Binance Square
0xMason
51 Posts

0xMason

前产品经理,现独立开发者,全职开发 AI 产品|手上在开的:U 卡、全球账户、AI 订阅支付、海外收款|只写自己开过的|X:@mason0x_
3 Following
0 Followers
1 Liked
Posts
·
--
See translation
传统信托拒接 Crypto 富豪:难的是资金来源,不是余额 钱包里有币,离岸信托照样能把你挡在门外。吴说转述《金融时报》:越来越多靠 Bitcoin 等攒下身家的人,想做税务和传承安排时,被传统受托机构直接拒绝。 他们怕的不是「你有钱」,是钱从哪来验不清、洗钱敞口、币价暴跌后受托责任、私钥丢了谁兜底。专门做数字资产的信托会上链分析、加码合规,主流那批仍宁可不接——怕哪天为来源或贬值背锅。 别把「身家够了」听成「信托窗口自动打开」。先把资金来源证据链备齐,比先约受托人电话有用。
传统信托拒接 Crypto 富豪:难的是资金来源,不是余额

钱包里有币,离岸信托照样能把你挡在门外。吴说转述《金融时报》:越来越多靠 Bitcoin 等攒下身家的人,想做税务和传承安排时,被传统受托机构直接拒绝。

他们怕的不是「你有钱」,是钱从哪来验不清、洗钱敞口、币价暴跌后受托责任、私钥丢了谁兜底。专门做数字资产的信托会上链分析、加码合规,主流那批仍宁可不接——怕哪天为来源或贬值背锅。

别把「身家够了」听成「信托窗口自动打开」。先把资金来源证据链备齐,比先约受托人电话有用。
See translation
PYUSDx 过了一亿:衍生币不是 PayPal 里能转的那种 一亿流水先上桌:PayPal、M0、MoonPay 把 PYUSDx 开成稳定币发行底层,Saturn / Concrete / Cap 首批项目累计处理已超 1 亿美元。 企业可以在 PYUSD 上挂自定义名字、收益分配、访问控制和跨链。听着像「PayPal 币开源了」,坑在后半句——PYUSDx 及其衍生代币不是 PayPal 或 Paxos 直接发的 PYUSD,目前也进不了 PayPal、Venmo 收发或支付。 名字带 x,不等于你钱包里那枚能直接刷。
PYUSDx 过了一亿:衍生币不是 PayPal 里能转的那种

一亿流水先上桌:PayPal、M0、MoonPay 把 PYUSDx 开成稳定币发行底层,Saturn / Concrete / Cap 首批项目累计处理已超 1 亿美元。

企业可以在 PYUSD 上挂自定义名字、收益分配、访问控制和跨链。听着像「PayPal 币开源了」,坑在后半句——PYUSDx 及其衍生代币不是 PayPal 或 Paxos 直接发的 PYUSD,目前也进不了 PayPal、Venmo 收发或支付。

名字带 x,不等于你钱包里那枚能直接刷。
Binance TradFi funding fee: from today, every 8 hours becomes every 4 hours For those TradFi perpetuals: in Taipei today, starting at 16:15, the funding fee frequency changes from once every 8 hours to once every 4 hours. Meituan, Kuaishou, Pop Mart, Tencent-related, plus the batch of USDⓈ-M TradFi contracts from Zhipu and MiniMax—also adjust the upper and lower limits together to ±1%. Previously, you could settle at most three times per day; now with a 4-hour schedule, you can settle six times per day. Don’t treat overnight positions under the old accounting rhythm. What’s even more complicated: these contracts are hard-coded—if the fee rate hits the top/bottom, it won’t automatically shrink back to a 1-hour interval. Don’t apply the “when it’s full, it changes the hour” experience from ordinary coin-margined perpetuals. Whether a region can be enabled depends on the App. $MEITUAN $TENCENT
Binance TradFi funding fee: from today, every 8 hours becomes every 4 hours

For those TradFi perpetuals: in Taipei today, starting at 16:15, the funding fee frequency changes from once every 8 hours to once every 4 hours.

Meituan, Kuaishou, Pop Mart, Tencent-related, plus the batch of USDⓈ-M TradFi contracts from Zhipu and MiniMax—also adjust the upper and lower limits together to ±1%. Previously, you could settle at most three times per day; now with a 4-hour schedule, you can settle six times per day. Don’t treat overnight positions under the old accounting rhythm.

What’s even more complicated: these contracts are hard-coded—if the fee rate hits the top/bottom, it won’t automatically shrink back to a 1-hour interval. Don’t apply the “when it’s full, it changes the hour” experience from ordinary coin-margined perpetuals. Whether a region can be enabled depends on the App.

