Rossi90

THE MARKET IS ONLY ELIMINATING EXCESSES — OR SOMETHING BIGGER IS STARTING?

About US$674 million in leveraged positions were liquidated in the crypto market over the last 24 hours. Most of it hit those who were betting on the upside.

But that doesn’t mean that US$674 million simply disappeared from the crypto market’s capitalization.

Liquidation happens when an exchange forcibly closes a leveraged position because the trader no longer has enough margin to maintain it.

That’s exactly why I set a rule from the very beginning of my AI Project: operate only in the spot market, with no margin, futures, or leverage.

My goal is still aggressive: turning 100 USDT into 1,000 USDT by seeking imbalances.

But taking risk in a small coin is different from artificially multiplying my exposure and allowing a fluctuation to end my position.

Right now, I keep approximately 20% of the portfolio in $IO and 80% in USDT.

For now, I won’t sell or increase the position just because of this volatility. First I want to figure out whether we’re dealing with a simple leverage cleanup or a deeper deterioration of the market.

Seeking imbalances is part of the strategy.

Getting liquidated before the thesis can play out, no.

#CryptoLiquidations$674MIn24H #ProjetoIA1000 #CriptoIA

THE EVENT THAT COULD HAVE TOPPLED OUR FIRST POSITION HAS ALREADY HAPPENED

Around 14 million $IO were unlocked on September 11.

Did the price collapse?

So far, no.

We bought 150,32952 $IO for 20 $USDT , with an approximate average price of US$0.133. Now, around US$0.130, our unrealized loss is about 2.4%.

Basically noise for a crypto of this size.
But unlocking doesn’t mean immediate selling. The pressure may show up gradually.

Our decision:
- Not to sell;
- Not to increase the position;
- Keep approximately 80 USDT in cash.

Has the market absorbed the new tokens, or just postponed the selling pressure?

#ProjetoIA1000 #criptoIA #ionet 👍👍👍

What do you think of $IO ?

A NEW AI CRYPTOCURRENCY HAS HIT OUR RADAR

We started the project by analyzing $RENDER , $FET and $TAO.

All three are still on our list, but we decided to broaden the search.

After all, our goal is not simply to pick the safest project.

We’re looking for a large asymmetry with calculated risk.

That’s how we found $IO , the token of io.net.

The project offers decentralized GPU infrastructure for training, processing, and other artificial intelligence applications.

What caught our attention was the combination of a functional product and a market value much lower than that of the first candidates.

This could represent greater upside potential.

But it also means higher risk.

For now, IO has only entered the radar and passed the initial analysis. Before any purchase, we still need to analyze price, tokenomics, dilution, network demand, and everything that could prove this thesis wrong.

Tomorrow early, I’ll publish our decision: to buy or not to buy.
Did you already know about io.net?

#ProjetoIA1000 #CriptoIA #ionet

OS 100 USDT CONTINUES PARADOX.

And this is also a decision.

We have three AI cryptocurrencies on the table: $RENDER , $FET and $TAO .

But finding a good project doesn’t mean finding a good buy.

Tomorrow we’ll compare the three and answer two questions:

- Which one has the best thesis?
- And which one offers the best entry point?

Meanwhile, I want to know: would you pick the best project first, or wait for the best price? 🤔

#BitcoinSurpasses$79K #ProjetoIA1000 #criptoIA

100 USDT. THREE AI CRYPTOS ON THE TABLE.

With $BTC above $79k, the urge to enter the market grows. But I haven’t bought any coin for this project yet.

The first candidates are:
$RENDER — GPU processing.
$FET — autonomous agents.
$TAO — decentralized intelligence.

If the 100 USDT were yours, which one would you analyze first?

Don’t just answer the name. I want to understand the reason behind the choice.

#ProjetoIA1000 #criptoIA
#BitcoinSurpasses$79K

RENDER A US$ 1,52: OPPORTUNITY OR TRAP?

I’ve been following $RENDER and the question is this: the price is approximately 89% below its all-time high. Does that mean it’s cheap?

Not necessarily.

A big drop doesn’t automatically turn an asset into an opportunity. First we need to look for fundamentals, and in this regard, Render has something interesting: a decentralized GPU network focused on rendering, 3D creation, and related applications for artificial intelligence.

In other words, it’s not just another cryptocurrency trying to ride the AI narrative. There’s real utility behind the token.

Now let’s look at the weekly chart:
• Current price: US$ 1,52
• 7-period average: US$ 1,42
• 25-period average: US$ 1,66
• 99-period average: US$ 3,29

The price has managed to stay above the short-term average, which suggests an attempt at recovery. On the other hand, it’s still below the longer averages. So, talking about a trend reversal right now would be premature.

The region between US$ 1,47 and US$ 1,42 deserves attention. If that support is lost, we could see another leg down. For me, a more interesting confirmation would only come with a breakout above US$ 1,65 accompanied by increased volume.

My take: it’s a good project to keep on your radar, and maybe start a small, staged entry. But I still don’t see enough confirmation for an aggressive position.

I like risk, but risk needs to come with a thesis. Buying just because it’s down 89% isn’t a thesis.

And you—do you believe this sideways movement is accumulation or just a pause before another drop?

#RENDER #RenderNetwork #Criptomoedas #IA #Altcoins