I've been shortlisted for the “2026 Blockchain Top 100 · Emerging Creator” award.
If you have a moment, please vote for me: go to my Square profile, tap “2026 Blockchain Top 100 Creator of the Year Award — Emerging Creator” below my avatar, then tap Vote.
Voting period: 10/19 17:00–10/28 23:59 (Beijing time) One vote per category per day. KYC-verified accounts only. Voting quotas reset at 08:00 Beijing time.
The treasury plans to spend about $5 million on copper Then tokenize it as CuTT The voting section is already arguing Is this RWA or a bet on copper prices?
That Toto Finance proposal Would allocate about ₳22 million To buy COMEX Grade 1 copper and put it on-chain About two-thirds goes toward actually buying the metal The rest covers custody, audits, and other costs The proposal itself also says there’s no guarantee of getting your money back Copper prices would have to rise significantly just to break even Voting is still underway Public sources disagree on the closing date I won’t commit to a specific date in the post
$ADA As soon as a physical-asset proposal like this appears The comments split into two camps One side thinks the treasury is finally doing something useful The other thinks betting $5 million on a metal is ridiculous Both sides have had their say But the proposal is still going through the on-chain process Don’t mistake a trending headline for an approved proposal
The RWA narrative sounds appealing But when the treasury uses real money to buy copper It takes on a different set of risks Custody, audits, a drop in copper prices If any part of that isn’t clearly spelled out It matters more than the slogans Trending topics love to shout, “The treasury is making big moves” But a big move can also mean a big loss
The proposal is still in progress Whether it passes is a whole other story The trending topic has only shown the opening scene Custody, audits, copper-price drops Until those are clearly explained Don’t read “proposed allocation” as “already bought”
The treasury is debating whether to buy copper Just help me out with a vote for Emerging Creator Go to my profile on the plaza Under the avatar: “2026 Blockchain Top 100 Creator Awards — Emerging Creator” Voting closes 10/28 at 23:59 (Beijing time) One vote per category per day; resets around 08:00 No need to reply after voting
Even the testnet isn't sticking to the original date So don't rush to bet on the mainnet timeline
Glamsterdam was originally expected to activate on Hoodi around October 26 ACDE has decided to put that on hold for now They need to further investigate how EIP-8037 interacts with legacy contracts on mainnet No new activation date has been announced The plan for the 200M gas tier has also been scrapped Mainnet users don't need to do anything right now
As soon as the upgrade news broke Two kinds of people dominated the comments One group is guessing which day the price will pump The other is ranting about the slow progress I only look at confirmed facts The original date is canceled The replacement date is unknown The mainnet date is still undecided When the testnet calendar is scrapped The most dangerous thing is people still using the old date in trading scripts
$ETH Short-term narratives are fair game for debate But don't size your positions based on the testnet calendar A delayed hard fork isn't a bearish slogan Nor is it a bullish one It means the engineers aren't ready, so they're hitting pause Pausing is more dignified than rushing the switch and having it go wrong People on the plaza love to read conspiracy into “delays” On the engineering side, it's usually just about avoiding damage to legacy contracts
The old date is scrapped Trading scripts should be scrapped along with it The upgrade window can wait Don't treat the testnet calendar As a catalyst for mainnet price action If the engineers aren't ready, they should pause That's more dignified than rushing the switch and having it go wrong
Hard forks can be delayed But the voting window won't wait for you Visit my plaza profile Tap “2026 Blockchain Top 100 Creator Awards — Emerging Creator” under my profile picture Deadline: 10/28 23:59 (Beijing time) One vote per category per day; refreshes around 08:00 No need to reply to me after voting
There have been plenty of headlines about mining rigs shifting to AI, but network hashrate just hit a seven-month high
According to BlocksBridge, the seven-day average has climbed back to around 1 ZH/s, or 1,000 EH/s That’s roughly the highest level since March Difficulty was recently bumped up, too Publicly listed miners are talking about pivoting to AI but competition on-chain hasn’t let up
What does this tell us? That the slogan “hashrate is fleeing” and the network’s actual online hashrate often have nothing to do with each other Slogans chase clicks Hashrate runs on electricity bills The ones who shut down know it And the ones still mining don’t need to issue a press release
Fierce competition among miners doesn’t mean the price will reward you right away A record-high hashrate is more a sign that the network is working hard to maintain its security budget not a starting gun for you to buy in Over here at $BTC , you can treat hashrate as a sentiment indicator but don’t treat it as a trading signal
The headlines from the mining side love to talk about transformation On-chain data tells a story of competition When both are true at once, slogans are the first thing to become outdated Data gets the final word Don’t let press releases stand in for the hashrate chart
Network hashrate is climbing and difficulty doesn’t take it easy on anyone Miners’ lives aren’t necessarily getting easier The buzz is on the trending page The pressure is on the electricity bill
On the day hashrate hits a record, remember the post under my profile picture on my homepage: “2026 Blockchain Top 100 Creator Awards — Next-Generation Creator” Just tap to vote Voting closes 10/28 at 23:59 (Beijing time) One vote per category per day; refreshes around 08:00 No need to reply after voting
Digitizing cash will take at least five years to get off the ground But stablecoins are already vying for the krona’s place
Over at Sweden’s central bank, the trending headlines say it’s urging a fresh assessment of the e-krona A final decision to issue one hasn’t been made but they’re pushing to get legislation ready first The deputy governor’s message is: once cash goes digital, if the krona isn’t easy to use, cross-border stablecoins will move in and fill the gap
This isn’t “CBDC launches tomorrow” It’s sovereign currencies starting to do the math seriously tallying the cost of being slow while others move fast A quick scroll through the feed makes it easy to reduce this to bullish/bearish slogans But it’s really more like a policy timeline that’s stretching out Slow implementation Fast-moving narrative Legislative preparations on a five-year scale and today’s trending buzz are running on completely different clocks
$BTC The comments section, as usual, has already had its arguments Some see it as evidence of pressure from dollar stablecoins Others see it as another round in Europe’s digital currency race I’m sticking to the verified facts No decision to issue Urging a reassessment Legislative preparations will take time Don’t read “urging an assessment” as “launching next week”
The policy clock and the trending clock aren’t one and the same Five years of legislative preparations don’t match today’s hype Read “urging an assessment” as “launching next week” and you’ll lose out on that gap between expectations and reality
The e-krona is at least five years away Voting closes on 10/28 Go to my profile on the feed Tap “2026 Blockchain Top 100 Creators Award — Emerging Creator” under my avatar One vote per category per day; refreshes at around 08:00 No need to reply after voting
The day gold broke below 4,000 The crypto crowd’s first argument wasn’t about gold It was whether $BTC would follow
The trending headline was blunt: First drop below $4,000 since July Even safe-haven assets can be squeezed by liquidity That fact itself isn’t surprising What is surprising is how fast the comments split into two camps One says a shift in macro sentiment toward risk benefits crypto The other says if safe havens are falling too, risk assets are in even more danger Both sides are using the same candlestick to prove their point
I’m not picking a side or calling a direction I’m just noting one thing: As soon as gold breaks down, the Plaza reshuffles its macro playbook The reshuffle comes with a lot of noise Actual position changes tend to lag behind Don’t let a trending headline place your trades for you And don’t translate the words “safe havens have failed” directly into “I must add to my position today”
On days when macro stories spill across markets, headline-driven positions are most likely to appear The thing about headline-driven positions is: there’s a reason for both rises and falls, but no personal plan for when to enter or exit
After the two camps finish arguing, the market won’t take sides It’s positions that take sides You can make a note when gold breaks down Then put your entry and exit rules on the table Don’t let the comments section click confirm for you
The crypto crowd was at its loudest the day gold broke below 4,000 I’m just one vote short of yours Visit my Plaza profile Tap “2026 Blockchain Top 100 Creator Awards — Emerging Creator” under my avatar Voting closes 10/28 at 23:59 (Beijing time) One vote per category per day, refreshes around 08:00 No need to reply after you vote
This altcoin rebound The trending list pushed the frog to the front Up about 14%
The comments heated up before the price did Some say the rotation has begun Some say this rally could last through the end of the month I only trust one thing in the order book When meme coins lead the gains A whole string of coins behind them will sway too But that doesn't mean the fundamentals suddenly got better When risk appetite rebounds Who gets hit by that swing is random
I wrote a similar short post yesterday Today I'm not repeating the same opening line Just adding one more thought The leading coin is the easiest to turn into a sentiment button When the button lights up There are more people chasing the price than doing the research When the button goes dark The narrative gurus all develop collective amnesia With coins like $PEPE Everyone has a rationale when the price is rising When it pulls back, everyone says they were only watching
An altcoin rebound is possible Don't size your position based on the trending list's gains Leading the rally doesn't mean it can carry you along The ones who get carried along are usually a small group who got in early Not the huge crowd trying to make themselves seen with a hashtag
On nights when meme coins lead the gains Narratives are cheaper than positions Cheap things are easiest to overdo And once you overdo it, the pullback comes fast Treat the trending list's gains as atmosphere Not as instructions for sizing your position
While the frog is rising, take a moment to cast a vote It's more solid than chasing the price Visit my profile page Tap “2026 Blockchain Top 100 Creator Awards — Emerging Creator” under my profile picture Deadline: 10/28 23:59 (Beijing time) One vote per category per day, refreshes around 08:00 No need to reply after voting
$PEPE #Pepe up 14%, leading the altcoin rebound #PEPE #山寨 #meme #rebound
That IRS headline is making the rounds, and it’s worded pretty boldly The key words are “proposed reduction”
It’s not a bill that’s been signed into law It’s not that the penalties have already been cut in half It’s a proposal / proposed language The voluntary disclosure route is being brought up again A lot of people used to get stuck on “If I file late, will the penalties make me cry?” Now the question is “Am I willing to lay my old accounts bare?” The sticking point has shifted from “Do I dare?” to “Is it worth it?”
One quick scroll through Square and it’s easy to turn this into “U.S. tax cuts are good news for crypto” Yeah, that’s a different movie This only concerns discussion of disclosure penalties It doesn’t change the math on your positions I’m not making up an exact percentage here Until it’s officially announced and finalized Putting numbers in the post is just digging a hole for myself
Whenever the compliance narrative heats up $BTC the comments section loves to spin it into “institutions are coming in” Institutional entry and whether you file back taxes are two separate things Proposed text can change The implementation timeline can be delayed A trending headline won’t read the fine print for you Don’t overlook the word “proposed”
Compliance news is especially prone to embellishment on Square And after all that embellishment, it turns into “the positive news is confirmed” Proposed text can change The timeline can be delayed Until the fine print is finalized Don’t use a trending headline as your tax adviser
The IRS proposal is still just a proposal But the B100 countdown is really ticking down Visit my Square profile Tap “2026 Blockchain Top 100 Creator Awards — Emerging Creator” under my avatar Deadline: 10/28 23:59 (Beijing time) One vote per category each day; resets around 08:00 No need to reply after voting
Franklin has moved another tranche of shares onto XRPL Trending topics say roughly $150 million was added
This isn’t this morning’s FBEQ story about “dividends being put into BTC.” It’s shares of the sgBENJI money market fund moving on-chain. According to CoinDesk, it’s roughly $150 million worth. The share count rose from about 48 million to about 193 million, bringing holdings close to the $200 million mark. Most of it went to a single wallet. Institutions are using public blockchains as settlement rails, not launching another meme coin with no substance.
People on the feed are likely to lump the two stories together: one is about U.S. stock dividends creating BTC exposure, and the other is about money market fund shares going onto XRPL. Don’t confuse them. If you do, you’re just echoing the headlines, not looking at what institutions are actually moving on-chain.
More shares doesn’t mean you should chase them on the secondary market. It only shows that the custody and settlement narrative is still moving toward public blockchains. Who’s buying the shares, and which wallet they end up in, are more worth watching than “another bullish catalyst.” $XRP The comments section has already started making up its own story. I’m just noting the verified numbers here. I’m not making up claims like “it’s about to skyrocket,” nor treating RWA slogans as buy or sell signals.
Putting RWA on-chain sounds great. What really matters is where the shares end up and how custody works. The $150 million in the headline is just an entry-point figure, not a signal for when you should buy or sell.
As institutional shares move onto XRPL, give me a vote on the feed too. Go to my profile and tap the link under my avatar: “2026 Blockchain Top 100 Creator Awards — Emerging Creator.” Voting closes 10/28 at 23:59 (Beijing time). One vote per category each day; votes refresh around 08:00. No need to message me after you’ve voted.
Under the same earnings-season tag, three tokenized stocks are already going head-to-head.
The trending list’s subtitle puts it plainly: MSFTB about +1.05% AMZNB about -1.12% GOOGLB about -1.32% One is climbing, two are getting hammered. The traditional market hasn’t finished telling its story, but crypto has already split the direction into three kinds of noise.
Over 8,000 discussions. They’re not talking about whose revenue looks good. They’re talking about which way risk appetite is leaning tonight. The Microsoft side is a bit steadier; the Amazon and Google sides are wobbling first. Same window, same tag, but the results are pulling in completely opposite directions. At times like this, the last thing you need is someone tossing out “a broad-based recovery in risk appetite.” The three stocks can’t even agree on a direction. Don’t buy the slogan just yet.
$BTC The comments section is heating up as usual. Whether anyone can keep up is another story. The trending list has already laid bare the market mood. Tokenized stocks map U.S. stock market jitters straight onto the Plaza timeline. Fast mapping doesn’t mean you understand what you’re seeing. Get the mapping wrong, and the followers are the ones who lose money.
Tokenized stocks bring U.S. market jitters over here. Fast mapping doesn’t mean you understand it. If you don’t understand it, don’t rush to follow the trend. When three stocks are moving in opposite directions, strip away the emotional labels before checking your positions.
