Doctorka
Frequent Trader
7.8 Years
18 Following
23 Followers
28 Liked
4 Shared
All
Quotes
The bigger the bubble, the closer it is to its end. 🎈 Driven by speculation, chasing profits, with unsustainable structure. Stretched by greed, hype. The pop is inevitable 📍
Kri
--
Zcash Soars 15% After Arthur Hayes Repeats His $10K Prediction — Here’s What’s Driving the Hype
Zcash surged 15% to $362 after Arthur Hayes repeated his bold $10K price prediction.Trading volume jumped 45%, fueled by rising demand for privacy coins and shielded transactions.Some traders warn the rally may be hype-driven, questioning Hayes’ influence and long-term fundamentals.
Zcash (ZEC) is on fire again. The privacy coin jumped 15% in just over a day, hitting $362 after BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes once more dropped his now-famous prediction: ZEC to $10,000. His post on X simply read, “nothing stops this train,” reigniting speculation across the crypto community. Trading volume also spiked 45% to nearly $800 million as traders piled in.
Hayes’ $10K Call Reignites the Zcash Frenzy
This isn’t the first time Hayes has fueled a rally. Last week, a similar comment from him sent ZEC up 30% in one day. His $10,000 target represents a massive 2,677% upside from current levels — meaning a $100 investment could, in theory, turn into more than $267,000 if the call ever came true. Whether that’s optimism or overhype depends on who you ask, but the excitement has clearly returned to the privacy coin space.
Privacy Coins Back in the Spotlight
The rally lines up with growing global interest in privacy-focused crypto as concerns about government surveillance mount. ZEC’s shielded supply rose 13% in October, now exceeding 4.9 million ZEC, while private transactions climbed 36% month-over-month. That activity suggests users are genuinely engaging with the technology — not just trading on hype. Privacy advocates say Zcash’s zk-SNARKs tech, which keeps transaction details hidden, could see renewed relevance as data control becomes a bigger public issue.
Doubts Linger Over the Rally’s Sustainability
Still, not everyone’s buying into the hype. Some analysts think the move looks more like influencer-fueled speculation than organic growth.
Critics point to Hayes’ history of hyping tokens before major selloffs and warn this might follow the same pattern. Others note that Zcash has had similar surges before, only to retrace once the buzz fades. While ZEC’s recent performance is impressive, the big question remains — is this the start of a long-term trend, or just another quick spike on crypto’s roller coaster?
$ZEC #zec
{future}(ZECUSDT)
Zcash (ZEC) is on fire again. The privacy coin jumped 15% in just over a day, hitting $362 after BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes once more dropped his now-famous prediction: ZEC to $10,000. His post on X simply read, “nothing stops this train,” reigniting speculation across the crypto community. Trading volume also spiked 45% to nearly $800 million as traders piled in.
Hayes’ $10K Call Reignites the Zcash Frenzy
This isn’t the first time Hayes has fueled a rally. Last week, a similar comment from him sent ZEC up 30% in one day. His $10,000 target represents a massive 2,677% upside from current levels — meaning a $100 investment could, in theory, turn into more than $267,000 if the call ever came true. Whether that’s optimism or overhype depends on who you ask, but the excitement has clearly returned to the privacy coin space.
Privacy Coins Back in the Spotlight
The rally lines up with growing global interest in privacy-focused crypto as concerns about government surveillance mount. ZEC’s shielded supply rose 13% in October, now exceeding 4.9 million ZEC, while private transactions climbed 36% month-over-month. That activity suggests users are genuinely engaging with the technology — not just trading on hype. Privacy advocates say Zcash’s zk-SNARKs tech, which keeps transaction details hidden, could see renewed relevance as data control becomes a bigger public issue.
Doubts Linger Over the Rally’s Sustainability
Still, not everyone’s buying into the hype. Some analysts think the move looks more like influencer-fueled speculation than organic growth.
Critics point to Hayes’ history of hyping tokens before major selloffs and warn this might follow the same pattern. Others note that Zcash has had similar surges before, only to retrace once the buzz fades. While ZEC’s recent performance is impressive, the big question remains — is this the start of a long-term trend, or just another quick spike on crypto’s roller coaster?
