牛佰腩

On October 1, I specifically took a screenshot of UniHexa. At the time, the 24-hour trading volume across its four trading pairs totaled just 0.0538 BTC, or about $4.49K.
I checked again today, and the total volume had reached 0.1614 BTC, or about $13.12K—nearly three times the October 1 figure.
Looking at the pairs individually, several have grown:
ORDI rose from 0.0312 BTC to 0.0994 BTC;
DOG rose from 0.0112 BTC to 0.0288 BTC;
UNCOMMON rose from 0.0114 BTC to 0.0255 BTC;
MIM also went from zero volume that day to 0.0077 BTC.
So this growth isn't all due to a sudden surge in trading for a single coin. Trading activity has started picking up across several pairs, and that's worth recognizing.
That said, $13K in daily trading volume is still very low for an exchange, and ORDI alone accounts for more than 60% of it. The order book depth, active user base, and market-making support are still a long way from making the platform truly lively.
There could be many reasons. The Bitcoin ecosystem has been pretty quiet lately, UniHexa is still in Beta, and there aren't many trading pairs. Plenty of people may not even know how to get started trading on it. The product is up and running, but user habits and liquidity will take time to build.
These two screenshots only show that things are better today than on October 1; they don't yet prove that trading volume is growing consistently.
My view of UniHexa hasn't changed: it has a direction, and the product is making progress, but right now what it needs most is people and volume.
The cold-start phase is always the hardest. $BTC $ORDI

Utexo brought Viktor and Lorenzo together this time to talk about what will change when USDT returns to Bitcoin.
When I saw Lorenzo, my first thought was still UniSat.
UniSat has already laid the groundwork with a wallet, a marketplace, and UniHexa—basically all the entry points for Bitcoin-native assets are in place. What’s missing most now is stablecoin liquidity that people are willing to keep trading with over the long term.
If USDT can be transferred directly within Bitcoin wallets and traded seamlessly with assets like BTC, Runes, and BRC-20 tokens, the entry points UniSat has built become all the more promising.
Neither side has announced a partnership so far, so this was just a conversation.
Still, it’s interesting in itself to see people working on USDT on Bitcoin sit down with people building entry points for Bitcoin assets.
#Bitcoin #USDT #Utexo #UniSat $BTC

Honestly, after spending so long in the BTC ecosystem, what bugs me most is having to hunt all over the place for ways to access different projects. Sometimes just finding the official website takes forever.

I checked out UniSat’s DApp Center update this time, and it seems pretty useful.

Some projects on Bitcoin and Fractal are now right in the wallet, covering trading, NFTs, staking, and games. You can use it on both mobile and the browser extension.

I used to think UniSat was just for storing coins and buying inscriptions, but now it’s clear they’re aiming to do a lot more.

And I’ve always felt that if the BTC ecosystem really takes off, the tools people use every day may be the first to benefit.

The market can be cold, but I’m still willing to take a closer look at projects that are actually getting things done. $BTC

I’ve been keeping a close eye on UniHexa and remain bullish on it.
It’s not just talk—the platform already lets users trade Bitcoin-native assets like BRC20 and Runes, with non-custodial trading and on-chain settlement. It’s also backed by UniSat’s existing user base and asset gateway.
The Week 4 campaign has also launched today: 120 FB per address, with 40 spots available each day.
What the Bitcoin ecosystem needs right now isn’t another new protocol—it needs a trading gateway that can keep users and liquidity. I think UniHexa is on the right track.
#UniHexa #Bitcoin #BRC20 $BTC $ORDI

More details about UniHexa Week 4 will be announced soon. Stay tuned. I just love this kind of quick and easy airdrop farming. $BTC #BRC20

Keep an eye on @Uni_Hexa on Twitter. As soon as the whitelist opens, submit your BTC address and wait for a spot.
Once you get a spot, complete the tasks: make $5 in purchases, join Discord, post a tweet, and submit it. If approved, you’ll get 120 FB, worth about $50 at the current price.
The requirements aren’t high, and it doesn’t cost anything, so why not go for a spot like this?
Yesterday’s round of 10 spots has already ended. Keep watching for new ones. #BRC20 $BTC

