曼迪mandy
主业是撸毛，偶尔玩合约，从未爆过仓。大钱没赚过，小钱凭运气。如果你也玩币圈，我们就是好朋友。
22 Following
14.7K+ Followers
6.6K+ Liked
637 Shared
All
Quotes
Live
PINNED
See original
Binance Square's Creator Task Platform is about to undergo significant adjustments!
The previous methods of relying on AI to generate content in bulk and crazy quantity are completely useless now. The newly launched #GAIB project @GAIB AI is being treated as a "pilot pioneer," clearly establishing "quality + views" as the sole evaluation standard, indicating the future direction of the entire square.
The current major pain points of Binance Square (which everyone agrees on):
1. Ranking fluctuations are extremely unstable: it's not a cumulative points system; today you might be in the top ten, but tomorrow you could drop off the chart, with the algorithm logic completely unclear.
2. Too friendly towards new users: older authors find it increasingly difficult to rank over time, seriously undermining the motivation of long-term creators.
3. Severe content homogenization: over 90% is AI-generated text, lacking personal viewpoints, focusing solely on quantity rather than quality.
4. Chinese creators are severely marginalized: the rankings are almost entirely dominated by the English-speaking region, with almost no visibility for Chinese content.
Because of these issues, the officials are taking decisive action this time, directly targeting the #GAIB project to strongly promote high-quality Chinese content.
GAIB project core rules breakdown (focus here):
1. Accounts must have ≥90% of content in Chinese, this time it's a clear benefit for Chinese creators!
2. Final rewards only consider "views + quality":
From all eligible Chinese posts, select the top 50 with the best comprehensive performance in terms of views and quality (each with ≥300 characters) to share the prize pool.
→ Translation: Brothers still using AI-generated content, it's time to stop!
→ You must write with profound insights, valuable content, personal viewpoints, and discussion-provoking content like top accounts on X (Twitter) to have a chance.
3. The officials explicitly encourage the "combination of images and text" in creative forms → Adding images = significant bonus points, not adding images is a big loss.
This is the first time Binance Square has truly prioritized "quality" and the first time it has genuinely brought Chinese creators back to the main stage.
Whoever adapts to the new rules the fastest will reap the biggest rewards.
Brothers still piling up AI-generated text, it's really time to wake up.
Start practicing writing now: write like you're tweeting, short and impactful, with viewpoints, valuable content, images, and the ability to attract traffic.
The sooner you transform, the sooner you take off!
The GAIB event has already begun, hurry up! Those who get on the bus first always earn the most.
@GAIB AI #GAIB
The previous methods of relying on AI to generate content in bulk and crazy quantity are completely useless now. The newly launched #GAIB project @GAIB AI is being treated as a "pilot pioneer," clearly establishing "quality + views" as the sole evaluation standard, indicating the future direction of the entire square.
The current major pain points of Binance Square (which everyone agrees on):
1. Ranking fluctuations are extremely unstable: it's not a cumulative points system; today you might be in the top ten, but tomorrow you could drop off the chart, with the algorithm logic completely unclear.
2. Too friendly towards new users: older authors find it increasingly difficult to rank over time, seriously undermining the motivation of long-term creators.
3. Severe content homogenization: over 90% is AI-generated text, lacking personal viewpoints, focusing solely on quantity rather than quality.
4. Chinese creators are severely marginalized: the rankings are almost entirely dominated by the English-speaking region, with almost no visibility for Chinese content.
Because of these issues, the officials are taking decisive action this time, directly targeting the #GAIB project to strongly promote high-quality Chinese content.
GAIB project core rules breakdown (focus here):
1. Accounts must have ≥90% of content in Chinese, this time it's a clear benefit for Chinese creators!
2. Final rewards only consider "views + quality":
From all eligible Chinese posts, select the top 50 with the best comprehensive performance in terms of views and quality (each with ≥300 characters) to share the prize pool.
→ Translation: Brothers still using AI-generated content, it's time to stop!