$MEITUAN $TENCENT
Revolut×Visa France first: AI-enabled bill payment via Passkey — not yet available in the app Revolut and Visa have completed their first Passkey-based AI bill payment in France: Visa tested an agent, “My Agent,” which uses a French Revolut spending card to place an order with Cleverbridge. No card number was entered at checkout, and no OTP was prompted—payment goes through Visa Payment Passkey, with the same underlying Tokenization and real-time anti-fraud measures. Users must authorize in advance and set the payment boundaries; the issuing endpoint is still acknowledged by Revolut. Don’t read the news as “the app already lets AI charge your card.” The official wording is that it’s a controlled pilot—functionality hasn’t been enabled in the Revolut app yet. It bypasses the SCA challenge in Europe, but it doesn’t bypass prior authorization. “Can pay on your behalf” ≠ “already live for you to use.”
Revolut×Visa France first: AI-enabled bill payment via Passkey — not yet available in the app

Revolut and Visa have completed their first Passkey-based AI bill payment in France: Visa tested an agent, “My Agent,” which uses a French Revolut spending card to place an order with Cleverbridge.

No card number was entered at checkout, and no OTP was prompted—payment goes through Visa Payment Passkey, with the same underlying Tokenization and real-time anti-fraud measures. Users must authorize in advance and set the payment boundaries; the issuing endpoint is still acknowledged by Revolut.

Don’t read the news as “the app already lets AI charge your card.” The official wording is that it’s a controlled pilot—functionality hasn’t been enabled in the Revolut app yet. It bypasses the SCA challenge in Europe, but it doesn’t bypass prior authorization.

“Can pay on your behalf” ≠ “already live for you to use.”
SideSwap Recap: Automated peg-out, swapping 4000 L-BTC for real funds SideSwap’s own recap lays it out clearly: on September 6, an Elements consensus flaw minted roughly 4,000 uninsured L-BTC out of thin air. The other party then carried out a peg-out, and the Federation released about 3,996 BTC. The wallet’s private keys weren’t lost—rather, they were exposed by the operational design: the peg-out authorization key stayed online for the long term, payments were automatically pushed outward, and there were almost no restrictions on large amounts, frequency, or sources. The same recap also mentioned something even more striking: the vulnerability patch was written as early as August, but it only made it into the public repository on September 1—leaving enough of a window for people to rehearse more than 70 “dress rehearsal” transactions. Don’t interpret “non-custodial wallet is fine” as “the bridge can still routinely move in and out.” Liquid is still down; before peg is enabled, don’t assume redemption is available by default. Automated large-amount peg-outs are more jarring than even the vulnerability’s headline.
SideSwap Recap: Automated peg-out, swapping 4000 L-BTC for real funds

SideSwap’s own recap lays it out clearly: on September 6, an Elements consensus flaw minted roughly 4,000 uninsured L-BTC out of thin air. The other party then carried out a peg-out, and the Federation released about 3,996 BTC.

The wallet’s private keys weren’t lost—rather, they were exposed by the operational design: the peg-out authorization key stayed online for the long term, payments were automatically pushed outward, and there were almost no restrictions on large amounts, frequency, or sources. The same recap also mentioned something even more striking: the vulnerability patch was written as early as August, but it only made it into the public repository on September 1—leaving enough of a window for people to rehearse more than 70 “dress rehearsal” transactions.

Don’t interpret “non-custodial wallet is fine” as “the bridge can still routinely move in and out.” Liquid is still down; before peg is enabled, don’t assume redemption is available by default.

Automated large-amount peg-outs are more jarring than even the vulnerability’s headline.
OFAC flags new-coin guarantees: $24B in transaction flow—SafeW / NewPay both added to the list “New-coin guarantees” have been marked by OFAC as a major transnational criminal organization: on September 9, along with Singapore’s SafeW and Cambodia’s Anwen (XinbiPay / NewPay), they were added to the list. The Department of Justice, on the same day, seized the infrastructure and digital-asset wallet. According to the official stance, since around 2022 they have handled more than $24 billion worth of digital assets and fiat in total, mainly providing guarantee custodianship for fraud centers and money-laundering networks in Southeast Asia. Not long ago, USDT was frozen on-chain and deposits were diverted from the account to USDD—that was stablecoin risk control. This time is at the level of the U.S. SDN list: in principle, U.S. persons may not trade with them, and assets under the list that fall within U.S.-associated jurisdiction must be frozen. In March this year, the UK already took the first cut; this time, the U.S. is stepping up. Don’t take “switch to another guarantee group / switch to a different crypto chat app” as meaning you can keep taking the old route. Moving to SafeW itself is already written into the rationale for the sanctions. Whether you’re in the U.S. and whether the channel connects to the USD system determines whether you get stuck or not—I didn’t verify your account-opening side for you. If you need to change the guarantee outlet, first check the SDN list—don’t wait until your money is stuck in the middle and only then react.
OFAC flags new-coin guarantees: $24B in transaction flow—SafeW / NewPay both added to the list

