Crypto Fear & Greed Index
24
Fear
Yesterday
Fear
22
Last Week
Extreme Fear
20
How do you feel about BTC today？
What's Crypto Fear & Greed Index?
The index ranges from 0 (Extreme Fear) to 100 (Extreme Greed), reflecting crypto market sentiment. A low value signals over-selling, while a high value warns of a potential market correction. Binance Square combines trading data and unique user behavior insights for a precise overview.
Trending Articles
XRP Analyst: Remember it, When This Happens, Sell Everything. This is the Sign
$XRP Egrag Crypto has sounded a sharp warning that could resonate across the financial and crypto markets. In a recent post on X, the analyst spotlighted a video shared by President Trump, featuring Representative Anna Paulina Luna, who revealed that a discharge petition is ready to force a House vote on banning congressional stock trading.
Egrag interprets this as a decisive market signal — a moment when traders should consider liquidating positions to avoid turbulence.
✨The Political Backdrop
Representative Luna’s comments underscore a growing frustration in Washington. She declared that if House leadership does not schedule a floor vote, she and allies will activate the petition, which requires signatures from a majority of lawmakers to succeed. This tool, seldom used in Congress, strips leadership of control and demonstrates the seriousness of the push.
A groundswell of discontent fuels the push for a ban, as lawmakers’ stock trades spark whispers of blurred lines and compromised integrity. A bipartisan group of legislators has introduced bills that would require elected officials to place their assets in blind trusts or restrict them to diversified funds. With the petition ready, the issue is approaching a breaking point.
✨Why It Matters
The perception of self-dealing among lawmakers has long eroded public confidence. High-profile cases have kept the controversy alive, especially trades made by households of influential members such as former Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Performance whispers secrets of an edge – reports reveal outsized returns, leaving skeptics to wonder if privileged whispers tilt the scales.
This pressure is not just about optics — it cuts to the credibility of democratic representation. As Luna and her colleagues argue, lawmakers cannot claim to act solely in the public’s interest while simultaneously benefiting from trades that may be influenced by privileged information. If the petition succeeds, it could mark the most significant ethics reform for Congress in decades.
✨Market Implications
Egrag Crypto views the discharge petition as a tipping point with far-reaching market consequences. A ban on congressional stock trading would signal that even the highest levels of government are willing to restrict speculative profit channels. For traders, this represents a high-volatility scenario that requires portfolio protection.
Political catalysts of this magnitude have the power to move markets abruptly. Headline-driven volatility is particularly dangerous for speculative assets such as small-cap equities and cryptocurrencies.
Algo-driven armies march in lockstep, magnifying market tremors – then retail investors join the fray, stoking the volatility flames. In this environment, Egrag’s directive to “sell everything” reflects the need for swift and disciplined risk management rather than panic.
✨Watching the Next Steps
The key variable now is whether the discharge petition garners enough signatures. If market momentum increases, traders can anticipate a shift of capital toward safer investments. Portfolio managers will likely tighten stop-losses, reduce speculative exposure, and prepare hedges against volatility.
✨Final Takeaway
Egrag Crypto’s warning highlights how quickly politics can alter market dynamics. The looming petition is not merely a procedural tactic; it is a signal that change is imminent, and traders must be prepared. When politics disrupts the status quo, hesitation can be costly.
Egrag interprets this as a decisive market signal — a moment when traders should consider liquidating positions to avoid turbulence.
✨The Political Backdrop
Representative Luna’s comments underscore a growing frustration in Washington. She declared that if House leadership does not schedule a floor vote, she and allies will activate the petition, which requires signatures from a majority of lawmakers to succeed. This tool, seldom used in Congress, strips leadership of control and demonstrates the seriousness of the push.
A groundswell of discontent fuels the push for a ban, as lawmakers’ stock trades spark whispers of blurred lines and compromised integrity. A bipartisan group of legislators has introduced bills that would require elected officials to place their assets in blind trusts or restrict them to diversified funds. With the petition ready, the issue is approaching a breaking point.
✨Why It Matters
The perception of self-dealing among lawmakers has long eroded public confidence. High-profile cases have kept the controversy alive, especially trades made by households of influential members such as former Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Performance whispers secrets of an edge – reports reveal outsized returns, leaving skeptics to wonder if privileged whispers tilt the scales.
This pressure is not just about optics — it cuts to the credibility of democratic representation. As Luna and her colleagues argue, lawmakers cannot claim to act solely in the public’s interest while simultaneously benefiting from trades that may be influenced by privileged information. If the petition succeeds, it could mark the most significant ethics reform for Congress in decades.
✨Market Implications
Egrag Crypto views the discharge petition as a tipping point with far-reaching market consequences. A ban on congressional stock trading would signal that even the highest levels of government are willing to restrict speculative profit channels. For traders, this represents a high-volatility scenario that requires portfolio protection.
Political catalysts of this magnitude have the power to move markets abruptly. Headline-driven volatility is particularly dangerous for speculative assets such as small-cap equities and cryptocurrencies.
Algo-driven armies march in lockstep, magnifying market tremors – then retail investors join the fray, stoking the volatility flames. In this environment, Egrag’s directive to “sell everything” reflects the need for swift and disciplined risk management rather than panic.
✨Watching the Next Steps
The key variable now is whether the discharge petition garners enough signatures. If market momentum increases, traders can anticipate a shift of capital toward safer investments. Portfolio managers will likely tighten stop-losses, reduce speculative exposure, and prepare hedges against volatility.
✨Final Takeaway
Egrag Crypto’s warning highlights how quickly politics can alter market dynamics. The looming petition is not merely a procedural tactic; it is a signal that change is imminent, and traders must be prepared. When politics disrupts the status quo, hesitation can be costly.
Are Your Keys at Risk? CZ Reveals the #1 Rule for Choosing a Hardware Wallet
Have you ever wondered what truly safeguards your crypto fortune? It's not your password, 2FA, or even your seed phrase. It's a principle that must never be broken.
Binance Co-founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) recently articulated it with crystal clarity in a discussion: "The private key should never leave the hardware wallet." And this isn't just a suggestion—it's a "non-negotiable criterion" for anyone serious about security.
Why is this the "Ironclad" Rule?
Hardware wallets (cold wallets) are considered the gold standard because they isolate your keys from the internet. But in CZ's view, this isolation must be absolute.
Not a "Nice-to-Have," but the Foundation. Any device that can even theoretically export your private key outside itself (e.g., for a backup on a connected device) creates a critical vulnerability.The Goal is an Impregnable Fortress. True hardware wallets use secure elements—chips that physically prevent key extraction. All transaction signing happens inside, and only the already-signed transaction leaves the device.Skepticism as a Shield. CZ explicitly urges users to be wary of any wallet that cannot guarantee this principle.
Why is CZ Emphasizing This Now?
This focus on a fundamental rule is more timely than ever.
