BnFastNews
289 Posts
BnFastNews
Report
Block User
0 Following
15 Followers
20 Liked
Posts
·
--
At 8:30 p.m., ether.fi’s official account published a long post explaining why it’s launching its own stablecoin: more than $300 million in stablecoins on the platform has been sitting idle, and going forward, cards, vaults, lending, trading, and transfers will all use a single native dollar. The key line: Powered by Ethena Whitelabel. Ethena will manage everything end to end—reserves, minting, redemptions, and compliance—with ether.fi only choosing the reserve mix. Ethena’s official account promptly reposted it.
What matters to me isn’t that there’s yet another stablecoin, but that major clients are starting to back the whitelabel model. Research account Glasscade’s figures today: about $74 million in partner stablecoins held in whitelabel custody. Based on a synthetic dollar supply of over $7.5 billion and fees being switched on, the baseline whitelabel scenario could generate about $16 million a year in buybacks. It’s still an “if,” but the path from revenue to buybacks is much clearer now.
The market reacted. Volume picked up after 9 p.m.; the 10 p.m. hourly candle reached 0.2028. Up about 8.5% over 24 hours, with $26 million in trading volume, ranking 12th among spot assets. I’m not chasing a big green candle. I’d scale in on a pullback to 0.193–0.197 (the top of the range from the past two days), and add more at 0.185–0.188 if it drops further. If the daily candle closes below 0.180, I’ll admit I’m wrong. First, I’m watching 0.208 above, then 0.215 and 0.224.
If you want to follow this whitelabel narrative, tap the trading widget below, $ENA , to check the chart. Place your orders, then get some sleep.
At 8:30 p.m., ether.fi’s official account published a long post explaining why it’s launching its own stablecoin: more than $300 million in stablecoins on the platform has been sitting idle, and going forward, cards, vaults, lending, trading, and transfers will all use a single native dollar. The key line: Powered by Ethena Whitelabel. Ethena will manage everything end to end—reserves, minting, redemptions, and compliance—with ether.fi only choosing the reserve mix. Ethena’s official account promptly reposted it.
What matters to me isn’t that there’s yet another stablecoin, but that major clients are starting to back the whitelabel model. Research account Glasscade’s figures today: about $74 million in partner stablecoins held in whitelabel custody. Based on a synthetic dollar supply of over $7.5 billion and fees being switched on, the baseline whitelabel scenario could generate about $16 million a year in buybacks. It’s still an “if,” but the path from revenue to buybacks is much clearer now.
The market reacted. Volume picked up after 9 p.m.; the 10 p.m. hourly candle reached 0.2028. Up about 8.5% over 24 hours, with $26 million in trading volume, ranking 12th among spot assets. I’m not chasing a big green candle. I’d scale in on a pullback to 0.193–0.197 (the top of the range from the past two days), and add more at 0.185–0.188 if it drops further. If the daily candle closes below 0.180, I’ll admit I’m wrong. First, I’m watching 0.208 above, then 0.215 and 0.224.
If you want to follow this whitelabel narrative, tap the trading widget below, $ENA , to check the chart. Place your orders, then get some sleep.
What matters to me isn’t that there’s yet another stablecoin, but that major clients are starting to back the whitelabel model. Research account Glasscade’s figures today: about $74 million in partner stablecoins held in whitelabel custody. Based on a synthetic dollar supply of over $7.5 billion and fees being switched on, the baseline whitelabel scenario could generate about $16 million a year in buybacks. It’s still an “if,” but the path from revenue to buybacks is much clearer now.
The market reacted. Volume picked up after 9 p.m.; the 10 p.m. hourly candle reached 0.2028. Up about 8.5% over 24 hours, with $26 million in trading volume, ranking 12th among spot assets. I’m not chasing a big green candle. I’d scale in on a pullback to 0.193–0.197 (the top of the range from the past two days), and add more at 0.185–0.188 if it drops further. If the daily candle closes below 0.180, I’ll admit I’m wrong. First, I’m watching 0.208 above, then 0.215 and 0.224.
If you want to follow this whitelabel narrative, tap the trading widget below, $ENA , to check the chart. Place your orders, then get some sleep.
13
·
--
I just came across a post from the official House of Stake account: voting on HSP-029 is now open. It proposes gradually lowering annual issuance from 2.5% to 1.6% over 24 months, while keeping the staking and treasury split at 90/10. The proposal model estimates that roughly 11.8 million fewer tokens would be issued over two years, and around 66.1 million fewer over six. The forum at gov.near.org shows the status as “Voting,” and you can also visit houseofstake.org/proposals/29. For someone like me who keeps an eye on supply, voting being open today is more useful than just talking about cutting issuance.
Spot price just plunged to around 4.64, down about 6.3% over 24 hours, with trading volume above 100 million U. The intraday high briefly touched 5.043. I’d be willing to buy in batches if it pulls back to 4.64–4.72, and add more if it dips further to 4.50–4.60. If the daily candle closes below 4.45, I’ll admit I was wrong and step aside for now. Above that, I’m first watching for a move back to 4.85, then 5.00 and 5.14.
If you want to follow the supply narrative, check the chart in the trading widget below $NEAR —don’t just wait for the vote result before making a move.
I just came across a post from the official House of Stake account: voting on HSP-029 is now open. It proposes gradually lowering annual issuance from 2.5% to 1.6% over 24 months, while keeping the staking and treasury split at 90/10. The proposal model estimates that roughly 11.8 million fewer tokens would be issued over two years, and around 66.1 million fewer over six. The forum at gov.near.org shows the status as “Voting,” and you can also visit houseofstake.org/proposals/29. For someone like me who keeps an eye on supply, voting being open today is more useful than just talking about cutting issuance.
Spot price just plunged to around 4.64, down about 6.3% over 24 hours, with trading volume above 100 million U. The intraday high briefly touched 5.043. I’d be willing to buy in batches if it pulls back to 4.64–4.72, and add more if it dips further to 4.50–4.60. If the daily candle closes below 4.45, I’ll admit I was wrong and step aside for now. Above that, I’m first watching for a move back to 4.85, then 5.00 and 5.14.
If you want to follow the supply narrative, check the chart in the trading widget below $NEAR —don’t just wait for the vote result before making a move.
Spot price just plunged to around 4.64, down about 6.3% over 24 hours, with trading volume above 100 million U. The intraday high briefly touched 5.043. I’d be willing to buy in batches if it pulls back to 4.64–4.72, and add more if it dips further to 4.50–4.60. If the daily candle closes below 4.45, I’ll admit I was wrong and step aside for now. Above that, I’m first watching for a move back to 4.85, then 5.00 and 5.14.
If you want to follow the supply narrative, check the chart in the trading widget below $NEAR —don’t just wait for the vote result before making a move.
30
·
--
I just came across this on TokenPost: Arbitrum is positioning Global Dollar (USDG) as the ecosystem’s main stablecoin, with the temperature check closing on October 22. The proposal’s core idea: add another 100 million $ARB to DRIP, raising the budget from roughly 65 million to about 165 million, and dedicate Seasons 2–4 to USDG. Most AEP fees would be converted to USDG and sent to the treasury. The Foundation has already voiced its support. This comes on top of the official account’s Stablecoin Growth Program announced on 10/15: the first 10 teams to reach 10 million USDG in TVL each get 200,000 ARB, from a 2 million ARB prize pool. To me, incentives, the treasury, and compliant dollars are all tied together here, and the voting window is just around the corner.
Spot is hovering around 0.191, down about 4.5% over 24 hours, with roughly 24 million U in trading volume. It hit 0.2041 this morning before dropping back to 0.1904. I’d be willing to buy in gradually on a pullback to 0.188–0.192, and add another tranche if it falls further to 0.175–0.180. If the daily candle closes below 0.174, I’ll admit I was wrong and step aside for now. On the upside, I’m watching for a move back to 0.197, then 0.204 and 0.215.
If you want to follow along, open the trading widget below at $ARB and check the chart yourself—don’t just wait around for the vote results.
I just came across this on TokenPost: Arbitrum is positioning Global Dollar (USDG) as the ecosystem’s main stablecoin, with the temperature check closing on October 22. The proposal’s core idea: add another 100 million $ARB to DRIP, raising the budget from roughly 65 million to about 165 million, and dedicate Seasons 2–4 to USDG. Most AEP fees would be converted to USDG and sent to the treasury. The Foundation has already voiced its support. This comes on top of the official account’s Stablecoin Growth Program announced on 10/15: the first 10 teams to reach 10 million USDG in TVL each get 200,000 ARB, from a 2 million ARB prize pool. To me, incentives, the treasury, and compliant dollars are all tied together here, and the voting window is just around the corner.
Spot is hovering around 0.191, down about 4.5% over 24 hours, with roughly 24 million U in trading volume. It hit 0.2041 this morning before dropping back to 0.1904. I’d be willing to buy in gradually on a pullback to 0.188–0.192, and add another tranche if it falls further to 0.175–0.180. If the daily candle closes below 0.174, I’ll admit I was wrong and step aside for now. On the upside, I’m watching for a move back to 0.197, then 0.204 and 0.215.
If you want to follow along, open the trading widget below at $ARB and check the chart yourself—don’t just wait around for the vote results.
Spot is hovering around 0.191, down about 4.5% over 24 hours, with roughly 24 million U in trading volume. It hit 0.2041 this morning before dropping back to 0.1904. I’d be willing to buy in gradually on a pullback to 0.188–0.192, and add another tranche if it falls further to 0.175–0.180. If the daily candle closes below 0.174, I’ll admit I was wrong and step aside for now. On the upside, I’m watching for a move back to 0.197, then 0.204 and 0.215.
If you want to follow along, open the trading widget below at $ARB and check the chart yourself—don’t just wait around for the vote results.
28
·
--
I watched last night’s official announcement twice—the @Enter_Elysium team made the date crystal clear: Elysium mainnet launches on November 9. This isn’t just another empty promise of an L2; it’s the first general-purpose, high-performance L2 built for the Hyperliquid ecosystem, settling back to HyperEVM and using $HYPE for gas (bridged over at a 1:1 ratio). Alchemy and Quicknode have both confirmed they’ll provide RPC access from day one. To me, the narrative has taken another step beyond “perpetuals territory” toward “applications need room to grow, too.” The real upside this time is gas being tied to the native token.
Spot has been hovering around 78.6, down about 1.8% over 24 hours, with roughly 24 million U in trading volume. Yesterday’s high touched 80.43, and the October 18 wick plunged to 76.15 before bouncing back. I’d be willing to scale in around 77.5–78.3, then add another tranche if it drops further to 76.0–76.5. If the daily candle closes below 75.5, I’ll admit I’m wrong and exit for now. On the upside, I’m watching for a move back to 80.4, followed by the previous highs at 82.5 and 86.7.
If you want to follow along, open the $HYPE trading widget below and check the chart for yourself—don’t just echo the trending hashtags.
I watched last night’s official announcement twice—the @Enter_Elysium team made the date crystal clear: Elysium mainnet launches on November 9. This isn’t just another empty promise of an L2; it’s the first general-purpose, high-performance L2 built for the Hyperliquid ecosystem, settling back to HyperEVM and using $HYPE for gas (bridged over at a 1:1 ratio). Alchemy and Quicknode have both confirmed they’ll provide RPC access from day one. To me, the narrative has taken another step beyond “perpetuals territory” toward “applications need room to grow, too.” The real upside this time is gas being tied to the native token.
Spot has been hovering around 78.6, down about 1.8% over 24 hours, with roughly 24 million U in trading volume. Yesterday’s high touched 80.43, and the October 18 wick plunged to 76.15 before bouncing back. I’d be willing to scale in around 77.5–78.3, then add another tranche if it drops further to 76.0–76.5. If the daily candle closes below 75.5, I’ll admit I’m wrong and exit for now. On the upside, I’m watching for a move back to 80.4, followed by the previous highs at 82.5 and 86.7.
If you want to follow along, open the $HYPE trading widget below and check the chart for yourself—don’t just echo the trending hashtags.
Spot has been hovering around 78.6, down about 1.8% over 24 hours, with roughly 24 million U in trading volume. Yesterday’s high touched 80.43, and the October 18 wick plunged to 76.15 before bouncing back. I’d be willing to scale in around 77.5–78.3, then add another tranche if it drops further to 76.0–76.5. If the daily candle closes below 75.5, I’ll admit I’m wrong and exit for now. On the upside, I’m watching for a move back to 80.4, followed by the previous highs at 82.5 and 86.7.
If you want to follow along, open the $HYPE trading widget below and check the chart for yourself—don’t just echo the trending hashtags.
30
·
--
Last night, Owocki tweeted himself: the Gitcoin relaunch narrative suddenly caught fire, but he was pouring cold water on it—is this surge of attention actually “earned”? Could fundamentals still be lagging, with sentiment getting ahead of itself? Add the official announcement a few days ago that the relaunch would be called Techne, with a target launch in December, plus the lingering buzz from Upbit opening KRW and USDT markets in mid-October, and the price shot up overnight from around 0.28 to 0.376. It has now pulled back to 0.333, still up around ten percent in 24 hours, with trading volume ranking twentieth among non-stablecoin tokens on Binance Spot.
One reminder: according to the governance proposal, Techne will be a separate nonprofit initiative. GTC holders have no economic rights in Techne; the token remains for Gitcoin governance. My plan: buy on a pullback to 0.318–0.328; if it drops further, watch 0.277–0.290 (near last night’s low, where it recovered); if the daily candle closes below 0.270, I’ll consider this structure broken. First, watch 0.360 overhead; if it holds, the next test is the 0.376 high, then 0.400. The narrative is hot, but the founder is urging caution—don’t treat the “relaunch” as an immediate bullish catalyst.
Do you think real demand is coming back, or is sentiment getting ahead of itself? Tap $GTC to see the live chart, and share your limit order levels in the comments.
Last night, Owocki tweeted himself: the Gitcoin relaunch narrative suddenly caught fire, but he was pouring cold water on it—is this surge of attention actually “earned”? Could fundamentals still be lagging, with sentiment getting ahead of itself? Add the official announcement a few days ago that the relaunch would be called Techne, with a target launch in December, plus the lingering buzz from Upbit opening KRW and USDT markets in mid-October, and the price shot up overnight from around 0.28 to 0.376. It has now pulled back to 0.333, still up around ten percent in 24 hours, with trading volume ranking twentieth among non-stablecoin tokens on Binance Spot.
One reminder: according to the governance proposal, Techne will be a separate nonprofit initiative. GTC holders have no economic rights in Techne; the token remains for Gitcoin governance. My plan: buy on a pullback to 0.318–0.328; if it drops further, watch 0.277–0.290 (near last night’s low, where it recovered); if the daily candle closes below 0.270, I’ll consider this structure broken. First, watch 0.360 overhead; if it holds, the next test is the 0.376 high, then 0.400. The narrative is hot, but the founder is urging caution—don’t treat the “relaunch” as an immediate bullish catalyst.
Do you think real demand is coming back, or is sentiment getting ahead of itself? Tap $GTC to see the live chart, and share your limit order levels in the comments.
One reminder: according to the governance proposal, Techne will be a separate nonprofit initiative. GTC holders have no economic rights in Techne; the token remains for Gitcoin governance. My plan: buy on a pullback to 0.318–0.328; if it drops further, watch 0.277–0.290 (near last night’s low, where it recovered); if the daily candle closes below 0.270, I’ll consider this structure broken. First, watch 0.360 overhead; if it holds, the next test is the 0.376 high, then 0.400. The narrative is hot, but the founder is urging caution—don’t treat the “relaunch” as an immediate bullish catalyst.
Do you think real demand is coming back, or is sentiment getting ahead of itself? Tap $GTC to see the live chart, and share your limit order levels in the comments.
61
·
--
Last night, a Bloomberg ETF analyst posted a screenshot of the filing: BlackRock has submitted another new document for Bitcoin—the iShares Bitcoin Managed Protection ETF, ticker PBIT. This isn’t the old spot-ETF route; it comes with a “buffer”: capped upside and downside protection, tracking IBIT underneath and using options to create the structure. This is the third product line after the IBIT spot ETF and BITA’s premium income strategy. The Block also reported that IBIT’s assets are still above $65 billion. One reminder: a filing doesn’t mean approval, and public reports haven’t announced a listing date or fee yet.
On the market side, Bitcoin just printed $81,683, down about 0.5% over 24 hours. Binance spot trading volume is still ranked No. 1. It hit $83,158 overnight before slipping back. My own plan: first watch for a bounce in the $80,800–$81,400 zone; if it drops further, wait for $79,800–$80,700 (the Oct. 15 wick and the low from early on the 19th). If the daily candle closes below $79,800, I’ll consider the structure broken. On a rebound, first watch $82,200; if it holds above that, then look toward yesterday’s high of $83,158, with $84,350 as the next level above. Institutions are expanding their product lineup toward “greater stability,” but spot Bitcoin is still hovering around $81,000. Don’t mistake a filing for an immediate price-pumping signal.
Do you think the buffered ETF is a bullish catalyst being realized, or a case of “buy the rumor, sell the news”? Tap $BTC to check the live market, and share your limit-order levels in the comments.
Last night, a Bloomberg ETF analyst posted a screenshot of the filing: BlackRock has submitted another new document for Bitcoin—the iShares Bitcoin Managed Protection ETF, ticker PBIT. This isn’t the old spot-ETF route; it comes with a “buffer”: capped upside and downside protection, tracking IBIT underneath and using options to create the structure. This is the third product line after the IBIT spot ETF and BITA’s premium income strategy. The Block also reported that IBIT’s assets are still above $65 billion. One reminder: a filing doesn’t mean approval, and public reports haven’t announced a listing date or fee yet.
On the market side, Bitcoin just printed $81,683, down about 0.5% over 24 hours. Binance spot trading volume is still ranked No. 1. It hit $83,158 overnight before slipping back. My own plan: first watch for a bounce in the $80,800–$81,400 zone; if it drops further, wait for $79,800–$80,700 (the Oct. 15 wick and the low from early on the 19th). If the daily candle closes below $79,800, I’ll consider the structure broken. On a rebound, first watch $82,200; if it holds above that, then look toward yesterday’s high of $83,158, with $84,350 as the next level above. Institutions are expanding their product lineup toward “greater stability,” but spot Bitcoin is still hovering around $81,000. Don’t mistake a filing for an immediate price-pumping signal.
Do you think the buffered ETF is a bullish catalyst being realized, or a case of “buy the rumor, sell the news”? Tap $BTC to check the live market, and share your limit-order levels in the comments.
On the market side, Bitcoin just printed $81,683, down about 0.5% over 24 hours. Binance spot trading volume is still ranked No. 1. It hit $83,158 overnight before slipping back. My own plan: first watch for a bounce in the $80,800–$81,400 zone; if it drops further, wait for $79,800–$80,700 (the Oct. 15 wick and the low from early on the 19th). If the daily candle closes below $79,800, I’ll consider the structure broken. On a rebound, first watch $82,200; if it holds above that, then look toward yesterday’s high of $83,158, with $84,350 as the next level above. Institutions are expanding their product lineup toward “greater stability,” but spot Bitcoin is still hovering around $81,000. Don’t mistake a filing for an immediate price-pumping signal.
Do you think the buffered ETF is a bullish catalyst being realized, or a case of “buy the rumor, sell the news”? Tap $BTC to check the live market, and share your limit-order levels in the comments.
BTC+0.60%
IBITETF+0.82%
67
·
--
Tomorrow is a big day for $ZEC —the development team is set to decide on the NU7 mainnet activation height. The testnet switched to 25-second block times on October 6 (down from 75 seconds), and November 5 is the target date. Whether it goes live on schedule all comes down to tomorrow’s decision.
Yesterday, the official @Zcash account also shared an update on its post-quantum plans: one-time viewing keys and unlinkable private swaps, summed up with the slogan “Private now, private in the future.” The upgrade window and privacy narrative are lining up, but the market action looks a little mixed.
At 3 a.m. this morning, the hourly candle spiked straight to 1049.01. During the day, it climbed all the way to 1191.76, and now it’s pulled back to around 1126. Binance spot 24-hour trading volume is still near the top of the rankings, and nobody can call this low volatility.
My plan: start with a small entry around 1110–1135; if it drops back to this morning’s low, I’ll wait for 1049–1075. If the daily close falls below 1040, I’m out—the structure is broken, and I won’t hold on. For a rebound, I’m watching 1170 first; if it holds above that, then today’s high of 1192, with 1280 as the next level beyond that. Decision days can bring fake-outs, so don’t go all in at once.
Are you betting on an activation height tomorrow, or a delay? Tap $ZEC to check the live market, and tell us in the comments where you’ve set your orders.
Tomorrow is a big day for $ZEC —the development team is set to decide on the NU7 mainnet activation height. The testnet switched to 25-second block times on October 6 (down from 75 seconds), and November 5 is the target date. Whether it goes live on schedule all comes down to tomorrow’s decision.
Yesterday, the official @Zcash account also shared an update on its post-quantum plans: one-time viewing keys and unlinkable private swaps, summed up with the slogan “Private now, private in the future.” The upgrade window and privacy narrative are lining up, but the market action looks a little mixed.
At 3 a.m. this morning, the hourly candle spiked straight to 1049.01. During the day, it climbed all the way to 1191.76, and now it’s pulled back to around 1126. Binance spot 24-hour trading volume is still near the top of the rankings, and nobody can call this low volatility.
My plan: start with a small entry around 1110–1135; if it drops back to this morning’s low, I’ll wait for 1049–1075. If the daily close falls below 1040, I’m out—the structure is broken, and I won’t hold on. For a rebound, I’m watching 1170 first; if it holds above that, then today’s high of 1192, with 1280 as the next level beyond that. Decision days can bring fake-outs, so don’t go all in at once.
Are you betting on an activation height tomorrow, or a delay? Tap $ZEC to check the live market, and tell us in the comments where you’ve set your orders.
Yesterday, the official @Zcash account also shared an update on its post-quantum plans: one-time viewing keys and unlinkable private swaps, summed up with the slogan “Private now, private in the future.” The upgrade window and privacy narrative are lining up, but the market action looks a little mixed.
At 3 a.m. this morning, the hourly candle spiked straight to 1049.01. During the day, it climbed all the way to 1191.76, and now it’s pulled back to around 1126. Binance spot 24-hour trading volume is still near the top of the rankings, and nobody can call this low volatility.
My plan: start with a small entry around 1110–1135; if it drops back to this morning’s low, I’ll wait for 1049–1075. If the daily close falls below 1040, I’m out—the structure is broken, and I won’t hold on. For a rebound, I’m watching 1170 first; if it holds above that, then today’s high of 1192, with 1280 as the next level beyond that. Decision days can bring fake-outs, so don’t go all in at once.
Are you betting on an activation height tomorrow, or a delay? Tap $ZEC to check the live market, and tell us in the comments where you’ve set your orders.
·
--
At 6:10 tonight, the official BNB Chain account announced its 37th quarterly burn: 1,646,196 BNB—$BNB sent straight to the burn address, worth about $1.197 billion at the time.
My first reaction was to look up the previous burn. The 36th burn in July destroyed 1.616 million BNB, worth about $932 million. This time, the number of coins was up by 30,000, and the dollar value was up 28.5%. The official historical chart shows that each of the 35th, 36th, and 37th burns was larger than the last. This was the biggest burn since the 29th. The total supply now stands at 131,512,085 BNB. We’re more than 68.5% of the way from 200 million down to 100 million.
The funny thing is, the market barely reacted. BNB was hovering around 724 on Binance spot, up 0.08% over 24 hours, and the hourly candle around the announcement even dipped to 723. What caught my eye was the 4 a.m. candle, which plunged to 705.86—almost exactly the same level as 708 on October 15—before quickly bouncing back above 720. That double bottom is what I’m watching.
My plan: place an initial order around 716–721, where the early-morning rally began. If it drops harder, I’ll wait for 705–709, around the two lows. If the daily candle closes below 698, I’m out—the structure will have broken, and I won’t hold on. To the upside, I’m watching today’s high at 729.5 first; if it holds above that, then 750 and 772.
Burns are bullish, but they’re not a launch button. Bitcoin dominance has climbed to around a 14-month high over the past couple of days, while altcoins are still getting drained. Don’t size your position too aggressively.
Do you think this $1.2 billion burn can push $BNB back to 750? Tap $BNB to check the live chart, and tell me in the comments where you’ve placed your orders.
At 6:10 tonight, the official BNB Chain account announced its 37th quarterly burn: 1,646,196 BNB—$BNB sent straight to the burn address, worth about $1.197 billion at the time.
My first reaction was to look up the previous burn. The 36th burn in July destroyed 1.616 million BNB, worth about $932 million. This time, the number of coins was up by 30,000, and the dollar value was up 28.5%. The official historical chart shows that each of the 35th, 36th, and 37th burns was larger than the last. This was the biggest burn since the 29th. The total supply now stands at 131,512,085 BNB. We’re more than 68.5% of the way from 200 million down to 100 million.
The funny thing is, the market barely reacted. BNB was hovering around 724 on Binance spot, up 0.08% over 24 hours, and the hourly candle around the announcement even dipped to 723. What caught my eye was the 4 a.m. candle, which plunged to 705.86—almost exactly the same level as 708 on October 15—before quickly bouncing back above 720. That double bottom is what I’m watching.
My plan: place an initial order around 716–721, where the early-morning rally began. If it drops harder, I’ll wait for 705–709, around the two lows. If the daily candle closes below 698, I’m out—the structure will have broken, and I won’t hold on. To the upside, I’m watching today’s high at 729.5 first; if it holds above that, then 750 and 772.
Burns are bullish, but they’re not a launch button. Bitcoin dominance has climbed to around a 14-month high over the past couple of days, while altcoins are still getting drained. Don’t size your position too aggressively.
Do you think this $1.2 billion burn can push $BNB back to 750? Tap $BNB to check the live chart, and tell me in the comments where you’ve placed your orders.
My first reaction was to look up the previous burn. The 36th burn in July destroyed 1.616 million BNB, worth about $932 million. This time, the number of coins was up by 30,000, and the dollar value was up 28.5%. The official historical chart shows that each of the 35th, 36th, and 37th burns was larger than the last. This was the biggest burn since the 29th. The total supply now stands at 131,512,085 BNB. We’re more than 68.5% of the way from 200 million down to 100 million.
The funny thing is, the market barely reacted. BNB was hovering around 724 on Binance spot, up 0.08% over 24 hours, and the hourly candle around the announcement even dipped to 723. What caught my eye was the 4 a.m. candle, which plunged to 705.86—almost exactly the same level as 708 on October 15—before quickly bouncing back above 720. That double bottom is what I’m watching.
My plan: place an initial order around 716–721, where the early-morning rally began. If it drops harder, I’ll wait for 705–709, around the two lows. If the daily candle closes below 698, I’m out—the structure will have broken, and I won’t hold on. To the upside, I’m watching today’s high at 729.5 first; if it holds above that, then 750 and 772.
Burns are bullish, but they’re not a launch button. Bitcoin dominance has climbed to around a 14-month high over the past couple of days, while altcoins are still getting drained. Don’t size your position too aggressively.
Do you think this $1.2 billion burn can push $BNB back to 750? Tap $BNB to check the live chart, and tell me in the comments where you’ve placed your orders.
30
·
--
Wall Street really has put DeFi on the trading desk today. CME Group is set to launch $UNI futures on October 19 (trading day), as planned. Each standard contract represents 10,000 tokens, while each Micro contract represents 1,000, with cash settlement. This is CME’s first futures product specifically for a decentralized exchange token.
Some people piled in when it was officially announced on September 22, and it touched 10.94 on September 23. But as the launch drew near, the price was sold off all the way down: it’s fallen about 30% from that high, and has retraced roughly 20% over the past two weeks. Some on-chain observers say it’s in a distribution phase, and Binance spot has also seen inflows pick up. And to put it bluntly: once futures go live, shorting gets easier too, so don’t expect an automatic rally on launch day.
The market first dipped, then recovered. It plunged to 6.81 at around 3 a.m. and has since clawed back to around 7.43. Twenty-four-hour trading volume is about 32 million U, putting it fourteenth in spot trading volume. The October 13 daily low of 6.74 is still holding as support.
My own game plan: scale in a little at 7.15–7.30, and keep a second entry level at 6.74–6.85 to catch a wick like the one overnight. If the daily candle closes below 6.70, I’ll admit I’m wrong. On the upside, I’m watching today’s high of 7.49 first; if it holds above that, then 7.85, and beyond that, 9.08 around October 5. Institutions being able to hedge doesn’t mean spot will explode higher right away, but the liquidity pool has definitely grown.
Do you think CME opening the gates is a bullish catalyst finally playing out, or does it just make it easier for both bulls and bears to trade in the short term? If you want to follow along, check the $UNI trading card below against the chart.
Wall Street really has put DeFi on the trading desk today. CME Group is set to launch $UNI futures on October 19 (trading day), as planned. Each standard contract represents 10,000 tokens, while each Micro contract represents 1,000, with cash settlement. This is CME’s first futures product specifically for a decentralized exchange token.
Some people piled in when it was officially announced on September 22, and it touched 10.94 on September 23. But as the launch drew near, the price was sold off all the way down: it’s fallen about 30% from that high, and has retraced roughly 20% over the past two weeks. Some on-chain observers say it’s in a distribution phase, and Binance spot has also seen inflows pick up. And to put it bluntly: once futures go live, shorting gets easier too, so don’t expect an automatic rally on launch day.
The market first dipped, then recovered. It plunged to 6.81 at around 3 a.m. and has since clawed back to around 7.43. Twenty-four-hour trading volume is about 32 million U, putting it fourteenth in spot trading volume. The October 13 daily low of 6.74 is still holding as support.
My own game plan: scale in a little at 7.15–7.30, and keep a second entry level at 6.74–6.85 to catch a wick like the one overnight. If the daily candle closes below 6.70, I’ll admit I’m wrong. On the upside, I’m watching today’s high of 7.49 first; if it holds above that, then 7.85, and beyond that, 9.08 around October 5. Institutions being able to hedge doesn’t mean spot will explode higher right away, but the liquidity pool has definitely grown.
Do you think CME opening the gates is a bullish catalyst finally playing out, or does it just make it easier for both bulls and bears to trade in the short term? If you want to follow along, check the $UNI trading card below against the chart.
Some people piled in when it was officially announced on September 22, and it touched 10.94 on September 23. But as the launch drew near, the price was sold off all the way down: it’s fallen about 30% from that high, and has retraced roughly 20% over the past two weeks. Some on-chain observers say it’s in a distribution phase, and Binance spot has also seen inflows pick up. And to put it bluntly: once futures go live, shorting gets easier too, so don’t expect an automatic rally on launch day.
The market first dipped, then recovered. It plunged to 6.81 at around 3 a.m. and has since clawed back to around 7.43. Twenty-four-hour trading volume is about 32 million U, putting it fourteenth in spot trading volume. The October 13 daily low of 6.74 is still holding as support.
My own game plan: scale in a little at 7.15–7.30, and keep a second entry level at 6.74–6.85 to catch a wick like the one overnight. If the daily candle closes below 6.70, I’ll admit I’m wrong. On the upside, I’m watching today’s high of 7.49 first; if it holds above that, then 7.85, and beyond that, 9.08 around October 5. Institutions being able to hedge doesn’t mean spot will explode higher right away, but the liquidity pool has definitely grown.
Do you think CME opening the gates is a bullish catalyst finally playing out, or does it just make it easier for both bulls and bears to trade in the short term? If you want to follow along, check the $UNI trading card below against the chart.
31
·
--
In 2024, an employee at an engineering firm joined a video call where everyone on screen except him was a deepfake. The result? $25.6 million was transferred in one go. Yesterday at Money20/20 in Las Vegas, World co-founder Alex Blania took aim at incidents like this and unveiled a full suite of identity verification solutions for banks and financial institutions.
What I think is really worth watching is a change in status: real-person verification in Zoom has gone from a limited test in April to being available to everyone. Verify once at an iris-scanning device, take a selfie for comparison during the meeting, and once approved, a Human Badge appears on your profile. Hosts can also require verification before anyone joins. They’ve also brought in AI agents that do tasks on your behalf: real people can authorize them to provide proof of identity so they can make transfers or place orders. The list of design partners includes Bain Capital, VanEck, and Pantera. The company says more than 18 million people now have proof of personhood.
A reality check first: The Block also reported that no banks have been named as actual users so far, and there’s no pricing yet. Don’t mistake this for a confirmed deal.
Still, the market action is interesting. The news spread shortly after 9 a.m., and $WLD has been hovering between 0.483 and 0.497 since then. Its 24-hour trading volume is 31.85 million USDT, putting it at No. 12 in spot trading. It was also dumped to 0.4565 overnight, still 20% below its early-October high of 0.619.
My plan: start buying a little at 0.480–0.488, and leave a second tranche around 0.457–0.466, near that overnight wick. If the daily candle closes below 0.445, I’ll admit I’m wrong and exit. First, I’m watching the 24-hour high of 0.513; if it breaks above that, the next levels are 0.547 and 0.586.
Would you get your iris scanned to protect against deepfakes? If you want to follow along, check the chart using the $WLD trading card below.
In 2024, an employee at an engineering firm joined a video call where everyone on screen except him was a deepfake. The result? $25.6 million was transferred in one go. Yesterday at Money20/20 in Las Vegas, World co-founder Alex Blania took aim at incidents like this and unveiled a full suite of identity verification solutions for banks and financial institutions.
What I think is really worth watching is a change in status: real-person verification in Zoom has gone from a limited test in April to being available to everyone. Verify once at an iris-scanning device, take a selfie for comparison during the meeting, and once approved, a Human Badge appears on your profile. Hosts can also require verification before anyone joins. They’ve also brought in AI agents that do tasks on your behalf: real people can authorize them to provide proof of identity so they can make transfers or place orders. The list of design partners includes Bain Capital, VanEck, and Pantera. The company says more than 18 million people now have proof of personhood.
A reality check first: The Block also reported that no banks have been named as actual users so far, and there’s no pricing yet. Don’t mistake this for a confirmed deal.
Still, the market action is interesting. The news spread shortly after 9 a.m., and $WLD has been hovering between 0.483 and 0.497 since then. Its 24-hour trading volume is 31.85 million USDT, putting it at No. 12 in spot trading. It was also dumped to 0.4565 overnight, still 20% below its early-October high of 0.619.
My plan: start buying a little at 0.480–0.488, and leave a second tranche around 0.457–0.466, near that overnight wick. If the daily candle closes below 0.445, I’ll admit I’m wrong and exit. First, I’m watching the 24-hour high of 0.513; if it breaks above that, the next levels are 0.547 and 0.586.
Would you get your iris scanned to protect against deepfakes? If you want to follow along, check the chart using the $WLD trading card below.
What I think is really worth watching is a change in status: real-person verification in Zoom has gone from a limited test in April to being available to everyone. Verify once at an iris-scanning device, take a selfie for comparison during the meeting, and once approved, a Human Badge appears on your profile. Hosts can also require verification before anyone joins. They’ve also brought in AI agents that do tasks on your behalf: real people can authorize them to provide proof of identity so they can make transfers or place orders. The list of design partners includes Bain Capital, VanEck, and Pantera. The company says more than 18 million people now have proof of personhood.
A reality check first: The Block also reported that no banks have been named as actual users so far, and there’s no pricing yet. Don’t mistake this for a confirmed deal.
Still, the market action is interesting. The news spread shortly after 9 a.m., and $WLD has been hovering between 0.483 and 0.497 since then. Its 24-hour trading volume is 31.85 million USDT, putting it at No. 12 in spot trading. It was also dumped to 0.4565 overnight, still 20% below its early-October high of 0.619.
My plan: start buying a little at 0.480–0.488, and leave a second tranche around 0.457–0.466, near that overnight wick. If the daily candle closes below 0.445, I’ll admit I’m wrong and exit. First, I’m watching the 24-hour high of 0.513; if it breaks above that, the next levels are 0.547 and 0.586.
Would you get your iris scanned to protect against deepfakes? If you want to follow along, check the chart using the $WLD trading card below.
52
·
--
That morning wick nearly shook me out of my position—$SUI . Around 3 a.m., it followed the broader market down from around 0.96 to 0.937, then bounced back within two hours. Now it’s back above $1, currently around 1.006, with roughly 360 million U in 24-hour trading volume, ranking among the top ten spot assets.
Why I’m watching it now: this isn’t just a technical bounce. DATA Network / Trace just announced it’s joining the Sui ecosystem. The Sui Foundation has made a strategic investment of around $30 million, becoming its largest holder. Trace registers over 3 million receipts a day for data with clear rights—addressing the critical need for AI training data provenance. Also, Hashi (Bitcoin-collateralized finance) is set to launch on mainnet in stages this month. The alliance has pledged over $500 million in funding, with more than 20 top-tier partners including Anchorage. Bitcoin stays on the main chain, while hBTC is minted on Sui for use as collateral. The narrative is “AI data layer + Bitcoin finance on the verge of launch,” but the price is still hovering around $1. The information gap is still there.
For now, I’m watching these levels: 0.980–0.995 as a potential pullback entry zone, with a deeper zone around the overnight low at 0.940–0.960. If it decisively breaks below 0.920 on the daily chart, I’ll admit I’m wrong and exit. Above, I’d look for another test of 1.04–1.05; if it holds, then I’d eye 1.08 and the previous highs around 1.13.
Do you think Hashi’s launch could spark a rally on liquidity expectations first? Open the $SUI trading card below and take a look at the chart for yourself.
That morning wick nearly shook me out of my position—$SUI . Around 3 a.m., it followed the broader market down from around 0.96 to 0.937, then bounced back within two hours. Now it’s back above $1, currently around 1.006, with roughly 360 million U in 24-hour trading volume, ranking among the top ten spot assets.
Why I’m watching it now: this isn’t just a technical bounce. DATA Network / Trace just announced it’s joining the Sui ecosystem. The Sui Foundation has made a strategic investment of around $30 million, becoming its largest holder. Trace registers over 3 million receipts a day for data with clear rights—addressing the critical need for AI training data provenance. Also, Hashi (Bitcoin-collateralized finance) is set to launch on mainnet in stages this month. The alliance has pledged over $500 million in funding, with more than 20 top-tier partners including Anchorage. Bitcoin stays on the main chain, while hBTC is minted on Sui for use as collateral. The narrative is “AI data layer + Bitcoin finance on the verge of launch,” but the price is still hovering around $1. The information gap is still there.
For now, I’m watching these levels: 0.980–0.995 as a potential pullback entry zone, with a deeper zone around the overnight low at 0.940–0.960. If it decisively breaks below 0.920 on the daily chart, I’ll admit I’m wrong and exit. Above, I’d look for another test of 1.04–1.05; if it holds, then I’d eye 1.08 and the previous highs around 1.13.
Do you think Hashi’s launch could spark a rally on liquidity expectations first? Open the $SUI trading card below and take a look at the chart for yourself.
Why I’m watching it now: this isn’t just a technical bounce. DATA Network / Trace just announced it’s joining the Sui ecosystem. The Sui Foundation has made a strategic investment of around $30 million, becoming its largest holder. Trace registers over 3 million receipts a day for data with clear rights—addressing the critical need for AI training data provenance. Also, Hashi (Bitcoin-collateralized finance) is set to launch on mainnet in stages this month. The alliance has pledged over $500 million in funding, with more than 20 top-tier partners including Anchorage. Bitcoin stays on the main chain, while hBTC is minted on Sui for use as collateral. The narrative is “AI data layer + Bitcoin finance on the verge of launch,” but the price is still hovering around $1. The information gap is still there.
For now, I’m watching these levels: 0.980–0.995 as a potential pullback entry zone, with a deeper zone around the overnight low at 0.940–0.960. If it decisively breaks below 0.920 on the daily chart, I’ll admit I’m wrong and exit. Above, I’d look for another test of 1.04–1.05; if it holds, then I’d eye 1.08 and the previous highs around 1.13.
Do you think Hashi’s launch could spark a rally on liquidity expectations first? Open the $SUI trading card below and take a look at the chart for yourself.
57
·
--
What’s happened with Pump.fun over the past few days would’ve been enough to spark a big rally in a bull market: on the evening of October 16, the app integrated Hyperliquid perpetuals, with up to 40x leverage on BTC and 25x on ETH. Then at 1:54 a.m. today, the official account dropped a “return to… animals?” A few hours later, it had more than 1,200 replies, and the whole meme scene was speculating that animal-themed coins might be back.
But what about $PUMP ? It’s been drifting down ever since October 4, from 0.0068 to around 0.0042—a drawdown of nearly 40%. Even after the perpetuals announcement, it only popped to 0.00475 before getting pushed back down.
What I’m more focused on is the wick from early this morning. Starting at 3:15, the whole market sold off together, with BTC dipping to 80684. PUMP plunged 7% in half an hour, from 0.00412 to 0.00383. But before dawn, it climbed back up in a series of small green candles, reclaiming 0.00416 shortly after 7. The entire wick was bought back. When good news fails to lift the price, yet a panic-driven wick fails to break lower, I’m more inclined to read that as selling pressure running out than as someone still dumping at any cost.
So here’s my plan: place my first bids at 0.00400–0.00412, the range where it traded sideways before the early-morning sell-off. If it drops further, I’ll watch 0.00375–0.00385, where both last night’s wick low and the September 24 low sit. If the daily candle closes below 0.00340—the mid-September bottom—I’ll admit I’m wrong. On the upside, I’m watching 0.00455–0.00475 first, then 0.0050 if it breaks through.
Put simply, I’m betting that “animal season” and perpetuals fees can get Pump’s revenue curve rising again. Keep your position size modest. If you want to follow along, check $PUMP for the live chart. Do you think the official account’s animal-themed hint can kick off a rally this time?
What’s happened with Pump.fun over the past few days would’ve been enough to spark a big rally in a bull market: on the evening of October 16, the app integrated Hyperliquid perpetuals, with up to 40x leverage on BTC and 25x on ETH. Then at 1:54 a.m. today, the official account dropped a “return to… animals?” A few hours later, it had more than 1,200 replies, and the whole meme scene was speculating that animal-themed coins might be back.
But what about $PUMP ? It’s been drifting down ever since October 4, from 0.0068 to around 0.0042—a drawdown of nearly 40%. Even after the perpetuals announcement, it only popped to 0.00475 before getting pushed back down.
What I’m more focused on is the wick from early this morning. Starting at 3:15, the whole market sold off together, with BTC dipping to 80684. PUMP plunged 7% in half an hour, from 0.00412 to 0.00383. But before dawn, it climbed back up in a series of small green candles, reclaiming 0.00416 shortly after 7. The entire wick was bought back. When good news fails to lift the price, yet a panic-driven wick fails to break lower, I’m more inclined to read that as selling pressure running out than as someone still dumping at any cost.
So here’s my plan: place my first bids at 0.00400–0.00412, the range where it traded sideways before the early-morning sell-off. If it drops further, I’ll watch 0.00375–0.00385, where both last night’s wick low and the September 24 low sit. If the daily candle closes below 0.00340—the mid-September bottom—I’ll admit I’m wrong. On the upside, I’m watching 0.00455–0.00475 first, then 0.0050 if it breaks through.
Put simply, I’m betting that “animal season” and perpetuals fees can get Pump’s revenue curve rising again. Keep your position size modest. If you want to follow along, check $PUMP for the live chart. Do you think the official account’s animal-themed hint can kick off a rally this time?
But what about $PUMP ? It’s been drifting down ever since October 4, from 0.0068 to around 0.0042—a drawdown of nearly 40%. Even after the perpetuals announcement, it only popped to 0.00475 before getting pushed back down.
What I’m more focused on is the wick from early this morning. Starting at 3:15, the whole market sold off together, with BTC dipping to 80684. PUMP plunged 7% in half an hour, from 0.00412 to 0.00383. But before dawn, it climbed back up in a series of small green candles, reclaiming 0.00416 shortly after 7. The entire wick was bought back. When good news fails to lift the price, yet a panic-driven wick fails to break lower, I’m more inclined to read that as selling pressure running out than as someone still dumping at any cost.
So here’s my plan: place my first bids at 0.00400–0.00412, the range where it traded sideways before the early-morning sell-off. If it drops further, I’ll watch 0.00375–0.00385, where both last night’s wick low and the September 24 low sit. If the daily candle closes below 0.00340—the mid-September bottom—I’ll admit I’m wrong. On the upside, I’m watching 0.00455–0.00475 first, then 0.0050 if it breaks through.
Put simply, I’m betting that “animal season” and perpetuals fees can get Pump’s revenue curve rising again. Keep your position size modest. If you want to follow along, check $PUMP for the live chart. Do you think the official account’s animal-themed hint can kick off a rally this time?
88
·
--
At 5:22 a.m. Sunday, with U.S. markets still closed, $SNDKB 6 minutes on Binance plunged from 1293 to 1214.34, leaving a brutal -6% wick. CoinGlass data, cited by CoinDesk, showed that about $51.6 million in chip-stock perpetual futures were liquidated across the market in those 10 minutes, including about $38 million in long positions. SOXL, SanDisk, and SK Hynix were hit hardest.
I went through the minute-by-minute trades: the first wave of large sell orders hit Binance, and Hyperliquid saw a cascade of liquidations almost in the same second. But what’s more interesting is what came next: it bounced back to 1250 in less than 20 minutes and is now hovering around 1260, having recovered more than half of the wick. Weekend thin liquidity combined with high leverage triggering liquidations—that looks much more likely than “fundamentals suddenly turning bad.”
Of course, don’t let the bounce lull you into complacency. On 10/11, it was still closing at 1609; it’s down more than 20% in a week and has pulled back more than 30% from the 9/22 high of 1908. Tomorrow, October 19, is exactly the 39th anniversary of Black Monday in 1987. U.S. markets open at 21:30, and that’s when this weekend’s price action will face its first real test.
My plan is simple: start buying in the 1215–1240 range; the wick low lines up almost exactly with the platform from early August. If it drops further, I’m watching 1165–1190, where it found support several times in August. If the daily close falls below 1120, I’ll admit I’m wrong and exit. To the upside, I’m first watching 1300, where it traded sideways for most of the half-day before the wick. If it holds above that, then I’ll look at 1370–1400.
If you want to bet on the direction at Monday’s open, tap $SNDKB to watch the live market. Those few hours before the open will really test your reaction speed. Do you think tomorrow night brings another leg down, or a recovery to 1300?
At 5:22 a.m. Sunday, with U.S. markets still closed, $SNDKB 6 minutes on Binance plunged from 1293 to 1214.34, leaving a brutal -6% wick. CoinGlass data, cited by CoinDesk, showed that about $51.6 million in chip-stock perpetual futures were liquidated across the market in those 10 minutes, including about $38 million in long positions. SOXL, SanDisk, and SK Hynix were hit hardest.
I went through the minute-by-minute trades: the first wave of large sell orders hit Binance, and Hyperliquid saw a cascade of liquidations almost in the same second. But what’s more interesting is what came next: it bounced back to 1250 in less than 20 minutes and is now hovering around 1260, having recovered more than half of the wick. Weekend thin liquidity combined with high leverage triggering liquidations—that looks much more likely than “fundamentals suddenly turning bad.”
Of course, don’t let the bounce lull you into complacency. On 10/11, it was still closing at 1609; it’s down more than 20% in a week and has pulled back more than 30% from the 9/22 high of 1908. Tomorrow, October 19, is exactly the 39th anniversary of Black Monday in 1987. U.S. markets open at 21:30, and that’s when this weekend’s price action will face its first real test.
My plan is simple: start buying in the 1215–1240 range; the wick low lines up almost exactly with the platform from early August. If it drops further, I’m watching 1165–1190, where it found support several times in August. If the daily close falls below 1120, I’ll admit I’m wrong and exit. To the upside, I’m first watching 1300, where it traded sideways for most of the half-day before the wick. If it holds above that, then I’ll look at 1370–1400.
If you want to bet on the direction at Monday’s open, tap $SNDKB to watch the live market. Those few hours before the open will really test your reaction speed. Do you think tomorrow night brings another leg down, or a recovery to 1300?
I went through the minute-by-minute trades: the first wave of large sell orders hit Binance, and Hyperliquid saw a cascade of liquidations almost in the same second. But what’s more interesting is what came next: it bounced back to 1250 in less than 20 minutes and is now hovering around 1260, having recovered more than half of the wick. Weekend thin liquidity combined with high leverage triggering liquidations—that looks much more likely than “fundamentals suddenly turning bad.”
Of course, don’t let the bounce lull you into complacency. On 10/11, it was still closing at 1609; it’s down more than 20% in a week and has pulled back more than 30% from the 9/22 high of 1908. Tomorrow, October 19, is exactly the 39th anniversary of Black Monday in 1987. U.S. markets open at 21:30, and that’s when this weekend’s price action will face its first real test.
My plan is simple: start buying in the 1215–1240 range; the wick low lines up almost exactly with the platform from early August. If it drops further, I’m watching 1165–1190, where it found support several times in August. If the daily close falls below 1120, I’ll admit I’m wrong and exit. To the upside, I’m first watching 1300, where it traded sideways for most of the half-day before the wick. If it holds above that, then I’ll look at 1370–1400.
If you want to bet on the direction at Monday’s open, tap $SNDKB to watch the live market. Those few hours before the open will really test your reaction speed. Do you think tomorrow night brings another leg down, or a recovery to 1300?
13
·
--
Checking the gainers and losers on Sunday night, the biggest drop among the top Binance spot tokens by trading volume is $STRK: it’s at 0.0622 now, down 13.5% in 24 hours. From 0.1265 on October 11, it’s already been cut in half.
Let’s recap the past two weeks. In early October, it was still languishing around 0.043. Then the post-quantum narrative took off, and it nearly tripled in eight days. On the 15th, StarkWare officially opened a governance vote, asking STRK stakers and delegates whether Starknet should move from an Ethereum L2 to an independent post-quantum L1. Note that the vote is non-binding; even if it passes, it would only kick off research. STRK would remain the token, and the bridge to Ethereum wouldn’t close. The same day also coincided with a routine unlock of 127 million tokens, so after spiking to 0.0987 on voting day, the price was pushed back down.
This afternoon, StarkWare’s official account posted an update: 99.95% of the voting power cast so far is in favor. The vote runs for seven days and is expected to end around the 22nd. Starknet isn’t the only one riding the quantum narrative, either. This week, Google’s quantum team announced that it had achieved “magic-state cultivation” on its Willow chip, reducing the error rate by 40 times.
My take is that most of the froth has been squeezed out. It’s now only 45% above where the rally began, but the narrative isn’t dead yet, and there’ll probably be another wave of sentiment around the vote result. I’m not chasing it. I’ll place a small order at 0.059–0.061 first—that was the October 4 high, where old resistance could turn into support. If it drops to 0.0515–0.0555, I’ll add more; that range lines up with the October 5 low and the October 9 launch point. A daily close below 0.048 would mean losing the starting point of the whole rally, so I’d admit I was wrong and exit. On a rebound, I’d first watch 0.0726 (today’s high), then the platform around 0.085, and finally the spike to 0.0987 on voting day.
A token that’s just been cut in half can be highly volatile, so keep your position size small. If you want to follow the vote results, tap $STRK to watch the market. Do you think that after the 22nd, this will be a “sell the news” event or the start of a second rally?
Checking the gainers and losers on Sunday night, the biggest drop among the top Binance spot tokens by trading volume is $STRK : it’s at 0.0622 now, down 13.5% in 24 hours. From 0.1265 on October 11, it’s already been cut in half.
Let’s recap the past two weeks. In early October, it was still languishing around 0.043. Then the post-quantum narrative took off, and it nearly tripled in eight days. On the 15th, StarkWare officially opened a governance vote, asking STRK stakers and delegates whether Starknet should move from an Ethereum L2 to an independent post-quantum L1. Note that the vote is non-binding; even if it passes, it would only kick off research. STRK would remain the token, and the bridge to Ethereum wouldn’t close. The same day also coincided with a routine unlock of 127 million tokens, so after spiking to 0.0987 on voting day, the price was pushed back down.
This afternoon, StarkWare’s official account posted an update: 99.95% of the voting power cast so far is in favor. The vote runs for seven days and is expected to end around the 22nd. Starknet isn’t the only one riding the quantum narrative, either. This week, Google’s quantum team announced that it had achieved “magic-state cultivation” on its Willow chip, reducing the error rate by 40 times.
My take is that most of the froth has been squeezed out. It’s now only 45% above where the rally began, but the narrative isn’t dead yet, and there’ll probably be another wave of sentiment around the vote result. I’m not chasing it. I’ll place a small order at 0.059–0.061 first—that was the October 4 high, where old resistance could turn into support. If it drops to 0.0515–0.0555, I’ll add more; that range lines up with the October 5 low and the October 9 launch point. A daily close below 0.048 would mean losing the starting point of the whole rally, so I’d admit I was wrong and exit. On a rebound, I’d first watch 0.0726 (today’s high), then the platform around 0.085, and finally the spike to 0.0987 on voting day.
A token that’s just been cut in half can be highly volatile, so keep your position size small. If you want to follow the vote results, tap $STRK to watch the market. Do you think that after the 22nd, this will be a “sell the news” event or the start of a second rally?
Let’s recap the past two weeks. In early October, it was still languishing around 0.043. Then the post-quantum narrative took off, and it nearly tripled in eight days. On the 15th, StarkWare officially opened a governance vote, asking STRK stakers and delegates whether Starknet should move from an Ethereum L2 to an independent post-quantum L1. Note that the vote is non-binding; even if it passes, it would only kick off research. STRK would remain the token, and the bridge to Ethereum wouldn’t close. The same day also coincided with a routine unlock of 127 million tokens, so after spiking to 0.0987 on voting day, the price was pushed back down.
This afternoon, StarkWare’s official account posted an update: 99.95% of the voting power cast so far is in favor. The vote runs for seven days and is expected to end around the 22nd. Starknet isn’t the only one riding the quantum narrative, either. This week, Google’s quantum team announced that it had achieved “magic-state cultivation” on its Willow chip, reducing the error rate by 40 times.
My take is that most of the froth has been squeezed out. It’s now only 45% above where the rally began, but the narrative isn’t dead yet, and there’ll probably be another wave of sentiment around the vote result. I’m not chasing it. I’ll place a small order at 0.059–0.061 first—that was the October 4 high, where old resistance could turn into support. If it drops to 0.0515–0.0555, I’ll add more; that range lines up with the October 5 low and the October 9 launch point. A daily close below 0.048 would mean losing the starting point of the whole rally, so I’d admit I was wrong and exit. On a rebound, I’d first watch 0.0726 (today’s high), then the platform around 0.085, and finally the spike to 0.0987 on voting day.
A token that’s just been cut in half can be highly volatile, so keep your position size small. If you want to follow the vote results, tap $STRK to watch the market. Do you think that after the 22nd, this will be a “sell the news” event or the start of a second rally?
37
·
--
Watching the market on a Sunday afternoon is pretty dull. BTC has been almost flat all day, while ETH and SOL are both slightly down. Among the top Binance spot pairs by trading volume, there aren’t many in the green—$HBAR is one of them: it’s at 0.0878 now, up 4.4% over 24 hours. The 1-hour candle at 2 p.m. pushed up to 0.0886, with volume more than double that of the previous few hours.
Why this one in particular? I looked into what Hedera has been up to this week and found a few things that can be verified. Money20/20 USA opens today in Las Vegas and runs through the 21st. Hedera has its own booth, plus a talk on the 20th. The payments-focused conference fits neatly with its focus on institutional payments and tokenization. On the 15th, its official account reposted a roundup from Token Relations: WISeKey and SpaceDev joined the governing council, and the cross-chain protocol CLPR was donated to open-source LF Decentralized Trust, part of the Linux Foundation. On-chain activity looks solid too: Chainspect reported 856,000 transactions settled on the 14th, making it the busiest day of the week.
Still, keep things in perspective: the long, high-volume candle on September 28 spiked to 0.131, and the price is still more than 30% below that high. October has mostly been a steady slide, with a low of 0.0800 on the 15th.
My approach: start with a small position around 0.0855–0.0870, the consolidation area before today’s breakout. Add more on a pullback to 0.0805–0.0825, near the lows from the 15th and yesterday. If the daily candle closes below 0.0795, I’ll admit I’m wrong. On the upside, I’m watching 0.0895 first (the high from the 13th); if it breaks through, then 0.095 and the 0.100–0.104 consolidation zone from early October.
With the broader market subdued, it’s posting gains against the trend just as a payments conference gets underway. Whether it can make a sustained move depends on whether volume picks up over the next few days. If you want to follow along, keep an eye on $HBAR —and manage your own position size.
Watching the market on a Sunday afternoon is pretty dull. BTC has been almost flat all day, while ETH and SOL are both slightly down. Among the top Binance spot pairs by trading volume, there aren’t many in the green—$HBAR is one of them: it’s at 0.0878 now, up 4.4% over 24 hours. The 1-hour candle at 2 p.m. pushed up to 0.0886, with volume more than double that of the previous few hours.
Why this one in particular? I looked into what Hedera has been up to this week and found a few things that can be verified. Money20/20 USA opens today in Las Vegas and runs through the 21st. Hedera has its own booth, plus a talk on the 20th. The payments-focused conference fits neatly with its focus on institutional payments and tokenization. On the 15th, its official account reposted a roundup from Token Relations: WISeKey and SpaceDev joined the governing council, and the cross-chain protocol CLPR was donated to open-source LF Decentralized Trust, part of the Linux Foundation. On-chain activity looks solid too: Chainspect reported 856,000 transactions settled on the 14th, making it the busiest day of the week.
Still, keep things in perspective: the long, high-volume candle on September 28 spiked to 0.131, and the price is still more than 30% below that high. October has mostly been a steady slide, with a low of 0.0800 on the 15th.
My approach: start with a small position around 0.0855–0.0870, the consolidation area before today’s breakout. Add more on a pullback to 0.0805–0.0825, near the lows from the 15th and yesterday. If the daily candle closes below 0.0795, I’ll admit I’m wrong. On the upside, I’m watching 0.0895 first (the high from the 13th); if it breaks through, then 0.095 and the 0.100–0.104 consolidation zone from early October.
With the broader market subdued, it’s posting gains against the trend just as a payments conference gets underway. Whether it can make a sustained move depends on whether volume picks up over the next few days. If you want to follow along, keep an eye on $HBAR —and manage your own position size.
Why this one in particular? I looked into what Hedera has been up to this week and found a few things that can be verified. Money20/20 USA opens today in Las Vegas and runs through the 21st. Hedera has its own booth, plus a talk on the 20th. The payments-focused conference fits neatly with its focus on institutional payments and tokenization. On the 15th, its official account reposted a roundup from Token Relations: WISeKey and SpaceDev joined the governing council, and the cross-chain protocol CLPR was donated to open-source LF Decentralized Trust, part of the Linux Foundation. On-chain activity looks solid too: Chainspect reported 856,000 transactions settled on the 14th, making it the busiest day of the week.
Still, keep things in perspective: the long, high-volume candle on September 28 spiked to 0.131, and the price is still more than 30% below that high. October has mostly been a steady slide, with a low of 0.0800 on the 15th.
My approach: start with a small position around 0.0855–0.0870, the consolidation area before today’s breakout. Add more on a pullback to 0.0805–0.0825, near the lows from the 15th and yesterday. If the daily candle closes below 0.0795, I’ll admit I’m wrong. On the upside, I’m watching 0.0895 first (the high from the 13th); if it breaks through, then 0.095 and the 0.100–0.104 consolidation zone from early October.
With the broader market subdued, it’s posting gains against the trend just as a payments conference gets underway. Whether it can make a sustained move depends on whether volume picks up over the next few days. If you want to follow along, keep an eye on $HBAR —and manage your own position size.
29
·
--
This week I went through Chainlink’s official account, and four concrete integrations popped up in two days. Meanwhile, $LINK is still hovering around $12; yesterday’s daily candle closed at 11.986.
Let’s focus on the solid stuff. On October 15, Lido launched direct L2 staking: you can stake ETH with a few clicks on Arbitrum, Base, Linea, and Optimism, without bridging back to mainnet yourself. CCIP powers it under the hood. That same day, Chainlink Data Feeds and Data Streams went live on Stellar. On October 16, Japan’s Pacific Meta announced a strategic partnership with Chainlink, naming CCIP its preferred cross-chain solution and integrating the compliance engine ACE into its platform. Also that day, Gravity designated CCIP as the official cross-chain channel for its L1 mainnet, with WETH and USDC already able to move both ways. In addition, LINK was on the list of assets Charles Schwab plans to launch by year-end in its October 15 fall business update.
These things won’t turn into buying pressure overnight, but they’re being used for real—not just sitting in a PowerPoint.
The market is cold: Binance spot is at 12.02, down 2.4% over 24 hours, with volume around $16 million. That’s a long way from the $126 million volume spike on September 28, and the price is now almost 24% below the September 29 high of 15.78.
My plan: start with a small position at 11.80–12.05; yesterday’s wick dipped to 11.74 just below that range. I’ll save some firepower to add at 11.05–11.40, the consolidation zone before the mid-September rally. Last time I put my stop at 11.90. This time I’m taking a longer-term view, and I’ll admit I’m wrong if the daily candle closes below 10.60 (the September 16 low), so my position is lighter than last time. First, I’m watching 12.78, the high from the 16th; then 13.20–13.50, the area where price got knocked down on the 12th and 13th.
Which do you think is more valuable: the Japanese institutional partnership or something immediately usable like Lido? If you want to follow along, just tap $LINK to check the chart.
This week I went through Chainlink’s official account, and four concrete integrations popped up in two days. Meanwhile, $LINK is still hovering around $12; yesterday’s daily candle closed at 11.986.
Let’s focus on the solid stuff. On October 15, Lido launched direct L2 staking: you can stake ETH with a few clicks on Arbitrum, Base, Linea, and Optimism, without bridging back to mainnet yourself. CCIP powers it under the hood. That same day, Chainlink Data Feeds and Data Streams went live on Stellar. On October 16, Japan’s Pacific Meta announced a strategic partnership with Chainlink, naming CCIP its preferred cross-chain solution and integrating the compliance engine ACE into its platform. Also that day, Gravity designated CCIP as the official cross-chain channel for its L1 mainnet, with WETH and USDC already able to move both ways. In addition, LINK was on the list of assets Charles Schwab plans to launch by year-end in its October 15 fall business update.
These things won’t turn into buying pressure overnight, but they’re being used for real—not just sitting in a PowerPoint.
The market is cold: Binance spot is at 12.02, down 2.4% over 24 hours, with volume around $16 million. That’s a long way from the $126 million volume spike on September 28, and the price is now almost 24% below the September 29 high of 15.78.
My plan: start with a small position at 11.80–12.05; yesterday’s wick dipped to 11.74 just below that range. I’ll save some firepower to add at 11.05–11.40, the consolidation zone before the mid-September rally. Last time I put my stop at 11.90. This time I’m taking a longer-term view, and I’ll admit I’m wrong if the daily candle closes below 10.60 (the September 16 low), so my position is lighter than last time. First, I’m watching 12.78, the high from the 16th; then 13.20–13.50, the area where price got knocked down on the 12th and 13th.
Which do you think is more valuable: the Japanese institutional partnership or something immediately usable like Lido? If you want to follow along, just tap $LINK to check the chart.
Let’s focus on the solid stuff. On October 15, Lido launched direct L2 staking: you can stake ETH with a few clicks on Arbitrum, Base, Linea, and Optimism, without bridging back to mainnet yourself. CCIP powers it under the hood. That same day, Chainlink Data Feeds and Data Streams went live on Stellar. On October 16, Japan’s Pacific Meta announced a strategic partnership with Chainlink, naming CCIP its preferred cross-chain solution and integrating the compliance engine ACE into its platform. Also that day, Gravity designated CCIP as the official cross-chain channel for its L1 mainnet, with WETH and USDC already able to move both ways. In addition, LINK was on the list of assets Charles Schwab plans to launch by year-end in its October 15 fall business update.
These things won’t turn into buying pressure overnight, but they’re being used for real—not just sitting in a PowerPoint.
The market is cold: Binance spot is at 12.02, down 2.4% over 24 hours, with volume around $16 million. That’s a long way from the $126 million volume spike on September 28, and the price is now almost 24% below the September 29 high of 15.78.
My plan: start with a small position at 11.80–12.05; yesterday’s wick dipped to 11.74 just below that range. I’ll save some firepower to add at 11.05–11.40, the consolidation zone before the mid-September rally. Last time I put my stop at 11.90. This time I’m taking a longer-term view, and I’ll admit I’m wrong if the daily candle closes below 10.60 (the September 16 low), so my position is lighter than last time. First, I’m watching 12.78, the high from the 16th; then 13.20–13.50, the area where price got knocked down on the 12th and 13th.
Which do you think is more valuable: the Japanese institutional partnership or something immediately usable like Lido? If you want to follow along, just tap $LINK to check the chart.
43
·
--
In three days, Solana is getting a new “heart.”
On October 16, Anza officially called on mainnet validators to upgrade to Agave v4.3.2. Alpenglow will activate at epoch 1064, around October 21 at 15:00 UTC—that’s around 11 p.m. Tuesday Beijing time. Yesterday, core developer Brennan Watt added: the test cluster migration succeeded; all systems go. Put simply, it replaces TowerBFT consensus and cuts transaction finality from over 12 seconds to around 150 milliseconds. For latency-sensitive use cases like payments, on-chain order matching, and market making, that’s a generational leap.
Meanwhile, Binance announced at 10 a.m. today that it has opened up an API for SOL staking through Earn, allowing quant traders and institutions to stake programmatically.
But the market is calm—almost too calm: $SOL is hovering around 103.7, with 24-hour trading volume at 110 million U. It’s been grinding within a 100.6–107.4 range since the 13th, and U.S. spot ETFs saw net outflows of $9.82 million on October 15. Good news is lining up, but the price hasn’t run ahead. That kind of expectation gap is exactly where I’d be willing to build a position.
My plan: scale in between 101 and 103.5; this morning’s wick down to 101.25 is a useful reference. If it breaks lower, I’ll wait for 97–99 to add again—that’s above the mid-September low of 95.8. If the daily close falls below 95.5, I’ll admit I’m wrong and exit. On the upside, I’m first watching the range high at 107.4; if it breaks through on strong volume, next up is 113.4, then around 120. There’ll likely be plenty of back-and-forth on the upgrade day as traders “sell the news,” so don’t chase with a full position.
Do you think Alpenglow is a “sell the news” event, or the start of a new run? Tap $SOL below to see the live chart, or tap the trade card to get in.
In three days, Solana is getting a new “heart.”
On October 16, Anza officially called on mainnet validators to upgrade to Agave v4.3.2. Alpenglow will activate at epoch 1064, around October 21 at 15:00 UTC—that’s around 11 p.m. Tuesday Beijing time. Yesterday, core developer Brennan Watt added: the test cluster migration succeeded; all systems go. Put simply, it replaces TowerBFT consensus and cuts transaction finality from over 12 seconds to around 150 milliseconds. For latency-sensitive use cases like payments, on-chain order matching, and market making, that’s a generational leap.
Meanwhile, Binance announced at 10 a.m. today that it has opened up an API for SOL staking through Earn, allowing quant traders and institutions to stake programmatically.
But the market is calm—almost too calm: $SOL is hovering around 103.7, with 24-hour trading volume at 110 million U. It’s been grinding within a 100.6–107.4 range since the 13th, and U.S. spot ETFs saw net outflows of $9.82 million on October 15. Good news is lining up, but the price hasn’t run ahead. That kind of expectation gap is exactly where I’d be willing to build a position.
My plan: scale in between 101 and 103.5; this morning’s wick down to 101.25 is a useful reference. If it breaks lower, I’ll wait for 97–99 to add again—that’s above the mid-September low of 95.8. If the daily close falls below 95.5, I’ll admit I’m wrong and exit. On the upside, I’m first watching the range high at 107.4; if it breaks through on strong volume, next up is 113.4, then around 120. There’ll likely be plenty of back-and-forth on the upgrade day as traders “sell the news,” so don’t chase with a full position.
Do you think Alpenglow is a “sell the news” event, or the start of a new run? Tap $SOL below to see the live chart, or tap the trade card to get in.
On October 16, Anza officially called on mainnet validators to upgrade to Agave v4.3.2. Alpenglow will activate at epoch 1064, around October 21 at 15:00 UTC—that’s around 11 p.m. Tuesday Beijing time. Yesterday, core developer Brennan Watt added: the test cluster migration succeeded; all systems go. Put simply, it replaces TowerBFT consensus and cuts transaction finality from over 12 seconds to around 150 milliseconds. For latency-sensitive use cases like payments, on-chain order matching, and market making, that’s a generational leap.
Meanwhile, Binance announced at 10 a.m. today that it has opened up an API for SOL staking through Earn, allowing quant traders and institutions to stake programmatically.
But the market is calm—almost too calm: $SOL is hovering around 103.7, with 24-hour trading volume at 110 million U. It’s been grinding within a 100.6–107.4 range since the 13th, and U.S. spot ETFs saw net outflows of $9.82 million on October 15. Good news is lining up, but the price hasn’t run ahead. That kind of expectation gap is exactly where I’d be willing to build a position.
My plan: scale in between 101 and 103.5; this morning’s wick down to 101.25 is a useful reference. If it breaks lower, I’ll wait for 97–99 to add again—that’s above the mid-September low of 95.8. If the daily close falls below 95.5, I’ll admit I’m wrong and exit. On the upside, I’m first watching the range high at 107.4; if it breaks through on strong volume, next up is 113.4, then around 120. There’ll likely be plenty of back-and-forth on the upgrade day as traders “sell the news,” so don’t chase with a full position.
Do you think Alpenglow is a “sell the news” event, or the start of a new run? Tap $SOL below to see the live chart, or tap the trade card to get in.
54
·
--
News that a bank had integrated RLUSD into its core system dominated X for two days, but $XRP didn’t seem impressed: the 4-hour candle from 4 to 8 a.m. today plunged to 1.2701, its lowest level since September 16. It’s now around 1.294, down 1.1% over 24 hours, with $53 million in trading volume.
Let’s get the facts straight. On October 15, Cross River, a U.S. bank that provides infrastructure for a range of fintech companies, announced a partnership with Ripple to add RLUSD to its core system and support transactions on the XRP Ledger. Customers can use a single API to move between dollars and RLUSD, with both listed alongside ACH and wire transfers in the same menu, and settlements available 24/7. RLUSD’s market cap has topped $2.5 billion, with more than $1 billion issued on the XRPL.
I see two things here. First, this isn’t exclusive: USDC was already listed on Cross River’s website, so RLUSD is simply a second option. Second, it’s currently available only in some states. So this gives the XRPL another real-world payments channel; it’s not the kind of catalyst that will send people rushing to buy spot tomorrow. The price continued to slide after the news broke, suggesting short-term holders are still selling and that the story will take time to play out.
I’m not chasing it. I’d place a small order in the 1.27–1.29 range (covering this morning’s lower wick and the October 15 low of 1.284). If it sweeps the September 16 low at 1.2468, I’d add another tranche around 1.245–1.26. If the daily candle closes below 1.23, I’d admit I was wrong and exit. For a rebound, I’d watch the 24-hour high at 1.3126 first, then 1.3534 from October 16. Only after it moves back above that would I start thinking about 1.43.
Do you think news like a bank adding RLUSD can eventually feed through to the token’s price? Tap the $XRP trading widget in the post and make up your own mind by looking at the order book.
News that a bank had integrated RLUSD into its core system dominated X for two days, but $XRP didn’t seem impressed: the 4-hour candle from 4 to 8 a.m. today plunged to 1.2701, its lowest level since September 16. It’s now around 1.294, down 1.1% over 24 hours, with $53 million in trading volume.
Let’s get the facts straight. On October 15, Cross River, a U.S. bank that provides infrastructure for a range of fintech companies, announced a partnership with Ripple to add RLUSD to its core system and support transactions on the XRP Ledger. Customers can use a single API to move between dollars and RLUSD, with both listed alongside ACH and wire transfers in the same menu, and settlements available 24/7. RLUSD’s market cap has topped $2.5 billion, with more than $1 billion issued on the XRPL.
I see two things here. First, this isn’t exclusive: USDC was already listed on Cross River’s website, so RLUSD is simply a second option. Second, it’s currently available only in some states. So this gives the XRPL another real-world payments channel; it’s not the kind of catalyst that will send people rushing to buy spot tomorrow. The price continued to slide after the news broke, suggesting short-term holders are still selling and that the story will take time to play out.
I’m not chasing it. I’d place a small order in the 1.27–1.29 range (covering this morning’s lower wick and the October 15 low of 1.284). If it sweeps the September 16 low at 1.2468, I’d add another tranche around 1.245–1.26. If the daily candle closes below 1.23, I’d admit I was wrong and exit. For a rebound, I’d watch the 24-hour high at 1.3126 first, then 1.3534 from October 16. Only after it moves back above that would I start thinking about 1.43.
Do you think news like a bank adding RLUSD can eventually feed through to the token’s price? Tap the $XRP trading widget in the post and make up your own mind by looking at the order book.
Let’s get the facts straight. On October 15, Cross River, a U.S. bank that provides infrastructure for a range of fintech companies, announced a partnership with Ripple to add RLUSD to its core system and support transactions on the XRP Ledger. Customers can use a single API to move between dollars and RLUSD, with both listed alongside ACH and wire transfers in the same menu, and settlements available 24/7. RLUSD’s market cap has topped $2.5 billion, with more than $1 billion issued on the XRPL.
I see two things here. First, this isn’t exclusive: USDC was already listed on Cross River’s website, so RLUSD is simply a second option. Second, it’s currently available only in some states. So this gives the XRPL another real-world payments channel; it’s not the kind of catalyst that will send people rushing to buy spot tomorrow. The price continued to slide after the news broke, suggesting short-term holders are still selling and that the story will take time to play out.
I’m not chasing it. I’d place a small order in the 1.27–1.29 range (covering this morning’s lower wick and the October 15 low of 1.284). If it sweeps the September 16 low at 1.2468, I’d add another tranche around 1.245–1.26. If the daily candle closes below 1.23, I’d admit I was wrong and exit. For a rebound, I’d watch the 24-hour high at 1.3126 first, then 1.3534 from October 16. Only after it moves back above that would I start thinking about 1.43.
Do you think news like a bank adding RLUSD can eventually feed through to the token’s price? Tap the $XRP trading widget in the post and make up your own mind by looking at the order book.
81
·
--
The most noteworthy thing about Ethereum over the past couple of days isn’t really the price—it’s the pace of development. Researcher Francesco D'Amato published a long post on October 16: the Fast Confirmation Rule (FCR) has received a Lean machine-verified security proof. Under additional assumptions, this rule lets applications confirm blocks in about 24 seconds, instead of waiting around 13 minutes for finality—nearly 30 times faster. Even more impressive, the core verification work was completed in just 4–5 days, mostly by AI agents working autonomously. The team also applied the model to the upcoming Gloas changes and uncovered a fork-choice bug hidden in the spec. It’s now fixed. When the official @ethereum account reposted the news, it summed things up in one line: upgrades are getting faster, while the chain is getting less buggy.
My take is that FCR offers a tangible UX improvement for use cases that require confirmations, such as cross-chain bridges and exchange deposits. It also lends more weight to the idea of “L1 as the asset hub.” But the market hasn’t caught up yet: ETH is around 2425, down 1.6% over 24 hours, with 390 million USDT in trading volume. It dipped as low as 2393 in the early hours.
I’d scale in between 2395 and 2425. If it retests the lower wick at 2318 from October 15, I’d add another tranche between 2320 and 2350. If the 4-hour candle closes below 2300, I’d admit I’m wrong and exit for now. To the upside, I’d look first at the 24-hour high of 2480, then 2494; only after it holds above that would I consider 2580. Do you think this acceleration in development could show up in the price first? Tap the $ETH trading widget in the main post and see for yourself.
The most noteworthy thing about Ethereum over the past couple of days isn’t really the price—it’s the pace of development. Researcher Francesco D'Amato published a long post on October 16: the Fast Confirmation Rule (FCR) has received a Lean machine-verified security proof. Under additional assumptions, this rule lets applications confirm blocks in about 24 seconds, instead of waiting around 13 minutes for finality—nearly 30 times faster. Even more impressive, the core verification work was completed in just 4–5 days, mostly by AI agents working autonomously. The team also applied the model to the upcoming Gloas changes and uncovered a fork-choice bug hidden in the spec. It’s now fixed. When the official @ethereum account reposted the news, it summed things up in one line: upgrades are getting faster, while the chain is getting less buggy.
My take is that FCR offers a tangible UX improvement for use cases that require confirmations, such as cross-chain bridges and exchange deposits. It also lends more weight to the idea of “L1 as the asset hub.” But the market hasn’t caught up yet: ETH is around 2425, down 1.6% over 24 hours, with 390 million USDT in trading volume. It dipped as low as 2393 in the early hours.
I’d scale in between 2395 and 2425. If it retests the lower wick at 2318 from October 15, I’d add another tranche between 2320 and 2350. If the 4-hour candle closes below 2300, I’d admit I’m wrong and exit for now. To the upside, I’d look first at the 24-hour high of 2480, then 2494; only after it holds above that would I consider 2580. Do you think this acceleration in development could show up in the price first? Tap the $ETH trading widget in the main post and see for yourself.
My take is that FCR offers a tangible UX improvement for use cases that require confirmations, such as cross-chain bridges and exchange deposits. It also lends more weight to the idea of “L1 as the asset hub.” But the market hasn’t caught up yet: ETH is around 2425, down 1.6% over 24 hours, with 390 million USDT in trading volume. It dipped as low as 2393 in the early hours.
I’d scale in between 2395 and 2425. If it retests the lower wick at 2318 from October 15, I’d add another tranche between 2320 and 2350. If the 4-hour candle closes below 2300, I’d admit I’m wrong and exit for now. To the upside, I’d look first at the 24-hour high of 2480, then 2494; only after it holds above that would I consider 2580. Do you think this acceleration in development could show up in the price first? Tap the $ETH trading widget in the main post and see for yourself.
·
--
I only just realized after seeing @NEARProtocol’s official account: Helius CEO Mert has joined the NEAR Foundation Council—not as a nominal advisor, but as someone from governance bringing in one of the best infrastructure builders on the Solana side. That same day, Sunrise listed NEAR in its Solana-side market, using NEAR Intents for the bridge; the next day, even privacy coin ZEC took the same route. The price surged on the news to around 5.36, then pulled back to around 5.14, while 24-hour trading volume is still holding around 130 million USDT. What I’m more interested in is whether the pullback can hold: I’d watch for a potential entry in the 5.00–5.14 range; if it drops to 4.92–5.00, I’d consider adding another tranche. If the 1-hour candle closes below 4.85, I’d get out for now. To the upside, I’m watching 5.25 first, then today’s high at 5.36, and 5.50 beyond that. If you want to follow along, tap the trading widget in the post—$NEAR —and watch the chart.
I only just realized after seeing @NEARProtocol’s official account: Helius CEO Mert has joined the NEAR Foundation Council—not as a nominal advisor, but as someone from governance bringing in one of the best infrastructure builders on the Solana side. That same day, Sunrise listed NEAR in its Solana-side market, using NEAR Intents for the bridge; the next day, even privacy coin ZEC took the same route. The price surged on the news to around 5.36, then pulled back to around 5.14, while 24-hour trading volume is still holding around 130 million USDT. What I’m more interested in is whether the pullback can hold: I’d watch for a potential entry in the 5.00–5.14 range; if it drops to 4.92–5.00, I’d consider adding another tranche. If the 1-hour candle closes below 4.85, I’d get out for now. To the upside, I’m watching 5.25 first, then today’s high at 5.36, and 5.50 beyond that. If you want to follow along, tap the trading widget in the post—$NEAR —and watch the chart.
33
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Trending Topics
EarningsSeason
1.2M views
5,730 Discussing
Earnings Season Session 2: Tesla & Meta Earnings — All Eyes on Magnificent 7
Binance Square Official
·416 Likes
·696.1k views
JPMorganPredictsBitcoinBestPerformingAssetOverNextDecade
8,682 views
45 Discussing
InjectiveSignsMoUToMakeKRW1ExclusiveWonSettlementAsset
8,087 views
35 Discussing