Sometimes, we match our own understanding in our minds when reading articles to assess their accuracy, but we fail to realize that we haven't even read the article clearly.
Here, there is only a pure translation of the main points. I also belong to those who interpret the main information; the main players do not care who understands their meaning. The trends we encounter afterwards are also facts created by the main players beforehand. When we mistakenly interpret an article, we do not examine whether we misunderstood it regarding future trends, and we even use our understanding to persuade others.
So, this is a problem between ourselves and others, unrelated to the main players, because future trends continue to prove the main players correct over time, as they are the ones making the moves, while the readers never verify their own understanding.
When one wants to use their incorrectly understood perception to convince others that the article is wrong, that is their own issue, unrelated to the main players and the article. Each person's position is not my profit value.
If you want to save some money, you have to compensate with your own understanding. When your understanding is incorrect, you bear the risk yourself.