The Essential Difference Between Cutting Leeks and Planting Leeks

Every time I see discussions about domestic projects and overseas projects, I find them particularly interesting.

There is a strange phenomenon in the industry now—whenever people hear that a project is from a domestic team, retail investors run away faster than rabbits. As a result, many domestic project parties now have to hire a foreigner as a front, fearing being labeled as "domestic scissors."

In the end, this is not a nationality issue but a problem of the founders' mindset. Many domestic project leaders, although now dressed in suits and frequenting high-end venues, still cannot change that mindset of "saving wherever possible, cutting wherever possible." It's like those retired old officials who, despite being wealthy, will haggle for half a dime when buying groceries. As soon as a project shows some promise, they rush to harvest without even pretending to care about the optics, and it's no wonder their reputation suffers.

In contrast, many overseas projects have founders who grew up in an environment rich in resources, receiving gifts hand over fist during Christmas, and inherently understand the principle of "give first, then take."

They do airdrops with real money, and their price increases are not about crashing the market with a big red candlestick but about slowly building an ecosystem, allowing more people to participate. This "planting leeks" mentality is starkly different from the "cutting leeks" tactics of domestic projects.

However, this gap cannot be changed overnight. After all, it takes three generations to cultivate a noble, and our crypto industry has only developed for a few years.

Only when domestic project parties learn to "fish for big catches with long lines" can they truly earn the market's respect.

#美国加征关税 #下一任美联储主席人选 #香港稳定币新规 $BTC

Strong recovery, asset doubling! Follow @比特财经 closely, lay out in advance, and easily achieve great returns.