I have been in the cryptocurrency industry for 7 years, focusing on trading BTC, ETH, BNB, SOL, and stablecoins, dedicated to providing clients with high-quality investment opportunities. With precise market analysis and strict risk control, my trading services have achieved a 44% return over the past 90 days. Join now and start your journey to wealth enhancement! #带单大神
One of the biggest issues with TON right now is that the issuance and burning aren’t aligned. After the staking mechanism update, yields are up, and the minting speed of TON has surged as well. Before, there were tens of thousands added daily, but now it could be hundreds of thousands a day. But what about the burn? Currently, it mainly relies on 50% of trading fees being burned. The issue is that TON's trading volume isn't that high, and if fees continue to drop, the burn rate will only decrease. So I’ve seen some folks hoping Telegram will buy back and burn TON. But to be honest, I really don’t think Telegram is going to throw cash into the market for buybacks.
At 3 AM, we saw a sharp rebound, with prices climbing back above water, indicating that the market isn't ready to break down just yet.
Next, we're likely looking at more sideways action.
Expect spikes, liquidations, and both long and short traps—likely all of them.
The real grind of a bear market isn't just the one-way descent, but the constant back-and-forth that keeps those trying to profit from a singular direction getting rekt.
Personally, I don’t think this is the bottom.
However, the market consensus of 35K may not necessarily be the actual bottom either.
Right now, the key isn't to guess the lowest point, but to manage your positions well and stick to your trading discipline. $BTC
Little Black says: HYPE target price is $150, NEAR has 20x upside potential in the coming year, ZEC's long-term target price should be "10% of Bitcoin's price."
Once the retail traders are in, he cashes out completely! $HYPE $NEAR $ZEC
I spent an afternoon pulling up the timeline of Old Black's recent moves. A bit of dark humor.
On May 22, HYPE+ ZWC+ NEAR = Holy Trinity. On May 30, HYPE called to $150. On June 1, went bullish on WLD = $10. On June 4, liquidated HYPE+ NEAR. On June 5, liquidated ZEC. On June 6, liquidated WLD.
In three days, cleared four coins.
What does that mean? From "the strongest combo" to "I'm out," it only took 13 days.
I specifically flipped through his previous records. In August 2025, sold 2373 ETH into stablecoins while clearing ENA+ ethereum:0x6982508145454ce325ddbe47a25d4ec3d2311933, totaling over $13 million, reason: macro concerns.
Then quickly buy back ETH. From September to November, multiple dumps of HYPE. In November, liquidated $MON with the caption "Send this dogshit to ZERO!"
This pattern is too stable. To put it simply:
Big narrative builds faith → meme + price target triggers FOMO → transparent holdings make you feel safe to follow → macro/event hits and immediately "I'm out."
Retail traders following along are still pondering what "long-term still looks good" means, while Old Black has already locked in profits.
He says long-term still looks good.
Do you believe it?
His reasons are always quite reasonable—macro shifts, energy prices, AI regulations, project exploits. But there's a detail: the time window between his calls and liquidations is basically not enough for retail traders to build a complete logical framework.
Old Black is not a scammer. Perpetual swap was designed by him, BitMEX was built by him. But his tweets are not research; they are performance. A performance for the retail traders willing to be an audience.
Sigh. The KOLs in crypto and retail traders are like the casino and the gamblers. The casino won’t thank the gamblers; it will just squeeze the value of the information gap.
Old Black is just writing this truth on-chain. So basically, whatever Old Black calls is likely to peak short-term, and it’s about to end.
Let’s break down May’s data with four key charts: - @Solana apps generated $68 million in revenue in May, marking a 16% month-over-month increase.
- NFT trading and the Gacha platform @collectorcrypt hit a monthly revenue of $9 million, setting a new all-time high.
- Tokenized asset trading volume soared past $1.1 billion in May, hitting another historic peak. The majority of this volume came from tokenized stocks.
- The supply of stablecoins grew by 2% month-over-month in May. Since its launch in mid-May, @Ethena's USDe supply has surged to over $500 million.
This coin's clueless whale is stuck, realizing there's no one to take the bag, while a bunch of people are selling. Just gotta keep pumping with no volume to see if any suckers bite.🤣 #币安人生
Found some evidence suggesting MSTR dumped a ton of BTC last week:
https://arkm.com/explorer/entity/fidelity-custody
This is Fidelity's custody address, with major clients being MSTR and their own BTC ETF, FBTC.
From May 28 to June 1, the amount of BTC held in custody dropped by 46,000, but their ETF saw a massive redemption of 1,000 BTC during that time.
So, an additional 45,000 BTC got moved out. If these BTC are being sold using TWAP over the five trading days this week, the average price should be around 66k, totaling a cash-out of 3 billion USD. Plus, with MSTR's remaining 900 million USD, they could bump the STRC dividend coverage period up to a solid 2 years. $BTC
The market's been really rough lately; I bet a ton of capital is just waiting for the space write-ups on OpenAI and Anthropic to drop, huh? $BTC #纳指跌4.18%创逾一年最大单日跌幅
Silicon Valley big shots are calling it: $ZEC is the insurance for Bitcoin, it once skyrocketed to become the shining star of the crypto space.
Today, it absurdly crashed; a project claiming to be Bitcoin insurance may have been extensively inflated over the past four years—without any algorithm to verify if or how much inflation occurred, it can't even protect itself.
This can be considered the major blowout event of this round, $LUNA . What’s puzzling is why the bear market has two identical candlesticks? $LUNA
ZEC's volatility today is driven by some pretty sensitive news.
The founder of Zcash has confirmed that there was a serious vulnerability in ZEC's privacy system, theoretically allowing attackers to create additional ZEC. And because of the privacy mechanisms in place, even if it did happen, it would be tough to track and verify.
What's more critical is that this vulnerability has been around since May 2022 and only got patched on June 1 of this year. So, whether it was exploited during that time remains a mystery.
ZEC has always been labeled as the "privacy version of Bitcoin," with its core selling points being privacy and scarcity. But this incident has sparked a market discussion:
If an asset's supply could potentially be quietly manipulated, and it can't be fully verified on-chain, can its "scarcity faith" still hold?
In the short term, the news itself is enough to trigger emotional swings; in the long term, ZEC needs to provide the market with more transparency, or regaining trust could be tougher than the technical fixes. $ZEC zec you silly d