HishamOn Crypto

Crypto isn’t a game — and recent events are a harsh reminder.
Reports are circulating that well-known Ukrainian crypto investor Konstantin Galish (Kudo) has passed away. Many sources claim he allegedly lost around $30 million of investor funds during the recent market crash — funds entrusted to him by others.
While all the facts are still not confirmed, one thing is crystal clear:
In crypto, if you don’t understand risk management, even your profits can become a burden.
Too many people get into futures trading driven by greed. But in that world, one mistake can wipe out everything — no matter how experienced you are. A major market dump can erase months or even years of gains in a single moment.
On the other hand, spot trading is a different game. With time, knowledge, and patience, you can recover from losses. It works more like a real business — the more experienced you become, the higher your chances of long-term success.
So here’s the takeaway:
Don’t fall for the trap of quick profits in futures.
Learn, grow, and build step by step through spot trading.
Because in crypto:
Slow is smooth. Smooth is profit. 🚀
🟢 Trade smart. Stay safe. Respect the market.
$XRP

Kite is built for a future where AI agents are not passive tools, but active participants in the digital economy. While most blockchains are designed around slow, human-driven interactions, Kite is optimized for speed, automation, and nonstop execution. Its architecture supports systems that think, act, and interact on-chain continuously—making the network feel dynamic rather than static.

At the heart of Kite is a clear separation between control and autonomy. Users can deploy AI agents that operate independently, but always within defined boundaries. By separating human identity, agent identity, and temporary session access, Kite ensures security without sacrificing flexibility. Automation is trusted, but ownership and authority never leave the user.

For developers, Kite removes friction instead of adding complexity. Full EVM compatibility allows builders to use familiar tools and workflows while benefiting from a faster, more responsive underlying system. This makes Kite especially attractive for applications centered on AI, trading, automation, and intelligent services that require real-time execution.

As AI expands deeper into finance, gaming, and data-driven systems, Kite is positioning itself as the foundational layer that can support this shift. It isn’t chasing trends or short-term hype. Instead, Kite is quietly engineering infrastructure for a world where machines operate around the clock, economies run autonomously, and blockchains must perform at machine speed.

Kite isn’t promising the future—it’s preparing for it.

#KITE @KITE AI $KITE

At first glance, Bitcoin’s price action looks uninspiring. Over the past 24 hours, BTC is down just 0.2%, and on a weekly timeframe, it’s barely up around 0.7%. The market feels stagnant, and many traders are labeling this phase as simple range-bound movement.
But that surface-level view misses what’s actually happening underneath. Momentum is quietly improving, selling pressure is weakening, and large holders are steadily positioning. These signals help explain why bullish Bitcoin price forecasts—like those from Tom Lee—remain intact even without a clear breakout.
---
1. Momentum and Volume Are Improving Beneath the Surface
On the daily chart, Bitcoin continues to defend the $90,100 level. This zone has acted as a solid base, preventing deeper pullbacks despite the lack of upward momentum.
A key early signal comes from On-Balance Volume (OBV), an indicator that tracks whether volume is flowing into or out of an asset.
Between December 9 and December 11, Bitcoin formed a lower high in price, while OBV printed a higher high. This divergence suggests that even as price struggled, buying activity increased behind the scenes.
The signal strengthened further between December 10 and December 12. During this period, Bitcoin made a lower low, yet OBV formed a higher low. In simple terms, sellers pushed price down, but with noticeably weaker volume support.
Taken together, these OBV divergences indicate fading selling pressure rather than growing weakness. While this does not guarantee a breakout, it often appears before one.
---
2. Holders and Whales Are Accumulating During Consolidation
Technical signals alone aren’t enough—on-chain data confirms the trend.
Holder Net Position Change shows whether long-term investors are accumulating or distributing Bitcoin. Negative values indicate selling, while smaller negatives suggest selling pressure is easing.
On December 10, long-term holders were distributing roughly 155,999 BTC. By December 13, that figure dropped to around 150,614 BTC—a reduction of about 3.4% in selling pressure.
This isn’t explosive accumulation, but it’s important. Bitcoin is not experiencing panic selling while trading sideways. Instead, selling activity is slowing, a pattern typically seen during consolidation phases rather than breakdowns.
The strongest signal comes from whales. The number of entities holding at least 1,000 BTC is near a six-month high. Since late October, Bitcoin’s price has corrected and moved sideways—but during the same period, whale addresses continued to accumulate.
That divergence matters. Large holders don’t accumulate aggressively without conviction. This behavior supports why bullish projections from analysts like Tom Lee haven’t faded.
---
3. Key Bitcoin Levels That Will Confirm—or Kill—the Bullish Case
For these signals to turn into real upside, price confirmation is essential.
The most important resistance is $94,600. A daily close above this level—roughly a 5% move from current prices—would break the upper boundary of the current compression range and signal that buyers have regained short-term control.
If $94,600 is cleared, the next resistance sits near $99,800. A sustained move above that zone could open the path toward $107,500, assuming broader market conditions cooperate. That would be the first meaningful step toward more aggressive long-term targets like Tom Lee’s $180,000 outlook.
On the downside, losing $90,000 would weaken the bullish structure. Support lies near $89,200, followed by $87,500. A breakdown below these levels would invalidate the bullish setup—at least in the short term.
$BTC

