot requests too frequently, it is highly likely to be a bot, and it will be blacklisted directly. This way, bots can only initiate requests at human speed, and with the collection time being random, bots can only make random requests at human speed. At least people can run on the same starting line as bots. As for catching bots, that will be very difficult; we can only solve the problem of humans not being able to compete with bots first.