“New-coin guarantees” have been marked by OFAC as a major transnational criminal organization: on September 9, along with Singapore’s SafeW and Cambodia’s Anwen (XinbiPay / NewPay), they were added to the list. The Department of Justice, on the same day, seized the infrastructure and digital-asset wallet. According to the official stance, since around 2022 they have handled more than $24 billion worth of digital assets and fiat in total, mainly providing guarantee custodianship for fraud centers and money-laundering networks in Southeast Asia.

Not long ago, USDT was frozen on-chain and deposits were diverted from the account to USDD—that was stablecoin risk control. This time is at the level of the U.S. SDN list: in principle, U.S. persons may not trade with them, and assets under the list that fall within U.S.-associated jurisdiction must be frozen. In March this year, the UK already took the first cut; this time, the U.S. is stepping up.

Don’t take “switch to another guarantee group / switch to a different crypto chat app” as meaning you can keep taking the old route. Moving to SafeW itself is already written into the rationale for the sanctions. Whether you’re in the U.S. and whether the channel connects to the USD system determines whether you get stuck or not—I didn’t verify your account-opening side for you.

If you need to change the guarantee outlet, first check the SDN list—don’t wait until your money is stuck in the middle and only then react.
$LAPTOP Dropped by ~99.5%: The peak FDV isn’t money you can actually get out That $LAPTOP from Hunter Biden—after going live for only a few hours, it fell from the highs by about 99.5%: GMGN reported around $1.6, and the peak had been over three hundred. On Base, there’s a 1 billion supply. In media narratives, peak FDV can be hyped up to the trillion level, looking like a blue-chip—but it’s basically a multiplication trick of price × total supply. Market makers like GSR / G20 / Wintermute together only grabbed about 2.3% of the supply, and on-chain you can already see Wintermute dumping. Don’t mistake “peak FDV” for “there’s that much real cash sitting in the pool you can sell.” Concentrated supply + celebrity meme—exiting liquidity isn’t the same as that string of zeros. Watch the show. Don’t use real gold as a voting booth.
$LAPTOP Dropped by ~99.5%: The peak FDV isn’t money you can actually get out

That $LAPTOP from Hunter Biden—after going live for only a few hours, it fell from the highs by about 99.5%: GMGN reported around $1.6, and the peak had been over three hundred.

On Base, there’s a 1 billion supply. In media narratives, peak FDV can be hyped up to the trillion level, looking like a blue-chip—but it’s basically a multiplication trick of price × total supply. Market makers like GSR / G20 / Wintermute together only grabbed about 2.3% of the supply, and on-chain you can already see Wintermute dumping.

Don’t mistake “peak FDV” for “there’s that much real cash sitting in the pool you can sell.” Concentrated supply + celebrity meme—exiting liquidity isn’t the same as that string of zeros.

Watch the show. Don’t use real gold as a voting booth.
Consensys splits into two: MetaMask stays independent, Linea remains Consensys will split itself into two entities: the existing entity will rebrand under the MetaMask banner, with Lubin serving as Chairman and CEO; the part dealing with protocol and institutional infrastructure (including Linea) will be spun off into a separate company, still called Consensys, with Mike Kriak as CEO, while Lubin will only hold the position of Executive Chairman. The official statement is very direct: the applications, assets, private keys, and access permissions in your wallet remain unchanged—you don’t need to click any confirmation on your end. The split is expected to be finalized by the end of the year, and then the two companies will operate independently. Don’t interpret this as “an upgrade today will require you to migrate your wallet.” What’s being separated is the corporate shell and reporting lines, not on-chain accounts. Lubin also wouldn’t share any IPO timetable in person—don’t treat the split as a countdown to going public. Your wallet will open as usual; don’t assume the corporate filing forms are a market catalyst yet.
Consensys splits into two: MetaMask stays independent, Linea remains

Consensys will split itself into two entities: the existing entity will rebrand under the MetaMask banner, with Lubin serving as Chairman and CEO; the part dealing with protocol and institutional infrastructure (including Linea) will be spun off into a separate company, still called Consensys, with Mike Kriak as CEO, while Lubin will only hold the position of Executive Chairman.

