Binance Square
GetMoney
161 Posts

GetMoney

其实全世界的钱一直藏在你的口袋里
High-Frequency Trader
5.4 Years
0 Following
43 Followers
26 Liked
Posts
·
--
📰 This time it wasn’t about front-running a project early. Instead, someone directly acted on the news that Binance was listing HAKIMI coin, made a news trade within minutes, and ended up making $350,000. 🔥 Lookonchain tracked that trader 0xb319 immediately sprang into action after the news broke. He first paid 5.5 BNB, about $4,200, in gas fees, then used 264.7 BNB, about $202,000, to buy 9.9 million HAKIMI coins. After that, he sold 8.39 million coins for $459,000, and still holds 1.5 million coins, worth about $93,300 at the time. In total, that means a net profit of $350,000. 💡 Honestly, the most impressive part isn’t the buy amount, but the reaction speed. Being able to finish the gas payment, buy, and sell as soon as the news drops is no longer just about whether you dare to jump in — it’s about whether you can get the news first and execute immediately. 👀 Even more impressive, this trader didn’t just succeed on this one trade. So far, his total profit from news trading has reached $1.78 million. When ordinary people see the announcement, many times they’re already watching others cash in profits. 🤔 If you knew in advance that a platform was about to list a coin, would you rush in immediately, or wait until the market reaction stabilizes before deciding? Original link: https://x.com/lookonchain/status/2096484533470396616 #哈基米币 #链上数据 #新闻交易 #加密市场
📰 This time it wasn’t about front-running a project early. Instead, someone directly acted on the news that Binance was listing HAKIMI coin, made a news trade within minutes, and ended up making $350,000.

🔥 Lookonchain tracked that trader 0xb319 immediately sprang into action after the news broke. He first paid 5.5 BNB, about $4,200, in gas fees, then used 264.7 BNB, about $202,000, to buy 9.9 million HAKIMI coins.

After that, he sold 8.39 million coins for $459,000, and still holds 1.5 million coins, worth about $93,300 at the time. In total, that means a net profit of $350,000.

💡 Honestly, the most impressive part isn’t the buy amount, but the reaction speed. Being able to finish the gas payment, buy, and sell as soon as the news drops is no longer just about whether you dare to jump in — it’s about whether you can get the news first and execute immediately.

👀 Even more impressive, this trader didn’t just succeed on this one trade. So far, his total profit from news trading has reached $1.78 million. When ordinary people see the announcement, many times they’re already watching others cash in profits.

🤔 If you knew in advance that a platform was about to list a coin, would you rush in immediately, or wait until the market reaction stabilizes before deciding?

Original link: https://x.com/lookonchain/status/2096484533470396616

#哈基米币 #链上数据 #新闻交易 #加密市场
📰 A certain whale has deposited another 4.5 million USDC into Hyperliquid. Just two days ago, this address also transferred $10.2 million from Crypto.com and Binance. Taken together, the moves are indeed a bit unusual. 🔥 Even more striking, this trader has accumulated about $20.17 million in losses from short positions over the past 20 days, and is still holding roughly $106.6 million in short positions, with unrealized losses of about $19.62 million. To be honest, this is no longer just one or two bad calls. Of those losses, the ZEC short contributed about $14.19 million, while the HYPE short lost about $5.32 million; together, the two positions account for the bulk of the damage. 💡 But he hasn’t stopped—instead, he has added another 4.5 million USDC. Is he preparing to keep holding the short, or simply topping up the account as margin? How this money will be used next is the most intriguing part right now. 🤔 If your account is already floating at nearly $20 million in losses, would you choose to cut your losses, or keep betting on it? #链上数据 #Hyperliquid #ZEC #HYPE
📰 A certain whale has deposited another 4.5 million USDC into Hyperliquid. Just two days ago, this address also transferred $10.2 million from Crypto.com and Binance. Taken together, the moves are indeed a bit unusual.

🔥 Even more striking, this trader has accumulated about $20.17 million in losses from short positions over the past 20 days, and is still holding roughly $106.6 million in short positions, with unrealized losses of about $19.62 million.

To be honest, this is no longer just one or two bad calls. Of those losses, the ZEC short contributed about $14.19 million, while the HYPE short lost about $5.32 million; together, the two positions account for the bulk of the damage.

💡 But he hasn’t stopped—instead, he has added another 4.5 million USDC. Is he preparing to keep holding the short, or simply topping up the account as margin? How this money will be used next is the most intriguing part right now.

🤔 If your account is already floating at nearly $20 million in losses, would you choose to cut your losses, or keep betting on it?

