libra

🚨 A PRESIDENT PROMOTED A CRYPTO TOKEN. IT CRASHED. NOW THE CRIMINAL CASE HAS BEEN DISMISSED!

🇦🇷 Argentina’s $LIBRA memecoin controversy has taken a major legal turn!

Here’s what happened. 👇

📅 FEBRUARY 2025

Argentina’s President Javier Milei shared a social media post about LIBRA, a cryptocurrency project presented as supporting Argentine businesses.

The token surged before crashing dramatically, leaving many investors facing losses.

⚖️ OCTOBER 2026 — MAJOR LEGAL DEVELOPMENT

An Argentine judge dismissed a criminal investigation related to the LIBRA controversy, citing insufficient evidence to establish criminal fraud.

But here’s the important part. 👇

⚠️ A DISMISSED CASE DOESN’T MEAN INVESTORS GOT THEIR MONEY BACK!

The legal decision doesn’t erase financial losses or necessarily end every possible legal challenge.

💡 THE BIG LESSON

Never invest in a cryptocurrency simply because a celebrity, influencer or politician promotes it.

Before buying any token, investigate:

✅ Token ownership and distribution
✅ Liquidity and trading volume
✅ Project transparency
✅ Real utility and potential risks

Whether you’re following $BTC, $SOL or trending memecoins, always do your own research.

💬 BIG QUESTION:

Should politicians and celebrities face stricter disclosure requirements when promoting crypto projects?

👇 Share your opinion in the comments!

#CryptoNews #LIBRA #Argentina #CryptoRegulation #Bitcoin

$LIBRA crashed. Argentina’s criminal probe into President Milei has now been dropped. 😳

The judge found that Javier Milei’s promotion of the memecoin did not constitute fraud, despite the attention his support drew to the token.

What sticks with me is the distinction: a court’s finding on fraud isn’t the same question as whether promoting a memecoin was responsible. ⚖️

Where do you draw the line—should public officials promote memecoins at all?

#LIBRA #Memecoins

🇦🇷 Argentine President Javier Milei appears to have emerged unscathed from the cryptocurrency turmoil — the court closed the investigation into the $Libra scam, NOT FINDING sufficient evidence of fraud.

Following Mileis promotion, the LIBRA token sharply rose in value, only to collapse just as quickly. Investors lost hundreds of millions of dollars, and there is nothing to charge the president with.
#libra

🚀 $LIBRA CASE DISMISSED – WHALE‑LEVEL RELIEF FOR THE TOKEN! 🦈

The Argentine court just tossed the criminal case against President Javier Milei and his sister, clearing the fog around the LIBRA token saga. 📊 Prosecutors couldn’t stitch together material that meets the legal threshold for fraud, so the charge evaporated.

That legal exhale instantly lifts the token’s risk profile, letting smart money recalibrate. 🦈 With the threat removed, we could see a liquidity influx as whales reposition, especially if the project still promises funding for startups. ⚡

💬 Will this legal win reignite $LIBRA ’s rally or merely settle the dust? 👇

⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️

🏷️ #LIBRA #LegalWin #CryptoNews #WhaleAction

🔥 💎

🚨 $LIBRA CASE DISMISSED – SMART MONEY REEVALUATES LIQUIDITY RISK 💥

The Argentine court’s dismissal removes a headline‑level legal cloud from $LIBRA , instantly resetting the token’s risk matrix. 🦈 Smart money had already mapped the abrupt post‑Milei sell‑off as a liquidity sweep, soaking up the surge before the price collapsed.

With the criminal narrative cleared, the next driver will be pure market mechanics – order‑block retests around the previous peak and any fresh institutional demand. 📊 Volume on the 4H remains muted, suggesting the swing may be waiting for a catalyst to re‑ignite buying pressure. ⚡

💬 Will $LIBRA attract a second wave of institutional inflow or stay dormant under the shadow of past volatility? 👇

⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️

🏷️ #LIBRA #LegalUpdate #CryptoNews #Liquidity #SmartMoney

🚀 🦈

The president’s crypto-token case is over: no crime was committed. On October 23, Argentine federal judge Marcelo Martínez de Giorgi dismissed the criminal case over LIBRA against President Javier Milei, his sister Karina Milei and nine others, after prosecutors themselves requested its dismissal. The judge’s reasoning was straightforward: the president’s post did amplify the project’s reach, but price swings and investor losses alone do not amount to fraud; nor was there evidence that state resources were used or that money was paid in exchange for access. Remember how wild this case was: the token launched on February 14, 2025, and took just 66 minutes to climb from its initial minting to around $4.55. Two wallets made about $5.4 million in just 43 minutes, while investors on the other side lost more than $251 million. The criminal case is closed, but the money hasn’t come back—and the ruling is not yet final. The civil claims and efforts to recover the funds are still another matter.#LIBRA #Argentina

An Argentine judge has dismissed the criminal investigation into President Milei, his sister, and LIBRA advisers, finding that their promotion of the token did not constitute fraud. LIBRA surged before plunging by more than 90%, while linked wallets withdrew large sums. The shift in regulatory stance has once again drawn attention to the legal boundaries of meme coin risks. #阿根廷 #米莱 #LIBRA #Meme coin

The legal outcomes following celebrity endorsements often arrive later than the price movements—and are more easily mistaken for a «final verdict».