The official statement is very direct: the applications, assets, private keys, and access permissions in your wallet remain unchanged—you don’t need to click any confirmation on your end. The split is expected to be finalized by the end of the year, and then the two companies will operate independently.

Don’t interpret this as “an upgrade today will require you to migrate your wallet.” What’s being separated is the corporate shell and reporting lines, not on-chain accounts. Lubin also wouldn’t share any IPO timetable in person—don’t treat the split as a countdown to going public.

Your wallet will open as usual; don’t assume the corporate filing forms are a market catalyst yet.
SkyAI Nearly 10% of Shareholders: All Five Directors Vote WITHHOLD A shareholder group holding about 9.99% has already filed a Schedule 13D: at the annual meeting, they plan to elect those five incumbent directors and vote all WITHHOLD ALL. The issues raised by Bastion / Lucio aren’t just that the share price looks bad. In the 13D, they allege the poison pill was adopted without a shareholder vote, the bylaws were amended to weaken written-consent rights, and they also point to related-party transactions involving entities connected to directors’ family members. The PIPE deal of roughly $400 million closed in August 2025; at the time, the narrative was about the Solana treasury. Now, nearly 10% of the shareholders are first moving on board seats—not again urging people to buy more SOL. Don’t take this as, “If the treasury-story shares fall, then you should buy more.” WITHHOLD doesn’t mean replacing the entire slate immediately. Until the annual meeting results come out, this is still about taking a stance; warrants are also capped at 9.99% beneficial ownership, so anyone looking to add more would have to first get through that door. Once the treasury story is done, governance provisions are the next page to turn. $SOL
SkyAI Nearly 10% of Shareholders: All Five Directors Vote WITHHOLD

A shareholder group holding about 9.99% has already filed a Schedule 13D: at the annual meeting, they plan to elect those five incumbent directors and vote all WITHHOLD ALL.

The issues raised by Bastion / Lucio aren’t just that the share price looks bad. In the 13D, they allege the poison pill was adopted without a shareholder vote, the bylaws were amended to weaken written-consent rights, and they also point to related-party transactions involving entities connected to directors’ family members. The PIPE deal of roughly $400 million closed in August 2025; at the time, the narrative was about the Solana treasury. Now, nearly 10% of the shareholders are first moving on board seats—not again urging people to buy more SOL.

Don’t take this as, “If the treasury-story shares fall, then you should buy more.” WITHHOLD doesn’t mean replacing the entire slate immediately. Until the annual meeting results come out, this is still about taking a stance; warrants are also capped at 9.99% beneficial ownership, so anyone looking to add more would have to first get through that door.

Once the treasury story is done, governance provisions are the next page to turn.

$SOL
Bolivia Can’t Get US Dollars: How Stablecoins Quietly Bypass SWIFT Bolivian importers at bank counters often “can’t get” enough US dollars they need. This route of paying Chinese suppliers has been blocked for a long time. The solution described by Forbes is a bit convoluted: El Dorado’s corporate accounts appear to send money out via SWIFT / ACH, but behind the scenes, a layer of stablecoin orchestration connects the liquidity. What the customer sees is a remittance, not an internal wallet transfer. Santa Cruz has also opened a physical office, because for large orders someone has to handle the document checks in person. The website says it can reach more than 120 countries, including China and Hong Kong, and that MT103 can be used to clear customs. Don’t take it as “just open a U wallet and you can do foreign trade.” This is enterprise account opening, compliance paperwork, and orchestration on a per-transaction basis; local banks’ USDT counters are usually still limited to business days. For retail users trying to use a cross-border remittance app—there’s no gap as wide as you might hope. In places where US dollars are tight, stablecoins act first like pipes, and only then do you get to the narrative. $BTC {spot}(BTCUSDT)
Bolivia Can’t Get US Dollars: How Stablecoins Quietly Bypass SWIFT

Bolivian importers at bank counters often “can’t get” enough US dollars they need. This route of paying Chinese suppliers has been blocked for a long time.

The solution described by Forbes is a bit convoluted: El Dorado’s corporate accounts appear to send money out via SWIFT / ACH, but behind the scenes, a layer of stablecoin orchestration connects the liquidity. What the customer sees is a remittance, not an internal wallet transfer. Santa Cruz has also opened a physical office, because for large orders someone has to handle the document checks in person. The website says it can reach more than 120 countries, including China and Hong Kong, and that MT103 can be used to clear customs.

Don’t take it as “just open a U wallet and you can do foreign trade.” This is enterprise account opening, compliance paperwork, and orchestration on a per-transaction basis; local banks’ USDT counters are usually still limited to business days. For retail users trying to use a cross-border remittance app—there’s no gap as wide as you might hope.

In places where US dollars are tight, stablecoins act first like pipes, and only then do you get to the narrative.

$BTC
India REC tokenized corporate bonds: sandbox launch nearly an eightfold oversubscription Indian state-owned power finance company REC has just issued a tokenized corporate bond worth about INR 5 billion inside the SEBI sandbox. According to CNBC: subscribed by roughly INR 7.96 billion—nearly eight times; coupon rate 7.30%; tenor 1 year and 9 months. The full process—payment on the day, allocation, and listing—was completed in one go, with listings on both NSE and BSE. Settlement uses atomicized bond payments against cash, and holdings are recorded on the Demat 2.0 licensed ledger system—not some blockchain wallet you can just connect to. Don’t interpret it as “anyone can buy bonds on-chain.” This is a regulatory sandbox pilot—an institutional-investor pathway. The payment leg also has to be tied to a wholesale digital rupee wallet approved by the Reserve Bank of India. Retail accounts and casual cross-border participation—this door hasn’t been opened for you. Settlement speed does improve, that’s true; whether open trading becomes available remains another question. $BTC {spot}(BTCUSDT)
India REC tokenized corporate bonds: sandbox launch nearly an eightfold oversubscription

Indian state-owned power finance company REC has just issued a tokenized corporate bond worth about INR 5 billion inside the SEBI sandbox.

According to CNBC: subscribed by roughly INR 7.96 billion—nearly eight times; coupon rate 7.30%; tenor 1 year and 9 months. The full process—payment on the day, allocation, and listing—was completed in one go, with listings on both NSE and BSE. Settlement uses atomicized bond payments against cash, and holdings are recorded on the Demat 2.0 licensed ledger system—not some blockchain wallet you can just connect to.

Don’t interpret it as “anyone can buy bonds on-chain.” This is a regulatory sandbox pilot—an institutional-investor pathway. The payment leg also has to be tied to a wholesale digital rupee wallet approved by the Reserve Bank of India. Retail accounts and casual cross-border participation—this door hasn’t been opened for you.

Settlement speed does improve, that’s true; whether open trading becomes available remains another question.

$BTC
Citi Japan’s Tokenized Deposits for Corporate Clients: Five Country Corridors Go Live by Year-End In an interview with Nikkei, Shamil Khairek, Global Head of the Service Department, said that foreign banks are offering this setup to Japanese corporate clients for the first time. The corridors will first be implemented on Citi’s own network—U.S., U.K., Singapore, Hong Kong, and Ireland—so foreign currencies can also be transferred even at night on weekends. Already running is Citi Token Services, with daily tokenized deposit volume at roughly the order of one billion dollars. By comparison, the broader market sees about six trillion dollars in average daily fund flow—don’t mix up these two figures. This isn’t like setting up a stablecoin wallet for you. The deposit remains on the bank’s ledger; companies simply tick “Use Token Service” in their online banking instructions—they don’t have to manage on-chain addresses themselves. Individual accounts still can’t access this door. Cross-institution interoperability is also still being built out with SWIFT and The Clearing House—don’t take it as “all banks everywhere can store and remit using the network.” For corporate clients, within the Citi ecosystem, and by year-end—only when all three line up does this count as real news. $BTC {spot}(BTCUSDT)
Citi Japan’s Tokenized Deposits for Corporate Clients: Five Country Corridors Go Live by Year-End

In an interview with Nikkei, Shamil Khairek, Global Head of the Service Department, said that foreign banks are offering this setup to Japanese corporate clients for the first time. The corridors will first be implemented on Citi’s own network—U.S., U.K., Singapore, Hong Kong, and Ireland—so foreign currencies can also be transferred even at night on weekends. Already running is Citi Token Services, with daily tokenized deposit volume at roughly the order of one billion dollars. By comparison, the broader market sees about six trillion dollars in average daily fund flow—don’t mix up these two figures.

This isn’t like setting up a stablecoin wallet for you. The deposit remains on the bank’s ledger; companies simply tick “Use Token Service” in their online banking instructions—they don’t have to manage on-chain addresses themselves. Individual accounts still can’t access this door. Cross-institution interoperability is also still being built out with SWIFT and The Clearing House—don’t take it as “all banks everywhere can store and remit using the network.”

For corporate clients, within the Citi ecosystem, and by year-end—only when all three line up does this count as real news.

$BTC
Binance CRMB / HIMSB: Spot at 8:00 PM tonight; collateral is enabled too, but you can’t borrow Two bStocks, CRMB and HIMSB. Spot trading opens in Taipei tonight at 20:00. At the same time, they can be used as collateral, but you can’t borrow against them. Salesforce (CRMB) and Hims & Hers (HIMSB) list on Binance spot for USDT: zero trading fees within the first hour after Convert opens. Maker fees are waived until September 30. Withdrawals need to wait until 21:00 in Taipei. Add these two coins to the collateral whitelist under “full position / unified account.” It’s the same 20:00 announcement. Officially it’s fixed: borrowing is not supported for now. Only VIP 3 and above are eligible, and the region also needs to be enabled in the app. bStocks are not the actual shares; the ADGM prospectus line means US users simply can’t sell. Titles love to say “collateral-eligible,” but the three lines—“can’t borrow,” “VIP thresholds block it,” and “not holdings”—are often what get overwritten. Check your own account first, then rush in. $CRMB $HIMSB {spot}(HIMSBUSDT)
Binance CRMB / HIMSB: Spot at 8:00 PM tonight; collateral is enabled too, but you can’t borrow

Two bStocks, CRMB and HIMSB. Spot trading opens in Taipei tonight at 20:00. At the same time, they can be used as collateral, but you can’t borrow against them.

Salesforce (CRMB) and Hims & Hers (HIMSB) list on Binance spot for USDT: zero trading fees within the first hour after Convert opens. Maker fees are waived until September 30. Withdrawals need to wait until 21:00 in Taipei.

Add these two coins to the collateral whitelist under “full position / unified account.” It’s the same 20:00 announcement. Officially it’s fixed: borrowing is not supported for now. Only VIP 3 and above are eligible, and the region also needs to be enabled in the app. bStocks are not the actual shares; the ADGM prospectus line means US users simply can’t sell.

Titles love to say “collateral-eligible,” but the three lines—“can’t borrow,” “VIP thresholds block it,” and “not holdings”—are often what get overwritten. Check your own account first, then rush in.

$CRMB $HIMSB
India targeted 15 overseas platforms: even unregistered ones can be held in custody A single notice targeted 15 overseas platforms and also demanded the removal of their apps. On Tuesday, India’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU-IND), under Article 13 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, issued compliance notices to 15 companies including Weex, Blofin, Pionex, ChangeNow, and XT.com. The list also includes common gateways such as DigiFinex, Toobit, and Fixedfloat. The action taken: as an IT law node officer, it required the relevant apps/URLs to be taken off India’s public internet. Don’t interpret it as “only Indian companies are fined.” Whether obligations apply is determined by whether the business serves users in India—not by whether the overseas entity has an office set up locally. Binance has already been registered and still received a penalty on the order of about 1.8 billion rupees; this time, the spotlight is on the group that provides services to Indian customers despite not being registered. You’re not in India—don’t treat “it can be downloaded and installed” as something that will always keep working. $BTC {spot}(BTCUSDT)
India targeted 15 overseas platforms: even unregistered ones can be held in custody

A single notice targeted 15 overseas platforms and also demanded the removal of their apps.

On Tuesday, India’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU-IND), under Article 13 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, issued compliance notices to 15 companies including Weex, Blofin, Pionex, ChangeNow, and XT.com. The list also includes common gateways such as DigiFinex, Toobit, and Fixedfloat. The action taken: as an IT law node officer, it required the relevant apps/URLs to be taken off India’s public internet.

Don’t interpret it as “only Indian companies are fined.” Whether obligations apply is determined by whether the business serves users in India—not by whether the overseas entity has an office set up locally. Binance has already been registered and still received a penalty on the order of about 1.8 billion rupees; this time, the spotlight is on the group that provides services to Indian customers despite not being registered. You’re not in India—don’t treat “it can be downloaded and installed” as something that will always keep working.

$BTC
Alby Hub (old version) exposed: touching the management API on the public internet is dangerous If the old Hub with a public-facing management API is accessible from the public internet, money may be stolen. Alby official: v1.7.0–v1.18.5 (packages before August 2025) has a critical vulnerability; if an attacker can reach the management interface, they can make unauthorized transfers. v1.19.0 (2025-08-29) is not affected. It is currently recommended to upgrade to the latest v1.24.0. At least one person is already known to have been targeted. It’s not that installing the Hub means you’ll be compromised. The condition is that the old version is still reachable from the public internet. If it’s on a private network + NWC, you don’t need to expose a management port to the outside. After upgrading, remember to change the unlock password—don’t only click update. $BTC {spot}(BTCUSDT)
Alby Hub (old version) exposed: touching the management API on the public internet is dangerous

If the old Hub with a public-facing management API is accessible from the public internet, money may be stolen.