#链上数据 #Hyperliquid #ZEC #HYPE
📰 In the past 24 hours, contract liquidations across the entire network reached $240 million, and this time the main casualties were shorts: $155 million in short positions were liquidated, while long positions saw $84.8924 million liquidated. 🔥 The gap is quite obvious; short liquidations were nearly 1.8 times the amount of long liquidations. Honestly, many people may think shorting is safer, but once prices move up quickly, highly leveraged positions simply can’t hold up, and a cascade of liquidations follows. 👀 By coin, BTC contract liquidations totaled $23.4011 million, while ETH reached $46.3504 million. ETH liquidations were nearly twice BTC’s, and in this round of contract liquidations, ETH traders were clearly having a harder time. ⚠️ The largest single liquidation occurred on GATE’s ETH_USDT contract, with a single order of $5.0965 million. One position losing that much all at once — after reading this, I just want to remind you again: before guessing the direction correctly, first make sure the leverage is something you can actually تحمل. 🤔 Recently, do you proactively reduce leverage when trading contracts, or do you keep chasing after seeing shorts liquidate in clusters? #合约爆仓 #BTC #ETH #CryptocurrencyMarket
📰 In the past 24 hours, contract liquidations across the entire network reached $240 million, and this time the main casualties were shorts: $155 million in short positions were liquidated, while long positions saw $84.8924 million liquidated.

🔥 The gap is quite obvious; short liquidations were nearly 1.8 times the amount of long liquidations. Honestly, many people may think shorting is safer, but once prices move up quickly, highly leveraged positions simply can’t hold up, and a cascade of liquidations follows.

👀 By coin, BTC contract liquidations totaled $23.4011 million, while ETH reached $46.3504 million. ETH liquidations were nearly twice BTC’s, and in this round of contract liquidations, ETH traders were clearly having a harder time.

⚠️ The largest single liquidation occurred on GATE’s ETH_USDT contract, with a single order of $5.0965 million. One position losing that much all at once — after reading this, I just want to remind you again: before guessing the direction correctly, first make sure the leverage is something you can actually تحمل.

🤔 Recently, do you proactively reduce leverage when trading contracts, or do you keep chasing after seeing shorts liquidate in clusters?

#合约爆仓 #BTC #ETH #CryptocurrencyMarket
Article
From FTX to the AI Fund Crisis: Nick Tomaino Says Elite Investors Often Ignore Risk While Chasing Narratives📰 Nick Tomaino, founder of 1confirmation, recently spoke about the crisis involving the AI investment fund Situational Awareness LP. But he first made it clear that he did not know all the details of the incident and did not want to comment on the specific process of the liquidation. 🔥 What he really wanted to say was a recurring problem in the investment world: many so-called “elite” and “smart money” investors, while chasing wealth, attention, and popular stories, end up putting basic risk assessment aside. 💡 Tomaino also used the collapse of FTX as an example. In his view, many people noticed something was off after only brief contact with the founder, yet large amounts of money still kept flowing in because they were drawn by the returns and market hype, and some even helped vouch for it.

From FTX to the AI Fund Crisis: Nick Tomaino Says Elite Investors Often Ignore Risk While Chasing Narratives

📰 Nick Tomaino, founder of 1confirmation, recently spoke about the crisis involving the AI investment fund Situational Awareness LP. But he first made it clear that he did not know all the details of the incident and did not want to comment on the specific process of the liquidation.
🔥 What he really wanted to say was a recurring problem in the investment world: many so-called “elite” and “smart money” investors, while chasing wealth, attention, and popular stories, end up putting basic risk assessment aside.
💡 Tomaino also used the collapse of FTX as an example. In his view, many people noticed something was off after only brief contact with the founder, yet large amounts of money still kept flowing in because they were drawn by the returns and market hype, and some even helped vouch for it.
Article
A whale went long SOL with 20x leverage, making about $960,000 in ten days📰 One address went long 500,000 SOL with 20x leverage, with a notional position of about $37.93 million and an entry price of 76.368 USDT. Over ten days, the realized profit plus unrealized gains on this trade came to nearly $960,000. 🔥 This whale did not keep forcing it, but instead took profit on 246,000 SOL at 78.297 USDT, locking in $475,000 from a single trade. Honestly, pulling out nearly half the position first is more interesting than simply how much was earned. 💡 The remaining position value is about $20 million, and it is still sitting on an unrealized profit of $486,000. In other words, part of the gains has been taken off the table while exposure to further upside has been retained; the move was indeed decisive.