$ZEC #zec
{future}(ZECUSDT)
BNB centralisation key point: The validator set is relatively small (the earlier 21 validators model was explicitly referenced) and the chain in several analyses is judged less decentralised than some “pure” proof-of-stake systems.
For example: during the October 2022 incident, a claim was made that the chain was paused by “contacting ~26 validators” to suspend operations. This suggests that a small group of validators (or at least reachable by the central entity) had significant control.
On the governance side, some critics argue that the ecosystem retains significant influence from Binance (the exchange) and therefore is less “community-governed” than some purely decentralised chains.
Implication: If you are assessing decentralisation for example to measure “trustlessness” or resistance to central censorship - BNB Chain (and BNB token) score moderate, but not best-in-class. #MarketPullback
For example: during the October 2022 incident, a claim was made that the chain was paused by “contacting ~26 validators” to suspend operations. This suggests that a small group of validators (or at least reachable by the central entity) had significant control.
On the governance side, some critics argue that the ecosystem retains significant influence from Binance (the exchange) and therefore is less “community-governed” than some purely decentralised chains.
Implication: If you are assessing decentralisation for example to measure “trustlessness” or resistance to central censorship - BNB Chain (and BNB token) score moderate, but not best-in-class. #MarketPullback
S
BNB/USDC
Price
1,370.56
Look $DASH started going up. Will it surpass it's all time high of $1642? With token supply limited to 19 million DASH is privacy-capable, but not privacy‐first by default. Let’s compare its mechanisms and trade-offs versus others like $XMR Monero, Zcash $ZEC
In short, DASH offers a good balance: fast transactions, governance, low fees, optional privacy, and extra security via its masternode & ChainLock system. But it doesn’t offer the same level of unseen, untraceable by default privacy that Monero or some other coins do. So its threat model / use-case for privacy is weaker unless the user takes explicit steps (uses PrivateSend, etc.).
In short, DASH offers a good balance: fast transactions, governance, low fees, optional privacy, and extra security via its masternode & ChainLock system. But it doesn’t offer the same level of unseen, untraceable by default privacy that Monero or some other coins do. So its threat model / use-case for privacy is weaker unless the user takes explicit steps (uses PrivateSend, etc.).
⚠️ USDC centralization and contract risks ⚠️
Here's a detailed breakdown of the security risks and centralization concerns related to the USDC smart contract, especially since it's implemented using an Admin Upgradeability Proxy (commonly via OpenZeppelin's TransparentUpgradeableProxy pattern).
1. Admin Upgradeability Proxy Risks
Upgradable contract means the core logic of USDC can be changed by the admin (Circle or its designated entity).
The admin has full control to upgrade the token's implementation to something malicious or flawed, such as one that:
• Freezes specific addresses or all tokens.
• Changes how balances are computed.
• Redirects or burns user funds.
Real Risk: The admin could, in theory, introduce a rug-pull mechanism or bugs during an upgrade. However, Circle is a regulated entity, so this risk is more about centralized control than technical incompetence or malicious intent.
2. Contract Not Renounced
Contract ownership is retained, meaning Circle can:
• Mint new tokens (within authorized limits).
• Burn tokens.
• Blacklist and freeze user accounts.
USDC is explicitly designed to be a centrally managed stablecoin, unlike DAI or LUSD.
3. Unlimited Minting?
Minting is usually tied to real-world fiat deposits. But yes, technically:
The admin can mint as much USDC as they want if they chose to.
There’s no smart contract-enforced hard cap like in Bitcoin or some altcoins.
This power could be abused, although such action would destroy trust and likely lead to legal consequences, making it unlikely - but still possible.
4. Blacklisting & Freezing Balances
Yes, #USDC can freeze user addresses.
They’ve done it before in compliance with OFAC sanctions and law enforcement.
The contract includes a function like freeze(address) or blacklist(address).
Funds in blacklisted addresses are locked forever - they can’t be moved or spent.