According to reports, Argentine federal judge Marcelo Martinez de Giorgi dismissed the criminal investigation into President Milei, his sister Karina Milei, and others, finding that the conduct in question did not constitute a statutory offense. In the United States, a judge also dismissed a class-action lawsuit against the organizers of LIBRA. After being promoted in February 2025, LIBRA surged and then crashed, leaving investors with losses estimated at around $251 million.

How to read this: dismissing an investigation does not mean the project posed no risks, nor does it mean investors will recover their losses. It primarily answers the question of whether the conduct amounts to fraud under that country’s criminal law. For observers, the more important things to watch are the reach of political endorsements, the on-chain withdrawal of funds, and the depth of buyers in the secondary market—not to mistake one legal proceeding for the final chapter in the token’s price narrative.

#LIBRA #米莱 #监管 #CryptoMarket

Argentina court rules on LIBRA case: President Milei not found guilty of criminal fraud!

- An Argentine court issued a 60-page ruling clearing President Javier Milei and 10 others.
- The president’s promotion of the LIBRA token does not automatically constitute criminal fraud.
- The ruling sets a new legal precedent for promoting crypto on social media.
#BinanceSquare #CryptoNews #LIBRA #Argentina

$libra

#vlikevn Titanbot

Source: The Block

[Poll] Milei cleared of criminal charges—can LIBRA victims still recover their losses?
Background: An Argentine judge ruled that the LIBRA case does not constitute a crime, clearing Milei of criminal charges. The recovery options for victims who saw 94% of their funds vanish in 11 hours have suddenly narrowed.
Do you think victims can still recover their losses?
A Yes: Civil suits and cross-border recovery are still possible
B Unlikely: The not-guilty ruling has shut the door on recovery
C Wait and see: It depends on whether regulators and exchanges step in
Vote in the comments and tell us why—which side are you on?
$LIBRA $SOL $BTC
#LIBRA #阿根廷 #Cryptocurrency
⚠️Risk warning: The above is shared for market information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risks; exercise caution when entering the market.

The judge’s point was straightforward: retail investors losing money and a coin’s price soaring and crashing aren’t, by themselves, proof of fraud.

In Argentina’s LIBRA case, on Friday (10/23) local time, federal judge Martínez de Giorgi dropped the criminal investigation into Milei, his sister Karina, and nine others, including Hayden Davis. The request to drop the case came from prosecutors themselves.

A quick recap: On February 14, 2025, Milei promoted LIBRA on X. Its price surged and then crashed within hours, and the post was later deleted. Davis, who called himself an “issuance adviser,” later admitted that he held nearly $100 million after the coin collapsed. He denied any wrongdoing.

Several points in the ruling are worth a closer look:
· The president’s status made the post “more influential,” but that doesn’t amount to a scheme to defraud;
· The post wasn’t accompanied by any administrative action or use of state resources, so it didn’t constitute abuse of office;
· Helping arrange meetings, in itself, doesn’t constitute influence peddling.

In crypto-speak: A big shot’s post may well be just a post in the eyes of the law. At least on the criminal-law front in Argentina, there’s no one to bail out those who were lured in and lost money.

The ruling can still be appealed before it takes effect, so the matter may not be entirely over. But the signal is already clear enough: when a big shot talks up a coin, you’re buying their reach—not their guarantee.

$ORDER

The LIBRA saga: the court has hit pause on the drama ⚖️ According to Odaily, an Argentine judge dismissed the criminal investigation into President Milei, and Milei and his sister were also cleared of wrongdoing. Milei said the case had caused him political and reputational harm. But plenty of ordinary people experienced the $LIBRA price roller coaster firsthand back then—closing the case legally doesn’t mean those memories just disappear. What do you think about coins promoted by celebrities? #LIBRA

When politicians get involved with meme coins, the outcome often plays out in courtrooms and public opinion.

According to reports, an Argentine federal court dismissed the criminal investigation into President Milei and his sister over the LIBRA meme coin affair. Milei responded that the judiciary had “put things back in their proper place,” and said that political and media maneuvering had harmed the office of the president. From its opening to its dismissal, the case is itself a study in both regulation and public relations.

How to read it: A dismissal is not an endorsement of the industry; it only means this round of criminal proceedings could not move forward. The lesson for the market is that celebrity coin risks extend beyond the price chart to include jurisdiction and political cycles. Once the narrative fades, what remains is the chain of evidence and the boundaries of responsibility.

#LIBRA #监管 #模因币 #Argentina

【Market Flash】Milei cleared of criminal charges; LIBRA victims have no way to recover their losses.

On October 23, an Argentine judge dismissed the accusations against Milei and 11 others, ruling that “the facts do not constitute a crime.” Civil cases have also hit a wall: 5 investors were removed from the plaintiffs’ list, and a New York judge dismissed the investors’ lawsuit. Only the $57 million in USDC frozen by Circle was seized.