A whale went long SOL with 20x leverage, making about $960,000 in ten days

📰 One address went long 500,000 SOL with 20x leverage, with a notional position of about $37.93 million and an entry price of 76.368 USDT. Over ten days, the realized profit plus unrealized gains on this trade came to nearly $960,000.
🔥 This whale did not keep forcing it, but instead took profit on 246,000 SOL at 78.297 USDT, locking in $475,000 from a single trade. Honestly, pulling out nearly half the position first is more interesting than simply how much was earned.
💡 The remaining position value is about $20 million, and it is still sitting on an unrealized profit of $486,000. In other words, part of the gains has been taken off the table while exposure to further upside has been retained; the move was indeed decisive.
Article
The whale “Set 10 Big Goals First” is currently holding 3,425.239 BTC, with unrealized gains of over $13.04 million📰 “Set 10 Big Goals First” showed his BTC position: he currently holds 3,425.239 BTC, with unrealized gains of more than $13.04 million. At market prices, the total value of the entire position has already exceeded $235 million. 🔥 What really got the group talking was his earlier move. On August 11, he reduced his BTC position by 2,260 BTC and clearly said he would buy back later at an opportune time. Now, his position size has basically returned to its pre-reduction level, and this sell-and-rebuy sequence was executed quite decisively. To be honest, with a position of several thousand BTC, any reduction or re-entry is no small move. Compared with simply showing unrealized gains, the process of proactively cutting the position first and then restoring it according to plan is actually more worth referencing.

The whale “Set 10 Big Goals First” is currently holding 3,425.239 BTC, with unrealized gains of over $13.04 million

📰 “Set 10 Big Goals First” showed his BTC position: he currently holds 3,425.239 BTC, with unrealized gains of more than $13.04 million. At market prices, the total value of the entire position has already exceeded $235 million.
🔥 What really got the group talking was his earlier move. On August 11, he reduced his BTC position by 2,260 BTC and clearly said he would buy back later at an opportune time. Now, his position size has basically returned to its pre-reduction level, and this sell-and-rebuy sequence was executed quite decisively.
To be honest, with a position of several thousand BTC, any reduction or re-entry is no small move. Compared with simply showing unrealized gains, the process of proactively cutting the position first and then restoring it according to plan is actually more worth referencing.
Article
A smart money address made $305,000 in profit on fone, with a 23x return📰 A smart money address called hexiecs achieved a 23x return on fone. Lookonchain monitoring shows that it initially used 13,000 USDC to buy 11.81 million fone, when the project's market cap was about $1.1 million. 🔥 The later actions were relatively restrained: this address only sold 1 million fone, receiving 12.8 SOL, worth about $1,290, and did not directly liquidate the entire position. 💡 It still holds 10.81 million fone, valued at about $317,000. Based on monitoring data, this trade has made a profit of about $305,000, with a paper return of 23x.

A smart money address made $305,000 in profit on fone, with a 23x return

📰 A smart money address called hexiecs achieved a 23x return on fone. Lookonchain monitoring shows that it initially used 13,000 USDC to buy 11.81 million fone, when the project's market cap was about $1.1 million.
🔥 The later actions were relatively restrained: this address only sold 1 million fone, receiving 12.8 SOL, worth about $1,290, and did not directly liquidate the entire position.
💡 It still holds 10.81 million fone, valued at about $317,000. Based on monitoring data, this trade has made a profit of about $305,000, with a paper return of 23x.
Article
A whale with an unrealized gain of about $1.538 million deposits about 88,000 HYPE into Coinbase📰 A whale that previously accumulated at low levels suddenly deposited 88,216 HYPE into Coinbase. This address is “0x008…E295f”. Between June 11 and August 13, it accumulated 280,000 HYPE, with an average entry cost of about $64.5. Based on the current holdings, the total value is estimated at about $18.06 million. 🔥 For this transfer into Coinbase, calculated at about $7.23 million, the estimated return is around 27%, with an unrealized profit of roughly $1.538 million. To be honest, that number is already quite significant; for an ordinary account, they’d probably have started debating whether to take profits long ago.

A whale with an unrealized gain of about $1.538 million deposits about 88,000 HYPE into Coinbase

📰 A whale that previously accumulated at low levels suddenly deposited 88,216 HYPE into Coinbase.
This address is “0x008…E295f”. Between June 11 and August 13, it accumulated 280,000 HYPE, with an average entry cost of about $64.5. Based on the current holdings, the total value is estimated at about $18.06 million.
🔥 For this transfer into Coinbase, calculated at about $7.23 million, the estimated return is around 27%, with an unrealized profit of roughly $1.538 million. To be honest, that number is already quite significant; for an ordinary account, they’d probably have started debating whether to take profits long ago.
Article
Address 0x9807 Withdrew Over 44 Million ENA from Coinbase and Staked All of It📰 A new address withdrew about 44.19 million ENA from Coinbase, worth roughly $6.82 million, and then staked all of those tokens into Ethena’s contract on Ethereum. The timing was also tight: the address 0x9807…19c9D completed the withdrawal about 4 hours ago, and then staked all the tokens about 3 hours later, without holding them for long. 🔥 Honestly, just looking at this transaction, it doesn’t seem like it was preparing to dump after withdrawing. At least on-chain, the funds’ next stop was the staking contract, not another transfer to an exchange for selling. But that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s a long-term bullish move either. A large address may have its own capital arrangements, and staking, yield, and later portfolio rebalancing could all affect the next step. You can’t draw a firm conclusion from just one transfer.

