#Bitcoin

Geopolitical Events Are Just Noise in the Long-Term Trend

If you think new WW3 fears will be the end of crypto, you are mistaken.

What do we see on the chart: Every red arrow marks a major war event since 2022. The pattern is crystal clear: Bitcoin doesn't care about your geopolitical FUD.

Sure, we get temporary dips. Markets react to headlines. Fear drives short-term volatility. But every single "world-ending" event becomes just a small blip on the larger trend.

The Ukraine war? Bitcoin went from 35k to 105k. And so on.

Historically, wars have had an impact on markets, for sure. But often it was just the effect of a strong economic crisis that resulted in war. Even after WW2, markets recovered quickly and went on to new highs.

Here's what really happens during these events: retail panics and sells, institutions accumulate. Market makers force liquidations to grab liquidity. While everyone's doom-scrolling Twitter about WW3, smart money is quietly buying the dip.

They know that territorial conflicts, missile strikes, and geopolitical tensions are temporary noise in a deflationary asset's long-term trajectory.

Even if we get a correction from current levels, this won't be the end. It will be used by big addresses to accumulate at better prices while retail capitulates on fear headlines.

Note: This post is merely descriptive and does not aim to seek blame or take sides in any territorial conflicts. It simply illustrates the historical relationship between geopolitical events and Bitcoin's price action for educational purposes.