Ethereum’s Prysm consensus client revealed that validators lost 382 ETH—worth over $1 million—due to a software bug that disrupted the network shortly after the Fusaka upgrade.

The issue, detailed in a post-mortem titled “Fusaka Mainnet Prysm Incident,” was caused by a resource exhaustion event affecting nearly all Prysm nodes, resulting in missed blocks and attestations.

What Triggered the Prysm Outage?

Offchain Labs, the team behind Prysm, reported that the problem began on December 4 when a previously introduced bug delayed validator requests. These delays caused blocks and attestations to be missed across the Ethereum network.

“Prysm beacon nodes received attestations from nodes that were potentially out of sync with the network. These attestations referenced a block root from the previous epoch,” the team explained.

The outage caused 41 missed epochs and 248 blocks lost out of 1,344 available slots, translating to an 18.5% missed slot rate and a drop in overall network participation to 75% during the incident.

Offchain Labs noted that the bug had been introduced and deployed to testnets roughly a month prior, only to be triggered on mainnet following the Fusaka upgrade. A temporary fix mitigated immediate effects, and the team has since made permanent changes to attestation validation logic to prevent recurrence.

Ethereum’s Client Concentration Under the Spotlight

The outage has renewed concerns about Ethereum’s client concentration and the risks of software monocultures.

Offchain Labs warned that if Prysm controlled a larger portion of Ethereum validators, the consequences could have been far more severe. “A client holding more than one-third of the network could cause a temporary loss of finality and additional missed blocks. If a single client controlled over two-thirds, it could finalize an invalid chain,” the firm stated.

Despite these risks, Ethereum’s client diversity helped contain the issue. According to Miga Labs, Lighthouse remains the largest Ethereum consensus client with 51.39% of validators. Prysm holds 19.06%, followed by Teku at 13.71% and Nimbus at 9.25%. Lighthouse’s dominance is roughly 15 percentage points below what some researchers consider a systemic risk threshold.

Following the incident, developers and ecosystem participants have renewed calls for validators to consider using alternative clients to minimize the risk that a single software flaw could disrupt Ethereum’s core operations.
$ETH #ETH

Let’s cut through the hype: Shiba Inu isn’t dead, but it’s hanging by a thread. Here’s what the on-chain data actually says.

---

Meme Coin Weakness Is Real

Meme coin dominance is at early-2024 lows.

SHIB price has struggled under long-term resistance.

Smart money wallets have steadily reduced exposure.

Translation: professional traders are not betting on a fast rebound. Speculative pumps are over—at least for now.

---

Whales and Holders Are Quietly Accumulating

Holder count has grown from ~1.46M → 1.54M this year.

Whale balances up ~249%; mega-whales up ~28.5%.

Exchange balances down ~22%, reducing immediate selling pressure.

This isn’t panic—it’s slow, deliberate accumulation. The whales are quietly stacking while retail excitement has faded.

---

Price Structure: Weak but Not Hopeless

SHIB is in a long-term falling wedge, often a bullish reversal pattern.

RSI bullish divergence emerged Dec 3–12: lower lows in price vs higher lows in momentum.

