Binance Square
Thedy
93 Posts

Thedy

Crypto lover and Blockchain passionate
#BinanceTurns7
#BinanceTurns7
Open Trade
Occasional Trader
5.4 Years
12 Following
38 Followers
50 Liked
1 Badges
Posts
Portfolio
PINNED
·
--
Article
Top Low Market Cap Cryptocurrencies with High PotentialThe cryptocurrency market continues to offer a plethora of investment opportunities, especially among low market cap tokens. These projects often carry higher risk, but their unique use cases and innovative approaches could potentially lead to significant rewards. Here’s a look at some promising low market cap cryptocurrencies worth considering: 1. Retik (RETIK) Retik is carving a niche in the real estate sector by introducing blockchain transparency to property transactions. This token aims to streamline and secure real estate deals, making the process more efficient and trustworthy. As the real estate market gradually adopts blockchain solutions, RETIK could see substantial growth. 2. Gala (GALA) Gala has been making waves in the gaming and entertainment industry. With a strong use case and an active community, GALA is focused on creating decentralized gaming experiences. The project’s dedication to empowering game developers and providing players with true ownership of their in-game assets sets it apart in the crowded crypto space. 3. Sei (SEI) Known for its applications in decentralized finance (DeFi), Sei offers a robust platform for developing and managing decentralized applications (dApps). The project's emphasis on providing secure, scalable, and user-friendly DeFi solutions positions it as a strong contender in the DeFi sector. 4. Xenon (XNA) Xenon is dedicated to enhancing security and privacy features in the cryptocurrency world. As concerns about digital privacy grow, Xenon’s focus on providing robust security solutions makes it a noteworthy project. Its potential applications in secure transactions and privacy-focused applications could drive significant interest. 5. Hello (HELLO) Hello aims to revolutionize social media by integrating blockchain technology to ensure user privacy and data security. With increasing awareness of data privacy issues, Hello's approach to creating a decentralized social media platform could attract users looking for more control over their personal information. 6. Zephyr (ZEPH) Zephyr is focused on providing fast and secure cross-border transactions. Its practical applications in international finance, coupled with the increasing demand for efficient global payment solutions, make ZEPH a promising project. The token’s ability to facilitate quick and low-cost transactions could drive its adoption. 7. Digital Media Labs (DML) Digital Media Labs seeks to decentralize content creation and distribution, empowering creators through blockchain technology. By eliminating intermediaries, DML aims to give content creators more control and a fairer share of revenue. This approach could significantly impact the media and entertainment industries. 8.Velas (VLX) Description: Velas is an EVM blockchain known for its high transaction speed and low costs, supporting decentralized applications. 9. IOTA (IOTA) Though not as low-cap as some others, IOTA’s innovative Tangle technology offers a unique approach to the Internet of Things (IoT) sector. Its feeless and scalable nature makes it suitable for a wide range of IoT applications. IOTA's potential to disrupt the IoT industry makes it a cryptocurrency to watch. 10. Gemini (GEM) Gemini is gaining popularity due to its unique features and potential to support various decentralized applications. The token’s versatility and strong community support could contribute to its growth. GEM's ability to facilitate different dApps makes it a valuable addition to the crypto ecosystem. Conclusion These cryptocurrencies are noteworthy for their potential driven by unique use cases, technological innovations, and active communities. While investing in low market cap cryptocurrencies can be highly rewarding, it is crucial to conduct thorough research and exercise caution. Always consider the risks and perform due diligence before making investment decisions. #altcoins #DYOR

Top Low Market Cap Cryptocurrencies with High Potential

The cryptocurrency market continues to offer a plethora of investment opportunities, especially among low market cap tokens. These projects often carry higher risk, but their unique use cases and innovative approaches could potentially lead to significant rewards. Here’s a look at some promising low market cap cryptocurrencies worth considering:
1. Retik (RETIK)
Retik is carving a niche in the real estate sector by introducing blockchain transparency to property transactions. This token aims to streamline and secure real estate deals, making the process more efficient and trustworthy. As the real estate market gradually adopts blockchain solutions, RETIK could see substantial growth.
2. Gala (GALA)
Gala has been making waves in the gaming and entertainment industry. With a strong use case and an active community, GALA is focused on creating decentralized gaming experiences. The project’s dedication to empowering game developers and providing players with true ownership of their in-game assets sets it apart in the crowded crypto space.
3. Sei (SEI)
Known for its applications in decentralized finance (DeFi), Sei offers a robust platform for developing and managing decentralized applications (dApps). The project's emphasis on providing secure, scalable, and user-friendly DeFi solutions positions it as a strong contender in the DeFi sector.
4. Xenon (XNA)
Xenon is dedicated to enhancing security and privacy features in the cryptocurrency world. As concerns about digital privacy grow, Xenon’s focus on providing robust security solutions makes it a noteworthy project. Its potential applications in secure transactions and privacy-focused applications could drive significant interest.
5. Hello (HELLO)
Hello aims to revolutionize social media by integrating blockchain technology to ensure user privacy and data security. With increasing awareness of data privacy issues, Hello's approach to creating a decentralized social media platform could attract users looking for more control over their personal information.
6. Zephyr (ZEPH)
Zephyr is focused on providing fast and secure cross-border transactions. Its practical applications in international finance, coupled with the increasing demand for efficient global payment solutions, make ZEPH a promising project. The token’s ability to facilitate quick and low-cost transactions could drive its adoption.
7. Digital Media Labs (DML)
Digital Media Labs seeks to decentralize content creation and distribution, empowering creators through blockchain technology. By eliminating intermediaries, DML aims to give content creators more control and a fairer share of revenue. This approach could significantly impact the media and entertainment industries.
8.Velas (VLX)
Description: Velas is an EVM blockchain known for its high transaction speed and low costs, supporting decentralized applications.
9. IOTA (IOTA)
Though not as low-cap as some others, IOTA’s innovative Tangle technology offers a unique approach to the Internet of Things (IoT) sector. Its feeless and scalable nature makes it suitable for a wide range of IoT applications. IOTA's potential to disrupt the IoT industry makes it a cryptocurrency to watch.
10. Gemini (GEM)
Gemini is gaining popularity due to its unique features and potential to support various decentralized applications. The token’s versatility and strong community support could contribute to its growth. GEM's ability to facilitate different dApps makes it a valuable addition to the crypto ecosystem.
Conclusion
These cryptocurrencies are noteworthy for their potential driven by unique use cases, technological innovations, and active communities. While investing in low market cap cryptocurrencies can be highly rewarding, it is crucial to conduct thorough research and exercise caution. Always consider the risks and perform due diligence before making investment decisions.
#altcoins #DYOR
·
--
The Fed opens two proposals for stablecoin payment issuers under the GENIUS Act. FACTS (Federal Reserve Board press release, 09/24, 2:30 p.m. EDT): • Proposal 1: 1:1 reserves in T-bills and other highly liquid assets, standardized capital (credit / operational risks), rules for reserve custodians, and clarification of bankable activities. • Proposal 2: application procedure for supervised banks (business plan + financial information), with calls, hearings, and final decisions. • Comment window: 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. These are not final rules yet. Takeaway (interpretation, not advice): For $USDT / $USDC et any issuer that falls under Board supervision, operational capital becomes tied to the size of the float (example of a grid cited in analyses: 2% on the first $20 billion outstanding). More coins in circulation = higher capital charge, even without revenues outside reserves. The OCC is pushing a different logic (tailored capital + liquidity = 12 months of expenses). Two regulators, two calibrations: the US stables market will have to follow the comments. Scenarios: • A: comments that loosen the capital bands → issuer-bank(s) more comfortable with scaling. • B: stricter calibration + Fed/OCC divergences that remain → friction for new issuers, longer-lasting status quo for stablecoins already in place. Would you rather focus on the reserves/capital side, or the bank application procedure? $USDT $USDC $BNB #Stablecoins #GENIUSAct #Crypto
The Fed opens two proposals for stablecoin payment issuers under the GENIUS Act.

FACTS (Federal Reserve Board press release, 09/24, 2:30 p.m. EDT):
• Proposal 1: 1:1 reserves in T-bills and other highly liquid assets, standardized capital (credit / operational risks), rules for reserve custodians, and clarification of bankable activities.
• Proposal 2: application procedure for supervised banks (business plan + financial information), with calls, hearings, and final decisions.
• Comment window: 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. These are not final rules yet.

Takeaway (interpretation, not advice):
For $USDT / $USDC et any issuer that falls under Board supervision, operational capital becomes tied to the size of the float (example of a grid cited in analyses: 2% on the first $20 billion outstanding). More coins in circulation = higher capital charge, even without revenues outside reserves. The OCC is pushing a different logic (tailored capital + liquidity = 12 months of expenses). Two regulators, two calibrations: the US stables market will have to follow the comments.

Scenarios:
• A: comments that loosen the capital bands → issuer-bank(s) more comfortable with scaling.
• B: stricter calibration + Fed/OCC divergences that remain → friction for new issuers, longer-lasting status quo for stablecoins already in place.

Would you rather focus on the reserves/capital side, or the bank application procedure?

$USDT $USDC $BNB
#Stablecoins #GENIUSAct #Crypto
·
--
Record week for spot BTC ETFs $BTC US: +$2.4B in net inflows (week ending 25/09), the biggest weekly print since October 2025. And it flipped the 2026 cumulative total back into positive territory. Facts (The Block, SoSoValue analysis, 26/09): • BTC week: +$2.4B (Mon: $999M → Tue: $714.7M → Wed: $347M → Thu: $190.6M → Fri: $134.5M) • Leaders: IBIT +$1.2B, FBTC +$701.7M, ARKB +$294.7M, MSBT +$203.3M • Cumulative since launch ~ $57.6B; net assets ~ $108.4B as of Friday • 2026 YTD: ~+$934.1M (it was still ~−$5.8B on July 13) • Same week: spot ETF $ETH +$689.9M (rebound after −$140M the prior week); $SOL +$188.2M (2nd-best week); XRP ETFs +$75.6M Spot now (Kraken): $BTC ~84,015 (−0.09% 24h), $ETH ~2,683 (−0.30%), $SOL ~121 (−0.80%). Fear & Greed 74 (Greed). OKX funding is calm. Interpretation: regulated BTC demand accelerated throughout the whole US week, enough to erase the YTD gap. The daily print declines from Monday to Friday (digestible); it’s not an isolated spike. ETH rebounds after a red week. This is not an automatic buy signal for the weekend spot. Scenarios: • Continuation: new BTC inflows ≥ 0 during US session + staying above ~82–83k → the ETF bid holds • Digestion: spot below ~81k even if flows remain green → the record week digests before the next leg • Soft invalidation: a run of weekly BTC outflows while ETH/SOL remain in inflow → rotation out of BTC ETFs Do you follow the weekly total for $BTC (+$2.4B), or the YTD flip to +$934M to judge what comes next? $BTC $ETH $SOL #Bitcoin #ETF
Record week for spot BTC ETFs $BTC US: +$2.4B in net inflows (week ending 25/09), the biggest weekly print since October 2025. And it flipped the 2026 cumulative total back into positive territory.

Facts (The Block, SoSoValue analysis, 26/09):
• BTC week: +$2.4B (Mon: $999M → Tue: $714.7M → Wed: $347M → Thu: $190.6M → Fri: $134.5M)
• Leaders: IBIT +$1.2B, FBTC +$701.7M, ARKB +$294.7M, MSBT +$203.3M
• Cumulative since launch ~ $57.6B; net assets ~ $108.4B as of Friday
• 2026 YTD: ~+$934.1M (it was still ~−$5.8B on July 13)
• Same week: spot ETF $ETH +$689.9M (rebound after −$140M the prior week); $SOL +$188.2M (2nd-best week); XRP ETFs +$75.6M

Spot now (Kraken): $BTC ~84,015 (−0.09% 24h), $ETH ~2,683 (−0.30%), $SOL ~121 (−0.80%). Fear & Greed 74 (Greed). OKX funding is calm.

Interpretation: regulated BTC demand accelerated throughout the whole US week, enough to erase the YTD gap. The daily print declines from Monday to Friday (digestible); it’s not an isolated spike. ETH rebounds after a red week. This is not an automatic buy signal for the weekend spot.

Scenarios:
• Continuation: new BTC inflows ≥ 0 during US session + staying above ~82–83k → the ETF bid holds
• Digestion: spot below ~81k even if flows remain green → the record week digests before the next leg
• Soft invalidation: a run of weekly BTC outflows while ETH/SOL remain in inflow → rotation out of BTC ETFs

Do you follow the weekly total for $BTC (+$2.4B), or the YTD flip to +$934M to judge what comes next?

$BTC $ETH $SOL
#Bitcoin #ETF
·
--
The spot SOL ETFs $SOL US have just printed a daily record, nearly at the level of the ETH inflows from the same day. Facts (SoSoValue, US session 25/09, via TokenPost / market wires): • Net inflow for the SOL category: +86.667M$ (highest daily print observed) • Leaders: BSOL (Bitwise) +55.73M$, GSOL (Grayscale) +18.47M$ • Same session: spot ETH ETF +86.95M$ (6th green day), BTC +134.5M$ (7th green day) • Aggregated SOL ETF AUM ~1.964B$, cumulative flows ~1.605B$ Spot now (Kraken): SOL ~121 (−0.96% 24h), $BTC ~83,990 (−0.12%), $ETH ~2,683. Fear & Greed 74 (Greed). OKX funding is calm (BTC slightly negative, SOL ~+0.007%). Interpretation: regulated demand for SOL accelerated (the 25/09 print more than doubled the 24/09 figure to ~32.8M$), while spot is digesting the weekend below ~122$. This is not an automatic buy signal. It’s a divergence between ETF flows and price to watch on Monday. Scenarios: • Continuation: new SOL inflows ≥ 0 during the US session + staying above ~118–120$ → the institutional bid holds • Digestion: spot below ~117$ even if flows remain green → the record is being digested before the next leg • Soft invalidation: a series of SOL outflows while BTC/ETH remain in inflow → rotation out of the Solana ETF Are you tracking the $SOL ETF print, or the spot price around $120 for the rest of the weekend? $SOL $ETH $BTC #Solana #ETF
The spot SOL ETFs $SOL US have just printed a daily record, nearly at the level of the ETH inflows from the same day.

Facts (SoSoValue, US session 25/09, via TokenPost / market wires):
• Net inflow for the SOL category: +86.667M$ (highest daily print observed)
• Leaders: BSOL (Bitwise) +55.73M$, GSOL (Grayscale) +18.47M$
• Same session: spot ETH ETF +86.95M$ (6th green day), BTC +134.5M$ (7th green day)
• Aggregated SOL ETF AUM ~1.964B$, cumulative flows ~1.605B$

Spot now (Kraken): SOL ~121 (−0.96% 24h), $BTC ~83,990 (−0.12%), $ETH ~2,683. Fear & Greed 74 (Greed). OKX funding is calm (BTC slightly negative, SOL ~+0.007%).

Interpretation: regulated demand for SOL accelerated (the 25/09 print more than doubled the 24/09 figure to ~32.8M$), while spot is digesting the weekend below ~122$. This is not an automatic buy signal. It’s a divergence between ETF flows and price to watch on Monday.

Scenarios:
• Continuation: new SOL inflows ≥ 0 during the US session + staying above ~118–120$ → the institutional bid holds
• Digestion: spot below ~117$ even if flows remain green → the record is being digested before the next leg
• Soft invalidation: a series of SOL outflows while BTC/ETH remain in inflow → rotation out of the Solana ETF

Are you tracking the $SOL ETF print, or the spot price around $120 for the rest of the weekend?

$SOL $ETH $BTC
#Solana #ETF
·
--
Calm weekend on the majors… except $XRP. Facts (Kraken OHLC ~24h + OKX public, reading from 26/09): • BTC ≈ +0.15% (spot ~84,075 $) ; ETH ≈ −0.22% ; SOL ≈ −0.50% • XRP ≈ −2.17% toward ~1.535 $ : clearly lagging in the same window • OKX long/short ratio (1H): BTC 0.95 · ETH 1.20 · SOL 1.12 · XRP 2.26 • OKX funding still soft (BTC ≈ −0.0023% ; XRP ≈ +0.010%) ; F&G 74 (Greed) Interpretation (not investment advice): the weekend tape is flat, but the XRP positioning is crowded long while price is giving way. This isn’t the same angle as the XRPL freeze / Bitget withdrawals: here it’s relative strength + account skew. A high L/S on the way down increases the risk of long squeezes if price breaks further. Scenarios: 1) Bounce if XRP holds ~1.53 and the L/S normalizes below ~1.5 → the lag unwinds 2) Lag extension if BTC stays pinned near 84k and XRP longs remain crowded → continued sell-side pressure Do you think it’s more of a catch-up move from $XRP or a continuation of the lag versus $BTC this weekend? $XRP $BTC $ETH #XRP #Crypto #Market
Calm weekend on the majors… except $XRP .

Facts (Kraken OHLC ~24h + OKX public, reading from 26/09):
• BTC ≈ +0.15% (spot ~84,075 $) ; ETH ≈ −0.22% ; SOL ≈ −0.50%
• XRP ≈ −2.17% toward ~1.535 $ : clearly lagging in the same window
• OKX long/short ratio (1H): BTC 0.95 · ETH 1.20 · SOL 1.12 · XRP 2.26
• OKX funding still soft (BTC ≈ −0.0023% ; XRP ≈ +0.010%) ; F&G 74 (Greed)

Interpretation (not investment advice): the weekend tape is flat, but the XRP positioning is crowded long while price is giving way. This isn’t the same angle as the XRPL freeze / Bitget withdrawals: here it’s relative strength + account skew. A high L/S on the way down increases the risk of long squeezes if price breaks further.

Scenarios:
1) Bounce if XRP holds ~1.53 and the L/S normalizes below ~1.5 → the lag unwinds
2) Lag extension if BTC stays pinned near 84k and XRP longs remain crowded → continued sell-side pressure

Do you think it’s more of a catch-up move from $XRP or a continuation of the lag versus $BTC this weekend?

$XRP $BTC $ETH
#XRP #Crypto #Market
·
--
Tomorrow, weekly expiry options $BTC sur Deribit (27SEP26). The spot pins just below max pain. Facts (Deribit public API, read on 26/09): • Total OI on 27SEP26 ≈ 4,431 contracts • Max pain approx. ≈ $84,500 (strike scan) • Call-heavy skew: call/put ratio ≈ 2.05; visible walls at 87k (647 OI) and 89k (627) • Kraken spot ≈ $84,064 (−0.03%); OKX BTC funding ≈ −0.0025% (calm) • 24h liquidations CoinGlass ≈ $93M (soft weekend), far from weekly peaks Interpretation (not financial advice): during an expiry weekend, price tends to gravitate toward the zone of maximum pain for the writers. Here the pin is tight, between ~84k and ~84.5k. Calls above have a lot of open interest, which can cap short squeezes if spot doesn’t break out. Scenarios: 1) Hold above ~84k / flirt with 84.5k → classic pin into expiry 2) Break below ~83–83.5k (where puts thicken) → the pin shifts and the call-heavy bias weighs less And you, are you trading the pin toward 84.5k or a breakdown below 83.5k before expiry? $BTC $ETH #Bitcoin #Options #Crypto
Tomorrow, weekly expiry options $BTC sur Deribit (27SEP26). The spot pins just below max pain.

Facts (Deribit public API, read on 26/09):
• Total OI on 27SEP26 ≈ 4,431 contracts
• Max pain approx. ≈ $84,500 (strike scan)
• Call-heavy skew: call/put ratio ≈ 2.05; visible walls at 87k (647 OI) and 89k (627)
• Kraken spot ≈ $84,064 (−0.03%); OKX BTC funding ≈ −0.0025% (calm)
• 24h liquidations CoinGlass ≈ $93M (soft weekend), far from weekly peaks

Interpretation (not financial advice): during an expiry weekend, price tends to gravitate toward the zone of maximum pain for the writers. Here the pin is tight, between ~84k and ~84.5k. Calls above have a lot of open interest, which can cap short squeezes if spot doesn’t break out.