Address 0x9807 Withdrew Over 44 Million ENA from Coinbase and Staked All of It

📰 A new address withdrew about 44.19 million ENA from Coinbase, worth roughly $6.82 million, and then staked all of those tokens into Ethena’s contract on Ethereum.
The timing was also tight: the address 0x9807…19c9D completed the withdrawal about 4 hours ago, and then staked all the tokens about 3 hours later, without holding them for long.
🔥 Honestly, just looking at this transaction, it doesn’t seem like it was preparing to dump after withdrawing. At least on-chain, the funds’ next stop was the staking contract, not another transfer to an exchange for selling.
But that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s a long-term bullish move either. A large address may have its own capital arrangements, and staking, yield, and later portfolio rebalancing could all affect the next step. You can’t draw a firm conclusion from just one transfer.
Article
An ETH swing whale fully exits after making over $1 million in two weeks📰 ETH swing whale “0x806…904aa” fully exited on September 2: sold 1,673 ETH at an average price of 2,392 USDT, cashing out about $4 million, for a profit of about $817,000 on this trade. 🔥 The most ruthless part of this trade was the entry timing. Two weeks earlier, it bought in at 1,903.05 USDT, just before this rally began, then sold everything in one go without lingering in the fight. To be honest, being able to buy before the move even starts is already not easy; being able to take the whole position off the table after unrealized gains have expanded is even more a test of execution. Many people don’t fail because they didn’t make money, but because once profits show up, they always want to hold on a little longer.

An ETH swing whale fully exits after making over $1 million in two weeks

📰 ETH swing whale “0x806…904aa” fully exited on September 2: sold 1,673 ETH at an average price of 2,392 USDT, cashing out about $4 million, for a profit of about $817,000 on this trade.
🔥 The most ruthless part of this trade was the entry timing. Two weeks earlier, it bought in at 1,903.05 USDT, just before this rally began, then sold everything in one go without lingering in the fight.
To be honest, being able to buy before the move even starts is already not easy; being able to take the whole position off the table after unrealized gains have expanded is even more a test of execution. Many people don’t fail because they didn’t make money, but because once profits show up, they always want to hold on a little longer.
Article
A whale long about 45,000 ETH lowered liquidation risk by selling 1,500 ETH and adding margin📰 A whale on Hyperliquid who was long about 45,000 ETH sold 1,500 ETH first as the position approached liquidation, cashing out about $3.75 million. 🔥 This sale was not a full exit. Instead, the USDC proceeds were redeposited into the platform as margin, with a clear goal: to push back the liquidation risk for now. To be honest, this kind of move is a bit worrying. On paper, this whale still holds about $107 million in ETH long positions, with unrealized losses widening to around $4.8 million. Selling part of the position is just buying room for the rest. 💡 The latest liquidation price for this position is now $2,173.36. In other words, the whale did not choose to take the loss all at once, but instead reduced the position and added margin to keep holding. Whether it can keep holding depends on whether the pressure on the position continues to increase.

A whale long about 45,000 ETH lowered liquidation risk by selling 1,500 ETH and adding margin

📰 A whale on Hyperliquid who was long about 45,000 ETH sold 1,500 ETH first as the position approached liquidation, cashing out about $3.75 million.
🔥 This sale was not a full exit. Instead, the USDC proceeds were redeposited into the platform as margin, with a clear goal: to push back the liquidation risk for now.
To be honest, this kind of move is a bit worrying. On paper, this whale still holds about $107 million in ETH long positions, with unrealized losses widening to around $4.8 million. Selling part of the position is just buying room for the rest.
💡 The latest liquidation price for this position is now $2,173.36. In other words, the whale did not choose to take the loss all at once, but instead reduced the position and added margin to keep holding. Whether it can keep holding depends on whether the pressure on the position continues to increase.
📰 The annualized scale of stablecoin corporate payments is about $390 billion, but in the global cross-border payments market of about $208 trillion, it accounts for only about 0.02%. That gap is even larger than many people imagine. 🔥 The problem may not be stablecoin transfer speed, but the banking step. Corporate money usually starts from a bank account and eventually has to return to a bank account; local clearing and fiat on/off-ramps still rely heavily on regulated banking systems. Stablecoins only handle the middle part of cross-border settlement. To be honest, single-bank partnerships are easy to overlook. The cases of Silvergate and Signature, as well as U.S. regulators' actions around "de-risking" and "cease and desist" orders, all show that if a company only has one bank handling the relevant business, payments can come to a sudden halt once that bank exits. 💡 So, institutions may now care more not just about stablecoins themselves, but about how many banking partners are behind them, local clearing capabilities in different markets, and FX handling capabilities. As regulations such as the GENIUS Act tighten compliance requirements, stablecoin payment providers will increasingly compete like infrastructure players. 🤔 Do you think the real bottleneck for stablecoin payments is insufficient on-chain efficiency, or that the banking system isn't ready yet? #稳定币 #加密支付 #银行基础设施 #GENIUSAct
📰 The annualized scale of stablecoin corporate payments is about $390 billion, but in the global cross-border payments market of about $208 trillion, it accounts for only about 0.02%. That gap is even larger than many people imagine.

🔥 The problem may not be stablecoin transfer speed, but the banking step. Corporate money usually starts from a bank account and eventually has to return to a bank account; local clearing and fiat on/off-ramps still rely heavily on regulated banking systems. Stablecoins only handle the middle part of cross-border settlement.

To be honest, single-bank partnerships are easy to overlook. The cases of Silvergate and Signature, as well as U.S. regulators' actions around "de-risking" and "cease and desist" orders, all show that if a company only has one bank handling the relevant business, payments can come to a sudden halt once that bank exits.

💡 So, institutions may now care more not just about stablecoins themselves, but about how many banking partners are behind them, local clearing capabilities in different markets, and FX handling capabilities. As regulations such as the GENIUS Act tighten compliance requirements, stablecoin payment providers will increasingly compete like infrastructure players.

🤔 Do you think the real bottleneck for stablecoin payments is insufficient on-chain efficiency, or that the banking system isn't ready yet?

#稳定币 #加密支付 #银行基础设施 #GENIUSAct
Article
Binance Futures live trading smart money “Semisemi” posts over $10.78 million in profits in the past 30 days📰 On-chain analyst Ai Yi monitored that the Binance Futures live trading account “Semisemi” has made more than $10.78 million in profits over the past 30 days. That number is indeed eye-catching in futures trading, and it’s no wonder it’s being called “smart money.” 🔥 Breaking it down, the BTC long positions made $8.06 million in profits, and the ETH long positions made $3.91 million. To be honest, being able to achieve this kind of result on long positions in two major coins at the same time at least shows that the directional bet has been very accurate during this period. 👀 But even more striking is that this account still holds BTC and ETH long positions worth $95.59 million, with an unrealized loss of $1.885 million. Earning a lot before doesn’t mean the current positions have been smooth sailing all the way; when nearly $100 million of exposure starts to fluctuate, the paper gains and losses can swing a lot too.

Binance Futures live trading smart money “Semisemi” posts over $10.78 million in profits in the past 30 days

📰 On-chain analyst Ai Yi monitored that the Binance Futures live trading account “Semisemi” has made more than $10.78 million in profits over the past 30 days. That number is indeed eye-catching in futures trading, and it’s no wonder it’s being called “smart money.”
🔥 Breaking it down, the BTC long positions made $8.06 million in profits, and the ETH long positions made $3.91 million. To be honest, being able to achieve this kind of result on long positions in two major coins at the same time at least shows that the directional bet has been very accurate during this period.
👀 But even more striking is that this account still holds BTC and ETH long positions worth $95.59 million, with an unrealized loss of $1.885 million. Earning a lot before doesn’t mean the current positions have been smooth sailing all the way; when nearly $100 million of exposure starts to fluctuate, the paper gains and losses can swing a lot too.
📰 WOO X responded to recent feedback about withdrawal delays. The platform said the team is reviewing related cases and system status. At present, some withdrawal requests are still in the review or on-chain processing stage, and it said it will work to resolve the issue as soon as possible. 🔥 Honestly, when a withdrawal gets stuck, it’s easy to feel a bit panicked. But from this statement, WOO X has not yet provided a unified handling timeline, nor has it explained the exact number of affected requests. Users still need to contact customer support one order at a time. 💡 If you are experiencing a delay, remember to use only official customer support channels, and prepare your UID, withdrawal order number, request time, asset and network information, as well as a screenshot of the current status. Submit everything at once, and at least there will be a little less back-and-forth communication. ⚠️ At this time, also watch out for fake customer support. WOO X specifically reminds users not to trust unofficial private messages, and never share your password, mnemonic phrase, private key, or verification code with anyone. The platform also said it reserves the right to take legal action against anyone who fabricates, distorts, or maliciously spreads false information. 🤔 Are there any friends waiting for withdrawals on WOO X? Is your order currently under review or being processed on-chain, and how long did it take to get a response after contacting customer support? #WOOX #交易平台 #提现延迟 #crypto security
📰 WOO X responded to recent feedback about withdrawal delays. The platform said the team is reviewing related cases and system status. At present, some withdrawal requests are still in the review or on-chain processing stage, and it said it will work to resolve the issue as soon as possible.

🔥 Honestly, when a withdrawal gets stuck, it’s easy to feel a bit panicked. But from this statement, WOO X has not yet provided a unified handling timeline, nor has it explained the exact number of affected requests. Users still need to contact customer support one order at a time.