Key resistance: $0.0000092 → breakout needed to revive bullish claims.

Downside risk: below $0.0000075 → reversal setup fails.

Bottom line: it’s fragile. The price can stay flat or drift lower until whales push enough to break the wedge.

---

Traders vs Long-Term Holders

Derivatives traders remain cautious; leverage is light.

Whales and holders are building positions quietly.

This split tells you something critical: SHIB’s near-term volatility is low, but long-term survival is supported by strong hands.

---

Conclusion

Shiba Inu is not dead, but it’s not thriving either. Expect slow accumulation and sideways price action unless a broader altcoin rally occurs. Quick gains are unlikely, and retail hype won’t return without a catalyst.

TL;DR: Survival mode. Not hype, not death—just quietly waiting for a reason to move.

$SHIB

Let’s look at the data.
Last 7 days:
Ethereum
- ETFs bought 67,532 ETH
- Network issued 18,577 ETH
- ETFs bought 363.5% of weekly issuance
Bitcoin
- ETFs bought 3,170 BTC
- Network issued 3,150 BTC
- ETFs bought 100.6% of new supply
So in both cases, ETF demand is matching or exceeding new supply.
Yet prices have not moved much.
When price does not react even after supply is absorbed, it usually means:
- Some holders are still selling
- Coins are moving from weak hands to stronger hands
This is not a demand problem.
Demand is already higher than new supply, but price is lagging.
Now look at the size of these flows:
- Ethereum ETFs bought roughly $208M worth of ETH
- Bitcoin ETFs bought around $286M worth of BTC
That’s a large amount of capital being absorbed without a major price reaction.
In past cycles, this phase did not last very long.
First flows showed up and then prices follower later.

Don’t Miss $ETH & $SOL

Plasma isn’t trying to be a jack-of-all-trades blockchain—it’s laser-focused on one thing: making stablecoin payments fast, cheap, and reliable at scale. While most chains chase DeFi hype, NFTs, or speculative activity, Plasma targets the quiet, massive demand that actually moves billions every day.
---
Speed and Throughput
Stablecoin payments are frequent, repetitive, and low-value—but extremely sensitive to delays and fees. Plasma treats them as a first-class priority: high transaction volumes, sub-second finality, near-instant settlement. This isn’t “crypto fast”; this is payment-system fast, which is what everyday users expect from digital dollars.
---
Gas-Free Simplicity
No more juggling volatile native tokens just to move stablecoins. Plasma introduces stablecoin-native fees and protocol-level sponsorship. Users can send money without holding XPL tokens for gas. For most transfers, fees are effectively zero. This aligns crypto payments with real-world expectations: sending money should be effortless.
---
Security Anchored to Bitcoin
Plasma isn’t cutting corners on trust. Its validators secure the chain, but checkpoints are periodically anchored to Bitcoin, giving an extra layer of immutability. Fast and cheap is nothing without finality, and Plasma understands that.
---
Liquidity That Matters
From the start, Plasma attracted significant stablecoin capital. This concentration of liquidity makes it a natural hub for payments, remittances, merchant tools, payroll rails, and settlement systems. Where traditional finance is slow or expensive, Plasma feels like internet-native money.
---
Developer-Friendly
EVM-compatible and focused, Plasma allows developers to build payment apps without compromise. Wallets, remittance tools, and merchant integrations thrive because the network is purpose-built, not general-purpose.
---
Token Utility
XPL exists primarily to secure the network and govern it. End users don’t need to interact with it for everyday payments—complexity stays behind the scenes while money moves effortlessly.
---
Why Now
Stablecoins are exploding across remittances, trading, savings, and business payments. Regulators, fintechs, and institutions are paying attention. Plasma isn’t a playground for speculation; it’s infrastructure ready for scale, compliance, and real-world use.
---
The Edge
Competition exists, but Plasma’s advantage is specialization. Instead of compromising to support every app, it optimizes entirely for stablecoin payments—speed, cost, and trust.
---
Bottom Line: Plasma is betting the most important blockchain won’t be flashy. It will be invisible. Sending money should feel as easy as sending an email—and Plasma is building the rails to make that a reality.
#Plasma | @Plasma | $XPL