The Rise of Self-Custody. With the growth of DeFi and Web3, more users are moving assets off exchanges to hold their own keys. And here lies the major pitfall: the vulnerability of backups and recovery phrases. Even with the most secure hardware wallet, if you store your seed phrase in the cloud or on an unprotected device, the entire security model collapses.CZ is a Realist. He is a long-time advocate of self-custody but has always warned that poor key management can be catastrophic. His hardline stance is an attempt to raise the security baseline for the entire industry.Echoing Expert Consensus. This position resonates with the mantra "Not your keys, not your crypto." Leading experts like Andreas Antonopoulos have been saying the same for years: control over your keys is control over your assets, and that control must be maximally secure.
What This Means for You: The Practical Takeaway
Choosing a hardware wallet isn't just about brand or price. It's an audit against the core principle.
The question you must ask before buying any hardware wallet is:
"Can this device, in any way—even during a firmware update or backup creation—transmit my private key externally to a connected computer or phone?"
The correct answer is "No, under no circumstances."
The industry is moving towards mass adoption, and security is becoming the cornerstone. CZ's words are a powerful reminder: in the world of crypto, true security begins with the inviolability of your private key. Don't compromise on this.
What do you think? Do today's popular hardware wallets communicate this fundamental "key-never-leaves" principle clearly enough to users? Or does the focus often shift to convenience at the expense of maximum security?
#Binance #CZ #ChangpengZhao
Binance Co-founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) recently articulated it with crystal clarity in a discussion: "The private key should never leave the hardware wallet." And this isn't just a suggestion—it's a "non-negotiable criterion" for anyone serious about security.
Why is this the "Ironclad" Rule?
Hardware wallets (cold wallets) are considered the gold standard because they isolate your keys from the internet. But in CZ's view, this isolation must be absolute.
Not a "Nice-to-Have," but the Foundation. Any device that can even theoretically export your private key outside itself (e.g., for a backup on a connected device) creates a critical vulnerability.The Goal is an Impregnable Fortress. True hardware wallets use secure elements—chips that physically prevent key extraction. All transaction signing happens inside, and only the already-signed transaction leaves the device.Skepticism as a Shield. CZ explicitly urges users to be wary of any wallet that cannot guarantee this principle.
Why is CZ Emphasizing This Now?
This focus on a fundamental rule is more timely than ever.
The Rise of Self-Custody. With the growth of DeFi and Web3, more users are moving assets off exchanges to hold their own keys. And here lies the major pitfall: the vulnerability of backups and recovery phrases. Even with the most secure hardware wallet, if you store your seed phrase in the cloud or on an unprotected device, the entire security model collapses.CZ is a Realist. He is a long-time advocate of self-custody but has always warned that poor key management can be catastrophic. His hardline stance is an attempt to raise the security baseline for the entire industry.Echoing Expert Consensus. This position resonates with the mantra "Not your keys, not your crypto." Leading experts like Andreas Antonopoulos have been saying the same for years: control over your keys is control over your assets, and that control must be maximally secure.
What This Means for You: The Practical Takeaway
Choosing a hardware wallet isn't just about brand or price. It's an audit against the core principle.
The question you must ask before buying any hardware wallet is:
"Can this device, in any way—even during a firmware update or backup creation—transmit my private key externally to a connected computer or phone?"
The correct answer is "No, under no circumstances."
The industry is moving towards mass adoption, and security is becoming the cornerstone. CZ's words are a powerful reminder: in the world of crypto, true security begins with the inviolability of your private key. Don't compromise on this.
What do you think? Do today's popular hardware wallets communicate this fundamental "key-never-leaves" principle clearly enough to users? Or does the focus often shift to convenience at the expense of maximum security?
#Binance #CZ #ChangpengZhao
FetchAI —The highest volume ever but... How far up can it go?
#FetchAI #FET #FETUSDT
In December 2022 FETUSDT produced the highest volume ever on the weekly timeframe. What followed this development was a bullish wave with more than 6,400% total growth.
In November 2025 FETUSDT produced a weekly session with the highest volume ever, even higher than December 2022. What follows is a major bullish cycle.
How much FetchAI will grow is not possible to know but it will be a lot, because the bearish period was really strong.
The action is happening now around long-term support. The same support zone from June 2021 and also June-October 2023.
Ok. I went to 🟢 Trade Stable and looked up FETUSDT. The numbers are showing 2,651% total profits potential. Maybe I am being conservative; maybe it will go higher. We are not calculating from the exact bottom so... Anything goes. We are happy with 100%, seeing 1,000% would be awesome. 2,000% is more than enough. If the market grows 5,000%... Fortunate those focused on the long-term that manage to buy and hold.
Namaste.
✅ Trade here on $FET
Michael Saylor Explains Why Banks Are No Longer Waiting for Bitcoin
Bitcoin news from Binance Blockchain Week in Dubai took a major turn on December 4, 2025, when Michael Saylor, Executive Chairman of Strategy Inc., revealed that the largest Wall Street banks have shifted from skepticism to active participation in crypto within just 12 months — far faster than the 4–8 year timeline most experts once predicted.
Speaking before thousands of attendees at Coca-Cola Arena, Saylor named BNY Mellon, PNC, Citi, JPMorgan, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and Vanguard as major institutions that are now offering Bitcoin custody, lending, and credit services.
He emphasized a milestone moment:
👉 In just the past six months, 8 out of the 10 largest U.S. banks have officially entered crypto lending.
At the same time:
Bitcoin trades near $92,669
Spot Bitcoin ETF inflows have turned positive again, according to Farside Investors
Together, these signals highlight a structural shift in the Bitcoin market:
> Institutions are now driving Bitcoin’s trajectory, no longer retail speculation alone.
This new era ties Bitcoin directly to:
Federal Reserve monetary policy
Fiscal deficits
Global macro liquidity cycles
For long-term investors, this strengthens Bitcoin’s legitimacy as a macro asset, while simultaneously raising concerns around regulation and centralization risks.
From Rejection to Custody in Just One Year
During a panel moderated by The Bitcoin Therapist and later shared on X by @CryptosR_Us (Dec 5), Saylor stated:
> “The world’s largest banks weren’t supposed to embrace Bitcoin for another 4–8 years — but it’s happening right now.”
Key developments he highlighted:
BNY Mellon now provides Bitcoin custody for ETFs
PNC offers Bitcoin-backed loans
Citi plans to roll out similar BTC services in 2026
JPMorgan, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America have entered crypto credit markets
Vanguard launched Bitcoin-linked products in Q4
The acceleration was fueled by the final implementation of Basel III reforms in July 2025, which officially classified Bitcoin as a Tier-1 asset for banks under U.S. Federal Reserve guidance.
According to PwC’s Nov 28, 2025 report:
8 of the top 10 U.S. banks now offer crypto lending
Up from zero in Q4 of 2024
Total newly issued crypto credit exceeded $50 billion since September
Meanwhile, Charles Schwab confirmed plans to launch full Bitcoin custody in Q1 2026, completing the institutional adoption circle.
Social sentiment reflected the shift:
@CryptoJoeReal: “Institutions all want Bitcoin. Everyone wants Bitcoin.”
