on-chain

When I look back on the early days of Ethereum scaling research, one thing becomes clear #Vitalik-Buterin's had a deep, genuine admiration for Plasma. To be honest it’s easy to see why. @Plasma was not just another Layer-2 idea it represented an entirely new way of thinking about blockchain architecture. It took Ethereum’s core values decentralization, security, user sovereignty and attempted to scale them without compromise. In a world where blockchains were struggling under their own weight, Plasma felt like a breath of fresh air, a bold step into the future of trust-minimized computation.

To understand why Vitalik loved Plasma you have to understand what Ethereum was facing at the time. The network was growing quickly. Gas costs were rising. Congestion was becoming a real threat to usability. People were experimenting with high-volume applications like gaming, payments, and decentralized marketplaces, but Ethereum couldn’t support the throughput required. Increasing the block size or modifying core consensus rules would have made the network more centralized, weakening its security. That was never an option.

Vitalik has always been vocal about preserving decentralization and keeping Ethereum accessible to anyone who wants to participate, whether they’re running a node or building on top of the protocol. Plasma aligned perfectly with this philosophy. Instead of stuffing more transactions into Ethereum blocks, Plasma shifted the heavy lifting off-chain while still allowing users to rely on Ethereum as the ultimate source of truth.

That idea offloading execution while maintaining trustlessness was the heart of Plasma’s appeal. The architecture created a layered system of child chains, each capable of processing massive numbers of transactions independently. These chains only needed to interact with Ethereum to commit state roots or facilitate exits. Everything else happened off-chain. This drastically reduced the burden on the mainnet, enabling a theoretical future where Ethereum could support millions of transactions per second across a network of interconnected Plasma chains.

Vitalik’s excitement came from the fact that Plasma offered a way to scale without violating Ethereum’s core principles. There was no need to trust a centralized operator. Users were not locked into a system with no escape. Fraud proofs and exit games were embedded directly into the design, giving people a safe pathway back to Ethereum if anything went wrong. This ensured that even if a Plasma operator behaved maliciously, users could still recover their funds by submitting cryptographic evidence on-chain.

This user escape hatch was a big reason Vitalik championed Plasma. It embodied the ethos of don’t trust verify. If a child chain failed, collapsed, or was attacked, users were not at risk of losing their assets forever. Ethereum was still their safety net.

Another reason Vitalik appreciated Plasma was its modularity. Plasma chains could be specialized for different use cases. One chain might be optimized for fast payments. Another for gaming. Another for supply chain tracking or identity systems. This was not just scaling it was ecosystem expansion. Plasma hinted at a world where Ethereum was not one monolithic network but a constellation of interconnected Layer-2s, each designed with purpose.

This vision was far ahead of its time. Today’s rollup-centric roadmap echoes the very ideas Plasma popularized years earlier. Sequencers, fraud proofs, state roots, and permissionless exits all of these concepts trace their origins to Plasma’s foundational research.

Vitalik loved Plasma because it proved something critical Ethereum could scale trustlessly without compromising decentralization. It challenged the notion that speed and user safety were mutually exclusive. Plasma argued that you could have both if you designed the architecture correctly.

It also represented a more decentralized world. Instead of a single, congested global chain, Plasma imagined a multi-layer system reminiscent of the early days of the internet. Local networks handled their own workloads while relying on a broader backbone for verification and security. This structure allowed innovation to flourish at the edges while keeping the core protocol stable and robust.

Vitalik also loved Plasma because it exposed the right problems. Even though Plasma was brilliant, it wasn’t perfect. Data availability issues made certain workflows risky. The exit game became increasingly complex as developers attempted to optimize it. Some use cases required full transaction data to be posted #On-chain , which Plasma did not provide. Rather than viewing these flaws as failures, Vitalik saw them as opportunities challenges that pushed the research community forward.

In a way Plasma was a necessary stepping stone. It paved the road for what would eventually become optimistic rollups and zk-rollups. Both of these solutions learned from Plasma’s successes and limitations. Rollups adopted its fraud-proof model but brought data availability on-chain. zk-rollups took the security guarantees even further with validity proofs. Without Plasma, the evolution of Layer-2 scaling might have taken far longer.

Why did Vitalik love Plasma? Because it captured the essence of Ethereum’s mission scale responsibly, protect users, and innovate boldly. Plasma wasn’t just a technical design. It was a philosophy, a statement that Ethereum didn’t have to sacrifice its integrity to grow.