💡 If you are experiencing a delay, remember to use only official customer support channels, and prepare your UID, withdrawal order number, request time, asset and network information, as well as a screenshot of the current status. Submit everything at once, and at least there will be a little less back-and-forth communication.

⚠️ At this time, also watch out for fake customer support. WOO X specifically reminds users not to trust unofficial private messages, and never share your password, mnemonic phrase, private key, or verification code with anyone. The platform also said it reserves the right to take legal action against anyone who fabricates, distorts, or maliciously spreads false information.

🤔 Are there any friends waiting for withdrawals on WOO X? Is your order currently under review or being processed on-chain, and how long did it take to get a response after contacting customer support?

#WOOX #交易平台 #提现延迟 #crypto security
📰 Harmony has put forward two proposals: to shut down the mainnet, which has been running since 2019, move ONE to Ethereum, and shift toward an AI video “remix economy.” The team says the reason is the threat posed by nation-state attackers and AI agents. 🔥 The plan is to take a snapshot at the last block of the mainnet, covering user wallets, staking delegations, validator rewards, tokens in smart contracts and exchanges, and then airdrop new ONE to the same addresses on Ethereum, with holders not needing to claim anything proactively. The total supply and issuance rate will remain unchanged. ⚠️ What really needs urgent attention is that multisig wallets, liquidity pools, and on-chain applications cannot be migrated. The team requires users to exit all smart contracts before September 10, 2026, and plans to make the token contract, snapshot calculations, and airdrop scripts public for audit. 💡 Validators may begin shutting down nodes starting at 22:00 Beijing time on September 10. The team also plans to establish a compensation pool of $1.372 million. Validators and delegators who meet the conditions of shutting down, signing the agreement, and retaining stake will receive compensation over four quarters. 👀 The new business aims to let users create derivative videos from prompts and materials, with AI agents expanding the story, while operators stake tokens to participate in generation, distribution, and review. To be honest, moving straight from shutting down the mainnet to AI video is quite a leap, and both proposals are currently non-binding, so further adjustments are still possible. 🤔 If your ONE is still in a liquidity pool or smart contract, will you withdraw before September 10, or wait until the proposal is further confirmed? #Harmony #ONE #以太坊 #AI视频
📰 Harmony has put forward two proposals: to shut down the mainnet, which has been running since 2019, move ONE to Ethereum, and shift toward an AI video “remix economy.” The team says the reason is the threat posed by nation-state attackers and AI agents.

🔥 The plan is to take a snapshot at the last block of the mainnet, covering user wallets, staking delegations, validator rewards, tokens in smart contracts and exchanges, and then airdrop new ONE to the same addresses on Ethereum, with holders not needing to claim anything proactively. The total supply and issuance rate will remain unchanged.

⚠️ What really needs urgent attention is that multisig wallets, liquidity pools, and on-chain applications cannot be migrated. The team requires users to exit all smart contracts before September 10, 2026, and plans to make the token contract, snapshot calculations, and airdrop scripts public for audit.

💡 Validators may begin shutting down nodes starting at 22:00 Beijing time on September 10. The team also plans to establish a compensation pool of $1.372 million. Validators and delegators who meet the conditions of shutting down, signing the agreement, and retaining stake will receive compensation over four quarters.

👀 The new business aims to let users create derivative videos from prompts and materials, with AI agents expanding the story, while operators stake tokens to participate in generation, distribution, and review. To be honest, moving straight from shutting down the mainnet to AI video is quite a leap, and both proposals are currently non-binding, so further adjustments are still possible.

🤔 If your ONE is still in a liquidity pool or smart contract, will you withdraw before September 10, or wait until the proposal is further confirmed?

#Harmony #ONE #以太坊 #AI视频
📰 Solana co-founder Toly is at it again with Arbitrum co-founder Steven Goldfeder, and this time they’re arguing over the same old point: don’t just look at the headline fee. Toly’s point is very straightforward: Arbitrum currently has a wider bid-ask spread and higher fees; if you only calculate the 10% cut taken from fees, the cost is already higher than the sandwich trading fee rate, and once you factor in the worse spread, he estimates the overall cost could be about 10 times higher. 💡 Steven’s take isn’t without merit either. He stresses that both Arbitrum One and Robinhood Chain are designed to prevent front-running and harmful MEV. A lot of people like to bring up “low fees,” but retail users may end up being slowly drained by hidden costs like front-running and sandwich attacks. Honestly, the core of this debate isn’t who’s louder, but what people care about more: the “visible fee” or the total amount spent on the trade. On the single-sequencer model, Toly flat-out says it can never beat permissionless market competition. 🤔 When looking at chains, you really can’t focus on just one number. Would you trust something that’s “cheap but may have hidden losses,” or “a bit more expensive but has a more stable mechanism”? #Solana #Arbitrum #MEV #on-chain trading
📰 Solana co-founder Toly is at it again with Arbitrum co-founder Steven Goldfeder, and this time they’re arguing over the same old point: don’t just look at the headline fee.