@GuoyuRwa: “Wall Street was supposed to warm up to Bitcoin by 2030… instead they rushed in by Q4 2025.”
The Explosion of Bitcoin Lending: $50 Billion in Fresh Credit
Saylor identified crypto lending as the true inflection point of this cycle.
One standout example:
JPMorgan launched a $10B Bitcoin-backed credit facility on Oct 15, 2025
According to Kaiko Research (Dec 3):
Annualized crypto lending volume reached $150B in Q4
Up 300% from Q1
Banks now control 40% of lending market share, overtaking DeFi protocols
Key lending metrics:
Loan-to-Value (LTV): 50–70%
Interest rates: only 4–6%
Versus 8%+ average on DeFi platforms like Aave
PNC’s lending program, launched on Nov 20:
Already deployed $2.5B in loans
Mainly to family offices, per American Banker (Dec 2)
This shift dramatically reduces forced selling: ✅ Investors no longer need to dump BTC during downturns
✅ Long-term upside remains intact
✅ Volatility is structurally dampened
ETFs, Derivatives, and Corporate Treasuries Now Dominate Bitcoin
Institutional capital continues to flood the ecosystem:
BlackRock’s IBIT ETF
AUM: $62.45B (Dec 5)
Up 5% in one week
Bitcoin derivatives open interest
Expanded from $10B to $50B in just four weeks
Source: CME Group (Nov 28)
Saylor summarized:
> “This is a macro, political, and structural transformation. Financial institutions now control Bitcoin.”
Bitcoin Halving No Longer Drives the Market
Perhaps Saylor’s most controversial statement:
> “The four-year Bitcoin halving cycle is becoming irrelevant.”
His reasoning:
Daily Bitcoin trading volume now exceeds $100B
That’s 5x higher than 2021
Supply shocks from halvings are no longer dominant drivers
Since the April 2024 halving, Bitcoin’s 120% YTD gain has been driven mostly by:
Spot ETFs
Corporate treasuries
Institutional balance sheets
Strategy alone now holds over 650,000 BTC, making it one of the most powerful treasury forces in the market.
Final Take
Bitcoin is no longer waiting for banks.
Banks are now racing for Bitcoin.
What was once a retail-driven, speculative asset has transformed into:
A Tier-1 institutional treasury reserve
A collateral base for global credit markets
A macro hedge integrated into the financial system
The next era of Bitcoin will not be about hype.
It will be about liquidity, leverage, and legacy finance integration.
✅ If you found this analysis valuable, FOLLOW for daily Bitcoin & crypto insights.
✅ Drop your thoughts in the comments — are banks bullish, or just too late?
#Bitcoin #BTC #MichaelSaylor
Speaking before thousands of attendees at Coca-Cola Arena, Saylor named BNY Mellon, PNC, Citi, JPMorgan, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and Vanguard as major institutions that are now offering Bitcoin custody, lending, and credit services.
He emphasized a milestone moment:
👉 In just the past six months, 8 out of the 10 largest U.S. banks have officially entered crypto lending.
At the same time:
Bitcoin trades near $92,669
Spot Bitcoin ETF inflows have turned positive again, according to Farside Investors
Together, these signals highlight a structural shift in the Bitcoin market:
> Institutions are now driving Bitcoin’s trajectory, no longer retail speculation alone.
This new era ties Bitcoin directly to:
Federal Reserve monetary policy
Fiscal deficits
Global macro liquidity cycles
For long-term investors, this strengthens Bitcoin’s legitimacy as a macro asset, while simultaneously raising concerns around regulation and centralization risks.
From Rejection to Custody in Just One Year
During a panel moderated by The Bitcoin Therapist and later shared on X by @CryptosR_Us (Dec 5), Saylor stated:
> “The world’s largest banks weren’t supposed to embrace Bitcoin for another 4–8 years — but it’s happening right now.”
Key developments he highlighted:
BNY Mellon now provides Bitcoin custody for ETFs
PNC offers Bitcoin-backed loans
Citi plans to roll out similar BTC services in 2026
JPMorgan, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America have entered crypto credit markets
Vanguard launched Bitcoin-linked products in Q4
The acceleration was fueled by the final implementation of Basel III reforms in July 2025, which officially classified Bitcoin as a Tier-1 asset for banks under U.S. Federal Reserve guidance.
According to PwC’s Nov 28, 2025 report:
8 of the top 10 U.S. banks now offer crypto lending
Up from zero in Q4 of 2024
Total newly issued crypto credit exceeded $50 billion since September
Meanwhile, Charles Schwab confirmed plans to launch full Bitcoin custody in Q1 2026, completing the institutional adoption circle.
Social sentiment reflected the shift:
@CryptoJoeReal: “Institutions all want Bitcoin. Everyone wants Bitcoin.”
@GuoyuRwa: “Wall Street was supposed to warm up to Bitcoin by 2030… instead they rushed in by Q4 2025.”
The Explosion of Bitcoin Lending: $50 Billion in Fresh Credit
Saylor identified crypto lending as the true inflection point of this cycle.
One standout example:
JPMorgan launched a $10B Bitcoin-backed credit facility on Oct 15, 2025
According to Kaiko Research (Dec 3):
Annualized crypto lending volume reached $150B in Q4
Up 300% from Q1
Banks now control 40% of lending market share, overtaking DeFi protocols
Key lending metrics:
Loan-to-Value (LTV): 50–70%
Interest rates: only 4–6%
Versus 8%+ average on DeFi platforms like Aave
PNC’s lending program, launched on Nov 20:
Already deployed $2.5B in loans
Mainly to family offices, per American Banker (Dec 2)
This shift dramatically reduces forced selling: ✅ Investors no longer need to dump BTC during downturns
✅ Long-term upside remains intact
✅ Volatility is structurally dampened
ETFs, Derivatives, and Corporate Treasuries Now Dominate Bitcoin
Institutional capital continues to flood the ecosystem:
BlackRock’s IBIT ETF
AUM: $62.45B (Dec 5)
Up 5% in one week
Bitcoin derivatives open interest
Expanded from $10B to $50B in just four weeks
Source: CME Group (Nov 28)
Saylor summarized:
> “This is a macro, political, and structural transformation. Financial institutions now control Bitcoin.”
Bitcoin Halving No Longer Drives the Market
Perhaps Saylor’s most controversial statement:
> “The four-year Bitcoin halving cycle is becoming irrelevant.”
His reasoning:
Daily Bitcoin trading volume now exceeds $100B
That’s 5x higher than 2021
Supply shocks from halvings are no longer dominant drivers
Since the April 2024 halving, Bitcoin’s 120% YTD gain has been driven mostly by:
Spot ETFs
Corporate treasuries
Institutional balance sheets
Strategy alone now holds over 650,000 BTC, making it one of the most powerful treasury forces in the market.
Final Take
Bitcoin is no longer waiting for banks.
Banks are now racing for Bitcoin.
What was once a retail-driven, speculative asset has transformed into:
A Tier-1 institutional treasury reserve
A collateral base for global credit markets
A macro hedge integrated into the financial system
The next era of Bitcoin will not be about hype.