Even today, as the ecosystem shifts toward rollups, the spirit of Plasma still shines through. Every time we talk about trust-minimized exits, commitment schemes, or off-chain execution, we were standing on the foundation Plasma built. And that’s the reason Vitalik loved Plasma not because it was perfect, but because it was transformative.

@Plasma
#Plasma
$XPL

When I look at the evolving structure of the decentralized economy, it’s impossible not to recognize how INJ positions itself as one of the most important base assets powering the next generation of financial infrastructure. INJ is not a typical ecosystem token it behaves more like the economic engine of an entire #On-chain financial universe. What makes this especially fascinating is that Injective was designed from the ground up for the real demands of modern finance speed, transparency, interoperability, and composability. INJ serves as the connective tissue that holds all of those components together.

What strikes me most is how @Injective engineered INJ to be fundamental, not optional. On many chains, native tokens serve primarily as gas assets with inflated narratives attached. But on Injective, INJ is woven into the protocol’s core mechanics in ways that directly reinforce network security, liquidity depth, governance participation, and long-term economic sustainability. This makes INJ one of the few assets in the industry with intrinsic demand driven by actual protocol-level activity rather than pure speculation.

One of the clearest examples of this is Injective’s burn auction design. Instead of relying on arbitrary emissions or inflation, Injective introduced a mechanism where protocol fees are systematically collected and the auction proceeds are used to purchase and burn INJ from the open market. This transforms every market created, every derivative traded, and every dApp deployed into a value-capturing event for INJ holders. I see this as one of the most elegant tokenomic structures in DeFi economic growth of the ecosystem translates directly into long-term scarcity of the native asset. Few networks offer such a clean alignment between activity and token sustainability.

Another reason INJ feels foundational is its role in governance. Injective’s decentralized governance model isn’t symbolic it actively shapes how markets evolve, how parameters are set, and how new protocol features are deployed. INJ holders effectively become the architects of the ecosystem, deciding how Injective scales and which innovations take priority. The ability to influence a chain designed specifically for advanced financial products perpetuals, spot markets, orderbook trading, synthetics, predictions gives governance participants far more meaningful influence than governance frameworks on general-purpose chains.

INJ plays an essential part in securing the network. With its high-performance, PoS-based architecture, Injective relies on validators to maintain integrity and decentralization. INJ staking not only reinforces this security but also generates recurring demand as more validators and delegators join the network. This creates a reinforcing loop: as Injective grows, participation grows as participation grows, security and decentralization strengthen, which in turn attracts more liquidity, developers, and institutional-grade applications.

Another dimension often overlooked is Injective’s position within the wider interchain environment. Injective’s deep integration with Cosmos IBC allows it to channel liquidity across multiple ecosystems, while also supporting Ethereum-based assets and beyond. INJ becomes the native asset inside a network that can freely interact with dozens of blockchains, enabling cross-chain finance that simply isn’t achievable elsewhere with the same level of speed and trustlessness. In this sense, INJ is not just foundational to Injective’s economy it is foundational to the multi-chain financial fabric emerging across Web3.

When I think about the future of decentralized economies, I imagine systems where liquidity moves seamlessly, markets are created without permission, and financial innovation is not hindered by legacy infrastructure. Injective is building that world piece by piece, and INJ is the asset that binds it all together. It represents security, governance, incentive alignment, value capture, and cross-chain interoperability all the essential pillars of a modern, decentralized economy.

INJ is not merely a token within an ecosystem it is the foundation upon which Injective’s new financial architecture is being built. As the ecosystem expands, its role as a core economic primitive only becomes more undeniable.
@Injective
#injective
$INJ

When I look at @Injective I don’t just see a blockchain. I see a blueprint for where finance is headed. The entire Injective ecosystem radiates a sense of purpose like it knows exactly what it wants to become and is quietly building toward that future with precision. And at the heart of that evolution sits INJ, the token that binds it all together. To me owning or supporting INJ is more than participating in yet another crypto project it feels like placing a strategic bet on the future of global finance itself, one that’s becoming harder to ignore by the day.

If you spend enough time observing the shifts happening across traditional markets, decentralized finance, and the broader digital economy, you start to notice a pattern. The world is moving toward systems that are faster, more transparent, and more open. Legacy institutions can’t keep up because they were not designed for the pace or complexity of modern financial interactions. Injective, however, was engineered precisely for this new era, and INJ is the essential fuel powering that transition.