Alby official: v1.7.0–v1.18.5 (packages before August 2025) has a critical vulnerability; if an attacker can reach the management interface, they can make unauthorized transfers. v1.19.0 (2025-08-29) is not affected. It is currently recommended to upgrade to the latest v1.24.0. At least one person is already known to have been targeted.

It’s not that installing the Hub means you’ll be compromised. The condition is that the old version is still reachable from the public internet. If it’s on a private network + NWC, you don’t need to expose a management port to the outside. After upgrading, remember to change the unlock password—don’t only click update.

$BTC
Hackers returned 3,400 BTC: left 598.5 behind, while the bridge still has funds waiting They repaid 3,400 BTC, keeping nearly 600 for themselves. This isn’t free security auditing. On September 6, about 4,000 BTC-worth in reserves on the Liquid sidechain were drained (back then roughly in the three-hundred-million USD range): it wasn’t a leaked key. Instead, an Elements range-proof cache vulnerability was exploited to mint uncollateralized L-BTC, then peg-out to convert it into real BTC. The self-proclaimed whitehat posted on-chain: “Fix the bug first.” After the bridge nodes applied the patch, on the 7th, 3,400 BTC flowed back into the federal wallet, with about 598.5 BTC still sitting in the address. The sidechain is still running. L-BTC deposits and withdrawals on exchanges are still paused; other Liquid assets like USDT weren’t touched. Your mainnet BTC is fine—don’t interpret a sidechain freeze as Bitcoin being “dead.” Whether the remaining 15% counts as a settled bounty is unclear; the on-chain message wasn’t written clearly. $BTC {spot}(BTCUSDT)
Hackers returned 3,400 BTC: left 598.5 behind, while the bridge still has funds waiting

They repaid 3,400 BTC, keeping nearly 600 for themselves. This isn’t free security auditing.

On September 6, about 4,000 BTC-worth in reserves on the Liquid sidechain were drained (back then roughly in the three-hundred-million USD range): it wasn’t a leaked key. Instead, an Elements range-proof cache vulnerability was exploited to mint uncollateralized L-BTC, then peg-out to convert it into real BTC. The self-proclaimed whitehat posted on-chain: “Fix the bug first.” After the bridge nodes applied the patch, on the 7th, 3,400 BTC flowed back into the federal wallet, with about 598.5 BTC still sitting in the address.

The sidechain is still running. L-BTC deposits and withdrawals on exchanges are still paused; other Liquid assets like USDT weren’t touched. Your mainnet BTC is fine—don’t interpret a sidechain freeze as Bitcoin being “dead.” Whether the remaining 15% counts as a settled bounty is unclear; the on-chain message wasn’t written clearly.

$BTC
22-year-old mastermind admits: one phone call, 4,100+ BTC Impersonating Google and Gemini customer support, one phone call siphoned away more than 4,100 bitcoins. AP: Singaporean Malone Lam (22) on September 8 pleaded guilty to RICO conspiracy in a federal court in Washington. Prosecutors say that in August 2024, his co-conspirators posed as customer service, tricking a Washington-area coin holder into handing over their Google drive and verification code, and transferring the entire haul away. In the same case, 18 people have been charged; he is the 11th to plead. Another hearing on December 8 will set the sentencing schedule, with a maximum of 20 years. Pleading guilty doesn’t mean the coins come back. The court may issue a restitution order, but what’s on-chain may not be recoverable along the original path; the second you blurt out the verification code, even a hardware wallet can’t stop it.
22-year-old mastermind admits: one phone call, 4,100+ BTC

Impersonating Google and Gemini customer support, one phone call siphoned away more than 4,100 bitcoins.

AP: Singaporean Malone Lam (22) on September 8 pleaded guilty to RICO conspiracy in a federal court in Washington. Prosecutors say that in August 2024, his co-conspirators posed as customer service, tricking a Washington-area coin holder into handing over their Google drive and verification code, and transferring the entire haul away. In the same case, 18 people have been charged; he is the 11th to plead. Another hearing on December 8 will set the sentencing schedule, with a maximum of 20 years.

Pleading guilty doesn’t mean the coins come back. The court may issue a restitution order, but what’s on-chain may not be recoverable along the original path; the second you blurt out the verification code, even a hardware wallet can’t stop it.
New-coin collateral: USDT froze, and the deposit channel switched to USDD After more than 40 million USDT was frozen, the new-coin collateral had not yet wrapped up; the deposit channel switched to USDD. Wu Shuo interviewed Bitrace: On September 8, a newly enabled business address was frozen again. About 1.8 million USDT was transferred out in advance, leaving only about 37,800 to be “cut”; afterward, transactions on-chain began testing USDD inflows and outflows. Other reports said they announced they would only accept deposits to addresses related to USDD. JustLend and jUSDT were also named as being used as a bridge at one point. A USDT blacklist isn’t a total shutdown. The issuer can control its own coins, but can’t stop people from switching to another stablecoin route to keep transferring. Don’t hear “frozen another batch” and interpret it as “this operation is finished”—that judgment is too early.
New-coin collateral: USDT froze, and the deposit channel switched to USDD

After more than 40 million USDT was frozen, the new-coin collateral had not yet wrapped up; the deposit channel switched to USDD.

Wu Shuo interviewed Bitrace: On September 8, a newly enabled business address was frozen again. About 1.8 million USDT was transferred out in advance, leaving only about 37,800 to be “cut”; afterward, transactions on-chain began testing USDD inflows and outflows. Other reports said they announced they would only accept deposits to addresses related to USDD. JustLend and jUSDT were also named as being used as a bridge at one point.

A USDT blacklist isn’t a total shutdown. The issuer can control its own coins, but can’t stop people from switching to another stablecoin route to keep transferring. Don’t hear “frozen another batch” and interpret it as “this operation is finished”—that judgment is too early.
Iran export receivables go through USDT: sources say it has become normalized Iranian export receivables being routed through USDT has already become “normalized” in the mouths of informed sources—not the kind of narrative associated with small-time black markets. FT reports that: sanctions are keeping things tight; the central bank has loosened its foreign-exchange channels in recent months, encouraging exporters to bring the money back home via channels such as crypto. Companies can use USDT or BTC within Iran, with USDT used more often. TRM’s figures: in 2025, the size of crypto transactions within Iran was close to $10 billion. The central bank has not publicly responded. The catch is this: it’s a secondary account plus input from insiders, not something you can open and copy in a compliant cross-border setup. USDT freezes and address-based sanctions are also not new. Don’t take “the national teams are using it” as meaning “ordinary people can copy the assignment.”
Iran export receivables go through USDT: sources say it has become normalized

Iranian export receivables being routed through USDT has already become “normalized” in the mouths of informed sources—not the kind of narrative associated with small-time black markets.

FT reports that: sanctions are keeping things tight; the central bank has loosened its foreign-exchange channels in recent months, encouraging exporters to bring the money back home via channels such as crypto. Companies can use USDT or BTC within Iran, with USDT used more often. TRM’s figures: in 2025, the size of crypto transactions within Iran was close to $10 billion. The central bank has not publicly responded.

The catch is this: it’s a secondary account plus input from insiders, not something you can open and copy in a compliant cross-border setup. USDT freezes and address-based sanctions are also not new. Don’t take “the national teams are using it” as meaning “ordinary people can copy the assignment.”
Aptos testnet will be wiped periodically: the mainnet stays put, but contracts need redeploying After the Aptos testnet’s 10 billion transactions have rolled over, AIP-147 has already been Accepted—going forward, the testnet will be cleared back to genesis as needed. Hard rules: at most once every six months; each time,公告 must be made at least one month in advance; the mainnet and Devnet remain unchanged. When the wipe happens, contracts, test accounts, balances, and historical data are all gone—so you’ll need redeployment. To stay close to real data, just use Forklift to fork the mainnet locally. Wu said he wrote the first reset date as October 7; the official X post and the AIP only pinned down a “notification window of about one month after acceptance.” Let policy take effect first—don’t treat third-party dates as the mainnet liquidation schedule, and don’t assume it’s an immutable calendar.
Aptos testnet will be wiped periodically: the mainnet stays put, but contracts need redeploying

After the Aptos testnet’s 10 billion transactions have rolled over, AIP-147 has already been Accepted—going forward, the testnet will be cleared back to genesis as needed.

Hard rules: at most once every six months; each time,公告 must be made at least one month in advance; the mainnet and Devnet remain unchanged. When the wipe happens, contracts, test accounts, balances, and historical data are all gone—so you’ll need redeployment. To stay close to real data, just use Forklift to fork the mainnet locally.

Wu said he wrote the first reset date as October 7; the official X post and the AIP only pinned down a “notification window of about one month after acceptance.” Let policy take effect first—don’t treat third-party dates as the mainnet liquidation schedule, and don’t assume it’s an immutable calendar.
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs