云淡风轻9527
Open Trade
High-Frequency Trader
2.8 Months
初入币圈的韭菜，基本不自己交易，做眼光最毒辣的伯乐，骑最稳最快的千里马。😁
52 Following
48 Followers
25 Liked
3 Shared
See original
PINNED
I am the nemesis of following trades
1.Hachibi was liquidated by me
2.usur, the vetoed boss, just happened to get liquidated on the day I followed.
3.skygggg, I just started following a few days ago and also faced a significant drawdown, but now it's at a new high, I guess my skills are still lacking.
4.Riding a donkey, Donkey brother, just started on the first day, a 60% drawdown, still resting.
5.Short Blade Master, Knife brother, had a significant drawdown after a few days of following, currently resting.
6.Stallone2222, not mistaken, an experienced trader with 450 days of trading, the most stable one faced a significant drawdown after a few days of following, but is currently slowly recovering.
There are still a few others who are kneeling that I won't mention for now. I have only been following for less than a month, being able to follow so many stable collapses is also a skill 😖
2.usur, the vetoed boss, just happened to get liquidated on the day I followed.
3.skygggg, I just started following a few days ago and also faced a significant drawdown, but now it's at a new high, I guess my skills are still lacking.
4.Riding a donkey, Donkey brother, just started on the first day, a 60% drawdown, still resting.
5.Short Blade Master, Knife brother, had a significant drawdown after a few days of following, currently resting.
6.Stallone2222, not mistaken, an experienced trader with 450 days of trading, the most stable one faced a significant drawdown after a few days of following, but is currently slowly recovering.
There are still a few others who are kneeling that I won't mention for now. I have only been following for less than a month, being able to follow so many stable collapses is also a skill 😖
See original
This dog farm really seems like a joke, going up and down like that, it's really disgusting.
See original
Tonight's trades with ALCH are basically all short positions. I know of three significant pullbacks, one small loss, and one small profit before getting off. It hurts too much 😖
See original
Copy traders actually don't need to worry about having a heavier position to earn more; normally, a monthly return of 20-30% on an investment of 77,000 for copy trading would yield a profit of 2,000 in one month. In fact, if your own principal is 1,000 USDT, it's like doubling your capital, which is hard to imagine! So as long as you manage your account data well and the copy trading funds increase, you don’t have to work too hard; your own capital returns will be quite satisfying. However, the most severe issue is a significant drawdown, where the losses are not only on your own capital but also on these potential earnings. Moreover, you need to ensure that the earnings from copy trading remain positive to continue receiving profits. Additionally, poor performance data can greatly reduce existing copy trading funds and prevent new investments, leading to significant losses.
See original
When following up on orders, it is important to do your homework and research.
I have followed 60 trades on Binance, almost all of them have resulted in losses, and I'm about to lose 1000 oil. Recently, I've analyzed some top traders again.
Jiuhuang has a high total return rate, but the drawdown is too large. Followers need to have a very high risk tolerance to be profitable, and if the investment amount is small, slippage can force a liquidation, and that would be the end.
Guchangcheng, which might be a new account for Guchangsheng, anyway, I lost quite a bit following him before, but this new account is performing well. However, the drawdown is still high, and I'm a bit scared.
The return rate for catching tigers in caves is average, but very stable. I believe the most important aspect of trading cryptocurrencies is stability. Of course, the returns shouldn't be too low; otherwise, it's not worth it compared to spot trading. So currently, the only trader I follow is him.
I have followed many traders, whether on OKEx or Binance, and in the end, I lost every time. It reminds me of something a netizen once said: the truly skilled ones don’t really lead trades. 😂 While it may not apply universally, it is indeed true that most perform very inconsistently.
Now, I look at traders' 90-day profit curves first. Something like Jiuhuang is very dangerous; you are very likely to follow at the peak and then face a sharp drop and liquidation.
Jiuhuang has a high total return rate, but the drawdown is too large. Followers need to have a very high risk tolerance to be profitable, and if the investment amount is small, slippage can force a liquidation, and that would be the end.
Guchangcheng, which might be a new account for Guchangsheng, anyway, I lost quite a bit following him before, but this new account is performing well. However, the drawdown is still high, and I'm a bit scared.
The return rate for catching tigers in caves is average, but very stable. I believe the most important aspect of trading cryptocurrencies is stability. Of course, the returns shouldn't be too low; otherwise, it's not worth it compared to spot trading. So currently, the only trader I follow is him.
I have followed many traders, whether on OKEx or Binance, and in the end, I lost every time. It reminds me of something a netizen once said: the truly skilled ones don’t really lead trades. 😂 While it may not apply universally, it is indeed true that most perform very inconsistently.
Now, I look at traders' 90-day profit curves first. Something like Jiuhuang is very dangerous; you are very likely to follow at the peak and then face a sharp drop and liquidation.
See original
People prefer to go long and dislike going short; it's much more comfortable to look at the trend upside down. $BTC
See original
The bullet grazed my scalp again, sooner or later I'll have a heart attack 😮💨#事件合约需要大胆魄
See original
Improved Martingale, just a slightly higher win rate makes it very terrifying!
See original
New Perspectives on Event Contracts: In addition to using strategies, one must also pay attention to the timing of entry points. The more the reversal and pinning points, the greater the space for entering and exiting. Everyone can take a look at the price difference between their opening and closing positions. If the price difference for each trade is not significant, it indicates that the entry point is not ideal, making it easy to falter midway. Additionally, in terms of mindset, many people charge in without thinking when placing orders, but soon after opening a position, they become anxious. This is a common manifestation of following emotional fluctuations. In fact, it should be the opposite: be more cautious in decision-making, don’t act impulsively, and think carefully at every step. Once a position is opened, it should be a 'buy and forget' mentality—just like Schrödinger's cat, the market trend is already determined the moment you place your order; whether the outcome is profit or loss, 'life or death', you cannot control it, only wait for the result to unfold. Therefore, maintaining emotional stability is crucial; excessive fluctuations will only interfere with your judgment and subsequent decisions.
Summary: To achieve long-term profitability, one must improve the win rate. Improved Martingale can only serve as a defense. Gamblers should stay away unless they have unlimited funds (which is not feasible) or can break the betting limit (which is hopeful).
See original
Summary: To achieve long-term profitability, one must improve the win rate. Improved Martingale can only serve as a defense. Gamblers should stay away unless they have unlimited funds (which is not feasible) or can break the betting limit (which is hopeful).
About the Improvement of the Martingale Strategy in Event Contracts
Core data
Principal: 1800U
Maximum consecutive losses: 6 times
Win rate: 40%
Betting limit: 750UInitial profit: 5UGive up profit: From the 4th time (P = 0U)Capital preservation ratio: From the 5th time 90%Betting amount (rounded up): 5U, 13U, 29U, 59U, 119U, 268URequired principal: 493UProbability of losing 6 times: 4.6656%Maximum bearable consecutive losses: 8 times (1765U)ExplanationA profit of 5U in the first 3 times is reasonable, give up profit on the 4th time, preserve 90% of the principal on the 5th time, 493U is far lower than 1800U, safe and efficient.If it's purely a mathematical formula derivation and calculation, the improvement of the Martingale strategy is indeed effective. However, why do some people encounter 11 consecutive losses? I believe that after four or five consecutive losses, your win rate may drop sharply to below 10%. Because at this point, the principal investment increases, and emotions and actions are fully dominated by human factors such as fear; you have become the '80' or even '90' in the 80/20 rule. Therefore, if you feel out of control after four or five consecutive losses, you should stop immediately, or switch to coin toss decision-making (50% stable probability), or lower profit targets (such as only making 2-3U each time) to increase the number of consecutive losses you can bear. Share your core data in the comments section, and I can use this strategy to calculate and analyze for you. Different viewpoints and opinions are welcome for discussion.
Principal: 1800U
Maximum consecutive losses: 6 times
Win rate: 40%
Betting limit: 750UInitial profit: 5UGive up profit: From the 4th time (P = 0U)Capital preservation ratio: From the 5th time 90%Betting amount (rounded up): 5U, 13U, 29U, 59U, 119U, 268URequired principal: 493UProbability of losing 6 times: 4.6656%Maximum bearable consecutive losses: 8 times (1765U)ExplanationA profit of 5U in the first 3 times is reasonable, give up profit on the 4th time, preserve 90% of the principal on the 5th time, 493U is far lower than 1800U, safe and efficient.If it's purely a mathematical formula derivation and calculation, the improvement of the Martingale strategy is indeed effective. However, why do some people encounter 11 consecutive losses? I believe that after four or five consecutive losses, your win rate may drop sharply to below 10%. Because at this point, the principal investment increases, and emotions and actions are fully dominated by human factors such as fear; you have become the '80' or even '90' in the 80/20 rule. Therefore, if you feel out of control after four or five consecutive losses, you should stop immediately, or switch to coin toss decision-making (50% stable probability), or lower profit targets (such as only making 2-3U each time) to increase the number of consecutive losses you can bear. Share your core data in the comments section, and I can use this strategy to calculate and analyze for you. Different viewpoints and opinions are welcome for discussion.
See original
Comparison of Traditional Martingale Strategy and Improved Strategy: The traditional strategy doubles the bet after a loss and resets after a win, with bet amounts increasing rapidly. Experiencing 6 consecutive losses requires over 1800U capital, which is extremely high risk and suitable for unlimited capital or short-term gambling. The improved strategy seeks early profits, gives up profits in the mid-term, and focuses on capital preservation in the later stages. The bet growth is slow, requiring only 424U after 6 consecutive losses, with controllable risk. It balances returns and risks in a positive EV market, suitable for long-term stable operations. Summary: The traditional strategy has high risk and high returns, suitable for short-term; the improved strategy has low risk, suitable for long-term operations with limited capital.
About the Improvement of the Martingale Strategy in Event Contracts
Core data
Principal: 1800U
Maximum consecutive losses: 6 times
Win rate: 40%
Betting limit: 750UInitial profit: 5UGive up profit: From the 4th time (P = 0U)Capital preservation ratio: From the 5th time 90%Betting amount (rounded up): 5U, 13U, 29U, 59U, 119U, 268URequired principal: 493UProbability of losing 6 times: 4.6656%Maximum bearable consecutive losses: 8 times (1765U)ExplanationA profit of 5U in the first 3 times is reasonable, give up profit on the 4th time, preserve 90% of the principal on the 5th time, 493U is far lower than 1800U, safe and efficient.If it's purely a mathematical formula derivation and calculation, the improvement of the Martingale strategy is indeed effective. However, why do some people encounter 11 consecutive losses? I believe that after four or five consecutive losses, your win rate may drop sharply to below 10%. Because at this point, the principal investment increases, and emotions and actions are fully dominated by human factors such as fear; you have become the '80' or even '90' in the 80/20 rule. Therefore, if you feel out of control after four or five consecutive losses, you should stop immediately, or switch to coin toss decision-making (50% stable probability), or lower profit targets (such as only making 2-3U each time) to increase the number of consecutive losses you can bear. Share your core data in the comments section, and I can use this strategy to calculate and analyze for you. Different viewpoints and opinions are welcome for discussion.
Principal: 1800U
Maximum consecutive losses: 6 times
Win rate: 40%
Betting limit: 750UInitial profit: 5UGive up profit: From the 4th time (P = 0U)Capital preservation ratio: From the 5th time 90%Betting amount (rounded up): 5U, 13U, 29U, 59U, 119U, 268URequired principal: 493UProbability of losing 6 times: 4.6656%Maximum bearable consecutive losses: 8 times (1765U)ExplanationA profit of 5U in the first 3 times is reasonable, give up profit on the 4th time, preserve 90% of the principal on the 5th time, 493U is far lower than 1800U, safe and efficient.If it's purely a mathematical formula derivation and calculation, the improvement of the Martingale strategy is indeed effective. However, why do some people encounter 11 consecutive losses? I believe that after four or five consecutive losses, your win rate may drop sharply to below 10%. Because at this point, the principal investment increases, and emotions and actions are fully dominated by human factors such as fear; you have become the '80' or even '90' in the 80/20 rule. Therefore, if you feel out of control after four or five consecutive losses, you should stop immediately, or switch to coin toss decision-making (50% stable probability), or lower profit targets (such as only making 2-3U each time) to increase the number of consecutive losses you can bear. Share your core data in the comments section, and I can use this strategy to calculate and analyze for you. Different viewpoints and opinions are welcome for discussion.
See original
In the case of a 60% win rate, the expected return for each bet is positive (EV=0.08A), which means that profitability can be achieved in the long run. When using the Martingale strategy, the risk of consecutive losses is low (the probability of 6 consecutive losses is only 0.4%), and the principal is sufficient (1800U far exceeds the required 872U), making the strategy effective and feasible. To balance returns and risks, the following suggestions are made: First 3 bets: aim to earn 10U each time, pursuing higher returns. Bets 4-5: reduce the target to 5U each time, gradually lowering risk. From the 6th bet onwards: adjust the target to break even, ensuring fund safety. Meanwhile, to control risks, the following limits must be set: Stop-loss line: stop betting when total losses reach 1500U to avoid significant losses. Single bet limit: 90U, to prevent excessive single investment.
About the Improvement of the Martingale Strategy in Event Contracts
Core data
Principal: 1800U
Maximum consecutive losses: 6 times
Win rate: 40%
Betting limit: 750UInitial profit: 5UGive up profit: From the 4th time (P = 0U)Capital preservation ratio: From the 5th time 90%Betting amount (rounded up): 5U, 13U, 29U, 59U, 119U, 268URequired principal: 493UProbability of losing 6 times: 4.6656%Maximum bearable consecutive losses: 8 times (1765U)ExplanationA profit of 5U in the first 3 times is reasonable, give up profit on the 4th time, preserve 90% of the principal on the 5th time, 493U is far lower than 1800U, safe and efficient.If it's purely a mathematical formula derivation and calculation, the improvement of the Martingale strategy is indeed effective. However, why do some people encounter 11 consecutive losses? I believe that after four or five consecutive losses, your win rate may drop sharply to below 10%. Because at this point, the principal investment increases, and emotions and actions are fully dominated by human factors such as fear; you have become the '80' or even '90' in the 80/20 rule. Therefore, if you feel out of control after four or five consecutive losses, you should stop immediately, or switch to coin toss decision-making (50% stable probability), or lower profit targets (such as only making 2-3U each time) to increase the number of consecutive losses you can bear. Share your core data in the comments section, and I can use this strategy to calculate and analyze for you. Different viewpoints and opinions are welcome for discussion.
Principal: 1800U
Maximum consecutive losses: 6 times
Win rate: 40%
Betting limit: 750UInitial profit: 5UGive up profit: From the 4th time (P = 0U)Capital preservation ratio: From the 5th time 90%Betting amount (rounded up): 5U, 13U, 29U, 59U, 119U, 268URequired principal: 493UProbability of losing 6 times: 4.6656%Maximum bearable consecutive losses: 8 times (1765U)ExplanationA profit of 5U in the first 3 times is reasonable, give up profit on the 4th time, preserve 90% of the principal on the 5th time, 493U is far lower than 1800U, safe and efficient.If it's purely a mathematical formula derivation and calculation, the improvement of the Martingale strategy is indeed effective. However, why do some people encounter 11 consecutive losses? I believe that after four or five consecutive losses, your win rate may drop sharply to below 10%. Because at this point, the principal investment increases, and emotions and actions are fully dominated by human factors such as fear; you have become the '80' or even '90' in the 80/20 rule. Therefore, if you feel out of control after four or five consecutive losses, you should stop immediately, or switch to coin toss decision-making (50% stable probability), or lower profit targets (such as only making 2-3U each time) to increase the number of consecutive losses you can bear. Share your core data in the comments section, and I can use this strategy to calculate and analyze for you. Different viewpoints and opinions are welcome for discussion.
See original
If your win rate is 40%, the odds are 0.8, and you lose an average of 0.28 times your principal each time you bet (assuming the bet amount is A). In the long run, for example, after betting 10,000 times, since the average return is negative, a losing streak will inevitably occur. For instance, according to the improved Martingale strategy (earn 5U in the first 3 bets, break even in the 4th bet, and protect 90% of the principal from the 5th bet onwards), an initial principal of 1800U cannot avoid being reduced to zero—losing streaks of 6 or more are highly probable. Therefore, in the long term, the betting principal will inevitably be wiped out. It is recommended to find a method with a higher win rate and better odds.
About the Improvement of the Martingale Strategy in Event Contracts
Core data
Principal: 1800U
Maximum consecutive losses: 6 times
Win rate: 40%
Betting limit: 750UInitial profit: 5UGive up profit: From the 4th time (P = 0U)Capital preservation ratio: From the 5th time 90%Betting amount (rounded up): 5U, 13U, 29U, 59U, 119U, 268URequired principal: 493UProbability of losing 6 times: 4.6656%Maximum bearable consecutive losses: 8 times (1765U)ExplanationA profit of 5U in the first 3 times is reasonable, give up profit on the 4th time, preserve 90% of the principal on the 5th time, 493U is far lower than 1800U, safe and efficient.If it's purely a mathematical formula derivation and calculation, the improvement of the Martingale strategy is indeed effective. However, why do some people encounter 11 consecutive losses? I believe that after four or five consecutive losses, your win rate may drop sharply to below 10%. Because at this point, the principal investment increases, and emotions and actions are fully dominated by human factors such as fear; you have become the '80' or even '90' in the 80/20 rule. Therefore, if you feel out of control after four or five consecutive losses, you should stop immediately, or switch to coin toss decision-making (50% stable probability), or lower profit targets (such as only making 2-3U each time) to increase the number of consecutive losses you can bear. Share your core data in the comments section, and I can use this strategy to calculate and analyze for you. Different viewpoints and opinions are welcome for discussion.
Principal: 1800U
Maximum consecutive losses: 6 times
Win rate: 40%
Betting limit: 750UInitial profit: 5UGive up profit: From the 4th time (P = 0U)Capital preservation ratio: From the 5th time 90%Betting amount (rounded up): 5U, 13U, 29U, 59U, 119U, 268URequired principal: 493UProbability of losing 6 times: 4.6656%Maximum bearable consecutive losses: 8 times (1765U)ExplanationA profit of 5U in the first 3 times is reasonable, give up profit on the 4th time, preserve 90% of the principal on the 5th time, 493U is far lower than 1800U, safe and efficient.If it's purely a mathematical formula derivation and calculation, the improvement of the Martingale strategy is indeed effective. However, why do some people encounter 11 consecutive losses? I believe that after four or five consecutive losses, your win rate may drop sharply to below 10%. Because at this point, the principal investment increases, and emotions and actions are fully dominated by human factors such as fear; you have become the '80' or even '90' in the 80/20 rule. Therefore, if you feel out of control after four or five consecutive losses, you should stop immediately, or switch to coin toss decision-making (50% stable probability), or lower profit targets (such as only making 2-3U each time) to increase the number of consecutive losses you can bear. Share your core data in the comments section, and I can use this strategy to calculate and analyze for you. Different viewpoints and opinions are welcome for discussion.
See original
👉👉👉👉Question: So in fact, we can disregard the market's ups and downs and make decisions by tossing a coin, but my odds are indeed 0.8. Then, using my previously improved version of the Martingale strategy, what can the mathematical expectation reach based on the most recent calculation data? 👉👉👉👉Answer: Using coin toss decisions (win rate 50%), odds of 0.8, and the improved Martingale strategy (earning 5U in the first 3 attempts, not pursuing profit in the 4th attempt, and protecting 90% of the principal in the 5th attempt), the mathematical expectation is negative. Taking an initial capital of 1800U as an example, the average loss per bet is about 0.5U, and in the long run, it will lead to total loss. Since the odds of 0.8 are less than 1, the strategy may slow down losses but cannot generate profit. It is advised to increase the odds or reduce costs; otherwise, the principal will eventually be wiped out.
About the Improvement of the Martingale Strategy in Event Contracts
Core data
Principal: 1800U
Maximum consecutive losses: 6 times
Win rate: 40%
Betting limit: 750UInitial profit: 5UGive up profit: From the 4th time (P = 0U)Capital preservation ratio: From the 5th time 90%Betting amount (rounded up): 5U, 13U, 29U, 59U, 119U, 268URequired principal: 493UProbability of losing 6 times: 4.6656%Maximum bearable consecutive losses: 8 times (1765U)ExplanationA profit of 5U in the first 3 times is reasonable, give up profit on the 4th time, preserve 90% of the principal on the 5th time, 493U is far lower than 1800U, safe and efficient.If it's purely a mathematical formula derivation and calculation, the improvement of the Martingale strategy is indeed effective. However, why do some people encounter 11 consecutive losses? I believe that after four or five consecutive losses, your win rate may drop sharply to below 10%. Because at this point, the principal investment increases, and emotions and actions are fully dominated by human factors such as fear; you have become the '80' or even '90' in the 80/20 rule. Therefore, if you feel out of control after four or five consecutive losses, you should stop immediately, or switch to coin toss decision-making (50% stable probability), or lower profit targets (such as only making 2-3U each time) to increase the number of consecutive losses you can bear. Share your core data in the comments section, and I can use this strategy to calculate and analyze for you. Different viewpoints and opinions are welcome for discussion.
Principal: 1800U
Maximum consecutive losses: 6 times
Win rate: 40%
Betting limit: 750UInitial profit: 5UGive up profit: From the 4th time (P = 0U)Capital preservation ratio: From the 5th time 90%Betting amount (rounded up): 5U, 13U, 29U, 59U, 119U, 268URequired principal: 493UProbability of losing 6 times: 4.6656%Maximum bearable consecutive losses: 8 times (1765U)ExplanationA profit of 5U in the first 3 times is reasonable, give up profit on the 4th time, preserve 90% of the principal on the 5th time, 493U is far lower than 1800U, safe and efficient.If it's purely a mathematical formula derivation and calculation, the improvement of the Martingale strategy is indeed effective. However, why do some people encounter 11 consecutive losses? I believe that after four or five consecutive losses, your win rate may drop sharply to below 10%. Because at this point, the principal investment increases, and emotions and actions are fully dominated by human factors such as fear; you have become the '80' or even '90' in the 80/20 rule. Therefore, if you feel out of control after four or five consecutive losses, you should stop immediately, or switch to coin toss decision-making (50% stable probability), or lower profit targets (such as only making 2-3U each time) to increase the number of consecutive losses you can bear. Share your core data in the comments section, and I can use this strategy to calculate and analyze for you. Different viewpoints and opinions are welcome for discussion.
See original
About the Improvement of the Martingale Strategy in Event Contracts
Core data
Principal: 1800U
Maximum consecutive losses: 6 times
Win rate: 40%
Betting limit: 750UInitial profit: 5UGive up profit: From the 4th time (P = 0U)Capital preservation ratio: From the 5th time 90%Betting amount (rounded up): 5U, 13U, 29U, 59U, 119U, 268URequired principal: 493UProbability of losing 6 times: 4.6656%Maximum bearable consecutive losses: 8 times (1765U)ExplanationA profit of 5U in the first 3 times is reasonable, give up profit on the 4th time, preserve 90% of the principal on the 5th time, 493U is far lower than 1800U, safe and efficient.If it's purely a mathematical formula derivation and calculation, the improvement of the Martingale strategy is indeed effective. However, why do some people encounter 11 consecutive losses? I believe that after four or five consecutive losses, your win rate may drop sharply to below 10%. Because at this point, the principal investment increases, and emotions and actions are fully dominated by human factors such as fear; you have become the '80' or even '90' in the 80/20 rule. Therefore, if you feel out of control after four or five consecutive losses, you should stop immediately, or switch to coin toss decision-making (50% stable probability), or lower profit targets (such as only making 2-3U each time) to increase the number of consecutive losses you can bear. Share your core data in the comments section, and I can use this strategy to calculate and analyze for you. Different viewpoints and opinions are welcome for discussion.
Principal: 1800U
Maximum consecutive losses: 6 times
Win rate: 40%
Betting limit: 750UInitial profit: 5UGive up profit: From the 4th time (P = 0U)Capital preservation ratio: From the 5th time 90%Betting amount (rounded up): 5U, 13U, 29U, 59U, 119U, 268URequired principal: 493UProbability of losing 6 times: 4.6656%Maximum bearable consecutive losses: 8 times (1765U)ExplanationA profit of 5U in the first 3 times is reasonable, give up profit on the 4th time, preserve 90% of the principal on the 5th time, 493U is far lower than 1800U, safe and efficient.If it's purely a mathematical formula derivation and calculation, the improvement of the Martingale strategy is indeed effective. However, why do some people encounter 11 consecutive losses? I believe that after four or five consecutive losses, your win rate may drop sharply to below 10%. Because at this point, the principal investment increases, and emotions and actions are fully dominated by human factors such as fear; you have become the '80' or even '90' in the 80/20 rule. Therefore, if you feel out of control after four or five consecutive losses, you should stop immediately, or switch to coin toss decision-making (50% stable probability), or lower profit targets (such as only making 2-3U each time) to increase the number of consecutive losses you can bear. Share your core data in the comments section, and I can use this strategy to calculate and analyze for you. Different viewpoints and opinions are welcome for discussion.
See original
Martin Gale Charm Moment 🙃
See original
Damn, the bullet grazed my scalp. It scared me to death.
See original
I want to know if following these KOLs can really help me make money, nothing else matters.
Quoted content has been removed
See original
Does anyone know if this simple mode has 0 fees, is it fully waived?
See original
Bro, take a look at these 1 HoangthaiCrypto1994 2 Volatility Hunter 3 MoneyBoxTM 4 Quantitative God of Wealth 5 Cattie 6 NovaVault 7 Stallone2222 8 6lowpan 9 MrPencil 10 Stable Compound_ Monthly Compound 18 11 Bluezones 1 12 index_ Compass 13 Unity of Knowledge and Action, Follow the Trend 14 Crypto_Money_Machine
Continuous tracking of the lead trader——Supplement 1
Today, this pullback saw Bitcoin drop by over 5000 points, and most of the lead traders are basically in cash today. If they are still gambling on a rebound in the next few days, I have to seriously question their trading skills. Such a beautifully executed decline, if they were betting on a rebound above 80k, they really would have to face a significant pullback.
Let’s talk about this lead trader. A few days ago, a fan recommended the 'King of Resilience in the Crypto Circle' to me, and after tracking the technicals, maybe they really are just lucky. With a spirit of integrity and a long/short hedge… they have slowly climbed up for 60 days. How much skill do you think they really have? Not much, right? But if you say they lack skill, it took them 70 days to have a significant pullback. So, the duration of following the lead trader must be extended to truly see their real strength. Here’s a suggestion: fans who are following trades can withdraw their orders. There are so many traders in the square, and this particular lead trader really isn’t that impressive. The returns are very average, and when it goes up, the pullback isn’t small either. So why not look for those traders with higher returns and similar pullbacks?
Usually high returns, and setting a good stop-loss, when it goes up, at least our stop-loss can preserve the principal and maybe even some profit, right? So, it’s important to keep your eyes open. A rising yield curve that grows slowly doesn’t mean they can continue to be profitable.
So, do you understand now? #带单大神
Today, this pullback saw Bitcoin drop by over 5000 points, and most of the lead traders are basically in cash today. If they are still gambling on a rebound in the next few days, I have to seriously question their trading skills. Such a beautifully executed decline, if they were betting on a rebound above 80k, they really would have to face a significant pullback.
Let’s talk about this lead trader. A few days ago, a fan recommended the 'King of Resilience in the Crypto Circle' to me, and after tracking the technicals, maybe they really are just lucky. With a spirit of integrity and a long/short hedge… they have slowly climbed up for 60 days. How much skill do you think they really have? Not much, right? But if you say they lack skill, it took them 70 days to have a significant pullback. So, the duration of following the lead trader must be extended to truly see their real strength. Here’s a suggestion: fans who are following trades can withdraw their orders. There are so many traders in the square, and this particular lead trader really isn’t that impressive. The returns are very average, and when it goes up, the pullback isn’t small either. So why not look for those traders with higher returns and similar pullbacks?
Usually high returns, and setting a good stop-loss, when it goes up, at least our stop-loss can preserve the principal and maybe even some profit, right? So, it’s important to keep your eyes open. A rising yield curve that grows slowly doesn’t mean they can continue to be profitable.
So, do you understand now? #带单大神
Login to explore more contents