When writing articles, it is essential that the meanings of the words correspond with the historical context at the time of referencing them in the future; only then can they be considered correct.
On BTC, starting from July 31, the mention of the event on the 1st led to a decline and the establishment of a new consolidation range.
As of now, reviewing historical articles and trends aligns perfectly.
From the new consolidation range line chart, it can be seen that the lowest price from the short-selling on the 3rd that did not materialize is the starting low point of the range, up to the current pressure line of the range, and it was mentioned on the 8th that after four o'clock in the morning, a consolidation peak should be established. Now, it can be seen that after four o'clock, the consolidation peak began to decline.
A: Why do my articles have to wait until after events occur for most people to understand them?
Q: This is because most people use their own expectations of the market to interpret the articles. Rather than demanding facts.
A: So why can I not understand the beginning of the article, yet understand it after the event has occurred?
Q: Clearly, the article remains unchanged, indicating that what has changed is your own thought process and sensory logic, which is a double standard.
If you do not practice writing future articles, how will you realize that your thoughts are extremely inconsistent with reality?