Scenarios:
1) Hold above ~84k / flirt with 84.5k → classic pin into expiry
2) Break below ~83–83.5k (where puts thicken) → the pin shifts and the call-heavy bias weighs less

And you, are you trading the pin toward 84.5k or a breakdown below 83.5k before expiry?

$BTC $ETH
#Bitcoin #Options #Crypto
·
--
Bitget’s pirate has already moved ~$83M in $XRP. Ripple cannot freeze the native asset. Facts (CoinDesk, reviewed XRPL at ~12:41 UTC on 26/09): • ~103M XRP stolen on 24/09, split across 5 wallets. • ~$83M already moved out of 3 holding accounts; ~ $75M remains on them. • Circle and Tether blacklisted ~$320k in USDC/USDT linked to the incident. Estimated fraction of the total: ~$387.5M. • On XRPL, the freeze targets issued tokens, not the native $XRP . A CEX can block a received deposit, but not the wallet that is still under the attacker’s control. Bitget keeps the resumption schedule (UTC): $BTC 28/09, $ETH 29/09, USDT 30/09, remainder 02/10. The announced protection funds are said to cover the loss. Spot (Kraken): $BTC ~84 110 $ (+0.03%), $ETH ~2 691 $ (−0.03%), $XRP ~1.547 $ (−1.35%). Fear & Greed 74 (Greed). OKX funding steady; BTC slightly negative. Interpretation: the contrast between a freezeable stablecoin vs mobile XRP highlights that “freeze” ≠ recovery. The real bottleneck is the destination (CEX / mixers / OTC), not a Ripple button. Scenarios: • A: XRP flow to a CEX + deposit restrictions → slower selling, limited spot impact. • B: dispersion outside the CEX + sell pressure → $XRP more sensitive as long as ~ $75M remains mobile. Are you more interested in the XRPL mechanics, or the spot dump risk around $1.55? $XRP $BTC $ETH #XRP #Crypto #Security
Bitget’s pirate has already moved ~$83M in $XRP . Ripple cannot freeze the native asset.

Facts (CoinDesk, reviewed XRPL at ~12:41 UTC on 26/09):
• ~103M XRP stolen on 24/09, split across 5 wallets.
• ~$83M already moved out of 3 holding accounts; ~ $75M remains on them.
• Circle and Tether blacklisted ~$320k in USDC/USDT linked to the incident. Estimated fraction of the total: ~$387.5M.
• On XRPL, the freeze targets issued tokens, not the native $XRP . A CEX can block a received deposit, but not the wallet that is still under the attacker’s control.

Bitget keeps the resumption schedule (UTC): $BTC 28/09, $ETH 29/09, USDT 30/09, remainder 02/10. The announced protection funds are said to cover the loss.

Spot (Kraken): $BTC ~84 110 $ (+0.03%), $ETH ~2 691 $ (−0.03%), $XRP ~1.547 $ (−1.35%). Fear & Greed 74 (Greed). OKX funding steady; BTC slightly negative.

Interpretation: the contrast between a freezeable stablecoin vs mobile XRP highlights that “freeze” ≠ recovery. The real bottleneck is the destination (CEX / mixers / OTC), not a Ripple button.

Scenarios:
• A: XRP flow to a CEX + deposit restrictions → slower selling, limited spot impact.
• B: dispersion outside the CEX + sell pressure → $XRP more sensitive as long as ~ $75M remains mobile.

Are you more interested in the XRPL mechanics, or the spot dump risk around $1.55?

$XRP $BTC $ETH
#XRP #Crypto #Security
·
--
Sepolia has a date. Mainnet, not yet. The Ethereum Glamsterdam hardfork activates its first public testnet on October 6, 2026 at 13:53:36 UTC (epoch 353024, slot 11296768). It’s in the EIP-7773 activation table—not a Telegram rumor. What it really tests: ePBS (EIP-7732) and block-level access lists (EIP-7928), with a gas trajectory toward ~200M in devnet. Hoodi was mentioned around October 27 on ACD, but nothing is locked in like Sepolia. Mainnet still has no epoch, roadmap target Q4 2026. Spot: $ETH ~2 688 on Kraken, nearly flat vs the open. Fear & Greed is at 74. Derivatives remain calm (OKX funding near zero). In other words: a dated technical catalyst, while price action is still indifferent. Simple scenarios: 1) Clean Sepolia → roadmap confidence, focus shifts toward Hoodi/mainnet. 2) Friction for builders / clients → possible delay, without invalidating the scope. 3) Price: invalidate a “upgrade rally” scenario until the mainnet has a date. And you: do you trade the testnet calendar, or do you wait only for the mainnet fork? $ETH #Ethereum #Glamsterdam
Sepolia has a date. Mainnet, not yet.

The Ethereum Glamsterdam hardfork activates its first public testnet on October 6, 2026 at 13:53:36 UTC (epoch 353024, slot 11296768). It’s in the EIP-7773 activation table—not a Telegram rumor.

What it really tests: ePBS (EIP-7732) and block-level access lists (EIP-7928), with a gas trajectory toward ~200M in devnet. Hoodi was mentioned around October 27 on ACD, but nothing is locked in like Sepolia. Mainnet still has no epoch, roadmap target Q4 2026.

Spot: $ETH ~2 688 on Kraken, nearly flat vs the open. Fear & Greed is at 74. Derivatives remain calm (OKX funding near zero). In other words: a dated technical catalyst, while price action is still indifferent.

Simple scenarios:
1) Clean Sepolia → roadmap confidence, focus shifts toward Hoodi/mainnet.
2) Friction for builders / clients → possible delay, without invalidating the scope.
3) Price: invalidate a “upgrade rally” scenario until the mainnet has a date.

And you: do you trade the testnet calendar, or do you wait only for the mainnet fork?

$ETH #Ethereum #Glamsterdam
·
--
Bitwise advance on a spot ETF $NEAR (forward-looking ticker NRR). The S-1 SEC (file 333-286995) describes a trust that holds NEAR and also aims for staking as a secondary objective. Reports indicate that a Form 8-A paved the way for listing on NYSE Arca. No first listing date is mentioned in the filings, and the prospectus reiterates that the SEC neither approves nor disapproves the securities. Spot Kraken ~ $4.82 (+7.1% over 48 hours). Cited custody: Coinbase Custody. Commonly cited sponsor fees are around 0.75% per year (to be confirmed in the final prospectus). FACTS: exchange step, not live trading yet. INTERPRETATION: institutional signal for $NEAR, but the price is still driven by the spot as long as NRR is not listed. SCENARIOS: effective listing → potential inflows; timing delays → L1 volatility unchanged. RISKS: staking, liquidity, and timeline still open. Do you see $NEAR more as L1, or the angle of a stakeable ETF? #NEAR #ETF #Crypto
Bitwise advance on a spot ETF $NEAR (forward-looking ticker NRR).