→ You must write with profound insights, valuable content, personal viewpoints, and discussion-provoking content like top accounts on X (Twitter) to have a chance.
3. The officials explicitly encourage the "combination of images and text" in creative forms → Adding images = significant bonus points, not adding images is a big loss.
This is the first time Binance Square has truly prioritized "quality" and the first time it has genuinely brought Chinese creators back to the main stage.
Whoever adapts to the new rules the fastest will reap the biggest rewards.
Brothers still piling up AI-generated text, it's really time to wake up.
Start practicing writing now: write like you're tweeting, short and impactful, with viewpoints, valuable content, images, and the ability to attract traffic.
The sooner you transform, the sooner you take off!
The GAIB event has already begun, hurry up! Those who get on the bus first always earn the most.
@GAIB AI #GAIB
PINNED
See original
Unlocking Future Wealth: Discussing How GAIB Achieves Sustainable Income and Cutting-Edge Technology Dividends Through Staking sAID
In investing, it is often difficult to achieve high returns, low risk, and good liquidity simultaneously. However, staking sAID is breaking this dilemma, satisfying both needs. It opens a new door to sustainable income for investors through a clever mechanism.
This 'key' can unlock the following threefold benefits:
1. Stable Interest: Pledged 'Basic Salary'
When you stake AID tokens into sAID, it's like depositing money into a super bank. This bank will reward you for maintaining network security, bringing you a continuous flow of passive income, akin to interest. This is the most stable cornerstone of your earnings.
This 'key' can unlock the following threefold benefits:
1. Stable Interest: Pledged 'Basic Salary'
When you stake AID tokens into sAID, it's like depositing money into a super bank. This bank will reward you for maintaining network security, bringing you a continuous flow of passive income, akin to interest. This is the most stable cornerstone of your earnings.
See original
The Art of Balance: How Injective Manages the Triangular Relationship of Technology, Ecology, and Value
When discussing the success of blockchain projects, people often fall into a single dimension of judgment: either marveling at its technological innovations or chasing the surge in its token prices. However, a truly vibrant and sustainable protocol is fundamentally a delicate balancing act—a precise triangular balance game—where the foresight of technology, the activity of the ecosystem, and the value capture mechanism must interlock and promote each other to create a positive feedback loop. The current state of Injective provides us with an excellent sample to observe this high-difficulty balancing art. We see that it has achieved phased victories in technological leaps and ecological catalysis, but the most critical value flywheel that connects the two still sounds dull.
See original
The Invisible Leap: When the Density of Ecological Innovation Surpasses the Precision of Infrastructure
In recent articles, we have examined the design blueprint, construction quality, and early entrants of Injective, the 'financial highway,' as city planners. We marveled at its sub-second confirmation smooth surface and zero gas fee policy, and witnessed the emergence of financial landmarks like Pre-IPO contracts and BlackRock's BUIDL fund. However, the true soul of a city and its sustainable prosperity ultimately do not lie in the height of landmark buildings, but in whether there are enough diverse 'small shops' in ordinary alleys that can grow independently and form a mutually nourishing ecological network. Today, as we once again turn our gaze to Injective, a shift more significant than technical parameters is occurring: the density of ecological innovation is beginning to serve as a new benchmark for measuring its success.
See original
Scaffolding and Scaffolding: When Injective's Urban Blueprint Meets the Real World of Bricks and Tiles
If we compare the construction of Injective over the past few years to drawing a meticulously exquisite urban blueprint, and based on it, we have erected exemplary infrastructures—sub-second confirmation main roads, zero gas fee municipal systems, and an open port called native EVM—then, in 2025, especially towards its end, marks the city entering a brand new and more complex stage: the blueprint is carefully put away, the architects step back, and the real test becomes how those pioneers, craftsmen, and merchants who have heard the news will build real houses, markets, and lives on this planned land with actual bricks and tiles?
