Did Vader make a mistake again?

In yesterday's tweet, it was mentioned again that the current strategy for Vader Yapping is to join if you can't beat it. Since you like high-frequency chatter, I will feed your algorithm. In the tests a few days ago, although I didn't keep talking like other small accounts, just adding some tags slightly increased the scores, which was particularly obvious for small bases.

Taking my own data as an example, the score for Vader was 1108 the day before yesterday, and yesterday's score was 2076. Previously, I hadn't mentioned $VADER at all, but just mentioning it slightly basically doubled the small base score. Of course, my Virtual score remains consistently stable at '8415' 🤣, but my ranking in Kaito's virtual system has dropped a lot.

Yesterday, I also saw many people updating their recent operations, whether reinvesting or bottom-fishing, all based on trust in @VaderResearch. Everyone still feels that the flywheel can keep turning despite the constant changes. Of course, admitting mistakes is a good thing, but isn't it ridiculous for a guy to have such absurd operations where 30% is weighted to 50% just because of poor team communication? Does the discrepancy between the data announced by the boss and the actual data really need users to keep providing feedback for over a week after launch to discover the issues? 🤣

The recent adjustment is: Mental Ownership % = Kaito Yaps Score * 42.5% + Arbus Score * 42.5% + Content Score * 15%

Simply put, the current algorithm's preference for chatter mostly depends on the algorithms of Kaito and Arbus. So, issues for the Chinese community also follow.

1️⃣ Although the weight ratio between Chinese and English in Kaito's algorithm is currently quite similar, from actual experience, Kaito's LLM recognition is clearly better for English than for Chinese. Some high-quality posts and interactions haven't helped their scores in Kaito.

2️⃣ For the officials, should the scoring standards and logic of the Arbus algorithm be updated? Kaito has also been running for half a year, and I believe that Kaito is definitely more mature than Arbus in terms of algorithms or subsequent optimizations. Why is the weight of both consistent?

3️⃣ For the 15% content scoring, does the meaning of chatter really just mean incessant blabbering? I believe that @Vader_AI_ needs high-quality content to attract more new users. The current state of the flywheel is that most people know it is declining, and with several rounds of score inflation, everyone is losing motivation to build. Users need a psychological support, and the platform needs to stabilize its users even more.

4️⃣ Currently, when it is known that there are issues with the VADER yapping rankings, there are still users in the top 100 of the mental leaderboard who have gained points through spam posts. Should we consider manual intervention to eliminate adverse effects on community users at this time?

Keep Building is not just talk; I hope to see some real measures implemented. Those who can persist are all hoping that Virtual can go further.