This centralization is by design but represents a major risk for users in controversial jurisdictions or using DeFi protocols that Circle disapproves of.
5. Other Risks
Censorship: USDC can be censored at the protocol level (e.g., if a DeFi dApp relies heavily on USDC liquidity).
Depegging Risk: Though rare, if there's a loss of confidence in Circle’s ability to redeem 1:1 for USD, the token could depeg.
Regulatory Risk: If Circle is forced to comply with new regulations, it may affect how users can interact with USDC globally.
Whitelisting/Permissioned DeFi: USDC has been moving toward supporting “compliant” DeFi - this means USDC-based protocols may become permissioned.
Final Thoughts
$USDC is not trustless. You are trusting:
Circle (the issuer),
The U.S. regulatory system,
That the smart contract won’t be abused.
This is fine for many use cases (trading, payments), but it's unsuitable for trust-minimized applications like censorship-resistant savings or decentralized governance.
1. Admin Upgradeability Proxy Risks
Upgradable contract means the core logic of USDC can be changed by the admin (Circle or its designated entity).
The admin has full control to upgrade the token's implementation to something malicious or flawed, such as one that:
• Freezes specific addresses or all tokens.
• Changes how balances are computed.
• Redirects or burns user funds.
Real Risk: The admin could, in theory, introduce a rug-pull mechanism or bugs during an upgrade. However, Circle is a regulated entity, so this risk is more about centralized control than technical incompetence or malicious intent.
2. Contract Not Renounced
Contract ownership is retained, meaning Circle can:
• Mint new tokens (within authorized limits).
• Burn tokens.
• Blacklist and freeze user accounts.
USDC is explicitly designed to be a centrally managed stablecoin, unlike DAI or LUSD.
3. Unlimited Minting?
Minting is usually tied to real-world fiat deposits. But yes, technically:
The admin can mint as much USDC as they want if they chose to.
There’s no smart contract-enforced hard cap like in Bitcoin or some altcoins.
This power could be abused, although such action would destroy trust and likely lead to legal consequences, making it unlikely - but still possible.
4. Blacklisting & Freezing Balances
Yes, #USDC can freeze user addresses.
They’ve done it before in compliance with OFAC sanctions and law enforcement.
The contract includes a function like freeze(address) or blacklist(address).
Funds in blacklisted addresses are locked forever - they can’t be moved or spent.
This centralization is by design but represents a major risk for users in controversial jurisdictions or using DeFi protocols that Circle disapproves of.
5. Other Risks
Censorship: USDC can be censored at the protocol level (e.g., if a DeFi dApp relies heavily on USDC liquidity).
Depegging Risk: Though rare, if there's a loss of confidence in Circle’s ability to redeem 1:1 for USD, the token could depeg.
Regulatory Risk: If Circle is forced to comply with new regulations, it may affect how users can interact with USDC globally.
Whitelisting/Permissioned DeFi: USDC has been moving toward supporting “compliant” DeFi - this means USDC-based protocols may become permissioned.
Final Thoughts
$USDC is not trustless. You are trusting:
Circle (the issuer),
The U.S. regulatory system,
That the smart contract won’t be abused.
This is fine for many use cases (trading, payments), but it's unsuitable for trust-minimized applications like censorship-resistant savings or decentralized governance.
Top fastest blockchains by transactions per second (TPS)
Here’s a list of notable blockchain networks and their associated tokens, sorted by their theoretical maximum transactions per second (TPS) capabilities, from highest to lowest:
1. Qubic - 15 520 000 TPS
2. Solayer ($LAYER ) – 1 million TPS updated values*
3. $TON (The Open Network) – 1 million TPS (theoretical max)
4. $SUI ~ 297 000 TPS
5. Aptos (APT) – 160,000 TPS
6. Solana (SOL) – 65,000 TPS
7. Polygon (MATIC/POL) – 65,000 TPS
8. Arbitrum (ARB) – 40,000 TPS
9. Internet Computer (ICP) – 11,500 TPS
10. Algorand (ALGO) – 6,000 TPS
11. Avalanche (AVAX) – 4,500 TPS
12. BNB Chain (BNB) – 2,200 TPS
13. TRON (TRX) – 2,000 TPS
14. Ripple (XRP) – 1,500 TPS
15. Cardano (ADA) – 386 TPS
16. Ethereum (ETH) – 119 TPS
17. Bitcoin (BTC) – 7 TPS
This is not a full list of all blockchains but rather a list of the fastest and for comparison the most notable blockchains with a high market cap.
Correct me if I missed something worth adding.
#Qubic
1. Qubic - 15 520 000 TPS
2. Solayer ($LAYER ) – 1 million TPS updated values*
3. $TON (The Open Network) – 1 million TPS (theoretical max)
4. $SUI ~ 297 000 TPS
5. Aptos (APT) – 160,000 TPS
6. Solana (SOL) – 65,000 TPS
7. Polygon (MATIC/POL) – 65,000 TPS
8. Arbitrum (ARB) – 40,000 TPS
9. Internet Computer (ICP) – 11,500 TPS
10. Algorand (ALGO) – 6,000 TPS
11. Avalanche (AVAX) – 4,500 TPS
12. BNB Chain (BNB) – 2,200 TPS
13. TRON (TRX) – 2,000 TPS
14. Ripple (XRP) – 1,500 TPS
15. Cardano (ADA) – 386 TPS
16. Ethereum (ETH) – 119 TPS
17. Bitcoin (BTC) – 7 TPS
This is not a full list of all blockchains but rather a list of the fastest and for comparison the most notable blockchains with a high market cap.
Correct me if I missed something worth adding.
#Qubic
Why Developers Should Avoid Creating New projects on the Ethereum Blockchain
You should think twice before launching new coin on the Ethereum blockchain.
1. High Transaction Fees Are a Major Bottleneck
One of the most significant drawbacks of using Ethereum for new projects is the consistently high transaction fees, or "gas fees." These fees are paid to miners for validating transactions on the blockchain. While this system ensures network security, the costs have become exorbitant, especially during times of network congestion.
For developers, this creates a massive hurdle:
User Friction: When fees for basic token transfers or smart contract interactions cost $20, $50, or even $100 during peak periods, end users are discouraged from engaging with dApps or transacting with new coins.
Deters Small-Scale Projects: High gas fees disproportionately impact smaller projects and startups, which may not have the capital to absorb these costs or the user base willing to pay them.
Limits Scalability: Projects designed to handle high volumes of microtransactions, such as gaming or micropayment systems, become practically unfeasible due to prohibitive fees.
Even with Ethereum's transition to Proof-of-Stake (PoS) through Ethereum 2.0, gas fees remain an issue, as the fundamental cost mechanics have not changed.
2. Network Congestion Hinders Performance
Ethereum's popularity comes at a price: network congestion. When the network becomes crowded, gas fees spike further. This lack of scalability can be detrimental to new projects relying on consistent and fast transaction processing.
For instance, during high-profile NFT drops or token launches, the Ethereum network often becomes clogged, leading to failed transactions or exorbitant costs. Developers launching new coins risk alienating their user base if their project's usability suffers due to these congestion issues.
3. Intense Competition and Lack of Differentiation
Ethereum is already saturated with thousands of tokens, many of which are redundant or offer little innovation. Launching a new coin on Ethereum often means competing with established projects that dominate user attention and liquidity.
Additionally, newer blockchains like Binance Smart Chain, Solana, and Avalanche offer lower fees, faster transaction speeds, and growing ecosystems, providing developers with alternative platforms to stand out and attract users.
4. Erosion of Developer and User Trust
The unpredictable and often excessive gas fees can erode trust in projects built on Ethereum. Users may perceive such projects as less accessible, while developers struggle to maintain consistent user engagement. Over time, this damages the reputation of the coin and undermines its potential for success.
Conclusion
While Ethereum has historically been the go-to platform for creating new coins, its high transaction fees and scalability challenges make it increasingly unattractive for developers in 2025 and beyond. With more efficient and cost-effective blockchain platforms available, developers should consider alternatives to maximize their project's success and user adoption.