See original
Mechanisms and Momentum: When Injective Transitions from 'Building the Stage' to 'Finding Dancers'
We have meticulously outlined the contours of Injective, this 'digital financial city': its underlying roads paved with sub-second confirmations and zero gas fees, introducing the vast builders of Ethereum through its native EVM's open policy, and the skyscrapers constructed with pre-IPO contracts and institutional-grade RWA. The blueprint is grand, the foundation solid. However, for a city to transition from completion to prosperity, its most profound and subtle transformation lies in the source of economic vitality shifting from external transfusions to internal blood production. For Injective, a series of key upgrades in 2025 mark its transition from a focus on 'building a world-class stage' to a new chapter that must fully 'seek and retain top dancers.' At the core of all this is a precise experiment on how 'mechanisms' create 'momentum.'
See original
Cities and Lights: The Value Capture Experiment of the Injective Ecosystem
Any ambitious city, after the completion of its magnificent infrastructure, must inevitably face a deeper and more complex stage: how to allow economic vitality to flow naturally within, and how to ensure that prosperity transcends blueprints to become a daily reality in the streets. For Injective, the solid foundations of sub-second confirmation, zero gas fees, and native EVM have already taken shape, and the 'flagship store' for Pre-IPO contracts and institutional-level RWAs has also been lit up and is in operation. At this moment, it stands at the crucial juncture of transitioning from 'excellent technology' to 'prosperous ecology', conducting a meticulous experiment on how value is created, captured, and cycled.
See original
Injective: The Rise of a 'Digital Financial City' and Its Silent Ambitions
In the world of cryptocurrency, while many projects are keen on chasing one sensational narrative after another, some choose a quieter and more solid path. Injective is one of them. It is not like a skyscraper that suddenly rises up, attracting all eyes with dazzling lights; it is more like a city that is gradually built according to a rigorous blueprint—first solidifying the foundation, planning the roads, connecting utilities, and then waiting for residents and businesses to naturally flow in. Now, as we look back at the construction process of this 'digital financial city,' we find that its outline has become increasingly clear, and lights are beginning to illuminate one block after another.
See original
The Victory of Professionalism: Lorenzo Protocol and the Breakthrough of the 'Impossible Triangle' in On-Chain Asset Management
In the world of DeFi, we have witnessed too many fleeting booms driven by liquidity incentives. When the tide recedes, many protocols are left with only a sophisticated yet unused framework, along with a collective memory of high yields. The exploration of the Lorenzo Protocol is worth continued attention precisely because it attempts to break out of this cycle to answer a more fundamental question: Can on-chain protocols, after removing the subsidies of token inflation, rely on pure financial expertise to construct a long-term, self-consistent, and scalable business model? This essentially challenges an 'impossible triangle': can decentralization, a high threshold for professional asset management, and a user-friendly experience coexist?
See original
Building a Rational Bridge Above the Noisy DeFi
This focus on the 'service' itself makes the challenges faced by the Lorenzo Protocol particularly concrete and real. The ultimate test is how it proves itself to be not just a more refined 'return wrapper', but a 'strategy factory' that can create real, sustainable alpha.
There is a core tension here: the protocol attracts users through a simple experience and clear expectations of returns, but the true asset management value lies in the unavoidable complexities—market fluctuations, the risk of strategy failure, and the friction costs of cross-chain settlement. Lorenzo's cleverness lies in its architectural design, which attempts to orderly 'layer' this complexity. It hedges the underlying technical risks (such as the security of asset custody and the reliability of cross-chain messaging) through the FAL abstraction layer and integration with mature protocols; it entrusts market strategy risks to professional strategy providers and uses a veBANK-based incentive model for continuous screening and elimination; what is ultimately presented to end users is a relatively pure 'return result' after multiple risk filters. This ability to layer risk management, rather than simply eliminating risk, is the true core of its 'institutional-level' positioning.
