eu

The EU is drafting unified taxes on crypto and online gambling to fund its next budget. Getting all 27 members to agree is a different problem entirely.
Key Takeaways:
0.1% transaction tax on crypto could generate €3-4B annually.Unified crypto capital gains tax projected at €1-2.4B per year.Combined crypto taxes could reach €20B across the 2028-2034 budget.3% gambling levy on operator margins estimated at €1.9B per year.All 27 member states must unanimously approve for any of this to pass.
The European Commission is building its case for the 2028-2034 long-term budget, and the numbers it needs are large. The current proposal package targets roughly €11 billion in new annual revenue, combining taxes on Big Tech digital services, online gambling, and cryptocurrency. Across the full seven-year cycle that approaches €77 billion in additional spending capacity. The Commission needs new sources, and two industries it has historically undertaxed at the EU level are now squarely in frame.
The crypto and gambling proposals are still internal drafts being reviewed by member states. Nothing has been voted on. But the mechanics being evaluated are specific enough to signal where Brussels is heading.
How the Crypto Tax Would Work
The Commission is looking at two separate layers. The first is a transaction tax of 0.1% applied to cryptocurrency trading volumes across the bloc. That rate sounds modest, but applied to the scale of European crypto activity the Commission estimates it could generate between €3 billion and €4 billion per year. The second layer targets capital gains directly, with a unified rate projected to add another €1 billion to €2.4 billion annually. Together, the two streams could bring in around €20 billion over the full budget cycle.
The logic behind unifying these at EU level rather than leaving them to individual member states is fragmentation. Right now, a trader in Germany faces different tax obligations than one in Portugal or Estonia. A unified framework would close those gaps and, in theory, make avoidance through jurisdiction shopping harder.
What makes the estimates shaky is the Commission's own acknowledgment that crypto figures carry high uncertainty. Market volatility makes projections difficult, and tracking decentralized users who may hold assets across multiple wallets and protocols is an unsolved problem. The €3-4 billion figure assumes a level of compliance and traceability that does not yet fully exist.
The Gambling Side
The online gambling proposal is structurally simpler. A 3% levy on the net margins of online gambling operators, meaning the revenue they keep after paying out winnings, is projected to generate approximately €1.9 billion per year. Over the 2028-2034 window that adds up to around €13.3 billion.
The rationale here is also fragmentation. Online gambling regulation varies dramatically across member states, and some countries have become registration hubs for operators who then serve customers across the entire bloc. A centralized levy would cut through that structure.
Malta has already signaled opposition. The island nation hosts a disproportionate share of internationally licensed betting operators and stands to lose significant economic activity if those operators face new EU-level costs on top of existing national frameworks.
The third stream in the package targets Big Tech directly. The Commission calculated that a 3% tax on net revenues from digital advertising, data monetization and online intermediation could generate approximately €5 billion per year, based on 2024 revenue data from Spain, France and Italy, all of which already run similar national levies. The threshold would apply to companies exceeding €750 million in global group turnover. That €5 billion, combined with the crypto and gambling projections, is how the Commission arrives at the €11 billion annual figure
Where It Could Break Down
The biggest obstacle is not technical, it is procedural. Under EU law, tax matters require unanimous approval from all 27 member states. A single holdout can block the entire package. Malta's position on gambling is one pressure point. The broader question of how crypto taxes get applied to decentralized protocols is another.
Industry observers have pointed out that a 0.1% transaction tax, if applied broadly, could push significant trading volume toward self-custody wallets and non-EU decentralized finance platforms that operate outside any jurisdiction's reach. The tax would then collect less than projected while accelerating the migration of activity away from regulated European venues, which is the opposite of what the DAC8 directive, the EU's recently implemented framework requiring crypto platforms to automatically share user transaction data with tax authorities, was designed to prevent.
DAC8 created the reporting infrastructure. These new proposals are the attempt to build a revenue layer on top of it. Whether the architecture holds together depends on how member states weigh the projected revenue against the compliance costs, the political opposition, and the very real possibility that parts of the crypto industry simply move beyond their reach.
#EU #crypto

Reports circulating across the crypto space suggest that the European Union is preparing stricter compliance rules, including lower cash usage limits, tighter KYC requirements for crypto transactions, and increased pressure on privacy-focused coins. Some discussions also claim that certain privacy assets like Monero, Zcash, and Dash could face restrictions or delistings on regulated EU platforms over time, with implementation timelines extending into 2027.
At the same time, contrasting global approaches are emerging. The United States continues to explore more investor-friendly frameworks such as tax clarity and potential capital gains reforms, while regions like the UAE are actively expanding crypto banking licenses and institutional adoption.
This growing regulatory divergence highlights a key narrative in global markets: capital tends to move toward jurisdictions offering clearer rules and more favorable conditions for innovation.
Whether Europe’s approach becomes a long-term restriction or a compliance-driven restructuring remains to be seen, but the policy gap between regions is becoming increasingly visible.$ZEC
#Crypto #Regulation #EU #Bitcoin #Web3 $XMR $DASH

The French regulator Autorité des marchés financiers is stepping up pressure on cryptocurrency companies. Firms operating in the country without a license now have until June 30 to comply with the European MiCA framework or exit the French market.
AMF President Marie-Anne Barbat-Layani made it clear that companies failing to obtain authorization must prepare an orderly shutdown. This includes not only ceasing operations, but also properly handling client relationships and closing all activities in a controlled manner.
MiCA reshapes the European crypto landscape
The Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation is fundamentally transforming how the crypto sector operates across the European Union. Service providers are now required to hold a license, which allows them to legally operate throughout all EU member states.
A key feature of MiCA is the “passporting” mechanism, enabling firms licensed in one country to expand across the entire bloc. However, this system is beginning to create tensions, as differences in national regulatory approaches may lead companies to relocate to more favorable jurisdictions.
Debate over regulatory control intensifies
The European Securities and Markets Authority is also entering the discussion, with proposals suggesting it could take on a stronger supervisory role over crypto markets in the EU. Critics warn that such centralization could weaken national regulators and disrupt the current licensing model.
Representatives from Malta’s financial authority have argued that any structural changes would be premature, emphasizing the need to first assess the real-world impact of MiCA, which only recently came into force.
Regulation likely to evolve further
The European Commission has already indicated that MiCA may not be the final version of crypto regulation. As the market continues to evolve, further updates are expected to address emerging technologies and increasing security demands.
Any revisions would likely involve public consultation, suggesting that changes will be gradual rather than abrupt.
France’s ultimatum signals a broader shift across Europe: the era of loosely regulated crypto markets is ending, and companies will need to adapt to a stricter, more structured framework.
#CryptoRegulation , #MiCA , #Eu , #blockchain , #CryptoCommunity
Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies.
Disclaimer:
The information and opinions presented in this article are for informational and educational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. Nothing on this page constitutes a recommendation to buy or sell any assets. Cryptocurrency investments are inherently risky and may result in financial loss. Always do your own research before making any investment decisions.