The S-1 SEC (file 333-286995) describes a trust that holds NEAR and also aims for staking as a secondary objective. Reports indicate that a Form 8-A paved the way for listing on NYSE Arca. No first listing date is mentioned in the filings, and the prospectus reiterates that the SEC neither approves nor disapproves the securities.

Spot Kraken ~ $4.82 (+7.1% over 48 hours). Cited custody: Coinbase Custody. Commonly cited sponsor fees are around 0.75% per year (to be confirmed in the final prospectus).

FACTS: exchange step, not live trading yet.
INTERPRETATION: institutional signal for $NEAR , but the price is still driven by the spot as long as NRR is not listed.
SCENARIOS: effective listing → potential inflows; timing delays → L1 volatility unchanged.
RISKS: staking, liquidity, and timeline still open.

Do you see $NEAR more as L1, or the angle of a stakeable ETF?

#NEAR #ETF #Crypto
·
--
On Base, Aave V4 now accepts tokenized US actions from Coinbase as collateral to borrow USDC. Official announcement from Aave Labs (25/09): seven titles, AAPLc, AMZNc, GOOGLc, METAc, MSFTc, NVDAc and TSLAc, can be deposited in the Equities Hub. The oracles have just been provided by Chainlink (feeds 24/5). Offer reserved for eligible non-US persons, under Regulation S. FACTS • Dedicated market on Aave V4 (Base), isolated from other hubs • Collateral only at launch: you borrow the USDC, not the securities themselves • Market open 24/7; over the weekend, the feeds keep the last published price • Dividends reinvested on the token side (total return instrument type) • Planned rollout: more securities + GHO borrowable, subject to governance/risk review • Spot: $AAVE ~153.7 $ (Kraken), $ETH ~2,686 $, $BTC ~84,036 $ INTERPRETATION This isn’t a magical “on-chain ETF.” It’s a concrete bridge between tokenized equities and DeFi liquidity, with clear product constraints (eligibility, collateral-only, weekend oracle prices fixed). RISKS TO KEEP IN MIND • Jurisdiction: not for US persons • Weekends/holidays: collateral that no longer moves while interest continues to accrue • Liquidity and caps are still young; the risk steward will need time to ramp up Would you test first with a small USDC loan against a tokenized Mag7, or would you wait for GHO and more depth? $AAVE $ETH #Aave #DeFi #Base
On Base, Aave V4 now accepts tokenized US actions from Coinbase as collateral to borrow USDC.

Official announcement from Aave Labs (25/09): seven titles, AAPLc, AMZNc, GOOGLc, METAc, MSFTc, NVDAc and TSLAc, can be deposited in the Equities Hub. The oracles have just been provided by Chainlink (feeds 24/5). Offer reserved for eligible non-US persons, under Regulation S.

FACTS
• Dedicated market on Aave V4 (Base), isolated from other hubs
• Collateral only at launch: you borrow the USDC, not the securities themselves
• Market open 24/7; over the weekend, the feeds keep the last published price
• Dividends reinvested on the token side (total return instrument type)
• Planned rollout: more securities + GHO borrowable, subject to governance/risk review
• Spot: $AAVE ~153.7 $ (Kraken), $ETH ~2,686 $, $BTC ~84,036 $

INTERPRETATION
This isn’t a magical “on-chain ETF.” It’s a concrete bridge between tokenized equities and DeFi liquidity, with clear product constraints (eligibility, collateral-only, weekend oracle prices fixed).

RISKS TO KEEP IN MIND
• Jurisdiction: not for US persons
• Weekends/holidays: collateral that no longer moves while interest continues to accrue
• Liquidity and caps are still young; the risk steward will need time to ramp up

Would you test first with a small USDC loan against a tokenized Mag7, or would you wait for GHO and more depth?

$AAVE $ETH
#Aave #DeFi #Base
·
--
CryptoQuant shows an on-chain regime shift for $BTC: from early bull to full bull. According to Axel Adler Jr. (CryptoQuant), the adjusted MVRV ratio (30DMA / 365DMA) crossed above its own 365-day average on 20/08, rising from $BTC to 71,255 $. This early phase lasted 31 days (+13%). On 20/09, the ratio broke through the 1.0 baseline at 80,691 $, marking the entry into a full bull. As of 26/09, the ratio is 1.018 with the Kraken spot price near 84,160 $. FACTS • Current ratio: 1.018 (bullish structure as long as it stays above 1.0) • Full bull entry: 20/09 at ~80,691 $ • 6th early→full transition since 2012; in 4 out of 5 previous cases, price then finished above the full-bull entry level • Fear & Greed: 74 (Greed). OKX BTC funding still calm INTERPRETATION This is a structure signal, not an entry timing. It coexists with other, more cautious CryptoQuant readings (high unrealized profits). Both can be true at the same time: a bullish on-chain trend, but a market burdened with latent gains. SCENARIOS • Ratio holds above 1.0: bullish structure unchanged, even in a range below 85k • Ratio falls back below 1.0: soft invalidation of this "full bull" framework Are you following this MVRV ratio, or profit-taking, to judge the strength of the move? $BTC #Bitcoin #CryptoQuant #OnChain
CryptoQuant shows an on-chain regime shift for $BTC : from early bull to full bull.

According to Axel Adler Jr. (CryptoQuant), the adjusted MVRV ratio (30DMA / 365DMA) crossed above its own 365-day average on 20/08, rising from $BTC to 71,255 $. This early phase lasted 31 days (+13%). On 20/09, the ratio broke through the 1.0 baseline at 80,691 $, marking the entry into a full bull. As of 26/09, the ratio is 1.018 with the Kraken spot price near 84,160 $.

FACTS
• Current ratio: 1.018 (bullish structure as long as it stays above 1.0)
• Full bull entry: 20/09 at ~80,691 $
• 6th early→full transition since 2012; in 4 out of 5 previous cases, price then finished above the full-bull entry level
• Fear & Greed: 74 (Greed). OKX BTC funding still calm

INTERPRETATION
This is a structure signal, not an entry timing. It coexists with other, more cautious CryptoQuant readings (high unrealized profits). Both can be true at the same time: a bullish on-chain trend, but a market burdened with latent gains.

SCENARIOS
• Ratio holds above 1.0: bullish structure unchanged, even in a range below 85k
• Ratio falls back below 1.0: soft invalidation of this "full bull" framework

Are you following this MVRV ratio, or profit-taking, to judge the strength of the move?

