Whoever did DCA in the last 2 years has a PM between $66–70k.
Whoever did it for 4 years paid $46–50k.
Whoever did it for 6 years paid $33–36k.
Whoever did it for 8 years paid $22–25k.
Whoever bought $100 per week over the last 10 years has between $400–450k and paid $11–14k for #BTC .
Whoever bought $100 per week for 12 years paid $2.5–4.5k for $BTC and has between $1.2–1.8M.
Whoever did it for 14 years paid $200–450 per BTC and has $15–25M.
BTCUSD at the bottom of the pit paid those who did DCA about 20% in 2 years, about 66% in 4, about 128% in 6, about 248% in 8, about 515% in 10, and about 4900% in 12 years.
What other asset with $100 per week for 10–12 years—no chance of expropriation, taxes, dilution, or involuntary capital control—retires with $1–3k per month?
For those who don’t understand derivatives and futures and don’t want "trading" risks, DCA of which other asset beat BTC in the last 10–15 years?
We identified malicious behavior in our L1 that exploits a vulnerability in the Cosmos EVM and we are currently working to mitigate the impact. We took quick action and will bring the services back online after applying a software fix and additional safeguards to ensure secure operation.
All exchanges have been notified and deposits will resume after completion. #NES
If Zema, Flávio, and Lula don’t go, it’ll be pathetic.
If they don’t have the courage to face other candidates, if they don’t have the courage to answer difficult questions, then don’t they assume that they don’t have the moral standing to be real candidates?
Lula and Flávio are surrounded by guys saying they’ve already won (or they’re already in the runoff) and don’t need to go—so what’s Zema’s rationale in 5# in #Polymarket for not showing up? #Eleicoes2026 #TRUMP
Bitcoin closed the largest absolute weekly in history in dollars.
On the daily, it consolidates a bullish flag.
Stay calm—correction after something like that is healthy.
On the monthly, it will likely test the 2025 low as resistance.
Bitcoin in self-custody for those who can have surplus—and the final exit statement for those who can’t or don’t need to—are the only real non-violent alternatives.
Violent opposition will only exist when it’s organized.
The current price is at US$ 0.01727, trying to recover the moving averages, but it still faces significant resistance ahead.
📌 Levels to watch: • US$ 0.01736 — EMA 25 • US$ 0.01770–0.01780 — EMA 99 • US$ 0.01797–0.01800 — recent resistance • US$ 0.01843 — Supertrend • US$ 0.01650 — main support
🔥 The key point is US$ 0.018. A breakout accompanied by rising volume may indicate a structural change in the short term and open room to target US$ 0.020–0.0214.
On the other hand, losing US$ 0.01650 would weaken the outlook significantly and could trigger a deeper correction.
At the moment, I see compression between support and resistance, waiting for the next strong move.
👀 US$ 0.018 is the level to keep an eye on.
Not financial advice. This is only a technical reading of the chart.
The Buffett Indicator is the ratio between the total market value of US stocks and US GDP.
Below 75% would indicate undervalued markets and above 120% overvalued markets.
Today it is 238%.
The main factor inflating the value of assets has been the decline in interest rates for decades—which has now (at least nominally) been reversed, with US10Y at its highest levels since 2008.
Market expectations are that AI will “cure all diseases” by 2040 and humanoid robots will replace most human work. The sector absorbs more than $1T in investment and more than $2T in debt per year (with no immediate perception of returns)—does that tend to decrease or increase? #BTC