It will be about liquidity, leverage, and legacy finance integration.
✅ If you found this analysis valuable, FOLLOW for daily Bitcoin & crypto insights.
✅ Drop your thoughts in the comments — are banks bullish, or just too late?
#Bitcoin #BTC #MichaelSaylor
$DOT
📉 POLKADOT REALITY CHECK (DOT)
A lot of people are saying DOT will do 3× or 4× soon… but let’s look at the math before believing the hype.
🔹 At a price of ~$2.13, DOT’s market cap is around $3B.
For DOT to do a 2× or 3×, the market cap would need to double or triple — meaning billions of dollars have to flow in.
Now ask yourself:
👉 Who is realistically injecting billions into DOT right now?
👉 If DOT’s market cap were still in the hundreds of millions, then sure, a 3×–4× could be believable.
But with a multi-billion-dollar cap… it’s not that simple.
Many “crypto influencers” already call DOT a dead project
📉 POLKADOT REALITY CHECK (DOT)
A lot of people are saying DOT will do 3× or 4× soon… but let’s look at the math before believing the hype.
🔹 At a price of ~$2.13, DOT’s market cap is around $3B.
For DOT to do a 2× or 3×, the market cap would need to double or triple — meaning billions of dollars have to flow in.
Now ask yourself:
👉 Who is realistically injecting billions into DOT right now?
👉 If DOT’s market cap were still in the hundreds of millions, then sure, a 3×–4× could be believable.
But with a multi-billion-dollar cap… it’s not that simple.
Many “crypto influencers” already call DOT a dead project
Exclusive: Expert Says Double-Digit XRP Price ‘Unrealistic’ As ETFs Hit $1 Billion
The post Exclusive: Expert Says Double-Digit XRP Price ‘Unrealistic’ as ETFs Hit $1 Billion appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News
XRP exchange-traded funds have gathered more than $1 billion in assets only a couple of weeks after going live, a pace that many in the market say is unusually fast for new financial products. Five issuers — Bitwise, Canary, Franklin Templeton, Grayscale and Rex Osprey — launched their funds in staggered phases and still managed to pull in strong inflows within just 11 to 12 trading days. At today’s prices, the ETFs now hold about 473 million XRP, locked inside these investment vehicles.
Despite the size of the inflows, the story has barely made its way to everyday investors. Some experts say this shows how unaware most people still are of crypto ETFs, even as Wall Street moves quickly to adopt them.
Others say interest could grow if regulatory clarity improves in the U.S., especially now that Ripple’s legal dispute has ended and new policy proposals like the Clarity Act are gaining attention.
Strong ETF Demand Meets Weak Price
Even with the rapid growth of these funds, XRP’s price has struggled. The token is fighting to stay above $2.03, with sellers consistently pushing it lower.
In an interview with Coinpedia, Nischal Shetty, Co-founder of Shardeum, said that expecting XRP to reach double-digit levels based only on ETF demand is unrealistic. He explained that early flows into new crypto ETFs usually come from short-term traders, not long-term institutions. Larger investors, he said, look for real-world settlement volumes, reliable liquidity and clear regulation before making major allocations.
“Purely ETF-driven double-digit pricing is unrealistic. ETF access improves liquidity and distribution, but it doesn’t replace utility. Sustainable value comes from real settlement demand, enterprise adoption,consistent volumes and regulatory acceptance,” he said.
Shetty added that ETFs can improve access, but they cannot replace the utility that gives a payments token long-term value.
XRP exchange-traded funds have gathered more than $1 billion in assets only a couple of weeks after going live, a pace that many in the market say is unusually fast for new financial products. Five issuers — Bitwise, Canary, Franklin Templeton, Grayscale and Rex Osprey — launched their funds in staggered phases and still managed to pull in strong inflows within just 11 to 12 trading days. At today’s prices, the ETFs now hold about 473 million XRP, locked inside these investment vehicles.
Despite the size of the inflows, the story has barely made its way to everyday investors. Some experts say this shows how unaware most people still are of crypto ETFs, even as Wall Street moves quickly to adopt them.
Others say interest could grow if regulatory clarity improves in the U.S., especially now that Ripple’s legal dispute has ended and new policy proposals like the Clarity Act are gaining attention.
Strong ETF Demand Meets Weak Price
Even with the rapid growth of these funds, XRP’s price has struggled. The token is fighting to stay above $2.03, with sellers consistently pushing it lower.
In an interview with Coinpedia, Nischal Shetty, Co-founder of Shardeum, said that expecting XRP to reach double-digit levels based only on ETF demand is unrealistic. He explained that early flows into new crypto ETFs usually come from short-term traders, not long-term institutions. Larger investors, he said, look for real-world settlement volumes, reliable liquidity and clear regulation before making major allocations.
“Purely ETF-driven double-digit pricing is unrealistic. ETF access improves liquidity and distribution, but it doesn’t replace utility. Sustainable value comes from real settlement demand, enterprise adoption,consistent volumes and regulatory acceptance,” he said.
Shetty added that ETFs can improve access, but they cannot replace the utility that gives a payments token long-term value.
WHALE GOES ALL-IN ON $ETH !A mysterious whale just made a colossal move. Their $ETH long position now stands at an astonishing $121,901,939. This is not a drill. Their liquidation price is a daring $1,520. They are already up +$3,847,611. Unprecedented confidence dominates this play. Normal traders cannot comprehend this level of conviction. The market is watching. This is the ultimate power move. Act now or miss the next wave.
Not financial advice. Trade at your own risk.
#ETH #WhaleAlert #CryptoTrading #FOMO #MarketShock
🚨
Not financial advice. Trade at your own risk.
#ETH #WhaleAlert #CryptoTrading #FOMO #MarketShock
🚨
🚨 BREAKING NEWS
President Trump has made a bold statement: “At some point in the not too distant future, you will not have income tax to pay.” He says his plan is to replace personal income tax with money collected from tariffs. Tariffs are taxes charged on products imported from other countries, and Trump believes that increasing and expanding these tariffs will bring in enough revenue to run the government without needing to tax people’s salaries.
If this happened, it would be one of the biggest changes in U.S. financial history. People would take home their full paycheck with no federal income tax, which sounds exciting for many Americans. But this idea is also controversial. Experts say that depending only on tariffs could make imported goods more expensive, start trade tensions with other countries, and affect businesses that rely on global supply chains. Supporters, however, argue that it would boost the economy, increase local production, and give families more money to spend.
Trump has repeated this idea many times, and he believes that strong tariff revenue can reshape the entire tax system. Whether this can actually happen or not is still a big question, but one thing is clear: this promise has already created huge debate, excitement, and uncertainty across the financial world. Investors, economists, and everyday citizens are watching closely — because if this plan ever becomes real, it could change how Americans live, work, and earn forever. $GLM $MDT $WIN
If this happened, it would be one of the biggest changes in U.S. financial history. People would take home their full paycheck with no federal income tax, which sounds exciting for many Americans. But this idea is also controversial. Experts say that depending only on tariffs could make imported goods more expensive, start trade tensions with other countries, and affect businesses that rely on global supply chains. Supporters, however, argue that it would boost the economy, increase local production, and give families more money to spend.
Trump has repeated this idea many times, and he believes that strong tariff revenue can reshape the entire tax system. Whether this can actually happen or not is still a big question, but one thing is clear: this promise has already created huge debate, excitement, and uncertainty across the financial world. Investors, economists, and everyday citizens are watching closely — because if this plan ever becomes real, it could change how Americans live, work, and earn forever. $GLM $MDT $WIN
THE REGULATOR BECOMES THE REGULATED
December 5: EU fines X €120 million for “deceptive” blue checkmarks.
December 6: X terminates the European Commission’s ad account.
The allegation: The same regulator that penalized X for misleading users exploited a platform vulnerability to disguise a link as video content, artificially inflating reach for the fine announcement itself.
First DSA fine in history. Two years of investigation. €45 million specifically for “deceiving users.” And within 24 hours, the enforcer stands accused of the very sin it punished.
Per X’s Head of Product Nikita Bier: The account sat dormant since 2021. Reactivated to promote the fine. Using tactics the platform deems deceptive.
What is verified:
The €120 million fine is real.
The termination announcement is real.
The alleged exploit awaits independent confirmation.
What is undeniable:
The EU demanded ad transparency from platforms while its own lobbying disclosures now return 404 errors. It cited “deceptive design” while allegedly deploying design tricks for algorithmic advantage.
If proven: This is not regulatory enforcement. This is regulatory theater performed on the very stage it claims to govern.
If unproven: X faces credibility questions for an unsubstantiated claim against the world’s most powerful regulatory body.
Either way, the old order just cracked.
Watch for: EU response within 48 hours. DSA court challenges. Potential app restrictions as retaliation.
The deeper fracture: When regulators operate by different rules than the regulated, who regulates the regulators?
This is not about €120 million.
This is about whether digital governance survives its own contradictions.
The tribunal now stands in the dock.
$BTC
December 5: EU fines X €120 million for “deceptive” blue checkmarks.
December 6: X terminates the European Commission’s ad account.
The allegation: The same regulator that penalized X for misleading users exploited a platform vulnerability to disguise a link as video content, artificially inflating reach for the fine announcement itself.
First DSA fine in history. Two years of investigation. €45 million specifically for “deceiving users.” And within 24 hours, the enforcer stands accused of the very sin it punished.
Per X’s Head of Product Nikita Bier: The account sat dormant since 2021. Reactivated to promote the fine. Using tactics the platform deems deceptive.
What is verified:
The €120 million fine is real.
The termination announcement is real.
The alleged exploit awaits independent confirmation.
What is undeniable:
The EU demanded ad transparency from platforms while its own lobbying disclosures now return 404 errors. It cited “deceptive design” while allegedly deploying design tricks for algorithmic advantage.
If proven: This is not regulatory enforcement. This is regulatory theater performed on the very stage it claims to govern.
If unproven: X faces credibility questions for an unsubstantiated claim against the world’s most powerful regulatory body.
Either way, the old order just cracked.
Watch for: EU response within 48 hours. DSA court challenges. Potential app restrictions as retaliation.
The deeper fracture: When regulators operate by different rules than the regulated, who regulates the regulators?
This is not about €120 million.
This is about whether digital governance survives its own contradictions.
The tribunal now stands in the dock.
$BTC
$SOL
uptotade
Solana (SOL) is currently trading at $132.28, with a market cap of $75.90 billion. The price has seen a slight decrease of 0.38% in the last 24 hours, with a high of $133.99 and a low of $131.28 ¹.
*Recent Developments:*
- Solana's price is stabilizing above key support, with potential for recovery towards $150-$165.
- Institutional interest is growing, with multiple Solana ETFs launched in the US, including products from Fidelity and VanEck.
- Solana Mobile has begun shipping over 150,000 Seeker phones, expanding its ecosystem into mobile hardware ² ³.
*Price Predictions:*
- Experts forecast Solana's price to range from $111 to $450 in 2025, with potential upside towards $1,000.
- Some analysts predict a bullish trend, citing Solana's strong technical upgrades and growing ecosystem ⁴ ⁵.
Would you like to know more about Solana's future price predictions or its recent developments?
uptotade
Solana (SOL) is currently trading at $132.28, with a market cap of $75.90 billion. The price has seen a slight decrease of 0.38% in the last 24 hours, with a high of $133.99 and a low of $131.28 ¹.
*Recent Developments:*
- Solana's price is stabilizing above key support, with potential for recovery towards $150-$165.
- Institutional interest is growing, with multiple Solana ETFs launched in the US, including products from Fidelity and VanEck.
- Solana Mobile has begun shipping over 150,000 Seeker phones, expanding its ecosystem into mobile hardware ² ³.
*Price Predictions:*
- Experts forecast Solana's price to range from $111 to $450 in 2025, with potential upside towards $1,000.
- Some analysts predict a bullish trend, citing Solana's strong technical upgrades and growing ecosystem ⁴ ⁵.
Would you like to know more about Solana's future price predictions or its recent developments?
LUNC CRASH: The 50 Cent Dream Is DEAD.
Official $LUNC account fueled a 500K follower frenzy, teasing a $0.50 target. The reality hit hard. Price just crashed to 0.00005. This isn't a test. The market is brutally efficient. Moves this fast create winners and losers. You need to be on the right side. Don't hesitate. This moment defines fortunes. Immediate action is critical.
Trading crypto is high risk. Do your own research.
#LUNC #CryptoNews #MarketCrash #TradingAlert #Urgent
🚨
Official $LUNC account fueled a 500K follower frenzy, teasing a $0.50 target. The reality hit hard. Price just crashed to 0.00005. This isn't a test. The market is brutally efficient. Moves this fast create winners and losers. You need to be on the right side. Don't hesitate. This moment defines fortunes. Immediate action is critical.
Trading crypto is high risk. Do your own research.
#LUNC #CryptoNews #MarketCrash #TradingAlert #Urgent
🚨
$ETH LIQUIDATION MAP JUST REVEALED THE REAL BATTLE LINE
This chart shows exactly where the next big Ethereum move can explode from.
Right now, ETH is trading around $3,048, sitting right in the middle of a massive liquidation zone. Below this level, there’s a dense cluster of long liquidations, meaning any sharp drop can flush leveraged buyers fast. That’s why dips have been violent.
But above this level, the map shows a huge wall of short liquidations waiting to be wiped out. If ETH pushes through even slightly, the squeeze can fuel a clean breakout.
This is a classic pressure build-up:
Sellers keep shorting into support.
Buyers keep defending the same zone.
Liquidation clusters keep growing.
#CryptoRally
This chart shows exactly where the next big Ethereum move can explode from.
Right now, ETH is trading around $3,048, sitting right in the middle of a massive liquidation zone. Below this level, there’s a dense cluster of long liquidations, meaning any sharp drop can flush leveraged buyers fast. That’s why dips have been violent.
But above this level, the map shows a huge wall of short liquidations waiting to be wiped out. If ETH pushes through even slightly, the squeeze can fuel a clean breakout.
This is a classic pressure build-up:
Sellers keep shorting into support.
Buyers keep defending the same zone.
Liquidation clusters keep growing.
#CryptoRally
🔥 THROWBACK: THE $1 BITCOIN WARNING THE WORLD IGNORED! 🚀💰
Years ago, DaVinci Jeremie literally begged everyone to put just $1 into Bitcoin… and most people laughed.
Today?
That same $1 would be worth over $800 — a mind-blowing reminder of how once-in-a-lifetime opportunities look “crazy” right before they become legendary.
This is the kind of moment people look back on and say:
“I wish I listened.”
“I wish I took the chance.”
History rewards the bold — and punishes the hesitant.
The next big opportunity never announces itself twice.
📢 FOLLOW DXB TRADER 1 for more iconic market insights —
and like & share with your friends so they never miss the next $1-to-$800 moment! 🚀🔥$BNB
$XRP
$ASTER
Years ago, DaVinci Jeremie literally begged everyone to put just $1 into Bitcoin… and most people laughed.
Today?
That same $1 would be worth over $800 — a mind-blowing reminder of how once-in-a-lifetime opportunities look “crazy” right before they become legendary.
This is the kind of moment people look back on and say:
“I wish I listened.”
“I wish I took the chance.”
History rewards the bold — and punishes the hesitant.
The next big opportunity never announces itself twice.
📢 FOLLOW DXB TRADER 1 for more iconic market insights —
and like & share with your friends so they never miss the next $1-to-$800 moment! 🚀🔥$BNB
$XRP
$ASTER
Read this carefully… because if you miss what’s happening right now,
you will regret it for the next 10 years.
Money isn’t flowing, it’s stampeding.
$SHIB is gearing up for a move so ridiculous people will think the charts are broken.
$LUNC is lining up the most disrespectful comeback crypto has ever seen —
$1 is officially on the radar.
$BTTC is quietly preparing the kind of breakout that turns small holders into dangerous people.
This market is not “bullish”…
It’s predatory.
It rewards the fast and destroys the late.
By 2030, some people will be flexing wealth so insane it looks fake,
and others will be scrolling apps saying:
“I should’ve bought when it was cheap…”
Choose your side now.
Because in this cycle?
Hesitation is a financial death sentence.
Not financial advice, just financial reality.
#Crypto #ShockAlert #2030Wealth #HighRiskHighReward 🚀💥
you will regret it for the next 10 years.
Money isn’t flowing, it’s stampeding.
$SHIB is gearing up for a move so ridiculous people will think the charts are broken.
$LUNC is lining up the most disrespectful comeback crypto has ever seen —
$1 is officially on the radar.
$BTTC is quietly preparing the kind of breakout that turns small holders into dangerous people.
This market is not “bullish”…
It’s predatory.
It rewards the fast and destroys the late.
By 2030, some people will be flexing wealth so insane it looks fake,
and others will be scrolling apps saying:
“I should’ve bought when it was cheap…”
Choose your side now.
Because in this cycle?
Hesitation is a financial death sentence.
Not financial advice, just financial reality.
#Crypto #ShockAlert #2030Wealth #HighRiskHighReward 🚀💥
See original
Binance airdrop preview on December 8th, no airdrop for 2 consecutive days, points are stagnant, the number of people is still over 230,000, and there is no obvious wave of resignations. Even if there is one today, the scores are likely to be outrageous.
Airdrop on December 8th
None for now, there has been no announcement, if it doesn't come today, everyone should consider withdrawing, it's already at the final stage.
$BTC
$ETH
$BNB
Airdrop on December 8th
None for now, there has been no announcement, if it doesn't come today, everyone should consider withdrawing, it's already at the final stage.
$BTC
$ETH
$BNB
$XRP IF YOU HAVE MONEY IN A BANK ACCOUNT, YOU NEED TO SEE THIS!!!
I've been digging into this for months, and it's looking sooo bad.
Banks could collapse soon, especially with a nasty recession potentially hitting in 2026.
Don't say I didn't warn you. Here's why many major banks may collapse next year:
First off, sky-high debt levels are choking the system.
Governments and companies are drowning in loans they took when rates were dirt cheap, and now with interest rates still biting, refinancing is a nightmare.
Come 2025-2026, a whopping $1.2 trillion in commercial real estate loans mature, and defaults are already spiking.
office spaces are ghost towns thanks to remote work, with valuations down 20-30%.
If they default, banks holding the bag could see massive losses.
Then there's the world of shadow banking.
Think private credit funds sitting on over $1.5 trillion, super leveraged and barely regulated.
They’re tied very tight to big banks (we're talking over $1 trillion in connections), so if they flop, it could spark a chain reaction like we saw with SVB a few years back.
Add in the overvalued AI bubble popping, and you've got a recipe for panic selling and liquidity freezes.
Geopolitical drama isn't helping either.
Trade wars, supply chain conflicts, and rising energy costs could trigger hyperinflation or stagflation, where prices soar while the economy tanks.
Unemployment's already ticking up, corporate bankruptcies hit a 14-year high this year, and that inverted yield curve? It's telling us "recession ahead" just like it did before 2008.
Demographics are the slow burn, aging populations mean shrinking workforces, higher costs, and stalled growth, making it harder for banks to get repaid on loans.
Weak regs aren't fixing squat; in fact, they're loosening up, setting the stage for another bailout bonanza on our dime.
Odds of a downturn? Experts says there’s a 65% chance by 2026, with a 20% shot at a full-blown crisis.
I've been digging into this for months, and it's looking sooo bad.
Banks could collapse soon, especially with a nasty recession potentially hitting in 2026.
Don't say I didn't warn you. Here's why many major banks may collapse next year:
First off, sky-high debt levels are choking the system.
Governments and companies are drowning in loans they took when rates were dirt cheap, and now with interest rates still biting, refinancing is a nightmare.
Come 2025-2026, a whopping $1.2 trillion in commercial real estate loans mature, and defaults are already spiking.
office spaces are ghost towns thanks to remote work, with valuations down 20-30%.
If they default, banks holding the bag could see massive losses.
Then there's the world of shadow banking.
Think private credit funds sitting on over $1.5 trillion, super leveraged and barely regulated.
They’re tied very tight to big banks (we're talking over $1 trillion in connections), so if they flop, it could spark a chain reaction like we saw with SVB a few years back.
Add in the overvalued AI bubble popping, and you've got a recipe for panic selling and liquidity freezes.
Geopolitical drama isn't helping either.
Trade wars, supply chain conflicts, and rising energy costs could trigger hyperinflation or stagflation, where prices soar while the economy tanks.
Unemployment's already ticking up, corporate bankruptcies hit a 14-year high this year, and that inverted yield curve? It's telling us "recession ahead" just like it did before 2008.
Demographics are the slow burn, aging populations mean shrinking workforces, higher costs, and stalled growth, making it harder for banks to get repaid on loans.
Weak regs aren't fixing squat; in fact, they're loosening up, setting the stage for another bailout bonanza on our dime.
Odds of a downturn? Experts says there’s a 65% chance by 2026, with a 20% shot at a full-blown crisis.
See original
He Yi: The Birth of the "Queen of the Crypto World!"
That girl who was played by fate.
A girl born in Sichuan in 1986, who lost her father at 9 and dropped out of school to work at 16, ultimately became the "queen of the crypto world" controlling a hundred billion dollar empire.
She is He Yi, a woman who epitomizes the phrase, "When fate closes a door on you, tear down the whole wall."
How outrageous is this story?
The coins He Yi bought for 900,000 are now worth 150 million.
What's even more outrageous is that what she holds is not just money but also control over the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange.
If CZ Zhao Changpeng is the "face" of Binance, then He Yi is the true "brain" of Binance.
A girl born in Sichuan in 1986, who lost her father at 9 and dropped out of school to work at 16, ultimately became the "queen of the crypto world" controlling a hundred billion dollar empire.
She is He Yi, a woman who epitomizes the phrase, "When fate closes a door on you, tear down the whole wall."
How outrageous is this story?
The coins He Yi bought for 900,000 are now worth 150 million.
What's even more outrageous is that what she holds is not just money but also control over the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange.
If CZ Zhao Changpeng is the "face" of Binance, then He Yi is the true "brain" of Binance.
See original
A year ago, looking at Bitcoin, it was at most 120,000. Ultimately, this year it stopped at 126,000.
Bitcoin has entered a bear market phase according to the cycle, and the future fluctuations are most likely to be in the 100,000 to 60,000 range before 2028. Breaking through a new high will happen after 2028. Next year, 2026, will be a very turbulent year.
The world will fall into chaos, starting from Qingcheng. Can you be the one to restore order?
Bitcoin has entered a bear market phase according to the cycle, and the future fluctuations are most likely to be in the 100,000 to 60,000 range before 2028. Breaking through a new high will happen after 2028. Next year, 2026, will be a very turbulent year.
The world will fall into chaos, starting from Qingcheng. Can you be the one to restore order?
See original
The Indian side warmly received, before attending the banquet, Putin suddenly announced to China!
When Putin arrived in India, no one expected Modi to provide such a high level of hospitality. The red carpet was rolled out, the dance performance started, and the Prime Minister personally greeted him at the airport, giving Putin a big hug, and then directly invited him back to the official residence for a private dinner, where they talked for three hours. It is important to note that this is Putin's first visit to India since the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and the West is watching closely, almost with eyes turning red from tension, yet Modi behaved as if he were welcoming the most distinguished guest. Modi is not unaware of the West's attitude; he is fully aware: Russia's position in India's strategic landscape cannot be replaced by any country. More noteworthy is that before meeting Modi, Putin, during an interview with Indian media, suddenly brought up China voluntarily, and his attitude was intriguing.
He said that India and China are Russia's "closest friends," which Moscow "treasures greatly," but Russia "has no right to interfere" in issues between China and India, believing that the two countries will find solutions to all problems themselves. Putin's words seem standard, yet they clearly articulate the underlying logic of the China-Russia-India triangle relationship, and bluntly reveal a reality: Putin's visit to India aims to enhance Russia-India relations, but he is not there to act as a "mediator" between China and India. Many people are puzzled, as this does not seem like Putin's style. Whether in the Middle East, Syria, Afghanistan, Nagorno-Karabakh, or the "Stan brothers" in Central Asia, when has Russia ever been afraid of meddling? Why is it only in the context of China and India that he takes a step back and voluntarily clarifies "I won't interfere"? The answer is simple: Putin understands the depth of the contradictions between China and India too well. The border disputes between China and India cannot be glossed over with diplomatic rhetoric, nor can they be easily resolved by external forces. Any excessive involvement by a third party will only lead to doubts from one side, and Russia must maintain strategic partnerships with both China and India, with "perceived bias" being the most taboo. Russia knows that China does not need mediation, and India certainly will not buy into that.
Rather than being an ungrateful "peacemaker," it is better to be a stable "third pivot." But this does not mean that Putin does not want to promote China-Russia-India cooperation. At a forum on December 2, he had already made his stance clear: "Years of friendship and strategic cooperation closely tie Russia, China, and India together." This statement reveals Putin's true strategic card: the Russia-Ukraine conflict cannot destroy Russia, Western sanctions cannot sever Russia-India relations, and the distribution of power in Eurasia is being reshaped, while Russia wants to stabilize the continental plate together with China and India. The problem is that there are no structural contradictions between China and Russia, and China has never rejected India; what truly needs to change is India. Over the past decade, India's biggest problem has not been a lack of strength, but a lack of vision. India's development potential is indeed enormous, but its policy towards China is often hijacked by nationalist sentiments and manipulated by the U.S. "Indo-Pacific strategy," thinking that entering Washington's small circle will turn it into a "quasi-ally great power." The U.S. outwardly claims it wants to pull India to balance China, yet in reality, India is merely treated as a pawn.
The U.S., Japan, and Australia all far exceed India in military and economic strength; India is merely "filling the numbers" rather than being the "core." The U.S. will not go to war with China for India's sake, nor will it sacrifice its relationship with Russia for India, let alone help India resolve border issues. Putin's visit to India represents a rare moment of clarity for Modi. What can Russia provide India? Energy, weapons, political security, diplomatic buffer, and even strategic space on the Eurasian continent. The former can be offered by the U.S. in small amounts, but the latter is something the U.S. can never provide. More crucially, in the context of the highly binding China-Russia relationship and the reshaping of Asian power dynamics, if India continues to waver between the West and China-Russia, it will ultimately lose trust on both sides. Ironically, if China, Russia, and India can truly cooperate, the combined energy of China's population, Russia's resources, and India's growth potential would be enough to shake the entire strategic center of the Western world.
This is not empty talk; it is the aggregation of hard power. The three countries span the Eurasian continent, controlling the most important geopolitical core globally; China is the global manufacturing center, India is the growth engine, and Russia is the resource giant. If the three sides can work together, the Western small circle and the new Cold War framework will be directly marginalized. If India joins such a framework, its position in international affairs will be more stable, faster, and more genuine than if it follows the U.S. at any step. Putin's strategy during his visit to India is to express the deepest reality in the gentlest way: Russia will not choose sides because it knows that the real future lies in the Eurasian continent; China will not force you to choose because cooperation is inherently bilateral; the key is whether India is willing to set aside ideological biases, break away from the Western narrative framework, and move towards truly "mature great power strategy."
Putin's embrace, Modi's red carpet, and China's restraint seem like three actions, but they are actually real signals of the quiet adjustment of the China-Russia-India triangular relationship. China-India relations cannot be immediately warmed up due to a single conversation, but India cannot forever push away from the center of continental power. The world becomes increasingly chaotic, while Eurasia remains stable; the more the U.S. seeks division, the more reason China, Russia, and India have to unite. Putin's visit to India is not a formality, nor a mere gesture, but a preemptive layout for the Eurasian landscape in the next ten to twenty years. As for when India will understand this chess game, that will be the key to whether the entire region can avoid being "carved up" by the West again.
When Putin arrived in India, no one expected Modi to provide such a high level of hospitality. The red carpet was rolled out, the dance performance started, and the Prime Minister personally greeted him at the airport, giving Putin a big hug, and then directly invited him back to the official residence for a private dinner, where they talked for three hours. It is important to note that this is Putin's first visit to India since the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and the West is watching closely, almost with eyes turning red from tension, yet Modi behaved as if he were welcoming the most distinguished guest. Modi is not unaware of the West's attitude; he is fully aware: Russia's position in India's strategic landscape cannot be replaced by any country. More noteworthy is that before meeting Modi, Putin, during an interview with Indian media, suddenly brought up China voluntarily, and his attitude was intriguing.
He said that India and China are Russia's "closest friends," which Moscow "treasures greatly," but Russia "has no right to interfere" in issues between China and India, believing that the two countries will find solutions to all problems themselves. Putin's words seem standard, yet they clearly articulate the underlying logic of the China-Russia-India triangle relationship, and bluntly reveal a reality: Putin's visit to India aims to enhance Russia-India relations, but he is not there to act as a "mediator" between China and India. Many people are puzzled, as this does not seem like Putin's style. Whether in the Middle East, Syria, Afghanistan, Nagorno-Karabakh, or the "Stan brothers" in Central Asia, when has Russia ever been afraid of meddling? Why is it only in the context of China and India that he takes a step back and voluntarily clarifies "I won't interfere"? The answer is simple: Putin understands the depth of the contradictions between China and India too well. The border disputes between China and India cannot be glossed over with diplomatic rhetoric, nor can they be easily resolved by external forces. Any excessive involvement by a third party will only lead to doubts from one side, and Russia must maintain strategic partnerships with both China and India, with "perceived bias" being the most taboo. Russia knows that China does not need mediation, and India certainly will not buy into that.
Rather than being an ungrateful "peacemaker," it is better to be a stable "third pivot." But this does not mean that Putin does not want to promote China-Russia-India cooperation. At a forum on December 2, he had already made his stance clear: "Years of friendship and strategic cooperation closely tie Russia, China, and India together." This statement reveals Putin's true strategic card: the Russia-Ukraine conflict cannot destroy Russia, Western sanctions cannot sever Russia-India relations, and the distribution of power in Eurasia is being reshaped, while Russia wants to stabilize the continental plate together with China and India. The problem is that there are no structural contradictions between China and Russia, and China has never rejected India; what truly needs to change is India. Over the past decade, India's biggest problem has not been a lack of strength, but a lack of vision. India's development potential is indeed enormous, but its policy towards China is often hijacked by nationalist sentiments and manipulated by the U.S. "Indo-Pacific strategy," thinking that entering Washington's small circle will turn it into a "quasi-ally great power." The U.S. outwardly claims it wants to pull India to balance China, yet in reality, India is merely treated as a pawn.
The U.S., Japan, and Australia all far exceed India in military and economic strength; India is merely "filling the numbers" rather than being the "core." The U.S. will not go to war with China for India's sake, nor will it sacrifice its relationship with Russia for India, let alone help India resolve border issues. Putin's visit to India represents a rare moment of clarity for Modi. What can Russia provide India? Energy, weapons, political security, diplomatic buffer, and even strategic space on the Eurasian continent. The former can be offered by the U.S. in small amounts, but the latter is something the U.S. can never provide. More crucially, in the context of the highly binding China-Russia relationship and the reshaping of Asian power dynamics, if India continues to waver between the West and China-Russia, it will ultimately lose trust on both sides. Ironically, if China, Russia, and India can truly cooperate, the combined energy of China's population, Russia's resources, and India's growth potential would be enough to shake the entire strategic center of the Western world.
This is not empty talk; it is the aggregation of hard power. The three countries span the Eurasian continent, controlling the most important geopolitical core globally; China is the global manufacturing center, India is the growth engine, and Russia is the resource giant. If the three sides can work together, the Western small circle and the new Cold War framework will be directly marginalized. If India joins such a framework, its position in international affairs will be more stable, faster, and more genuine than if it follows the U.S. at any step. Putin's strategy during his visit to India is to express the deepest reality in the gentlest way: Russia will not choose sides because it knows that the real future lies in the Eurasian continent; China will not force you to choose because cooperation is inherently bilateral; the key is whether India is willing to set aside ideological biases, break away from the Western narrative framework, and move towards truly "mature great power strategy."
Putin's embrace, Modi's red carpet, and China's restraint seem like three actions, but they are actually real signals of the quiet adjustment of the China-Russia-India triangular relationship. China-India relations cannot be immediately warmed up due to a single conversation, but India cannot forever push away from the center of continental power. The world becomes increasingly chaotic, while Eurasia remains stable; the more the U.S. seeks division, the more reason China, Russia, and India have to unite. Putin's visit to India is not a formality, nor a mere gesture, but a preemptive layout for the Eurasian landscape in the next ten to twenty years. As for when India will understand this chess game, that will be the key to whether the entire region can avoid being "carved up" by the West again.
🇺🇸 **BREAKING NEWS:**
Fed Chair Jerome Powell just sent shockwaves through global markets.
In a calm but heavy statement, Powell revealed that a **new digital asset is rapidly rising as a legitimate competitor to gold** — though he emphasized it poses *no threat* to the US dollar… *yet.*
The reaction was instant:
Silence.
Charts paused.
Traders froze — trying to decode what Powell really meant and what’s unfolding behind the scenes.
This wasn’t a normal comment.
It felt like the quiet announcement of a **new financial era**, delivered with almost surgical timing.
And now, all eyes have shifted to President Trump.
Because everyone knows one thing for sure:
**Trump won’t stay quiet.**
His response could be explosive, confident, and possibly the start of a new financial strategy for America.
The world is watching.
The crypto market is watching.
And everyone is waiting for what comes next.
$USTC $LUNA $WIN
Fed Chair Jerome Powell just sent shockwaves through global markets.
In a calm but heavy statement, Powell revealed that a **new digital asset is rapidly rising as a legitimate competitor to gold** — though he emphasized it poses *no threat* to the US dollar… *yet.*
The reaction was instant:
Silence.
Charts paused.
Traders froze — trying to decode what Powell really meant and what’s unfolding behind the scenes.
This wasn’t a normal comment.
It felt like the quiet announcement of a **new financial era**, delivered with almost surgical timing.
And now, all eyes have shifted to President Trump.
Because everyone knows one thing for sure:
**Trump won’t stay quiet.**
His response could be explosive, confident, and possibly the start of a new financial strategy for America.
The world is watching.
The crypto market is watching.
And everyone is waiting for what comes next.
$USTC $LUNA $WIN