$BTC
#Bitcoin #CryptoQuant #OnChain
·
--
CryptoQuant spotted a rare duo: unrealized profits AND profit-taking at the very top at the same time. According to Julio Moreno (CryptoQuant Research), the unrealized profit rate of the $BTC a has risen to 33%, the highest since December 2024. At the same time, profit-taking is reaching around 25,700 BTC, a record since the beginning of 2026. FACTS • Unrealized profit rate: 33% (highest since Dec. 2024) • Profit-taking: ~25,700 BTC (highest since 2026) • Spot Kraken: ~84,118 $; Fear & Greed: 74 (Greed) • OKX BTC funding still calm (~0,0017%) INTERPRETATION When these two curves rise together, the momentum of a rally tends to run out of steam. This isn’t an automatic sell signal—rather, it’s a reminder that the market is loaded with latent gains near current levels. SCENARIOS • Consolidation / pressure below ~85k if profit-taking stays high • Soft invalidation if $BTC clearly resumes above recent highs without an acceleration in outflows Do you track on-chain unrealized profit, or exchange flows, to gauge this correction risk? $BTC #Bitcoin #CryptoQuant #OnChain
CryptoQuant spotted a rare duo: unrealized profits AND profit-taking at the very top at the same time.

According to Julio Moreno (CryptoQuant Research), the unrealized profit rate of the $BTC a has risen to 33%, the highest since December 2024. At the same time, profit-taking is reaching around 25,700 BTC, a record since the beginning of 2026.

FACTS
• Unrealized profit rate: 33% (highest since Dec. 2024)
• Profit-taking: ~25,700 BTC (highest since 2026)
• Spot Kraken: ~84,118 $; Fear & Greed: 74 (Greed)
• OKX BTC funding still calm (~0,0017%)

INTERPRETATION
When these two curves rise together, the momentum of a rally tends to run out of steam. This isn’t an automatic sell signal—rather, it’s a reminder that the market is loaded with latent gains near current levels.

SCENARIOS
• Consolidation / pressure below ~85k if profit-taking stays high
• Soft invalidation if $BTC clearly resumes above recent highs without an acceleration in outflows

Do you track on-chain unrealized profit, or exchange flows, to gauge this correction risk?

$BTC
#Bitcoin #CryptoQuant #OnChain
·
--
CoinGlass mapping where the leverage lever concentrates around $BTC, while spot remains in consolidation. FACTS (CoinGlass via ChainCatcher, 26/09 08:30 UTC) • If $BTC breaks 88,099 $, the cumulative intensity of short liquidations on major CEXs reaches about 1.673B$. • If $BTC loses 79,929 $, the long intensity reaches about 1.288B$. • Over 24 h, total liquidations ~275 M$ are almost balanced (137 M$ longs / 138 M$ shorts). • Kraken spot ~83,995 $. Fear & Greed 74 (Greed). OKX BTC funding still calm. INTERPRETATION The price is still far from both walls. This is not a timing signal, but rather a map of leverage clusters. Current consolidation leaves "fuel" on both sides if the range breaks. SCENARIOS • Clean break above ~88k: risk of a short squeeze (high intensity on the shorts side). • Clean break below ~80k: risk of a long flush. • In between: range + noise, with 24 h liqs balanced. Are you watching the upper wall at 88k or the support around 80k? $BTC #Bitcoin #CoinGlass #Crypto
CoinGlass mapping where the leverage lever concentrates around $BTC , while spot remains in consolidation.

FACTS (CoinGlass via ChainCatcher, 26/09 08:30 UTC)
• If $BTC breaks 88,099 $, the cumulative intensity of short liquidations on major CEXs reaches about 1.673B$.
• If $BTC loses 79,929 $, the long intensity reaches about 1.288B$.
• Over 24 h, total liquidations ~275 M$ are almost balanced (137 M$ longs / 138 M$ shorts).
• Kraken spot ~83,995 $. Fear & Greed 74 (Greed). OKX BTC funding still calm.

INTERPRETATION
The price is still far from both walls. This is not a timing signal, but rather a map of leverage clusters. Current consolidation leaves "fuel" on both sides if the range breaks.

SCENARIOS
• Clean break above ~88k: risk of a short squeeze (high intensity on the shorts side).
• Clean break below ~80k: risk of a long flush.
• In between: range + noise, with 24 h liqs balanced.

Are you watching the upper wall at 88k or the support around 80k?

$BTC #Bitcoin #CoinGlass #Crypto
·
--
Bitget publishes the withdrawal resumption schedule, after the incident on 24/09. According to official support (26/09, 03:55 UTC), the vulnerability has been fixed. Mandiant and SlowMist continue their investigation. User balances remain available, trading and deposits are still running, and the Protection Fund covers the financial impact. Schedule (UTC): • 28/09 08:00 : $BTC (Bitcoin) • 29/09 08:00 : $ETH (Ethereum, BSC, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism) • 30/09 08:00 : USDT (Ethereum, BSC, Solana, Tron) • 02/10 08:00 : other tokens, fiat and P2P AMA with CEO Gracy Chen on 28/09 at 07:30 UTC. Withdrawals will be reopened gradually on the platform. Follow only Bitget’s official channels. Spot reference (Kraken): $BTC ~84.2k / $ETH ~2.69k. Fear & Greed 74 (Greed). Will this schedule hold without queues or limits on 28/09? #Bitget #Crypto #Security
Bitget publishes the withdrawal resumption schedule, after the incident on 24/09.

According to official support (26/09, 03:55 UTC), the vulnerability has been fixed. Mandiant and SlowMist continue their investigation. User balances remain available, trading and deposits are still running, and the Protection Fund covers the financial impact.

Schedule (UTC):
• 28/09 08:00 : $BTC (Bitcoin)
• 29/09 08:00 : $ETH (Ethereum, BSC, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism)
• 30/09 08:00 : USDT (Ethereum, BSC, Solana, Tron)
• 02/10 08:00 : other tokens, fiat and P2P

AMA with CEO Gracy Chen on 28/09 at 07:30 UTC.

Withdrawals will be reopened gradually on the platform. Follow only Bitget’s official channels.

Spot reference (Kraken): $BTC ~84.2k / $ETH ~2.69k. Fear & Greed 74 (Greed).

Will this schedule hold without queues or limits on 28/09?

#Bitget #Crypto #Security
·
--
CoinMarketCap has just acquired CoinGlass. Official CMC announcement (Hong Kong, 25/09/2026): transaction closed; amount not disclosed. CoinGlass remains an independent brand. Website, app, free tools, API, and pricing unchanged, according to the release. What changes for the market: • CMC (115M users/month) adds open interest (OI), funding, liquidations, and options alongside spot prices • CoinGlass: 28 exchanges, 2,500+ instruments, 5M+ MAUs, 10k+ API clients (founded in 2019) • Derivatives already account for most crypto volumes. CMC wants to make this positioning visible to the general public, not only to specialized traders Useful reminder: Binance acquired CMC in 2020. CoinGlass, in the same data ecosystem, further concentrates derivative information flows (liquidation heatmaps, funding, OI) around an already central player. To watch on the perceived neutrality of the data, even if the release stresses operational independence. Spot at the time of the post (26/09): BTC ≈ $84,022, ETH ≈ $2,689, SOL ≈ 120.6, XRP ≈ $1.552 (Kraken); BNB ≈ $773.5 (Coinbase). Fear & Greed 74 (Greed). OKX BTC funding calm (~0.002%). Do you mainly consult CMC, CoinGlass, or both for positioning? $BNB $BTC #Binance #CoinMarketCap #Crypto
CoinMarketCap has just acquired CoinGlass.

Official CMC announcement (Hong Kong, 25/09/2026): transaction closed; amount not disclosed. CoinGlass remains an independent brand. Website, app, free tools, API, and pricing unchanged, according to the release.

What changes for the market:
• CMC (115M users/month) adds open interest (OI), funding, liquidations, and options alongside spot prices
• CoinGlass: 28 exchanges, 2,500+ instruments, 5M+ MAUs, 10k+ API clients (founded in 2019)
• Derivatives already account for most crypto volumes. CMC wants to make this positioning visible to the general public, not only to specialized traders

Useful reminder: Binance acquired CMC in 2020. CoinGlass, in the same data ecosystem, further concentrates derivative information flows (liquidation heatmaps, funding, OI) around an already central player. To watch on the perceived neutrality of the data, even if the release stresses operational independence.

Spot at the time of the post (26/09): BTC ≈ $84,022, ETH ≈ $2,689, SOL ≈ 120.6, XRP ≈ $1.552 (Kraken); BNB ≈ $773.5 (Coinbase). Fear & Greed 74 (Greed). OKX BTC funding calm (~0.002%).

Do you mainly consult CMC, CoinGlass, or both for positioning?

$BNB $BTC
#Binance #CoinMarketCap #Crypto
·
--
Today, a scheduled pause on Binance’s US Stock Trading. Official window (Binance CMS announcement, Maintenance Updates): • 26/09/2026 from 10:50 to 14:00 UTC • System upgrade on the side of the partner broker • Unable to place US stock orders during the window • Timing intentionally outside regular US market hours • Automatic resumption at the end (the window may shift a little) This is not a Spot/Futures crypto outage: the announced scope is US Stock Trading. It’s useful to line up your stock orders before 10:50 UTC or after the resumption, especially if you have stock/options flows tied to your Stocks Account. Spot at the time of the post (~07:45 UTC, 26/09): BTC ≈ $84,047, ETH ≈ $2,690, SOL ≈ 120.6, XRP ≈ $1.552 (Kraken); BNB ≈ $773.5 (Coinbase). Fear & Greed 74 (Greed). OKX funding is calm (~0.002%). Are you using Binance Stock Trading, or staying 100% in Spot crypto? $BNB $BTC #Binance #Stocks #Crypto
Today, a scheduled pause on Binance’s US Stock Trading.

Official window (Binance CMS announcement, Maintenance Updates):
• 26/09/2026 from 10:50 to 14:00 UTC
• System upgrade on the side of the partner broker
• Unable to place US stock orders during the window
• Timing intentionally outside regular US market hours
• Automatic resumption at the end (the window may shift a little)

This is not a Spot/Futures crypto outage: the announced scope is US Stock Trading. It’s useful to line up your stock orders before 10:50 UTC or after the resumption, especially if you have stock/options flows tied to your Stocks Account.

Spot at the time of the post (~07:45 UTC, 26/09): BTC ≈ $84,047, ETH ≈ $2,690, SOL ≈ 120.6, XRP ≈ $1.552 (Kraken); BNB ≈ $773.5 (Coinbase). Fear & Greed 74 (Greed). OKX funding is calm (~0.002%).

Are you using Binance Stock Trading, or staying 100% in Spot crypto?

$BNB $BTC
#Binance #Stocks #Crypto
·
--
Spot ETH ETFs $ETH have not yet seen net inflows yesterday, alongside the BTC print already discussed. Facts (SoSoValue, US session 25/09, via ChainCatcher): • Total net inflow: +$86.9M (6th consecutive green session) • Leaders: ETHA (BlackRock) +$50.4M, ETHB (BlackRock Staked) +$31.9M • Aggregated AUM ~ $17.78B, cumulative net flows ~ $13.94B (ETF/mkt ETH ratio ~5.42%) Spot now (Kraken): $ETH ~2,685 (−0.25% vs open), $BTC ~83,907 (−0.22%), Fear & Greed 74 (Greed). OKX BTC funding ~0.002%, calm. Interpretation: the regulated demand for $ETH holds even without a breakout above 2,700. This is not an automatic buy signal; it’s a reminder that ETF flows and spot price can diverge for a few days. Scenarios: • Continuation: a series of inflows + reclaim above 2,700 → institutional support confirmed • Soft invalidation: flows turn negative for several days while spot remains under 2,650 The 26/09 session ETH prints have not come out yet. Do you mainly track ETH flows or the ETH/BTC ratio to gauge rotation? $ETH $BTC #Ethereum #ETF
Spot ETH ETFs $ETH have not yet seen net inflows yesterday, alongside the BTC print already discussed.

Facts (SoSoValue, US session 25/09, via ChainCatcher):
• Total net inflow: +$86.9M (6th consecutive green session)
• Leaders: ETHA (BlackRock) +$50.4M, ETHB (BlackRock Staked) +$31.9M
• Aggregated AUM ~ $17.78B, cumulative net flows ~ $13.94B (ETF/mkt ETH ratio ~5.42%)

Spot now (Kraken): $ETH ~2,685 (−0.25% vs open), $BTC ~83,907 (−0.22%), Fear & Greed 74 (Greed). OKX BTC funding ~0.002%, calm.

Interpretation: the regulated demand for $ETH holds even without a breakout above 2,700. This is not an automatic buy signal; it’s a reminder that ETF flows and spot price can diverge for a few days.

Scenarios:
• Continuation: a series of inflows + reclaim above 2,700 → institutional support confirmed
• Soft invalidation: flows turn negative for several days while spot remains under 2,650

The 26/09 session ETH prints have not come out yet. Do you mainly track ETH flows or the ETH/BTC ratio to gauge rotation?

$ETH $BTC
#Ethereum #ETF
·
--
Spot Bitcoin ETFs $BTC have still seen net inflows yesterday, while the price is consolidating around 84k. Facts (SoSoValue, US session 25/09, via ChainCatcher): • Total net inflow: +$134M (7th consecutive green session) • Leaders: IBIT (BlackRock) +$97.0M, FBTC (Fidelity) +$49.3M • Largest outflow of the day: BITB (Bitwise) −$11.8M • Aggregated AUM ~ $108.4B, cumulative net flows ~ $57.55B (ETF / BTC market flow ratio ~6.43%) Spot now (Kraken): $BTC ~ 83,970 (−0.14% 24h), $ETH ~ 2,688, Fear & Greed 74 (Greed). OKX funding is calm across majors. Interpretation: ETF demand remains positive even without a breakout above 85k. This is not an automatic buy signal; rather, it’s a reminder that institutional flows and the spot price can diverge over a few sessions. Scenarios: • Continuation: a run of inflows + a move back above 85k → buy pressure confirmed • Soft invalidation: flows turn red for several days while spot stays below 84k Friday’s flows (26/09 ET) haven’t been released yet. Are you following the spot price or the ETF flows more closely right now? $BTC #Bitcoin #ETF
Spot Bitcoin ETFs $BTC have still seen net inflows yesterday, while the price is consolidating around 84k.

Facts (SoSoValue, US session 25/09, via ChainCatcher):
• Total net inflow: +$134M (7th consecutive green session)
• Leaders: IBIT (BlackRock) +$97.0M, FBTC (Fidelity) +$49.3M
• Largest outflow of the day: BITB (Bitwise) −$11.8M
• Aggregated AUM ~ $108.4B, cumulative net flows ~ $57.55B (ETF / BTC market flow ratio ~6.43%)

Spot now (Kraken): $BTC ~ 83,970 (−0.14% 24h), $ETH ~ 2,688, Fear & Greed 74 (Greed). OKX funding is calm across majors.

Interpretation: ETF demand remains positive even without a breakout above 85k. This is not an automatic buy signal; rather, it’s a reminder that institutional flows and the spot price can diverge over a few sessions.

Scenarios:
• Continuation: a run of inflows + a move back above 85k → buy pressure confirmed
• Soft invalidation: flows turn red for several days while spot stays below 84k

Friday’s flows (26/09 ET) haven’t been released yet. Are you following the spot price or the ETF flows more closely right now?

$BTC #Bitcoin #ETF
·
--
While Bitcoin is treading water, $SOL clearly drives the session. On the 24h stats from Coinbase (cross-checked on Kraken spot): Solana +3.70% to ~120.7 $, while $BTC slips ~0.25% around 83,980 $. Ethereum is barely green (+0.33%), XRP gains ~1.55%. Fear & Greed remains in the Greed zone (74). This is not a confirmed structural breakout. It’s a relative strength divergence: capital rotates into a few alts while Bitcoin digests the ~84k area. OKX funding is still calm (SOL slightly positive, ETH a bit negative), so there’s no obvious leveraged overheating behind the move. Scenarios I’m watching: • Continuation: SOL holds above ~118–120 $ if BTC stays stable under 84.5k • Failure: back below ~116–117 $ if risk returns to the majors • Relative invalidation: BTC reclaims the lead with a clean break above the recent range Are you leaning more toward Solana strength here, or waiting for Bitcoin to decide the consolidation? $SOL $BTC #Crypto
While Bitcoin is treading water, $SOL clearly drives the session.

On the 24h stats from Coinbase (cross-checked on Kraken spot): Solana +3.70% to ~120.7 $, while $BTC slips ~0.25% around 83,980 $. Ethereum is barely green (+0.33%), XRP gains ~1.55%. Fear & Greed remains in the Greed zone (74).

This is not a confirmed structural breakout. It’s a relative strength divergence: capital rotates into a few alts while Bitcoin digests the ~84k area. OKX funding is still calm (SOL slightly positive, ETH a bit negative), so there’s no obvious leveraged overheating behind the move.

Scenarios I’m watching:
• Continuation: SOL holds above ~118–120 $ if BTC stays stable under 84.5k
• Failure: back below ~116–117 $ if risk returns to the majors
• Relative invalidation: BTC reclaims the lead with a clean break above the recent range

Are you leaning more toward Solana strength here, or waiting for Bitcoin to decide the consolidation?
$SOL $BTC #Crypto
·
--
Binance prepares a concrete switch: crypto holdings outside the order books leave the Funding Account for the Spot. Timeline (official Binance announcement, reposted by CryptoTimes / FX News Group, 23/09): • Starting 29/09/2026: the Funding Account no longer accepts on-chain crypto deposits. Crypto deposits and withdrawals go through Spot. • One-Click Migration button in the Funding Account (updated iOS/Android app). • Assets not moved manually: automatic batch migration starting January 2027, 1:1 ratio, total balances unchanged. • In January 2027, the Funding Account becomes the Stocks Account (settlement of shares / options). • Six stock/options settlement assets: USD, USDC, USDT, USD1, U, $BNB. • Pay, Card, Gift Card, Convert, and part of P2P also switch to Spot starting 29/09. P2P advertisers keep the Funding longer, until a dedicated P2P account (Dec. 2026). Spot at the time of the post (~03:45 UTC, 26/09): BTC ≈ $83,942, ETH ≈ $2,688, SOL ≈ 120.7, XRP ≈ $1.558 (Kraken); BNB ≈ $774.7 (Coinbase). To check before 29/09: Funding balance vs Spot, Pay/Card/Convert flows, and whether the One-Click button appears correctly in the app. Do you migrate everything right away with one click, or do you wait for the 2027 auto batch? $BNB $BTC #Binance #Crypto #Spot
Binance prepares a concrete switch: crypto holdings outside the order books leave the Funding Account for the Spot.

Timeline (official Binance announcement, reposted by CryptoTimes / FX News Group, 23/09):
• Starting 29/09/2026: the Funding Account no longer accepts on-chain crypto deposits. Crypto deposits and withdrawals go through Spot.
• One-Click Migration button in the Funding Account (updated iOS/Android app).
• Assets not moved manually: automatic batch migration starting January 2027, 1:1 ratio, total balances unchanged.
• In January 2027, the Funding Account becomes the Stocks Account (settlement of shares / options).
• Six stock/options settlement assets: USD, USDC, USDT, USD1, U, $BNB .
• Pay, Card, Gift Card, Convert, and part of P2P also switch to Spot starting 29/09. P2P advertisers keep the Funding longer, until a dedicated P2P account (Dec. 2026).

Spot at the time of the post (~03:45 UTC, 26/09): BTC ≈ $83,942, ETH ≈ $2,688, SOL ≈ 120.7, XRP ≈ $1.558 (Kraken); BNB ≈ $774.7 (Coinbase).

To check before 29/09: Funding balance vs Spot, Pay/Card/Convert flows, and whether the One-Click button appears correctly in the app.

Do you migrate everything right away with one click, or do you wait for the 2027 auto batch?

$BNB $BTC
#Binance #Crypto #Spot
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs