文財神按讚幣漲廟

I used to think someone would use AI for evil, but I didn't expect it to be like this....

So many likes, it's a bit scary...

"The giant tag affected 0 normal women buying clothes"

They can buy half the earth together 😂#搞笑图文

Now Singapore really can't sit still! Why? Because the Chinese are gradually breaking their decades-long golden bowl!\nRecently, Singapore has been a bit restless; this isn't just a wild guess. The 'golden bowl' that it has held for decades is being slowly 'pried' by us Chinese.\nSome may wonder, Singapore is a tiny place with no minerals or arable land, so how can it be the richest in Southeast Asia?\nIn 2023, Singapore's GDP rarely declined by $2.953 billion, and its per capita GDP experienced negative growth for the first time in three years. The rebound in 2024 relies solely on a partial boost from high-end manufacturing—this city-state, which once relied on the tolls from the Malacca Strait, multinational companies' OEM production, and offshore financial centers to stabilize its golden bowl, is now facing comprehensive industrial substitution from China.\nThe story begins with the 'maritime expressway.' The Malacca Strait sees 140,000 vessels passing through each year, with 80% of China's oil imports passing through here. Singapore not only collects transit fees but also enjoys the entire industrial chain's attraction effect: ship repairs, fuel supply, and cargo transshipment have even fostered the world's third-largest refining center and Southeast Asia's largest shipyard.\nHowever, by 2025, cargo volume through the Arctic route will exceed 40 million tons, and the China-Europe Railway Express has cumulatively operated 110,000 trains, with the rail transport time from Chongqing to Duisburg compressed to 16 days—when ships from Shanghai to Rotterdam can save 22 days by taking the Arctic route and save $3 million in fuel costs per trip, the 'toll booth' of Malacca is becoming an alternative option.\nEven more critically, Gwadar Port, a deep-water port in southwestern Pakistan, will reach a throughput of 547,000 tons by 2025. With the opening of the supporting Wakhan Corridor, Central Asian copper mines will connect directly to the sea, eliminating the 3,000-kilometer sea route for Singapore.\nThe foundation of manufacturing is also loosening. Singapore's electronics industry once accounted for over 40% of manufacturing, with 60 semiconductor companies contributing 7% of GDP. TSMC and Micron's wafer factories supported the title of 'Silicon Island of Asia.'\nHowever, the improvement of China's semiconductor industry chain is rewriting the rules of the game: SMIC's 28nm process has entered mass production, Yangtze Memory has broken through 128-layer 3D NAND, and the chip industrial park in Shanghai Lingang is attracting GlobalFoundries and Infineon to set up factories.\nData from 2024 shows that in Southeast Asia, the proportion of foreign investment in manufacturing flowing to China is 17 percentage points higher than that to Singapore—when multinational companies find that the Pearl River Delta can complete precision manufacturing and radiate to a domestic market of 1.4 billion, why squeeze onto Singapore's 728 square kilometers island?\nThe halo of the financial center is also fading. Singapore was once the world's third-largest offshore RMB market, managing an asset management scale of 26 trillion Singapore dollars.\nHowever, in 2023, Shanghai's free trade zone RMB cross-border payment system covered 92 countries, and infrastructure financing for the China-Laos Railway and the Jakarta-Bandung High-Speed Railway is increasingly led by Chinese banks. Even Singapore's own Temasek is increasing investments in Chinese new energy and AI companies.\nMore straightforwardly, there is tax competition: China's 15% corporate tax introduced in 2024 for Hainan Free Trade Port directly attracted 12 Singapore-listed companies to set up regional headquarters, while Singapore's proud 0% capital gains tax is gradually becoming ineffective in the face of the industrial chain shift.\nWhat makes Singapore most uneasy is that China is replicating its successful logic of 'small country, big city.' The Suzhou Industrial Park has evolved over 30 years, from electronic OEM to nanotechnology, with GDP exceeding 340 billion yuan; the cross-border financial innovations in Shenzhen Qianhai have quadrupled offshore RMB settlement volumes in three years; even the ability to reclaim land from the sea, China's dredging fleet has an annual operating volume 23 times that of Singapore.\nAs the feasibility study for the Kra Canal heats up again—if this canal crossing Thailand's Kra Isthmus is built, 100,000-ton cargo ships could shorten their journey by 1,200 kilometers, and the throughput of Singapore port's 37 million standard containers will directly face diversion risks.\nAnd Thailand's decision in 2025 to announce that 60% of official cargo will be diverted to Gwadar Port is just the first domino in a chain reaction.\nThis quiet replacement is essentially a redistribution of the globalization dividend. In the past, Singapore relied on its role as a 'middleman' to reap geopolitical benefits: the ports left by British colonizers, the Southeast Asian pivot contested by the US and the USSR during the Cold War, and the foreign investment springboard during China's reform and opening up.\nHowever, as China becomes the largest trading partner of over 120 countries, and as the industrial clusters under the 'dual circulation' strategy bring their own flow, Singapore's 'transshipment economy' suddenly loses the soil it relied on.\nData from 2024 shows that the reinvestment rate of foreign enterprises in Singapore's manufacturing sector has dropped to its lowest in 12 years, while foreign investment in high-end manufacturing attracted to China has increased by 28%—this is not just simple competition but an inevitable shift in the center of the industrial chain.\nNow, Singapore resembles Hong Kong 20 years ago. When Shenzhen's Huaqiangbei can buy 90% of the world's electronic components, and when Hengqin's cross-border financial pilot is more flexible than Hong Kong Island, the once 'super connectors' suddenly find that they are no longer the irreplaceable bridge.\nThe difference is that Singapore has an even narrower retreat: 90% of agriculture relies on imports, 50% of freshwater depends on Malaysia, and even the sand and gravel for land reclamation must be imported from Indonesia.\nAs China weaves a new global network with infrastructure, technology, and trade, this city-state that once relied on 'straws' to absorb global resources is experiencing the painful loosening of the straw. And all of this has just begun.

What does "equal protection for all" mean? How can those who engage in "prostitution, drug use" not be considered a specific group? What qualifications do they have to represent everyone? If someone believes that the sealing of criminal records is aimed at "administrative violations that do not constitute criminal punishment" to avoid the principle of "once violated, lifetime limitations", then please elevate behaviors such as "prostitution, drug use", which are greatly disapproved by the public, to a higher level of illegal criminal activity for handling, rather than mixing it with other minor violations to confuse the issue and downplay the seriousness!

Is there a situation in Taiwan, is there a situation in Germany?

Which young master was involved?
The cryptocurrency world always has new models.

Modigliani mineral water, poverty limits imagination
A bottle of mineral water actually sells for $60,000, and even Wang Sicong would shed tears at the thought of drinking it. Such an exorbitant price for mineral water, even those with a family mine might hesitate to drink it, right?
Just looking at this bottle, I can tell I probably can't afford it. It is made of 24k pure gold and crafted by a famous artist named Fernando. The design inspiration comes from the characters in the works of Italian painter Modigliani. It seems that art truly arises and fades, unrelated to money.
The mineral water inside is very famous, coming from Fiji's freshwater. The water here is considered the purest in the world; Obama took a sip and praised it for a long time. Even more amazing, 5 milligrams of gold powder is added to the water, which can still be seen when poured out.
I wonder if drinking these gold particles can be absorbed by the body? $$SOL
{future}(SOLUSDT)

Recharge the faith of confused brothers and sisters!

A sudden fire in Hong Kong plunged the entire city into grief and also embroiled the star-studded MAMA Awards in a whirlpool of public opinion. As many celebrities rushed to help, with Miriam Yeung even donating her concert proceeds, 70-year-old Chow Yun-fat became the focus of controversy due to his appearance at the ceremony without any visible donation, shifting from 'charity superstar' to a point of contention. On one side are sharp accusations of 'hypocritical charity' and 'taking advantage of the situation for profit', while on the other side is a rational defense of 'low-key philanthropy' and 'gratitude'. Do the explanations from netizens hold water behind this public discourse?
The spark of controversy was an unexpected 'appearance'. After the Hong Kong fire, the MAMA ceremony urgently adjusted its agenda, canceling the red carpet and fireworks segments, and adding a moment of silence. Chow Yun-fat and Michelle Yeoh both publicly stated they would be absent to pay their respects. However, on the last night of the ceremony on the 29th, Chow Yun-fat unexpectedly took the stage, igniting cheers from the audience and also triggering doubts online. 'No donation seen during the disaster, yet coming to perform for profit,' and 'promised absence, yet flipped the script, too hypocritical,' negative comments surged, as in the public's perception, this superstar, who had previously announced a 'naked donation' of 5.6 billion HKD, should have stepped up in the face of disaster rather than appearing under the spotlight of an entertainment ceremony.
In response to the overwhelming criticism, rational netizens provided another perspective. Some pointed out that Chow Yun-fat's appearance was not 'flip-flopping' but rather a gesture of gratitude—the MAMA organizers quickly donated 20 million HKD after the fire, and South Korean entertainment companies and artists like G-Dragon also made donations. As an invited guest, his attendance seemed more like a response and respect for this philanthropic spirit. More crucially, his first action after taking the stage was to call for the audience to stand and turn off the lights in a moment of silence for the victims. The solemnity of that moment sharply contrasted with the previous noise, and this respect for life clearly should not be simply categorized as 'profit-seeking'.
What is even more thought-provoking is that the public's cognitive bias regarding 'charity forms' might be the core of the controversy. Critics fixated on 'no donation record' overlooked Chow Yun-fat's consistent logic of philanthropy—his charity has never been an 'emergency performance' in the face of disaster but rather a long-term commitment to silent action. Official disclosures indicate that he anonymously donated 50 million during the Wenchuan earthquake in 2008, donated 88 million worth of materials during the Yushu earthquake in 2010, and has contributed over 300 million HKD through his foundation over the years. The teaching equipment for schools in the mountainous areas of Yunnan, the ongoing 'Yunfat Scholarship', and the 3 million HKD in sales driven by agricultural live broadcasts are all imprints of his low-key philanthropy. There are also reports that he has quietly donated 5 million HKD for post-disaster reconstruction after the Hong Kong fire, adhering to the principle that 'charity does not need a dazzling halo'.
Those who accuse him of 'failing to fulfill his naked donation promise' also do not hold up under scrutiny. Chow Yun-fat completed the legal notarization of his naked donation with his wife back in 2018, and in 2024, he plans to sell his property on The Peak and inject the funds into the charity foundation. Although he jokingly responded, 'It's my wife's decision, I don't want to donate,' it fundamentally reflects his aversion to the hype surrounding charity. Compared to some celebrities who publicly flaunt transfer screenshots in 'traffic charity', he chooses to secure the destination of his lifetime wealth with a legal contract, and this determination carries far more weight than a temporary slogan. His frugal lifestyle, spending only 800 HKD a month and wearing flip-flops to the market, further confirms the wealth view that 'money is only temporarily held'. How could a person willing to give up their lifetime savings be stingy in the face of disaster?
Of course, the public's doubts are not entirely unfounded. In an era where traffic takes precedence, public figures' philanthropy indeed requires more transparency. If Chow Yun-fat's team could timely disclose the progress of their charitable efforts, it might reduce many misunderstandings. But this does not mean we can use 'whether to publicize donations' as the sole criterion for judging charity. The teaching building of Louis Koo, Chen Kun's 'Power of Walking', and Chow Yun-fat's long-term foundation all prove that charity has never been one-dimensional—some speak out loudly to create atmosphere, while others work quietly and diligently; there is no hierarchy, only different choices.
Returning to the initial question, do netizens' explanations make sense? The answer is affirmative. Chow Yun-fat's appearance is not 'profit-seeking' but a sincere expression of gratitude and reverence; his 'no donation seen' is simply a low-key choice not to let charity devolve into performance. Perhaps we can be less harsh like 'keyboard philanthropists' and more inclusive of different forms of charity. After all, compared to those who only talk and do not act, a person who entrusts all their wealth of 5.6 billion to society and dedicates decades to quietly practicing kindness deserves to be viewed more rationally.
The essence of charity is the original intention, not the showcase. When we no longer use a single standard to bind goodwill, we can truly understand the most touching warmth behind those silent commitments.

$ZEC Is this the top ranking?

【Binance Square·30K Fans Commemorative Post】
Brothers,
Just now the Binance Square fans officially surpassed 30,000! Unfortunately, at the beginning of 2023, when Binance Yingge helped me open the square, I didn't pay enough attention and missed out on too much. It was only in the past month or two that I've been working hard with this new enterprise account on the square, almost spending every day in Binance Square.
Thank you for liking my posts every time you see them,
Thank you for interacting in the comments,
Thank you to all the brothers and sisters in the live broadcast rooms, and to foreign friends,
Thank you for treating me as a friend, and not just a stranger ID.
I just like to write down good things I see and think about, and share them with everyone,
30K is not the end, just a signpost on the way.
Moving forward to 50K, 100K… as long as you are still here, I will still be here.
The crypto world is never short of opportunities, as long as you can endure loneliness and move forward steadily. #加密市场反弹 $BNB