I finished watching this one from Utexo.
On October 14, @utexocom will talk with @unisat_wallet’s founder @lorenzonical about UniSat supporting USDT.
What’s been confirmed is that UniSat will integrate the RGB version of USDT. It plans to support sending, receiving, and exchanging, but they haven’t said which day it will go live yet—I’m personally inclined to think this will work out.
RGB has been discussed for many years; what it’s lacking is a wallet entry point with real users’ funds. UniSat already has a lot of BRC20, Runes, and Ordinals users. If USDT can truly go directly into a wallet, then in the Bitcoin ecosystem, trading finally won’t require everything to be routed back through exchanges, and liquidity should be a bit easier to manage.
But RGB isn’t about stuffing every transaction entirely into the Bitcoin mainnet. Utexo’s cross-chain solution also involves bridges and TEE. Security, auditing, deposit/withdrawal speed, and liquidity all need to be verified after things go live.
Once UniSat really can be funded, can withdraw, and can trade, then we can see whether this line has substance.
#bitcoin #USDT #UniSat $USDT

Abstract has announced its shutdown. Seeing so many people in the comments saying they farmed dozens of accounts and spent thousands of U, only to end up with this result, is genuinely upsetting.

I’m increasingly convinced that you really don’t need to keep gambling on the future when farming airdrops.

Compared with farming points and waiting for a TGE, I much prefer an instant-reward model like UniHexa’s.

Complete the tasks, pass the review, and you can claim FB rewards the next day—no need to wait months or even years for an uncertain outcome.

Sometimes, what you lose in crypto isn’t money, but the time you spend earnestly sticking with a project. $ORDI
#unihexa

Previously, trading inscriptions and runes was essentially more like listing NFTs for sale.

The advantage was simplicity. You set a price, and if someone was interested, they bought the whole listing. The logic was straightforward. Trades were generally one-to-one, with a relatively short process.

But the downside was obvious: it wasn’t very flexible.

Changing the price or canceling an order often meant going through the process again, and might even mean paying another miner fee. It was also hard to split quantities. For example, if you listed 100 and someone only wanted to buy 30, the order couldn’t be filled. When there weren’t many people in the market, you could only leave your listing up and wait.

A model like UniHexa is more like an order book on an exchange.

The advantage is that orders can queue and be filled in parts. The highest buy price gets matched first, and the lowest sell price gets matched first. At the same price, orders are matched in the order they were placed.

If you list 100 and someone only wants to buy 30, those 30 can be filled directly—you don’t have to buy the whole listing.

You can also adjust your price in the order book without putting every change on-chain. Only after a buyer and seller are successfully matched does settlement take place on Bitcoin.

Put simply:

The old model was more like “list an item and wait for someone to buy the whole thing.”

UniHexa is more like “turn Bitcoin asset trading into a true order book.”$ORDI #币安推出BinanceIntelligence

UniHexa is already live with rune #0.
Previously, many Runes were often scattered with separate orders, making buying and selling more complicated. Now that UniHexa has arrived, at least there’s an order book and a single consolidated liquidity entry point.
#bitcoin

Some CEX has shut down BRC-20 withdrawals again.

Retail traders don’t care how beautifully your announcement is worded. If the coins are in the account but you can’t withdraw them, then having them is no different from having none.

Everyone normally buys and sells on the CEX ledger. But the moment it’s time to actually withdraw, they flip the switch—everyone suddenly becomes obedient.

So I’m increasingly feeling like UniHexa is the right path.

BRC-20 and Runes were originally things on Bitcoin—why should the price be controlled day after day by what CEXs say?

If it’s your own coin, you still need your own venue.$ORDI

UniHexa and BISDEX are both talking about BRC20 liquidity, but they are not at the same stage right now.
UniHexa is backed by the Unisat ecosystem. It has already integrated assets such as BRC20 and Runes, and the product is live. Whether Taproot, multisig accounts, and off-chain order matching are actually effective—users can experience and verify it now.
BISDEX has not officially launched yet. Its BRC2.0, AMM, Token-to-Token trading, and the parameter of 40,000 operations per block mainly come from the official proposals and specifications. More directly, it is still in the “slide-deck (PPT) stage”—it has not yet been tested against real capital, trading peaks, and user exits.
Also, 40,000 operations per block is a parameter for the BRC2.0 execution module and cannot be equated with Bitcoin mainnet TPS. Indexing status, contract safety, liquidity depth, and the exit experience all need to be evaluated after launch.
So, at this stage, I’m more optimistic about UniHexa. One is already running, has user entry points, and a foundation of multi-protocol assets; the other has not entered the real market yet. BISDEX is worth keeping an eye on, but treating it as a peer-level competitor to UniHexa is still too early.
#bitcoin #BRC20 #runes #比特币生态

Honestly, what BRC-20 lacks was never just issuing a brand-new coin.
The coins are on-chain, and trading can only be done by posting long-term orders on chain and on a small number of CEXs. If you want to hold the coins yourself and execute trades, then either the price spread is huge, or you can’t even find a counterparty. With holders but no one can repeatedly enter and exit orders on the order book.
What UniHexa is doing now is basically this layer: posting orders on the order book, with the funds still in addresses derived from its own wallet; the final settlement happens on Bitcoin.
It’s still early, and the depth isn’t deep yet—don’t expect it to instantly revive the entire BRC-20 market. But at least it provides these coins a place where, under self-custody, you can post orders, execute trades, and withdraw. This market layer—there really wasn’t one before.$BTC #unihexa

UniHexa currently has too few coins that can be traded, which feels a bit stifling. Other coins want to go live, and holders also want a place to trade—this demand has always been there.
But putting all coins together in the main market might make things worse.
The order book is not deep to begin with. If there are more coins, capital and buy/sell orders will be further fragmented. In the end, you might see dozens of trading pairs, with only two or three orders in each order book: you want to buy but can’t, and you want to sell but nobody is there to take it.
I think it could be split into two sets of markets.
The main market would continue to be filtered by the official team, focusing on making the order books deeper. Only assets that continuously have trades, reasonable spreads, and reach a certain depth on both sides—buy and sell orders—can enter the main board.
The community market can open self-service listing. Both project teams and holders can apply, but by default it won’t appear on the homepage and won’t participate in reward activities in the main market. The page should clearly label that it’s a community market and provide a risk level, so users don’t mistake it for official endorsement.
Self-service listing should also have a cost.
Applicants must provide both buy and sell orders at the same time to lock in the minimum liquidity, and maintain it for a period of time. Listing a few “air” orders far away from the market price, or withdrawing the orders immediately after listing, cannot be considered an effective order book.
For a community market asset to enter the main market, you can check order book depth, buy-sell spread, trade frequency, and the number of independent traders.
This would be much clearer.
The main board is responsible for quality—users who enter can immediately see a relatively normal buy/sell book. The community board provides flexibility, giving more Bitcoin assets a trading entry point first.
What UniHexa lacks most right now is tradability.
If users can buy and also sell smoothly, increasing the number of trading pairs makes sense. Simply increasing the number of listed coins may make the page busier, but liquidity could end up being worse.
#unihexa #UniSat #BRC20

UniHexa brings a qualitative change, changing the way Bitcoin native assets are traded.
In the past, trading BRC-20 and Runes was quite fragmented in the market. Many coins looked like they had decent market caps, but when people actually wanted to buy or sell, there weren’t many orders on the order book.
UniHexa connects assets from different protocols into the same order book. Users set their own prices, the system completes the matching, and settlement is then done via Bitcoin. The operation is closer to how we use exchanges every day, and users also retain the ability to transfer out the assets.
If this model works, Bitcoin native assets can move from scattered limit orders toward more continuous trading over time. It also makes it easier for the project team to provide market making, while retail users can directly see the buy side, sell side, and order book depth.
This is important for the Bitcoin trading sector.
At present, UniHexa has fewer trading pairs, and the order books aren’t deep enough yet. BRC-20 is still waiting for official integration. The product framework is already in place, but whether it can form a real market still depends on proving trading volume and liquidity.
So my current assessment of UniHexa is simple:
It has already set the direction for a qualitative change in the trading sector—the result hasn’t appeared yet.
When more assets get integrated, and users are willing to trade long-term, leaving trading volume even without activity rewards, that’s when we can talk about a qualitative change with more confidence.
#unihexa #UniSat #bitcoin #BRC20