What makes Injective so compelling is how naturally it fits into the future of markets. Traditional financial rails rely on intermediaries, clearing houses, custodians, and an army of gatekeepers. These structures slow everything down and add layers of fees, dependence, and restrictions. Injective flips that model entirely. It removes the central bottlenecks and replaces them with a trustless, high-performance network that settles trades in milliseconds and charges practically nothing.

This is not just faster it’s transformative. The traditional system cannot offer this experience. Even other blockchains struggle to deliver this consistency because they were not built specifically for financial optimization. Injective is different. Its entire architecture the orderbook module, the MEV resistance, the oracle integrations, the cross-chain interoperability is designed to support complex financial applications that operate like well-oiled machines. INJ, in this context, becomes the heartbeat of a network poised to become the new financial infrastructure.

When you think about the future of finance, what do you see? Markets that move instantly. Borders that don’t block capital. Assets that can be traded by anyone, from anywhere. Products that are designed not by banks but by developers with creativity and vision. Injective captures that entire picture and INJ is the incentive layer that makes it possible.

One of the most compelling aspects of Injective is how much real usage the network already generates. Many projects promise the future, but Injective delivers it now. Derivatives platforms built on Injective process real volume. Structured product protocols attract liquidity. AI-driven financial tools launch on the network, leveraging its speed and efficiency. Prediction markets, #On-chain CFDs, advanced #DEXs , and yield platforms all of these exist within Injective’s ecosystem today. INJ is at the center of these applications, providing governance, economic alignment, and transactional utility.

This level of diversity within the ecosystem is what makes Injective so resilient and such a promising long-term bet. The network is not dependent on one category or trend. Instead, it enables builders to create whatever the market demands, whether that’s cutting-edge trading tools or groundbreaking financial primitives. The more the ecosystem expands, the more intrinsic demand is generated for INJ. Unlike inflationary models where more usage means more token emissions, Injective’s deflationary system tightens supply as usage grows.

The weekly burn auctions are a powerful example of this alignment. Every week, protocol fees from real applications are collected and used to buy back and burn INJ. This makes INJ one of the few tokens whose supply decreases as the network thrives. It’s not promises it’s on-chain math. Investors and participants can literally verify the burn, witness the supply reduction, and observe how activity in the ecosystem directly benefits the token itself. When you consider this mechanism in a future where Injective continues to attract more builders, more trading volume, and more users, the long-term value proposition becomes incredibly compelling.

Interoperability also plays a major role in why INJ represents a bet on the future. Finance is not meant to be siloed. Liquidity naturally wants to move, to connect, to interact across systems. Injective’s interchain capabilities position it as a financial highway a place where assets from different chains meet, trade, and flow freely. This exposes Injective to users and assets from across the broader crypto universe, not just its native ecosystem. The cross-chain movement of value is one of the biggest themes shaping the future of markets, and Injective is already architected for it.

What truly elevates Injective and by extension, INJ is its commitment to fairness. This might sound subtle, but it’s arguably one of the most important characteristics a future financial system must have. MEV exploitation is one of the biggest threats in decentralized finance. Injective neutralizes it at the protocol level. That means no sandwich attacks, no predatory behavior, no invisible manipulation. Users and traders get the prices they expect. Markets operate fairly. Strategies remain viable without external interference. In a world where transparency matters more every year, this level of integrity becomes a serious competitive advantage.

Another core reason INJ stands out as a strategic bet is how it empowers builders. The modular nature of Injective’s technology allows developers to create sophisticated financial applications faster than ever before. They don’t have to reinvent infrastructure they can leverage Injective’s ready-made modules. This reduces friction dramatically. Innovation cycles speed up. New ideas reach users faster. And with every new application, Injective becomes more valuable, more capable, and more deeply integrated into the financial fabric of Web3.

This is where the comparison between INJ and traditional financial assets becomes interesting. Most investments rely on centralized entities performing well. But Injective’s value grows through decentralization, creativity, and participation. It grows through the collective energy of its builders, the engagement of its users, and the strength of its technology. It's an ecosystem where growth isn’t dictated by a single company it’s created by an entire network of contributors.

When I think about the future of finance, I think about systems that are open, programmable, interoperable, and fundamentally fair. I think about financial tools that react instantly, markets that operate globally, and infrastructure that users can trust without needing permission. Injective embodies all of these characteristics. INJ amplifies them.

Accordint to my point of view investing in INJ feels like supporting the evolution of finance itself not through speculation, but through technology, innovation, and utility. You are not just betting on a token you are betting on a movement, a direction, a paradigm shift. And given how rapidly the financial world is changing, Injective’s vision is not just relevant it’s inevitable.

@Injective
#injective
$INJ

@Yield Guild Games I #YGGPlay I $YGG
The idea of work has always evolved alongside technology, but the shift we are witnessing today is far more foundational than the transition from office to remote, or from analog to digital. For the first time, human labor is being reorganized around virtual economies economies that operate 24/7, borderless, and governed not by corporations but by code. In this emerging landscape, Yield Guild Games (YGG) has positioned itself as one of the most influential builders of the #Metaverse labor market, establishing the infrastructure through which millions may eventually earn, learn, and build sustainable careers entirely online.

Metaverse employment is not a futuristic buzzword. It’s an active, dynamic economy where players, strategists, and digital workers produce measurable value inside virtual worlds. The difference now is that blockchain makes this value transferable, ownable, and financially meaningful. The actions of a player in a game, a contributor in a virtual guild, or a strategist optimizing digital assets can generate income with real-world impact. But to transform this from an opportunity for a few into a global labor system, a structured ecosystem must exist and that is precisely what YGG has been constructing.

YGG serves as a talent network, resource layer, and economic accelerant for participants who want to build experience inside metaverse environments. The guild’s core innovation is simple yet profound it professionalizes digital labor. It treats a player with discipline, skill, and consistency the same way a traditional employer treats qualified talent. It brings structure to an industry that previously relied on luck and informal communities. By curating high-quality games, offering education and coaching, managing digital assets, and setting standards for participation, YGG creates a path where someone’s time and skill can mature into a genuine digital profession.

In regions where economic constraints limit opportunities, metaverse employment becomes more than entertainment it becomes economic mobility. YGG’s framework gives players access to assets they could not afford, mentorship they would not receive elsewhere, and a supportive ecosystem that recognizes effort with on-chain reputation. This empowerment is not theoretical for thousands, it has already reshaped their financial landscape, especially during the peak of Web3 gaming cycles. But the long-term significance is even bigger YGG is building a universal workforce that is not dependent on geography, legacy education, or traditional employment gatekeepers.

What makes YGG’s model transformative is its emphasis on sustainability. Instead of hyping speculative play-to-earn trends, the guild focuses on games with strong economies, skilled gameplay, and long-term value. They are building an employment foundation meant to survive market cycles, not disappear with them. Over time, YGG is shaping a workforce with transferable digital skills, #On-chain achievements, and a consistent track record elements that will define employability in the next generation of virtual economies.

If the metaverse is destined to become the new global workplace, then YGG is creating the blueprint. Infrastructure, standards, training, reputation all the elements that support real-world industries are now being reconstructed digitally. As more virtual worlds mature, the people entering them will need a stable bedrock on which to build their careers. YGG is laying that foundation today.

When people talk about the idea of a digital dollar rail system, most imagine something futuristic, maybe even abstract. But when you dig into it, the concept is far more practical and honestly, way more important than many realize. It’s not about replacing the dollar. It’s about redefining how the dollar moves. @Plasma seems to understand this problem better than most projects out there.

The global financial system runs on infrastructure that feels like it was built for a world without the internet. Sending money internationally still relies on rails like SWIFT, which acts more like a glorified messaging system than an actual value-transfer mechanism. It works, but it’s slow, expensive, and way too dependent on intermediaries. The crypto ecosystem tried to fix this, but until now, #Stablecoins have been floating around on fragmented chains, each with their own liquidity pools, bridge risks, and regulatory hurdles.

The idea of a digital dollar rail system is to consolidate those functions into a unified architecture one where stablecoins behave like true digital dollars, not like wrapped versions living in silos. That’s where Plasma’s approach becomes interesting. It’s not trying to reinvent the dollar it’s building the high-speed, programmable rails the dollar never had in the first place.

Think about what it means if dollar-denominated value can settle globally in seconds, with near-zero friction, and with the same finality guarantees you’d associate with Bitcoin-level security. Suddenly, you are no longer talking about a crypto experiment you are talking about a monetary upgrade for the modern world. And this isn’t theory anymore. Between U.S. regulatory developments around stablecoins and the proliferation of #On-chain financial products, it’s becoming obvious that digital dollars are here to stay. The question now is on what infrastructure should they actually run?

Plasma treats stablecoins as first-class citizens, not afterthoughts. It imagines a world where stablecoin transactions flow through consistent, predictable, low-latency settlement rails. That means businesses do not have to worry about chain congestion, cross-chain liquidity fragmentation, or unstable gas economics. Instead, they get something that feels almost like plugging into an upgraded version of today’s banking network only global, permissionless, and programmable.

A digital dollar rail system also changes the conversation about remittances, payroll, B2B settlement, and even everyday consumer payments. Imagine people getting paid in digital dollars with instant finality. Imagine merchants receiving funds without waiting days for settlement. Imagine institutional money flowing at the speed of software rather than the speed of banking hours.

This does not require the government to issue a new currency. The market has already chosen stablecoins as the digital representation of the dollar. What’s missing is the underlying rail system that treats them with the seriousness they deserve. Plasma steps into that gap by offering a chain designed around stability, speed, and compliance pathways that align with regulatory maturity.

If the last decade was about proving crypto works, the next decade is about integrating it with the real financial world. A digital dollar rail system is not just a technical upgrade it’s the logical evolution of money movement in a global, digital economy. Plasma seems determined to build that backbone.

@Plasma
#Plasma
$XPL

For years, traders and crypto enthusiasts have been stuck between two extremes the speed and convenience of centralized exchanges, and the philosophy and transparency of decentralized ones. Centralized exchanges #CEXs dominate because they offer fast execution, deep liquidity, and a polished user experience things that most blockchains and DeFi platforms still struggle to match. Yet time and time again, the industry has witnessed the risks of trusting centralized custodians with user funds. Frozen withdrawals, mismanaged assets, opaque operations, and security breaches have shown that this model carries serious vulnerabilities.

@Injective didn’t just notice this gap it was built to close it. Instead of trying to imitate a centralized exchange through half-measures, Injective re-engineered the fundamental architecture of decentralized finance to create a trading environment that actually rivals, and in many ways surpasses, CEX performance. It’s not a compromise between the two worlds; it’s a new category entirely.

At the heart of Injective’s approach is its lightning-fast, interoperable blockchain specifically optimized for trading and financial applications. Most smart contract platforms were not originally built with high-performance trading in mind. They prioritize generalized computation, which often comes at the cost of latency, execution speed, and fee stability. Injective, however, was built the other way around like an exchange first and a blockchain second. This focus positions it uniquely among its peers.

One of the clearest distinctions between Injective and traditional DeFi is the presence of a fully decentralized, #On-chain orderbook. While AMMs opened the door for decentralized swaps, they never solved the deeper complexities needed for advanced markets. Orderbooks are the backbone of professional trading, yet building one fully on-chain is notoriously difficult due to throughput constraints. Injective overcame this with an architecture that supports fast matching, low fees, and a trading experience reminiscent of top exchanges without sacrificing decentralization.

This on-chain orderbook comes with several advantages that traders immediately appreciate. First, it allows users to execute trades with minimal slippage. Instead of relying on bonding curves and liquidity pools where prices shift based on pool ratios, traders place precise orders that get matched efficiently. This means more predictable execution outcomes, especially during volatile market conditions. For anyone running strategic trades limit orders, scalping, arbitrage, derivatives this predictability is essential.

Liquidity behaves differently on Injective. Instead of splintering liquidity across isolated AMM pools or siloed ecosystems, Injective’s structure encourages liquidity aggregation across #dApps . Whether a trader is using a derivatives platform, a spot market interface, or a prediction dApp, they all connect into the same underlying liquidity engine. This creates a unified, scalable environment that feels much closer to a centralized exchange, but remains open and transparent.

Speed is another area where Injective sets itself apart. Traders used to making split-second decisions know that latency can make or break profitability. Injective’s near-instant block finality ensures that orders are executed quickly, reducing the frustrations of waiting for confirmations or dealing with failed transactions due to network congestion. For strategies that rely on rapid adjustments, this speed is transformative.

Yet performance alone doesn’t fully answer the question of how to move past centralized exchanges. Trust and security must also be considered. Injective brings the safety of self-custody, meaning traders keep full control over their funds at all times. No deposit requirements, no custodial risk, no hidden dangers behind corporate balance sheets. Assets remain in users’ wallets, and trades happen on-chain, visible for anyone to audit. This level of transparency is impossible for centralized exchanges to match.

From my view Injective goes deeper. Its interoperability layer allows assets from numerous chains Ethereum, Cosmos, Solana, and more to interact seamlessly. Centralized exchanges have historically been the primary way users bridge liquidity across ecosystems. Injective solves this with smart design. Instead of relying on centralized bridges or wrapped tokens managed by third parties, Injective’s cross-chain architecture brings real assets on-chain while maintaining decentralization. This makes Injective feel as liquid and diverse as a major exchange, without the central point of failure.

Another important advantage Injective has over centralized exchanges is openness. While CEXs operate as closed systems with proprietary matching engines, closed APIs, and limited transparency, Injective functions as an open platform where anyone can build. Developers can launch dApps directly on Injective and tap into its high-performance trading infrastructure without recreating orderbooks, liquidity systems, or execution engines from scratch. This fosters a vibrant ecosystem where innovation compounds and reinforces the network’s strength.

Think of it this way on a centralized exchange, traders can only interact with products the exchange chooses to offer. On Injective, builders define what financial products can exist—perpetual markets, RWAs, prediction markets, customizable derivatives, and entirely new financial models. This openness gives traders more opportunities and allows markets to evolve naturally based on user demand. The best part: all of this happens with the same performance CEX users expect.

Injective also addresses a subtle yet crucial psychological factor in trading: fairness. Centralized exchanges are known for opaque order flow, privileged market makers, and internal mechanics that users cannot verify. Injective eliminates these concerns by executing trades on-chain with transparent rules anyone can audit. There is no hidden order routing, no internal matching advantage, no black box. Every participant operates on an equal playing field.

There is the economics that underpin the network. INJ, the native token, isn’t merely a transactional asset. It contributes to governance, staking, collateralization, and network security, while the burn auction mechanism ensures sustainable scarcity. Trading activity fuels INJ burns, which strengthens the token’s long-term economic foundation. This turn trading into an active part of the ecosystem’s health instead of merely a user-level activity.

As the crypto industry transitions toward a more mature and regulated future, traders are demanding platforms that can offer both performance and autonomy. Injective stands out as one of the few ecosystems capable of delivering both simultaneously. It gives traders everything they rely on from centralized exchanges speed, liquidity, deep markets, and intuitive execution while giving them everything DeFi promised from the beginning: transparency, ownership, interoperability, and decentralization.

Injective is not trying to replace centralized exchanges through imitation. It’s offering a superior alternative that combines efficiency with freedom. For traders tired of compromises, Injective represents the next evolution not just of trading platforms, but of financial infrastructure as a whole.

@Injective
#injective
$INJ

As a modular protocol that combines Bitcoin and Ethereum, Hemi Network (HEMI) strengthens and expands the core capabilities of these two leading blockchain networks. So let's look at what Hemi Network (HEMI) is, what it does, and what it does.

What is Hemi Network (HEMI)?
Hemi offers an innovative perspective on blockchain interoperability and scaling issues; rather than treating Bitcoin and Ethereum as two separate ecosystems, it combines them as components of a single supernet. This approach aims to achieve the following goals:

↪️To align leading networks in a secure, scalable and durable protocol.

↪️To maximize the tremendous value stored in Bitcoin and Ethereum.

↪️To provide a basis for integrating the best features of blockchain technology with the wider Internet.

Advantages of Hemi Network⚡️✅️
Hemi’s approach offers the following main advantages:↪️⚡️
✅️Proof-of-Proof (PoP) Super Finality: Transactions on Hemi reach Bitcoin-level finality in just a few hours, and this does not affect Ethereum settlement rate while maintaining rank decentralization.
✅️Tunnels: Cross-Chain Portability with Trust and Minimum Trust — provides protocol-level awareness of the states of hVM, Bitcoin, and Ethereum, so it securely performs cross-chain asset movement.
✅️hVM and hBK: True Bitcoin DeFi — Hemi offers smart contracts high-detail indexed views of the Bitcoin status, enabling the creation of reliable DeFi applications and interoperability infrastructure that were not previously possible in EVM.
✅️Chainbuilder: Instant Expandability — External project teams can launch Hemi ecosystem chains (hChains) that use Hemi’s Bitcoin Security Service (BSaaS) capabilities and double chain interoperability.
✅️Capsule: Asset-On-Chain Programmability — It offers advanced asset processing capabilities such as Hemi, chain-on-chain routing, time lock, password protection.
As a result, Hemi not only provides an ideal basis for development on Bitcoin and Ethereum, but also creates a multi-chain interoperability ecosystem secured by Bitcoin
@Hemi #HEMİ $HEMI #Bitcoin #Ethereum $BTC $ETH #On-chain

#BNB_chain Network announced the launch of a dedicated add-on for the Eliza AI framework, facilitating integration to execute on-chain operations (<t-35/>#On-chain ) using AI. The Eliza AI framework, powered by the BNB Chain add-on, offers several key features, including:

1. Support for large language models (LLMs): such as #GPT from OpenAI, Claude, and Llama, enabling diverse AI needs to be met.