By choosing a platform with lower fees, faster speeds, and modern technology, developers can focus on innovation and user satisfaction without being burdened by Ethereum’s well-documented shortcomings. Ethereum remains a powerful blockchain, but for many, the costs simply outweigh the benefits.
$ETH #ETHProspects #bnb #sol #avax
1. High Transaction Fees Are a Major Bottleneck
One of the most significant drawbacks of using Ethereum for new projects is the consistently high transaction fees, or "gas fees." These fees are paid to miners for validating transactions on the blockchain. While this system ensures network security, the costs have become exorbitant, especially during times of network congestion.
For developers, this creates a massive hurdle:
User Friction: When fees for basic token transfers or smart contract interactions cost $20, $50, or even $100 during peak periods, end users are discouraged from engaging with dApps or transacting with new coins.
Deters Small-Scale Projects: High gas fees disproportionately impact smaller projects and startups, which may not have the capital to absorb these costs or the user base willing to pay them.
Limits Scalability: Projects designed to handle high volumes of microtransactions, such as gaming or micropayment systems, become practically unfeasible due to prohibitive fees.
Even with Ethereum's transition to Proof-of-Stake (PoS) through Ethereum 2.0, gas fees remain an issue, as the fundamental cost mechanics have not changed.
2. Network Congestion Hinders Performance
Ethereum's popularity comes at a price: network congestion. When the network becomes crowded, gas fees spike further. This lack of scalability can be detrimental to new projects relying on consistent and fast transaction processing.
For instance, during high-profile NFT drops or token launches, the Ethereum network often becomes clogged, leading to failed transactions or exorbitant costs. Developers launching new coins risk alienating their user base if their project's usability suffers due to these congestion issues.
3. Intense Competition and Lack of Differentiation
Ethereum is already saturated with thousands of tokens, many of which are redundant or offer little innovation. Launching a new coin on Ethereum often means competing with established projects that dominate user attention and liquidity.
Additionally, newer blockchains like Binance Smart Chain, Solana, and Avalanche offer lower fees, faster transaction speeds, and growing ecosystems, providing developers with alternative platforms to stand out and attract users.
4. Erosion of Developer and User Trust
The unpredictable and often excessive gas fees can erode trust in projects built on Ethereum. Users may perceive such projects as less accessible, while developers struggle to maintain consistent user engagement. Over time, this damages the reputation of the coin and undermines its potential for success.
Conclusion
While Ethereum has historically been the go-to platform for creating new coins, its high transaction fees and scalability challenges make it increasingly unattractive for developers in 2025 and beyond. With more efficient and cost-effective blockchain platforms available, developers should consider alternatives to maximize their project's success and user adoption.
By choosing a platform with lower fees, faster speeds, and modern technology, developers can focus on innovation and user satisfaction without being burdened by Ethereum’s well-documented shortcomings. Ethereum remains a powerful blockchain, but for many, the costs simply outweigh the benefits.
$ETH #ETHProspects #bnb #sol #avax
You'll get badly burned by shorting LTC. 😀 Just a friendly reminder of $LTC historical performance, see attached chart
Crypto Master 786
--
Bearish
$LTC /USDT Short Trade Signal! 🔥💯
Current Price: $127.67
📉 Trade Setup:
Entry Zone: $128.00–$130.00
Take Profit Targets:
TP1: $125.00
TP2: $120.00
TP3: $115.00
Stop Loss: $132.00
📊 Analysis:
Resistance: $130.00 and $132.00
Support: $125.00 and $120.00
Market Insight: LTC has been facing strong resistance around $130.00, showing signs of a pullback. With increasing selling pressure, a decline towards $125.00 and potentially $120.00 is likely.
💡 Pro Tip: Monitor for confirmation near resistance levels before entering the trade. Stick to your stop loss to manage risk effectively!
📢 Like, comment, and follow for more actionable setups! Drop your favorite coin pair below for analysis!
$LTC
{future}(LTCUSDT)
#TRUMPOnBinanceFutures #TRUMPCoinMarketCap #CryptoTrump2.0 #CryptoTrump2.0 #Write2Earn
Current Price: $127.67
📉 Trade Setup:
Entry Zone: $128.00–$130.00
Take Profit Targets:
TP1: $125.00
TP2: $120.00
TP3: $115.00
Stop Loss: $132.00
📊 Analysis:
Resistance: $130.00 and $132.00
Support: $125.00 and $120.00
Market Insight: LTC has been facing strong resistance around $130.00, showing signs of a pullback. With increasing selling pressure, a decline towards $125.00 and potentially $120.00 is likely.
💡 Pro Tip: Monitor for confirmation near resistance levels before entering the trade. Stick to your stop loss to manage risk effectively!
📢 Like, comment, and follow for more actionable setups! Drop your favorite coin pair below for analysis!
$LTC
{future}(LTCUSDT)
#TRUMPOnBinanceFutures #TRUMPCoinMarketCap #CryptoTrump2.0 #CryptoTrump2.0 #Write2Earn
Warning ⚠️ Tether's (USDT) misleading claims about its reserves and lack of transparency raises concerns about the true stability and reliability of $USDT
Possibility of Depegging ⚠️ (Losing the $1 Peg)
Although USDT usually maintains a value close to $1, its price can deviate in certain situations. Such deviations often occur during periods of extreme market volatility or when there is a lack of confidence in Tether's stability.
Examples of USDT Dropping Below $1:
April 2017: During cryptocurrency market volatility, USDT dropped to around $0.91 as doubts arose about Tether's ability to maintain backing. 🚩
October 2018: USDT experienced a sharp drop to $0.85 after rumors of Tether's insolvency and insufficient reserves to back all issued tokens.
Centralization ⚠️
USDT is a centralized stablecoin, meaning its issuance and control are managed by Tether Limited. Centralized stablecoins are exposed to risks such as regulatory interventions or liquidity issues if the company faces legal or financial challenges.
⚠️ Credit Risk and Growing Competition
If Tether's reserves are not sufficiently diversified or secure, credit risk may arise. Additionally, stablecoins like #USDD , #DAI (#USDS ) offer more decentralized alternatives, threatening USDT 's long-term dominance in the market.
These factors, combined, can lead to volatility or a weakening of investor confidence in USDT. ❗
Last but not least #USDT cannot be subscribed for earning interest citing binance "due to your current local restrictions these assets cannot be subscribed". WFT?
Possibility of Depegging ⚠️ (Losing the $1 Peg)
Although USDT usually maintains a value close to $1, its price can deviate in certain situations. Such deviations often occur during periods of extreme market volatility or when there is a lack of confidence in Tether's stability.
Examples of USDT Dropping Below $1:
April 2017: During cryptocurrency market volatility, USDT dropped to around $0.91 as doubts arose about Tether's ability to maintain backing. 🚩
October 2018: USDT experienced a sharp drop to $0.85 after rumors of Tether's insolvency and insufficient reserves to back all issued tokens.
Centralization ⚠️
USDT is a centralized stablecoin, meaning its issuance and control are managed by Tether Limited. Centralized stablecoins are exposed to risks such as regulatory interventions or liquidity issues if the company faces legal or financial challenges.
⚠️ Credit Risk and Growing Competition
If Tether's reserves are not sufficiently diversified or secure, credit risk may arise. Additionally, stablecoins like #USDD , #DAI (#USDS ) offer more decentralized alternatives, threatening USDT 's long-term dominance in the market.
These factors, combined, can lead to volatility or a weakening of investor confidence in USDT. ❗
Last but not least #USDT cannot be subscribed for earning interest citing binance "due to your current local restrictions these assets cannot be subscribed". WFT?
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Trending Topics
USGovShutdownEnd?
186,108 views
2,675 Discussing
Crypto News: Crypto Markets Eye Relief as U.S. Senate Reaches Deal to End Government Shutdown
Binance News
23 Likes
10.2k views
AltcoinMarketRecovery
13.6M views
17,901 Discussing
CryptoIn401k
14M views
23,297 Discussing