There is a core tension here: the protocol attracts users through a simple experience and clear expectations of returns, but the true asset management value lies in the unavoidable complexities—market fluctuations, the risk of strategy failure, and the friction costs of cross-chain settlement. Lorenzo's cleverness lies in its architectural design, which attempts to orderly 'layer' this complexity. It hedges the underlying technical risks (such as the security of asset custody and the reliability of cross-chain messaging) through the FAL abstraction layer and integration with mature protocols; it entrusts market strategy risks to professional strategy providers and uses a veBANK-based incentive model for continuous screening and elimination; what is ultimately presented to end users is a relatively pure 'return result' after multiple risk filters. This ability to layer risk management, rather than simply eliminating risk, is the true core of its 'institutional-level' positioning.
See original
Lorenzo Protocol: Becoming the 'translator' between the old world and new finance
When we shift our focus away from the noisy short-term profit competitions and truly examine whether a protocol has lasting viability, the criteria for judgment often return to some simple principles: Does it address real and persistent needs? Does its solution build a sufficiently deep moat? And does it find a sustainable balance in the distribution of benefits? Observing the Lorenzo Protocol along these lines, some more nuanced scenarios and potential challenges emerge.
The success of a protocol lies not only in the ingenuity of its technical architecture but also in its ability to attract and unite a high-quality ecosystem. The path chosen by Lorenzo is to become a 'shelf of strategies' and a 'pipeline of profits', which means its prosperity heavily relies on both ends: one end consists of developers or institutions capable of providing high-quality, robust profit strategies; the other end involves various platforms that have user traffic and seek value-added services. This sounds like a perfect two-sided market model, but initiating such a network effect requires clever cold start strategies and sustained trust accumulation. It needs to prove to strategy providers that this is a place where their capabilities can be fairly showcased and effectively translated into returns; at the same time, it must also prove to integrated platforms that the introduced OTF products are safe, reliable, and can genuinely enhance user stickiness. The establishment of trust here cannot be accomplished by a mere technical document or audit report; it needs to withstand multiple market fluctuation cycles to demonstrate that its risk control mechanisms remain effective even in extreme situations.
The success of a protocol lies not only in the ingenuity of its technical architecture but also in its ability to attract and unite a high-quality ecosystem. The path chosen by Lorenzo is to become a 'shelf of strategies' and a 'pipeline of profits', which means its prosperity heavily relies on both ends: one end consists of developers or institutions capable of providing high-quality, robust profit strategies; the other end involves various platforms that have user traffic and seek value-added services. This sounds like a perfect two-sided market model, but initiating such a network effect requires clever cold start strategies and sustained trust accumulation. It needs to prove to strategy providers that this is a place where their capabilities can be fairly showcased and effectively translated into returns; at the same time, it must also prove to integrated platforms that the introduced OTF products are safe, reliable, and can genuinely enhance user stickiness. The establishment of trust here cannot be accomplished by a mere technical document or audit report; it needs to withstand multiple market fluctuation cycles to demonstrate that its risk control mechanisms remain effective even in extreme situations.
See original
The Quiet Revolution of On-Chain Yields: The Return of Lorenzo Protocol and 'Service as Product'
Unlike those projects that remain silent in a bear market or chase hotspots in a bull market, the trajectory of the Lorenzo Protocol shows a rare restraint and resilience. It starts from a point with considerable imaginative space - a liquidity hub for Bitcoin Layer 2 - but ultimately adjusts its course towards a seemingly calm yet turbulent deep water area: on-chain institutional-grade asset management. This shift can be described less as a strategic deviation and more as a deepening of understanding. While the industry is keen to create bizarre new assets, it chooses a more straightforward path: how to ensure that existing, validated financial wisdom operates reliably on-chain and benefits the masses.
See original
Lorenzo Protocol: When On-Chain Asset Management Understands the True Meaning of 'Service'
In recent years, after observing various DeFi projects, I have gradually developed a sense of 'professional skepticism'—whenever I hear terms like 'institutional-level' or 'asset management', my first reaction is not excitement, but rather a desire to see whether there is genuine innovation behind it or if it's just old wine in new bottles. It wasn't until recently, when I carefully reviewed the development path of Lorenzo Protocol, that this skepticism began to soften. Its initial narrative focused on Bitcoin ecosystem liquidity, which is quite clever but also easily falls into homogeneous competition. Its transformation chose a heavier but potentially more solid path: acting as a translator and executor between traditional financial strategies and the on-chain world.
See original
Binance alpha performance, fellow townsfolk, don't leave the series? Just the other day, the small account that was just stopped, again it was a day of slapping my thigh. Yesterday $STABLE was worth 50 dollars, received 220 points. Today there are two airdrops, $NIGHT 230 points. Should I restart my small account?
See original
Lorenzo Protocol: The Path to Truly Generating Value for Bitcoin On-Chain
From an investor's perspective, the value of the Lorenzo Protocol lies in its ability to provide BTC with 'utility value,' rather than just expectations of price increases. In the past, BTC holders mostly just waited for price fluctuations, and it was almost impossible to participate in richer financial operations on-chain. After the emergence of stBTC, BTC can participate in lending, yield strategies, liquidity provision, and even be combined into more complex DeFi products. This means that the same amount of BTC can now generate multiple layers of income on-chain, rather than just relying on simple price fluctuation income.
This design is very friendly to medium to long-term investors. The core value of BTC will not be weakened, the underlying security remains intact, and the assets can also participate in strategies to generate additional income. This income is controllable, transparent, and standardized, allowing investors to combine strategies across multiple protocols to form a diversified income structure, rather than solely relying on market fluctuations.
This design is very friendly to medium to long-term investors. The core value of BTC will not be weakened, the underlying security remains intact, and the assets can also participate in strategies to generate additional income. This income is controllable, transparent, and standardized, allowing investors to combine strategies across multiple protocols to form a diversified income structure, rather than solely relying on market fluctuations.
See original
Lorenzo Protocol: A New Bridge for Bitcoin to Participate in the On-Chain Economy
From another perspective, what the Lorenzo Protocol does is actually fill a 'liquidity bridge' between BTC and DeFi. In the past, Bitcoin was almost just a symbol of value storage, and its liquidity was largely confined to exchanges or OTC markets, with very few on-chain use cases. This limited BTC's potential in the on-chain financial ecosystem and kept BTCFi in the conceptual stage.
Lorenzo's stBTC is like adding a new 'vein' to Bitcoin. This vein allows BTC not only to be stored passively but also to participate in lending, yield strategies, liquidity provision, and cross-chain operations on-chain. Its core value lies not in turning BTC into ERC-20 but in bringing composability and strategic capabilities to BTC, allowing BTC to truly move on-chain and become an asset that generates value, is operable, and can participate in ecological cycles.
Lorenzo's stBTC is like adding a new 'vein' to Bitcoin. This vein allows BTC not only to be stored passively but also to participate in lending, yield strategies, liquidity provision, and cross-chain operations on-chain. Its core value lies not in turning BTC into ERC-20 but in bringing composability and strategic capabilities to BTC, allowing BTC to truly move on-chain and become an asset that generates value, is operable, and can participate in ecological cycles.
See original
Lorenzo Protocol: The Team Reworking 'Bitcoin Asset Efficiency'
If you look a bit further ahead, you will find that Lorenzo is promoting a new 'financialization cycle' for Bitcoin assets. Previous BTCFi simply wrapped BTC, moved it to other chains, and then performed basic lending and liquidity pools. However, this approach cannot scale, nor can it form a closed loop, because the underlying asset has not changed—it's just locked in one contract after another on a different chain.
Lorenzo's stBTC is a completely different direction. It is not the 'porter approach', but rather 'reconstructing the value structure of BTC'. This means that once stBTC becomes mainstream, it is not just BTC that can flow, but the financial attributes of BTC itself will be dismantled, expanded, and recombined, becoming a core asset that can truly support ecological growth. This type of asset may become a 'credit foundation' for an ecosystem.
Lorenzo's stBTC is a completely different direction. It is not the 'porter approach', but rather 'reconstructing the value structure of BTC'. This means that once stBTC becomes mainstream, it is not just BTC that can flow, but the financial attributes of BTC itself will be dismantled, expanded, and recombined, becoming a core asset that can truly support ecological growth. This type of asset may become a 'credit foundation' for an ecosystem.
See original
Lorenzo Protocol: Truly 'Bringing Bitcoin Assets into DeFi'
Continue to delve into Lorenzo. The key issue is not that it has issued an asset called stBTC, but rather that it aims to solve the old problem of BTC's inefficiency on-chain. There used to be a saying in the market: ETH is an asset that can participate in economic activities, while BTC is an asset locked away in a cold storage, sleeping. This statement may sound like a joke, but it is essentially accurate—BTC has immense value, but its usability is indeed too weak.
The value of Lorenzo lies in breaking this 'inefficient' link, allowing BTC to no longer be just a 'bullish storage asset,' but to truly move on-chain, generate yields, provide collateral value, and participate in strategy portfolios. To make assets active, it often relies not on storytelling, but on whether there are people behind the scenes setting up the structure. Lorenzo is doing this, and is doing it more systematically than most BTC projects.
The value of Lorenzo lies in breaking this 'inefficient' link, allowing BTC to no longer be just a 'bullish storage asset,' but to truly move on-chain, generate yields, provide collateral value, and participate in strategy portfolios. To make assets active, it often relies not on storytelling, but on whether there are people behind the scenes setting up the structure. Lorenzo is doing this, and is doing it more systematically than most BTC projects.
See original
Lorenzo Protocol: Truly 'Bringing Bitcoin Assets into DeFi'
If we are to talk about which projects are genuinely addressing the fundamental issues of the Bitcoin ecosystem recently, the Lorenzo Protocol is certainly one of them. Its direction does not rely on shouting concepts, nor is it just joining the hype of 'BTC narrative', but rather it goes straight to the core: bringing Bitcoin assets into an efficient, freely applicable DeFi environment, and allowing the earning potential of BTC to be unleashed, rather than remaining forever in cold wallets 'lying quietly'.
The most critical step for Lorenzo is the launch of stBTC as an asset. Simply put, it helps users turn BTC, which would originally just sit idle, into a form of asset that can flow on-chain, participate in strategies, generate yields, and still maintain value stability. It's not just a matter of 'packaging it up' simply, but rather combining the security, hierarchical structure, cross-chain capabilities, and yield generation of BTC into a new asset form.
The most critical step for Lorenzo is the launch of stBTC as an asset. Simply put, it helps users turn BTC, which would originally just sit idle, into a form of asset that can flow on-chain, participate in strategies, generate yields, and still maintain value stability. It's not just a matter of 'packaging it up' simply, but rather combining the security, hierarchical structure, cross-chain capabilities, and yield generation of BTC into a new asset form.
See original
Injective: A Public Chain That Truly Treats 'On-Chain Execution Efficiency' as Its Core Competitiveness
Many people see Injective and immediately say that its ecosystem is heading towards finance, but the underlying logic is that it treats 'execution efficiency' as the most important thing. This is completely different from the narratives of most chains. Other chains emphasize scalability, user experience, and developer friendliness, while Injective's first principle is very simple: to ensure that financial protocols can operate on-chain effectively, stably, and accurately.
You will find that Injective's technical approach revolves around this point, such as execution accuracy of the chain-level order book, matching speed, liquidation certainty, and cross-chain asset throughput. It hasn't implemented a bunch of decorative features; instead, it directly tackles the most challenging parts at the base layer of the chain. Essentially, it ensures that every transaction behaves with certainty like a centralized system, rather than the on-chain experience of 'let's wait and see if it gets packed into a block.'
You will find that Injective's technical approach revolves around this point, such as execution accuracy of the chain-level order book, matching speed, liquidation certainty, and cross-chain asset throughput. It hasn't implemented a bunch of decorative features; instead, it directly tackles the most challenging parts at the base layer of the chain. Essentially, it ensures that every transaction behaves with certainty like a centralized system, rather than the on-chain experience of 'let's wait and see if it gets packed into a block.'
Login to explore more contents