Comparison of NOT Staking Returns: Which Platform is More Cost-Effective? @The Notcoin Official

#Notcoin ($NOT ) is a popular token in the TON ecosystem, and its staking returns vary significantly due to different platform mechanisms. Below is a comparison of returns and risk analysis for mainstream platforms:

1. Centralized Exchanges (CEX)

• Binance: Offers flexible NOT staking options with an annualized return rate of approximately 5%-7%, supporting both flexible and fixed-term lock-ups, but be aware that platform fees (about 15%-20%) will reduce actual returns.

• OKX: Slightly lower returns (4%-6%), but withdrawal speed is faster, suitable for short-term capital allocation.

• Huobi HTX: Recently launched staking borrowing 2.0 service, supports multi-currency joint staking, with NOT annualized returns of up to 6%-8%, and borrowing rates as low as 0.09%, suitable for leveraged strategy users.

2. Decentralized Platforms (DeFi)

• In the TON ecosystem protocols: Such as STON.fi or DeDust, $NOT staking annualized returns can reach 8%-12%, but it requires bearing the risks of smart contracts and market volatility.

• Liquid staking protocols: TON versions similar to Lido (such as Bifrost), providing secondary liquidity for staking tokens (like vDOT), with annualized returns of 7%-10%, but penetration rate is low (only 3%), posing risks of an immature ecological development.

3. Self-Built Nodes

High technical threshold, requires starting from 320,000 $NOT (approximately 6400 USD), with annualized returns of 10%-15%, all profits belong to oneself, but faces operational costs and penalty risks.

Comprehensive Recommendations

• Small investors: Preferably choose Binance or OKX to balance returns and security.

• Long-term holders: May try DeFi protocols within the TON ecosystem, but need to diversify risks.

• Institutions or large holders: Build self-nodes or use Huobi HTX's multi-currency staking to maximize capital efficiency.

Risk Warning

Price fluctuations of NOT may offset staking returns, and some platforms have lock-up periods or KYC restrictions, so liquidity should be reserved to respond to unexpected demands.