Imagine an organization without bosses, no board of directors, or CEO, where decisions are based on data, statistics, and machine learning, with minimal human intervention. Although it sounds like science fiction, this scenario is beginning to take shape thanks to the fusion of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and DAOs (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations).
In recent months, certain protocols have been incorporating AI into their DAO systems to improve governance, investment, and treasury management processes. Is this step a leap in efficiency or does it pose a risk to human autonomy? Here we delve into the scope of this innovation and what is truly at stake.
What are DAOs and how have they evolved?
DAOs emerged as an alternative to traditional business structures. Instead of relying on a leader or board of directors, a DAO is based on smart contracts and votes exercised by its members. Each participant (usually with a governance token) can propose, vote, and implement improvements.
The model gained strength in the crypto world by providing decentralized direction and greater transparency. However, as its complexity increased, the challenge of efficiency arose: how to sustain a scheme that demands the active participation of hundreds or thousands of people?
The answer may lie in Artificial Intelligence.
AI + DAO: what changes with the intervention of algorithms?
Combining AI and DAOs not only involves automating processes but also rethinking the paradigm of decision-making. Instead of relying entirely on human votes, some protocols use AI algorithms to suggest proposals, manage resources, anticipate risks, and even manage funds.
Projects like Virtuals DAO are starting to offer tokenized autonomous agents that operate with AI algorithms and smart contracts. These agents can make decisions based on real-time information (prices, trading volumes, community trends), reducing the inherent slowness of human voting and speeding up strategy execution.
For example, a DAO investment fund that needs to rebalance its portfolio does not need to wait several days for approval from its members. Instead, an AI agent, following criteria predefined by the participants, executes the plan instantly.
Advantages of this fusion: more agility and fewer human biases
Among the benefits of adding AI to DAOs, efficiency and objectivity stand out. Algorithms lack emotions or social pressures, analyzing everything according to programmed logic.
Furthermore, automation could reduce the possibility of fraud or corruption, as humans can be influenced by external interests, but an AI trained with clear rules would not have those biases. Finally, bureaucratic or routine tasks could be delegated to the machine, freeing people for more 'strategic' tasks (e.g., validating parameters or monitoring the AI itself).
But, who controls those algorithms?
Even with its advantages, the use of AI in DAOs presents complex challenges. The first is obvious: who develops and supervises the AI? How can it be ensured that the model is not biased or has not been manipulated? In a fully automated system, a failure or bug could have critical effects on funds and governance.
On the other hand, a DAO that delegates its decisions to advanced algorithms could lose transparency before its own members, undermining the participatory foundation. If the community does not understand in detail how the AI works or what variables it analyzes, the process ceases to be 100% accessible. Moreover, excessive reliance on code could mean that if the AI makes a mistake due to a misinterpretation, the damage could be complicated to reverse.
Is a future with almost 100% autonomous DAOs on the horizon?
The question is whether we will move towards DAOs that operate without daily human votes. Today, there are prototypes where AI not only supports but leads decisions. Projects like Fetch.ai, the aforementioned Virtuals DAO, and initiatives on Ethereum explore structures where AI not only assists but directs the process.
However, the main challenge lies in balancing that autonomy with control mechanisms. Perhaps the hybrid model is the way forward: an AI operating within a framework of limits set by humans, with constant community review. After all, the purpose of these organizations is to serve people, not AI.
AI and DAO: what does it imply for the crypto market?
The convergence between AI and DAOs opens a new chapter in crypto development. On one hand, greater speed, efficiency, and rationality. On the other, the threat that the lack of human oversight and the complexity of algorithms undermine the democratic essence of DAOs.
DAOs could transition from being purely human structures to a symbiosis with algorithms: 'Human-in-the-loop' (humans supervising) or, in extreme cases, 'Machine-in-the-loop' (AI dominating decision-making). Ultimately, technology must serve the collective, not replace it entirely.
The big question is: to what extent would we be willing to trust our investments and decision-making power to a non-human intelligence?
One step closer to decentralization (or not)
The adoption of AI in DAOs promises greater benefits and hints at a future with less human intervention in the management of funds and crypto projects. However, any computerized system—no matter how sophisticated—requires monitoring and clarity about the rules it executes.
Perhaps the DAOs of the future will end up being very different from those of today, with algorithms governing many of their processes automatically. But that future requires safeguards, oversight, and a genuine debate about the role that humans should maintain to avoid losing the essence of decentralized collaboration.
Would you be willing to participate in a protocol where decisions are primarily made by AI?
---
Image available on Freepik