Toly’s point is very straightforward: Arbitrum currently has a wider bid-ask spread and higher fees; if you only calculate the 10% cut taken from fees, the cost is already higher than the sandwich trading fee rate, and once you factor in the worse spread, he estimates the overall cost could be about 10 times higher.

💡 Steven’s take isn’t without merit either. He stresses that both Arbitrum One and Robinhood Chain are designed to prevent front-running and harmful MEV. A lot of people like to bring up “low fees,” but retail users may end up being slowly drained by hidden costs like front-running and sandwich attacks.

Honestly, the core of this debate isn’t who’s louder, but what people care about more: the “visible fee” or the total amount spent on the trade. On the single-sequencer model, Toly flat-out says it can never beat permissionless market competition.

🤔 When looking at chains, you really can’t focus on just one number. Would you trust something that’s “cheap but may have hidden losses,” or “a bit more expensive but has a more stable mechanism”?

#Solana #Arbitrum #MEV #on-chain trading
📰 Microsoft is directly rolling out an AI-assisted WinUI development and migration solution this time, with a very clear goal: use less of “web wrappers” like WebView2 and Electron, and move more toward native Windows 11 WinUI 3. It also claims that with VS Code, Windows App Development CLI, WinUI templates, and GitHub Copilot, you can go from an empty folder to a submit-ready app in about 30 minutes. 🔥 Honestly, this pace is pretty aggressive. In the past, when people did Windows native development, the first reaction was often that the process was cumbersome and hard to get started with; now Microsoft is bundling scaffolding, CLI, templates, and Copilot together, basically lowering the barrier right away. 💡 What’s even more practical is the migration side. Microsoft has also provided AI-assisted guidance for moving from WPF and UWP to WinUI, including mapping tables for controls, threading, window management, DPI, and data binding. For legacy projects, this is way more useful than empty talk, at least it can help avoid a bunch of repeated pitfalls. 👀 In addition, Microsoft is also improving WinUI itself: memory usage, DataGrid and chart support, and open-source participation are all being strengthened, and at the system level, components like AutoPlay and Print Management have been rewritten in WinUI. It’s clear that it’s not just trying to publish a guide—it’s trying to pave the native path again. 🤔 Put simply, this wave feels like Microsoft is telling developers: web wrappers can work, but for a real native experience, you still need to come back to WinUI. Do you think this kind of AI-assisted migration can really bring legacy projects back to native? #WinUI #微软 #Windows11 #AI开发
📰 Microsoft is directly rolling out an AI-assisted WinUI development and migration solution this time, with a very clear goal: use less of “web wrappers” like WebView2 and Electron, and move more toward native Windows 11 WinUI 3. It also claims that with VS Code, Windows App Development CLI, WinUI templates, and GitHub Copilot, you can go from an empty folder to a submit-ready app in about 30 minutes.

🔥 Honestly, this pace is pretty aggressive. In the past, when people did Windows native development, the first reaction was often that the process was cumbersome and hard to get started with; now Microsoft is bundling scaffolding, CLI, templates, and Copilot together, basically lowering the barrier right away.

💡 What’s even more practical is the migration side. Microsoft has also provided AI-assisted guidance for moving from WPF and UWP to WinUI, including mapping tables for controls, threading, window management, DPI, and data binding. For legacy projects, this is way more useful than empty talk, at least it can help avoid a bunch of repeated pitfalls.

👀 In addition, Microsoft is also improving WinUI itself: memory usage, DataGrid and chart support, and open-source participation are all being strengthened, and at the system level, components like AutoPlay and Print Management have been rewritten in WinUI. It’s clear that it’s not just trying to publish a guide—it’s trying to pave the native path again.

🤔 Put simply, this wave feels like Microsoft is telling developers: web wrappers can work, but for a real native experience, you still need to come back to WinUI. Do you think this kind of AI-assisted migration can really bring legacy projects back to native?

#WinUI #微软 #Windows11 #AI开发
📰 WOO X has been reported to have withdrawal issues. ZachXBT said that multiple verified users have reported withdrawals being stuck in pending or processing for the past 3 days, and even some trades have been canceled. 🔥 Honestly, this is the kind of news exchanges fear most. When money can’t be withdrawn, users’ first reaction is usually not to read the explanation, but to check whether their own order is still there. 💡 ZachXBT also mentioned that WOO X was acquired by FusionX Digital in Q4 2025, and that the company is reportedly linked to BitMart founder Sheldon Xia. With that context, the discussion becomes much easier to spread in different directions. 👀 But as of publication, WOO X has not yet issued a statement about the withdrawal issue. Right now, the most important thing isn’t the speculation from outside, but whether the platform will clarify the situation as soon as possible. 🤔 If you encountered a withdrawal getting stuck, would you wait for an official response first, or immediately pause further activity? #WOOX #提现异常 #交易所 #on-chain data
📰 WOO X has been reported to have withdrawal issues. ZachXBT said that multiple verified users have reported withdrawals being stuck in pending or processing for the past 3 days, and even some trades have been canceled.

🔥 Honestly, this is the kind of news exchanges fear most. When money can’t be withdrawn, users’ first reaction is usually not to read the explanation, but to check whether their own order is still there.

💡 ZachXBT also mentioned that WOO X was acquired by FusionX Digital in Q4 2025, and that the company is reportedly linked to BitMart founder Sheldon Xia. With that context, the discussion becomes much easier to spread in different directions.

👀 But as of publication, WOO X has not yet issued a statement about the withdrawal issue. Right now, the most important thing isn’t the speculation from outside, but whether the platform will clarify the situation as soon as possible.

🤔 If you encountered a withdrawal getting stuck, would you wait for an official response first, or immediately pause further activity?

#WOOX #提现异常 #交易所 #on-chain data
📰 Robinhood Chain's chain fees over the past 24 hours surged to $2.9 million, ranking first among all chains. Over the same period, chain revenue also reached $2.61 million. 🔥 What's even more interesting is that this wasn't driven by just one day's data. The total value locked in on-chain DeFi has already reached $909 million, up 29.62% over the past 7 days and 109% over the past month. Honestly, when TVL and usage are both rising together, it shows this chain has really become much more active lately. But high fees don't mean every participant is making money, and we'll still need to see whether these trades and funds can continue. 💡 Over the past 7 days, Robinhood Chain's on-chain DEX trading volume reached $10.424 billion, up 95.26% from the previous period. This kind of growth is already hard to ignore; I didn't expect its on-chain activity to move this fast. 🤔 How long do you think this wave of growth on Robinhood Chain can last? #RobinhoodChain #DeFi #链上数据 #DEX
📰 Robinhood Chain's chain fees over the past 24 hours surged to $2.9 million, ranking first among all chains. Over the same period, chain revenue also reached $2.61 million.

🔥 What's even more interesting is that this wasn't driven by just one day's data. The total value locked in on-chain DeFi has already reached $909 million, up 29.62% over the past 7 days and 109% over the past month.

Honestly, when TVL and usage are both rising together, it shows this chain has really become much more active lately. But high fees don't mean every participant is making money, and we'll still need to see whether these trades and funds can continue.

💡 Over the past 7 days, Robinhood Chain's on-chain DEX trading volume reached $10.424 billion, up 95.26% from the previous period. This kind of growth is already hard to ignore; I didn't expect its on-chain activity to move this fast.

🤔 How long do you think this wave of growth on Robinhood Chain can last?

#RobinhoodChain #DeFi #链上数据 #DEX
📰 Willy Woo is focusing on the relationship between BTC and the stock market this time. He says that a clear decoupling like the current one last happened in 2015. 🔥 He put it very bluntly: from 2015 to 2016, stocks stayed weak for two straight years, while BTC instead entered a bull market; then in 2017, when stocks also started to strengthen, BTC had another big rally. Sounds pretty familiar. 💡 Looking a bit further back, in 2014 stocks were still in a bull market, but BTC was going through its own bear market and didn’t follow along at all. Now he thinks BTC liquidity is still improving, while the stock market is starting to show signs of fragility. 👀 To be honest, this kind of argument is the most likely to leave people torn. Is BTC really moving first, or is this just a temporary divergence? Either way, once the market starts talking about “decoupling,” everyone pays even closer attention. 🤔 Do you think this time will again play out like the period before 2017? Right now, are you watching BTC more, or are you looking at stocks first? #比特币 #BTC #股市 #WillyWoo
📰 Willy Woo is focusing on the relationship between BTC and the stock market this time. He says that a clear decoupling like the current one last happened in 2015.

🔥 He put it very bluntly: from 2015 to 2016, stocks stayed weak for two straight years, while BTC instead entered a bull market; then in 2017, when stocks also started to strengthen, BTC had another big rally. Sounds pretty familiar.

💡 Looking a bit further back, in 2014 stocks were still in a bull market, but BTC was going through its own bear market and didn’t follow along at all. Now he thinks BTC liquidity is still improving, while the stock market is starting to show signs of fragility.

👀 To be honest, this kind of argument is the most likely to leave people torn. Is BTC really moving first, or is this just a temporary divergence? Either way, once the market starts talking about “decoupling,” everyone pays even closer attention.

🤔 Do you think this time will again play out like the period before 2017? Right now, are you watching BTC more, or are you looking at stocks first?

#比特币 #BTC #股市 #WillyWoo
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs