The TRON mainnet is about to undergo a critical technical upgrade. According to official community news, discussions on the 4.8.0 version upgrade proposal have started and are expected to enter the voting process on June 23.

This version will introduce new virtual machine instructions to achieve compatibility with Ethereum's #Cancun upgrade and simultaneously optimize the consensus layer verification mechanism.

This news may seem like a routine evolution from a technical perspective, but from a strategic viewpoint, it releases a strong signal:

TRON is consciously aligning with the Ethereum ecosystem to enhance technical openness and developer compatibility.

One, why does TRON want to be compatible with Ethereum Cancun?

The Cancun upgrade of Ethereum is an important evolution in the EVM series, mainly focusing on Rollup performance, data sharding, and transaction consistency. Although TRON is not a fork of Ethereum, its virtual machine TVM is similar to the EVM architecture, attracting a large number of Solidity developers.

The essence of this 4.8.0 version upgrade is that TRON conveys this message to developers:

"Deploying contracts on TRON is no different from doing so on Ethereum."

This means:

(1) Future developers can reuse Ethereum ecosystem tools, contracts, and Rollup components on TRON at a lower cost;

(2) TRON's behavior in on-chain transaction execution is becoming more consistent with Ethereum, facilitating cross-chain communication and compliance analysis;

(3) For institutional users and on-chain financial scenarios, transaction consistency and virtual machine compatibility will become key infrastructure decisions.

Two, behind the technical fusion is the proactive evolution of ecological strategy

This is not TRON's first attempt to align with Ethereum.

From supporting Solidity smart contracts to building BitTorrent Bridge and multi-chain compatibility, and now following up on the Cancun upgrade—we see a selective fusion strategy along a technological path:

(1) Rather than building a 'closed fast chain,' it is better to create a 'high-performance but not decoupled' compatible system;

(2) Introducing mainstream virtual machine languages and operational logic without sacrificing its own TPS and stablecoin advantages;

(3) Enhancing developers' willingness to migrate and expanding TRON's role as a 'universal entry point' in the Web3 multi-chain universe.

Three, what can Cancun compatibility bring?

We can understand the long-term significance of this upgrade from the following aspects:

1. Standardizing execution logic

Transaction consistency makes cross-chain asset transfers, oracle introductions, and Rollup compatibility smoother, avoiding fragmented execution deviations.

2. Synchronizing the development experience with the Ethereum ecosystem

Reuse existing L2 toolchains (such as zkSync, Scroll, Arbitrum SDK) to lower the migration threshold.

3. Paving the way for future L2 plans

Once TRON embarks on the zkEVM or TRON-L2 model route, virtual machine layer compatibility is a necessary prerequisite.

Four, TRON is not imitating Ethereum, but is selectively aligning with the future

TRON's current ecological advantages are no longer limited to 'fast transfers and abundant USDT.' With the continuous evolution of its mainnet's underlying structure, it is gradually transforming from a 'high-frequency transfer network' to a 'developer-friendly platform.'

And this proactive compatibility with the Cancun upgrade represents a significant leap.

This is a continuation of TRON's consistent rhythm: not rushing to shout slogans, nor blindly chasing trends, but step by step consolidating its capability as a core node in the global settlement network through improvements in technological core.

True progress is often not a noisy demonstration but a silent alignment.