$4.56 billion evaporated in 11 hours, a 94% drop. Can the money still be recovered? Share your thoughts in the comments.

$LIBRA $SOL $BTC
#LIBRA #米莱 #CryptoRegulation
（Source: Unchained）
⚠️Risk warning: The above is shared for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risk; exercise caution when entering the market.

Argentina’s president launched a coin and fleeced investors out of $110 million. The court ruled: not guilty.

Last February, Milei gave Libra a shout-out on X. Some 40,000 retail investors rushed in and lost $110 million, while eight wallets linked to the project turned around and pulled out $99 million. Yesterday, a judge ruled that the president’s post was a personal act, not fraud, and dismissed the investigation.

Innocent or not, the money is gone. Even if $BTC falls further, no one’s going to bail you out—the ultimate disclaimer for shilling a coin is to become president first.

A. The president was also duped by the project team. B. The court cleared him; you eat your own losses. Sound off in the comments.

#米莱 #Libra
$BTC $ETH $SOL

【Market Update】$4.56 billion market cap, 94% wiped out in 11 hours: The LIBRA ledger
On February 14, Milei promoted LIBRA on X. Its market cap reached $4.56 billion before plunging more than 94% within 11 hours.
On October 23, an Argentine federal judge dismissed the allegations against Milei and 11 others, ruling that “the facts do not constitute a crime.”
Circle froze $57 million in USDC. The ruling has not taken effect and may be appealed. How much credibility does a presidential meme coin have left? Let’s talk.
$LIBRA $SOL $USDC
#LIBRA #阿根廷 #MemeCoin
(Source: Unchained)
⚠️Risk warning: The above is shared for market information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risks; please exercise caution.

The LIBRA case is closed, with the conclusion that "no crime was committed."

The president promoted a coin in a tweet. Its market cap surged to around $4 billion within hours, then lost 90% of its value. According to a news roundup on X, 86% of traders collectively lost around $251 million. Judge Martinez de Giorgi’s ruling, in plain English, was basically: meme coins are volatile—that’s just how they are.

The funniest part is that prosecutors themselves requested the case be dropped. The investors’ class-action lawsuit in New York had already been dismissed in September. Milei, his sister Karina, Hayden Davis—11 people in total—all walked away unscathed.

I don’t understand the law; I only understand the charts. When you buy a coin promoted by a celebrity, you’re not buying a story—you’re providing exit liquidity for insiders. When things go wrong, nobody compensates you—not even the courts. The words "market volatility" can make it all go away.

The ruling can theoretically be appealed, but don’t get your hopes up. Next time some big shot announces a coin to "support the real economy," first check who holds the tokens, then ask yourself whether you’re the one left holding the bag.

#LIBRA #Meme coin

【Market Flash】An Argentine federal judge has ruled that there is no evidence President Milei committed fraud in the LIBRA meme coin scandal. The investigation has been dismissed, and his sister has also been cleared.
The judge said bluntly: the president’s status made the promotion “more influential,” but that doesn’t amount to fraud. Ironically, eight associated wallets cashed out around $99 million, and no one was held accountable.
Would you dare touch a coin endorsed by the president? Comment 1 = absolutely not; comment 2 = don’t care.

$LIBRA $SOL $BTC
#LIBRA #米莱 #memecoin
(Source: Reuters)
⚠️Risk warning: The above is shared for market information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risk; proceed with caution.

Argentina Court Clears President Milei in LIBRA Coin Scandal

- Argentine President Javier Milei has been cleared of criminal allegations in the LIBRA coin scandal.
- Judge Marcelo Martinez de Giorgi ruled that the investigation lacked merit due to insufficient evidence of fraud in the cryptocurrency’s collapse.
- The ruling officially exonerates President Milei, bringing an end to the high-profile tech scandal.

#BinanceSquare #CryptoNews #LIBRA #MemeCoin

$libra

#vlikevn Titanbot

Source: CoinGape

Catching up on the latest developments in Argentina: In the $LIBRA case, at the prosecution’s request, federal judge Marcelo Martínez de Giorgi dismissed the criminal charges against President Javier Milei, his sister Karina, Hayden Davis, and the other defendants, and closed the investigation. The reason: “the alleged facts do not constitute a crime,” and there was no evidence of “deception of criminal significance.”

To recap how it started: On February 14, 2025, Milei reposted or mentioned the newly launched $LIBRA on X. The token surged, then crashed within hours, leaving investors with heavy losses. At the time, the opposition was calling for impeachment, while some people online called it a rug pull. The president’s side has maintained that he shared it “in good faith,” that he deleted the post after learning more about the project and deciding not to promote it further, and that investing was voluntary and carried known risks.

Note: This is the conclusion of Argentina’s domestic criminal investigation, and it is separate from the earlier U.S. civil class-action lawsuit. The judge also wrote that meme coins’ high volatility does not, in itself, amount to a crime. Whether an appeal could overturn the decision remains to be seen.

#LIBRA #Milei #CryptoRegulation