Once the earnings-season noise dies down, come visit my Plaza profile when you have a moment. Tap “2026 Annual Top 100 Blockchain Creator Awards — Emerging Creator” under my profile picture. Deadline: 10/28 23:59 (Beijing time) One vote per category each day; refreshes around 08:00. No need to reply after voting.
118,000 discussions It’s pinning every other trending topic to the floor
The “神算子” tag doesn’t feel like a topic today so much as an emotional thermometer for the square The more people there are, the more the comments section sounds like a wall of noise before the night session opens The long-position crowd curses the short-position crowd The short-position crowd mocks the long-position crowd No one’s showing their hand Everyone’s just trying to get noticed
Yesterday, around 90,000 was already packed Today it’s shot straight to 118,000 The “traffic black hole” reputation is official But what’s really valuable inside the black hole isn’t the predictions themselves It’s that people are willing to stake their emotions on a public tag Then deny they ever did And come back the next day shouting in the opposite direction
I’m not writing trade signals here or making up claims about who got how many predictions right Posts like that turn into a joke the very next day xxlb is just here for the spectacle The people who actually make money won’t be shouting in the tag or showing screenshots as trophies
Being a permanent fixture on the trending list isn’t a reason for you to follow along and take a position Take the “神算子” tag as entertainment and you’re less likely to lose face than if you treat it as a strategy
Hype is just hype 90,000 yesterday, 118,000 today The numbers are scary but the position logic hasn’t changed at all Don’t mistake the number of people discussing it for a win rate
While you’re here watching the show, help me out and vote for the New Generation group Go to my square profile Under the avatar, find “2026 Annual Top 100 Blockchain Creator Awards — New Generation Creator” Just tap it Voting closes 10/28 23:59 (Beijing time) One vote per category each day; refreshes around 08:00 No need to message me after you vote
Agentic payments use x402 + USDC Settlement happens on Base
AI agents need to pay for themselves Now the card issuer is getting involved too Don’t mistake automatic payments for blanket authorization $USDC #Base #Mastercard #USDC #x402 #AI
Franklin puts U.S. stock dividends into a BTC sleeve
Filed Form 8-A to register on Nasdaq on 10/22 The prospectus lists 10/27 as the effective date It hasn’t started trading yet—don’t assume you can buy it already
About 95% U.S. stocks + 5% BTC-related exposure Company dividends are reinvested in BTC the next day Quarterly rebalancing No on-chain spot BTC holdings; uses ETPs and futures FBEQ expense ratio: about 0.09%
Automatically using dividends to buy crypto— institutions have finally made it into an ETF sleeve $BTC #ETF #富兰克林 #BTC #Nasdaq #机构
Trending headlines say Malaysia and Thailand’s central banks are joining Singapore’s BLOOM In other words, it’s Malaysia and Thailand
MAS confirmed on Friday Bank Negara Malaysia Bank of Thailand are joining BLOOM as policymakers to test cross-border stablecoin and tokenized deposit settlements
Industry players like Circle, Coinbase, and JPMorgan were already involved This is an expansion of the central bank seats not another vaporware blockchain $BTC
Winklevoss and Silbert’s camps are clashing again over $ZEC in hash power
The trending headline says mining firms from both camps each control roughly 20% of the hash rate Cypherpunk’s public estimate is around 18% to 20% Fortitude is also pushing to expand toward roughly 20% of the network
Tonight’s post about ETF inflows is already up This post focuses only on mining firms’ share of hash power No repeating the ZCSH figures
When privacy-coin hash power gets concentrated people in the comments love to argue about decentralization $ZEC
Trending headlines say the central banks of Malaysia and Thailand are joining Singapore’s BLOOM In other words, Malaysia and Thailand
MAS confirmed on Friday Bank Negara Malaysia Bank of Thailand are joining BLOOM as policymakers to test cross-border stablecoin and tokenized deposit settlements
Circle, Coinbase, JPMorgan, and the other industry players were already involved This is an expansion of central bank seats not another vaporware blockchain $BTC
A proposal is topping the Cardano treasury trending list, seeking about $5 million to buy copper.
Toto Finance’s proposal requests ₳22 million to buy COMEX Grade 1 copper and tokenize it as CuTT. About two-thirds would go toward buying the metal, with the rest covering custody, audits, and other costs.
Copper prices would have to rise considerably just to break even. The proposal itself also says the principal isn’t guaranteed. Voting is still underway, and the comments under $ADA are already heated.
Ethereum isn't having a price-swing drama—it's the Hoodi testnet hard fork that's been postponed.
Glamsterdam was originally slated to activate on Hoodi around October 26. ACDE decided to pause for now and investigate how EIP-8037 might interact with legacy contracts on mainnet.
No new activation date has been announced yet. The 200M gas tier plan has also been dropped. Mainnet users don't need to do anything for now. $ETH The comments section is already guessing at the schedule.