LIVE
超人不会飞2020
Verified Creator
推特/X:@super55668 周一至周六下午14：00直播，风里雨里超人等你💞💞
Open Trade
BNB Holder
High-Frequency Trader
5.5 Years
439 Following
43.3K+ Followers
50.7K+ Liked
7.1K+ Shared
Posts
Portfolio
All
Videos
Live
I often ponder a rather heart-wrenching question: if it's just a compliant transfer, why does it always feel like everything about me has been laid bare?
When small merchants make payments to suppliers, and exchanges and payment parties settle, cross-border remittances should be clean and straightforward. However, every transaction leaves a permanent trace, and analysis companies and competitors can see everything that can be investigated. Compliance slowly turns into complete transparency, which feels very awkward.
Currently, most systems are about patching up privacy afterwards, obscuring and complicating permissions, mixing public and private ledgers, which looks clumsy no matter how you view it. Regulators need to audit, users need privacy, and developers can only piece things together. In the end, either too much data leaks out, or the process becomes cumbersome and expensive. I've seen both outcomes many times, and neither works. #plasma is working hard to solve this problem.
So I have always believed that compliant finance should treat privacy as a standard feature, not an additional option. Projects like plasma ($XPL ) can succeed not because of a new Layer 1, but because in stablecoin settlements, payroll, goods payments, and capital flows are inherently sensitive. You can't expose everything just for speed. @Plasma Financial infrastructure should inherently include privacy, flowing quietly like pipes, rather than being left open for all to see.
When small merchants make payments to suppliers, and exchanges and payment parties settle, cross-border remittances should be clean and straightforward. However, every transaction leaves a permanent trace, and analysis companies and competitors can see everything that can be investigated. Compliance slowly turns into complete transparency, which feels very awkward.
Currently, most systems are about patching up privacy afterwards, obscuring and complicating permissions, mixing public and private ledgers, which looks clumsy no matter how you view it. Regulators need to audit, users need privacy, and developers can only piece things together. In the end, either too much data leaks out, or the process becomes cumbersome and expensive. I've seen both outcomes many times, and neither works. #plasma is working hard to solve this problem.
So I have always believed that compliant finance should treat privacy as a standard feature, not an additional option. Projects like plasma ($XPL ) can succeed not because of a new Layer 1, but because in stablecoin settlements, payroll, goods payments, and capital flows are inherently sensitive. You can't expose everything just for speed. @Plasma Financial infrastructure should inherently include privacy, flowing quietly like pipes, rather than being left open for all to see.
In the hustle of the crypto market, I just want to find a way forward that isn't exhausting.
The current crypto market gives me a strange sense of bustling excitement, like a room that never turns off its lights, where everyone is talking and analyzing, each holding onto a script they believe to be correct. But the more I hear, the more exhausted I feel—no matter how thorough the analysis is, in the end, I still have to open my wallet, click to exchange, and watch the fees surge here and fluctuate there, like unpredictable weather, leaving me feeling powerless.
At this moment, I always ask myself a repeatedly ridiculous question: after shouting 'blockchain changes the world' for so many years, how many projects have truly improved the experience for ordinary people? DeFi once carried the expectation of financial freedom, but this freedom feels more like each person shouldering all the burdens alone: finding chains with lower fees, filtering for the lowest-risk bridges, remembering which tokens can offset Gas, and accepting that pending and failed transactions have become the norm.
At this moment, I always ask myself a repeatedly ridiculous question: after shouting 'blockchain changes the world' for so many years, how many projects have truly improved the experience for ordinary people? DeFi once carried the expectation of financial freedom, but this freedom feels more like each person shouldering all the burdens alone: finding chains with lower fees, filtering for the lowest-risk bridges, remembering which tokens can offset Gas, and accepting that pending and failed transactions have become the norm.
Privacy and Compliance: The Balancing Act of Future Financial Infrastructure
I can't help but ponder a very tangible yet somewhat unsettling question: Clearly, the transfers are compliant and legal, so why does it always feel like every move I make and all information are exposed under the broad daylight?
Take the matters around us as an example. Small businesses pay suppliers, exchanges and payment entities settle, and remittance companies conduct cross-border transfers. These things seem to be done properly, with no suspicious elements. However, in reality, the ins and outs of every transaction are permanently recorded — they might be monitored by analytics companies, targeted by competitors, or anyone who knows how to check can dig up this information thoroughly. Unknowingly, 'compliance' has transformed into 'complete transparency', which is precisely the core issue.
Take the matters around us as an example. Small businesses pay suppliers, exchanges and payment entities settle, and remittance companies conduct cross-border transfers. These things seem to be done properly, with no suspicious elements. However, in reality, the ins and outs of every transaction are permanently recorded — they might be monitored by analytics companies, targeted by competitors, or anyone who knows how to check can dig up this information thoroughly. Unknowingly, 'compliance' has transformed into 'complete transparency', which is precisely the core issue.
The first time I heard someone mention @Dusk , the project had no traction at all; no one was discussing it, no one was shouting that it was the next hot spot. It was only mentioned in passing during a conversation about regulatory settlements. I glanced at the introduction of "institution-level privacy sovereignty L1" at that time and found it dull. Projects like this in the crypto space, deemed "boring," are often easily overlooked.
However, upon deeper reflection, I realized that this "boring" aspect, #Dusk , might actually be the core. After witnessing institutions hitting walls while probing public chains, I found that their bottlenecks were never about scalability or user experience, but about privacy—core information like transactions and holdings simply cannot be made public. Everyone is left to rely on additional databases and legal agreements, which are both fragile and costly, making privacy an exception rather than a standard.
Setting aside the label of a crypto project and viewing $DUSK as a settlement infrastructure, its value becomes clear: it allows institutions to operate without hiding behind the foundational layer. However, infrastructure never relies on publicity; its success depends entirely on whether anyone is genuinely building applications and conducting settlements on top of it. I'm neither promoting nor criticizing; I'm just quietly observing.
However, upon deeper reflection, I realized that this "boring" aspect, #Dusk , might actually be the core. After witnessing institutions hitting walls while probing public chains, I found that their bottlenecks were never about scalability or user experience, but about privacy—core information like transactions and holdings simply cannot be made public. Everyone is left to rely on additional databases and legal agreements, which are both fragile and costly, making privacy an exception rather than a standard.
Setting aside the label of a crypto project and viewing $DUSK as a settlement infrastructure, its value becomes clear: it allows institutions to operate without hiding behind the foundational layer. However, infrastructure never relies on publicity; its success depends entirely on whether anyone is genuinely building applications and conducting settlements on top of it. I'm neither promoting nor criticizing; I'm just quietly observing.
Recently, the market is very quiet, but the human feelings are very strong.
After almost 3 months of live streaming, my brothers and sisters finally welcome a wave of New Year benefits.
Special thanks to Jiajia姐 for randomly gifting coins for several days. I am very grateful for Jiajia姐 @Jiayi Li 's recognition; she is beautiful and speaks little, so everyone please give Jiajia姐 more attention!
A special thanks to "Pikachu" C哥 @Saccccc for finding my live streaming room in the vast sea of people, and I also welcome all friends to come to the live streaming room to hang out often~
And thank you to all the friends who have given me tips!
After almost 3 months of live streaming, my brothers and sisters finally welcome a wave of New Year benefits.
Special thanks to Jiajia姐 for randomly gifting coins for several days. I am very grateful for Jiajia姐 @Jiayi Li 's recognition; she is beautiful and speaks little, so everyone please give Jiajia姐 more attention!
A special thanks to "Pikachu" C哥 @Saccccc for finding my live streaming room in the vast sea of people, and I also welcome all friends to come to the live streaming room to hang out often~
And thank you to all the friends who have given me tips!
Personal Perspective on the Dusk Project Share
When I talk to my friends who don't play with crypto about @Dusk , I usually don't mention terms like "privacy" or "compliant DeFi"; instead, I explain it through a simple scenario: Imagine a fully glass bank outlet where everyone can see transactions happening, but the customers' privacy is effectively protected—that's the core concept of Dusk. Its most unique aspect is that it doesn't just shout privacy slogans; it has implemented two parallel transaction channels at the underlying level, focusing on both public and private aspects, flexible and pragmatic like traditional financial markets.
What I admire most about #Dusk is its pragmatic spirit, completely devoid of fluff. Even the API has been optimized to avoid redundant operations, truly making it applicable in institutional scenarios.
Although it is still refining aspects like endgame and sequencers, from the developer support and on-chain data, $DUSK is slowly transforming from a "demonstrable" project into a "practical" infrastructure. This fills me with anticipation for its future, and it's worth continuing to follow the subsequent developments.
When I talk to my friends who don't play with crypto about @Dusk , I usually don't mention terms like "privacy" or "compliant DeFi"; instead, I explain it through a simple scenario: Imagine a fully glass bank outlet where everyone can see transactions happening, but the customers' privacy is effectively protected—that's the core concept of Dusk. Its most unique aspect is that it doesn't just shout privacy slogans; it has implemented two parallel transaction channels at the underlying level, focusing on both public and private aspects, flexible and pragmatic like traditional financial markets.
What I admire most about #Dusk is its pragmatic spirit, completely devoid of fluff. Even the API has been optimized to avoid redundant operations, truly making it applicable in institutional scenarios.
Although it is still refining aspects like endgame and sequencers, from the developer support and on-chain data, $DUSK is slowly transforming from a "demonstrable" project into a "practical" infrastructure. This fills me with anticipation for its future, and it's worth continuing to follow the subsequent developments.
Analysis of Plasma's Technical Architecture
As an experienced player, when dismantling the technical architecture of @Plasma , I can immediately see that it is designed around fast, low-cost, and highly compatible stablecoin payments. Its three-layer core architecture is very clear and precisely addresses various pain points.
First is the consensus layer (PlasmaBFT), which is a customized Rust implementation based on the Fast HotStuff BFT algorithm, using PoS (Proof of Stake) to elect validating nodes, achieving sub-second confirmation and finality, seamlessly integrated with the Reth execution layer through the Engine API. This is the key to Plasma achieving 'second-level confirmation.'
Next is the execution layer (Reth EVM), which is a fully EVM-compatible client written in Rust, allowing developers to directly deploy Solidity contracts on it, using Ethereum tools like MetaMask and Hardhat, with almost no migration costs, enabling seamless integration for developers.
Finally, there is the security and cross-chain layer. Plasma anchors state commitments to the Bitcoin blockchain, using multi-signature validating nodes to create cross-chain bridges, enabling cross-chain interaction between Bitcoin and Plasma. This not only leverages Bitcoin's security to ensure the neutrality of the settlement layer but also provides space for Bitcoin's DeFi applications.
Additionally, Plasma optimizes native stablecoins to implement gasless USDT transfers using Paymaster and employs stablecoin-prioritized gas logic to make transactions nearly frictionless. By staking and incentivizing with the $XPL token, the stablecoin flow is effectively stabilized.
In summary, #plasma not only focuses on technological innovation but also steadily advances in the process of achieving decentralization, aiming to become the infrastructure for stablecoin payments rather than just a simple project narrative.
As an experienced player, when dismantling the technical architecture of @Plasma , I can immediately see that it is designed around fast, low-cost, and highly compatible stablecoin payments. Its three-layer core architecture is very clear and precisely addresses various pain points.
First is the consensus layer (PlasmaBFT), which is a customized Rust implementation based on the Fast HotStuff BFT algorithm, using PoS (Proof of Stake) to elect validating nodes, achieving sub-second confirmation and finality, seamlessly integrated with the Reth execution layer through the Engine API. This is the key to Plasma achieving 'second-level confirmation.'
Next is the execution layer (Reth EVM), which is a fully EVM-compatible client written in Rust, allowing developers to directly deploy Solidity contracts on it, using Ethereum tools like MetaMask and Hardhat, with almost no migration costs, enabling seamless integration for developers.
Finally, there is the security and cross-chain layer. Plasma anchors state commitments to the Bitcoin blockchain, using multi-signature validating nodes to create cross-chain bridges, enabling cross-chain interaction between Bitcoin and Plasma. This not only leverages Bitcoin's security to ensure the neutrality of the settlement layer but also provides space for Bitcoin's DeFi applications.
Additionally, Plasma optimizes native stablecoins to implement gasless USDT transfers using Paymaster and employs stablecoin-prioritized gas logic to make transactions nearly frictionless. By staking and incentivizing with the $XPL token, the stablecoin flow is effectively stabilized.
In summary, #plasma not only focuses on technological innovation but also steadily advances in the process of achieving decentralization, aiming to become the infrastructure for stablecoin payments rather than just a simple project narrative.
Dusk in My Eyes: A Solid Foundation for Compliant Financial Privacy
In my years of deepening my work in the field of financial privacy, I have seen too many projects fall into the misunderstanding of 'hiding everything.' The compliant financial privacy infrastructure created by #Dusk has taken a different path — we do not seek indiscriminate hiding, but rather value 'controlled disclosure.' This is actually the most urgent demand in the market: it can protect the identities and transaction locations of the parties involved while allowing authorized parties to complete information verification smoothly when needed, achieving a balance between privacy and compliance.
To achieve this goal, we did not accumulate scattered buzzwords but instead dedicated ourselves to the development of Phoenix, Zedger, and XSC standards, allowing them to form a mutually supportive organic whole. Phoenix, as the core transaction model, has maintained the privacy baseline of transfers and smart contract interactions; Zedger extends on this basis, specifically adapting a hybrid design for securities-type assets, as these assets not only require clear rules and permissions but also must support complete lifecycle behaviors; while the XSC standard aims to turn confidential secure contracts into a part of the network-native asset behavior, completely breaking away from the fragile stopgap measures of the application layer.
To achieve this goal, we did not accumulate scattered buzzwords but instead dedicated ourselves to the development of Phoenix, Zedger, and XSC standards, allowing them to form a mutually supportive organic whole. Phoenix, as the core transaction model, has maintained the privacy baseline of transfers and smart contract interactions; Zedger extends on this basis, specifically adapting a hybrid design for securities-type assets, as these assets not only require clear rules and permissions but also must support complete lifecycle behaviors; while the XSC standard aims to turn confidential secure contracts into a part of the network-native asset behavior, completely breaking away from the fragile stopgap measures of the application layer.
Talking about Plasma: A 'Pragmatic' Chain Born for Stablecoin Payments
To be honest, having been in the crypto finance circle for a long time, I've seen too many flashy projects, but @Plasma is different. It’s the kind of project that only those who have really used stablecoins and understand the real payment needs can get what’s good about it.
As ordinary users, we don’t have the time to study new ecosystems every week, right? To put it simply, we just want to transfer money a bit faster and cheaper, without dealing with those complicated steps or spending extra money. Plasma’s positioning is particularly practical; it doesn’t do anything unrealistic, it’s specifically designed for high transaction volume stablecoin payments as a foundational chain, and it is fully compatible with the development tools everyone is familiar with. Developers don’t have to learn new things, and this chain doesn’t mess around, focusing solely on settling and transaction speed.
As ordinary users, we don’t have the time to study new ecosystems every week, right? To put it simply, we just want to transfer money a bit faster and cheaper, without dealing with those complicated steps or spending extra money. Plasma’s positioning is particularly practical; it doesn’t do anything unrealistic, it’s specifically designed for high transaction volume stablecoin payments as a foundational chain, and it is fully compatible with the development tools everyone is familiar with. Developers don’t have to learn new things, and this chain doesn’t mess around, focusing solely on settling and transaction speed.
I have always felt that the discussion around crypto finance has been off track from the very beginning. Everyone is always entangled in anti-money laundering thresholds and reporting obligations, yet they overlook the real pain points faced by practitioners on a daily basis - it's not about hacker attacks or human error, but rather the information leakage risks inherent in the system design itself.
Public ledgers seem to solve the trust issue, but they actually make every transaction permanently traceable. Competitors spy on transaction volumes, bad actors look for patterns, and regulators are overwhelmed by irrelevant information, ultimately placing all the risks on users.
True trust has never been about being 'visible', but rather about 'accountability when problems arise'. Privacy design should not be optional, but rather a default configuration, shifting the risk to institutions and processes instead of making users tread carefully under constant surveillance. This is also the reason I am paying attention to @Plasma , as it may balance privacy and compliance, allowing crypto finance to truly take root.
$XPL #plasma
Public ledgers seem to solve the trust issue, but they actually make every transaction permanently traceable. Competitors spy on transaction volumes, bad actors look for patterns, and regulators are overwhelmed by irrelevant information, ultimately placing all the risks on users.
True trust has never been about being 'visible', but rather about 'accountability when problems arise'. Privacy design should not be optional, but rather a default configuration, shifting the risk to institutions and processes instead of making users tread carefully under constant surveillance. This is also the reason I am paying attention to @Plasma , as it may balance privacy and compliance, allowing crypto finance to truly take root.
$XPL #plasma
Breaking Out of Rule Inefficiency: Balancing Privacy and Compliance is the Key to Unlocking Crypto Finance
The longer I stay in the field of crypto finance, the more I realize a core issue: our discussions have started from the wrong point. Most of the time, the focus is on various rules—anti-money laundering thresholds, reporting obligations, audit trails, disclosure requirements. While these are indeed important, they never address the real dilemmas faced by practitioners in their daily lives. The true contradictions have always been hidden in those more subtle everyday operations: when information is leaked by the design itself, who should bear the risk?
This kind of leak has nothing to do with hacker attacks or human improper operations; it is purely a defect inherent in the system design. The daily cash flow of stablecoin settlement companies, the bulk transactions of payment service providers, and the liquidity adjustments of finance teams' wallets are all just routine operational activities, not anything special. But on a completely transparent blockchain, every operation will be permanently recorded, and anyone with time and motivation can extract useful information from it.
This kind of leak has nothing to do with hacker attacks or human improper operations; it is purely a defect inherent in the system design. The daily cash flow of stablecoin settlement companies, the bulk transactions of payment service providers, and the liquidity adjustments of finance teams' wallets are all just routine operational activities, not anything special. But on a completely transparent blockchain, every operation will be permanently recorded, and anyone with time and motivation can extract useful information from it.
People engaged in financial compliance often encounter a painful issue: clearly following the rules, yet practical operations are riddled with data security vulnerabilities. User privacy data is inexplicably leaked, teams spend a lot of effort filling in the information disclosure gaps, leaving no time to optimize the system; each department in the company keeps their own records, and no one trusts a unified data source; the transparency required by regulators is drowned in a pile of worthless raw information, making it impossible to grasp real risks.
In fact, the problem lies not with regulation itself, but with the traditional financial system first maximizing transparency and then using permissions and exceptions to supplement privacy protection. It seems reasonable on paper, but in practice, it is fraught with issues. Every additional exception adds another set of processes, every new permission adds another layer of responsibility, and costs are entirely consumed in the conflict between this structure and reality.
This is also the value of infrastructure like @Dusk ; it does not promise absolute privacy but sets selective disclosure as the default state. Settlement and auditing have all the necessary components, and data disclosure is actively controlled, which aligns with the operational logic of compliant finance.
#Dusk $DUSK
In fact, the problem lies not with regulation itself, but with the traditional financial system first maximizing transparency and then using permissions and exceptions to supplement privacy protection. It seems reasonable on paper, but in practice, it is fraught with issues. Every additional exception adds another set of processes, every new permission adds another layer of responsibility, and costs are entirely consumed in the conflict between this structure and reality.
This is also the value of infrastructure like @Dusk ; it does not promise absolute privacy but sets selective disclosure as the default state. Settlement and auditing have all the necessary components, and data disclosure is actively controlled, which aligns with the operational logic of compliant finance.
#Dusk $DUSK
The Balance of Privacy and Transparency: Information Control and Trust Building in the Financial System
In the field of financial regulation that I have encountered, regulation is mostly event-driven. Simply put, there must be specific circumstances for review and supervision to intervene. For example, when transaction amounts exceed the prescribed limits, complaints are received, or it is time for a regular audit. Before these situations arise, all operations of financial institutions are generally conducted quietly according to the rules, and overall, it remains relatively stable. This is not to say that the system itself is unprepared, but rather that I believe excessive exposure of information can lead to more trouble and does not fundamentally solve the problem.
·
--
🎙️ Hawk中文社区直播间！更换白头鹰头像获得8000枚Hawk！同时解锁其他奖项福利！维护生态平衡和传播自由理念，Hawk正在影响全球每个城市
End
05 h 59 m 44 s
44.2k
131
The recent cryptocurrency market has dropped significantly, Binance Square is in turmoil!
Login to explore more contents