openAI

A U.S. court has opened the door to one of the most high-profile tech legal battles. Elon Musk can now move forward with his lawsuit against OpenAI, accusing the company of deceiving him about its nonprofit status. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers upheld Musk’s fraud allegations but dismissed other claims, including racketeering and false advertising.

🔹 Musk’s Claim: “OpenAI Misled Me”
Musk, one of OpenAI’s co-founders and early donors—contributing around $45 million—claims he was misled into believing the company would remain nonprofit and open-source. Instead, he argues, OpenAI secretly planned to transition into a for-profit business, contradicting its original mission to develop AI “for the benefit of humanity.”
“They convinced me to fund a nonprofit, but behind the scenes, they were preparing to turn it into a money-making machine,” Musk claims.

The judge agreed that Musk’s fraud allegations were plausible enough to move forward, stating that he presented sufficient evidence suggesting the company may have acted unethically to raise capital for a for-profit model.

❌ Dismissed: Racketeering, False Advertising, and Contract Breach
On the other hand, the court dismissed Musk’s racketeering charges under the RICO Act, citing a lack of concrete evidence. Claims of deceptive advertising and breach of an express contract were also rejected. The emails Musk provided were ruled insufficient to prove a binding agreement.
However, the court acknowledged the possibility of an implied agreement, based on the behavior and expectations shared between the parties involved.

🔄 OpenAI’s Counterclaim: Musk Is Sabotaging Our Restructuring
Meanwhile, OpenAI has filed a counter-lawsuit accusing Musk of deliberately obstructing its corporate restructuring, which is estimated to be worth nearly $100 billion.
The centerpiece is Musk’s February 2024 bid to acquire OpenAI for $97.375 billion. OpenAI dismissed the offer as fraudulent and strategic, claiming it was designed to gain access to internal information and derail the restructuring. According to the company, none of the investors listed in Musk’s letter conducted due diligence, and one even admitted that Musk planned to obtain internal data through legal action.
“Musk is no longer affiliated with OpenAI and now runs a rival AI company, xAI. This lawsuit is just a tool to stop our progress,” OpenAI argues.

⏳ Deadline Pressure
OpenAI is racing against the clock: it must complete its restructuring by the end of 2025, or risk losing major funding. SoftBank, one of its major backers, has pledged $30 billion—but warned it would withdraw at least $10 billion if the process isn’t finished on time.

📌 Summary:
Elon Musk is allowed to move forward with his fraud lawsuit against OpenAI, while other claims were thrown out. OpenAI, in turn, is fighting back with a counterclaim, alleging that Musk is sabotaging its future. At stake: the future of one of the most powerful AI labs on the planet—and tens of billions of dollars.

#ElonMusk , #OpenAI , #SamAltman , #ArtificialInteligence , #worldnews

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

The U.S. federal antitrust trial is heating up, and at the center of the storm is one of the most widely used digital tools in the world – Google Chrome. According to Gabriel Weinberg, CEO of rival search engine DuckDuckGo, Chrome could be worth up to $50 billion if a court forces Google to sell it. 💥

🔹 The trial: The U.S. Department of Justice, along with a coalition of states, argues that Google holds an illegal monopoly over online search, and the most radical – yet most effective – solution could be to separate Chrome from the rest of the company.

🔹 Potential buyers are already interested: AI-driven companies like OpenAI and Perplexity have already expressed interest in acquiring Chrome if it hits the market. OpenAI, for example, currently uses Microsoft’s Bing to fetch search results for its chatbot ChatGPT.

🔹 Weinberg’s estimate: During the hearing, DuckDuckGo’s CEO estimated Chrome’s value based on its massive user base and global reach. While calling it a “back-of-the-envelope” estimate, he suggested the browser could fetch as much as $50 billion – far exceeding a previous valuation of $20 billion by Bloomberg analyst Mandeep Singh.

🔹 Google pushes back: Alphabet, Google’s parent company, is not voluntarily offering Chrome for sale and plans to appeal any ruling that finds it guilty of maintaining a monopoly.

🔹 AI as the new weapon in the search war: U.S. prosecutors argue that Google’s dominance in search also gives it an unfair advantage in artificial intelligence, allowing it to steer users back toward its main advertising business. Tools like Google Gemini could further entrench this dominance.

🔹 Tensions with OpenAI: Court documents revealed that Google rejected OpenAI’s request for access to its search API. According to emails presented during the hearing, Google declined the request in August, citing concerns that the deal would “involve too many competitors.” OpenAI responded that access to the API would help it “deliver a better product” to users.

What Happens Next?
Judge Amit Mehta is currently weighing possible remedies – from minor product adjustments to the drastic step of forcing Chrome’s sale. His decision, expected later this year, could determine whether one of the world’s most popular internet gateways stays under Google’s roof or finds a new owner. 🌐

#Google , #AI , #OpenAI , #Technology , #Gemini

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

Summary: According to Odaily, in the ongoing antitrust lawsuit filed by the U.S. Department of Justice against Google, OpenAI's ChatGPT product head, Nick Turley, has expressed interest in acquiring the Chrome browser if the court orders its sale. The Department of Justice accuses Google of maintaining its monopoly in the search market through default search agreements and the Chrome browser, suggesting the divestiture of Chrome as a potential remedy. Turley noted that integrating ChatGPT with Chrome could enhance the user experience and expand the product's influence. Currently, OpenAI is challenging Google's dominance in search with products like ChatGPT Search.