DeF

The world of cryptocurrencies is no stranger to controversy, and Justin Sun's recent actions have once again thrown the spotlight on the stability and management of stablecoins. Let's explore this unfolding drama.

## 💥 TUSD Loses Peg — Sun Points Finger at First Digital Trust
In February 2025, a significant event sent shockwaves through the crypto ecosystem. TUSD, a well - known stablecoin, briefly de - pegged to $0.95. This deviation from its intended $1 value raised serious alarms. Justin Sun, the founder of the TRON blockchain, wasted no time in stepping into the fray. He later claimed that the root cause of this de - pegging was the non - transparent handling of TUSD’s reserves by First Digital Trust (FDT), its custodian. Sun alleged that loopholes in Hong Kong’s trust laws might have enabled FDT to redirect financial reserves away from their proper use, thus contributing to the stablecoin's destabilization. It's like a financial detective story, with Sun playing the role of the sleuth uncovering potential wrongdoings. 😮💸

## 🤔 First Digital Trust Denies All Allegations
FDT, on the other hand, was quick to respond. They strongly denied all of Sun's accusations, branding them as baseless and misleading. The company tried to reassure the market by emphasizing that it remains fully solvent. They also pointed out that their other stablecoin, FDUSD, is fully backed and transparently managed. In a show of determination, FDT signaled that it may take legal action to defend its reputation. However, Sun didn't back down. He pointed to FDT’s own financial disclosures, which revealed negative equity for three consecutive years, with a reported shortfall of over HK$100 million by the end of 2024. Sun argued that these figures raise serious questions about FDT's financial governance and the oversight role of Hong Kong regulators. He even went as far as to say on X, “FDT’s very existence at this moment is a mockery of the rule of law in Hong Kong,” attaching screenshots of FDT’s balance sheet for evidence. It's a classic case of he - said - she - said, with both sides presenting their arguments. 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♀️
## 🌊 FDUSD Also Feels the Heat
Sun's comments didn't just affect TUSD; they had a ripple effect on FDUSD, another stablecoin managed by FDT. Shortly after the accusations went public, FDUSD temporarily de - pegged to $0.87. This sent investors into a panic, as they worried about the stability of their investments. However, the situation didn't remain chaotic for long. Over 87 million FDUSD tokens were redeemed, and the stablecoin managed to regain its dollar parity. Attestation reports also confirmed reserve backing, which helped to calm the market somewhat. But the damage had been done, and the incident left a lingering sense of unease. It's like a storm that hits one part of the crypto island and spreads its effects to neighboring areas. 🌪️💧

## 📜 Sun Calls for Legal Reform in Hong Kong
Justin Sun saw this as an opportunity to push for regulatory reforms. He urged Hong Kong lawmakers to review and update laws governing trust structures. Sun believes that better transparency and protection are crucial for the crypto ecosystem. He stated, “The stablecoin industry depends on trust. If reserves can be misused, the entire sector is at risk.” It's as if he's a crusader, fighting for a more secure and regulated crypto world. 🛡️📋

## 📉 Declining Trust in TUSD and FDUSD
The impact of this controversy on TUSD and FDUSD has been palpable. Both stablecoins have witnessed a significant decline in usage. TUSD still has a circulating supply of over 495 million, but trading activity has become minimal. FDUSD has also seen a drastic drop, going from a peak of 4.3 billion to 2.2 billion tokens over the past year. Previously, both tokens were prominently featured in Binance’s Launchpool campaigns. But after being removed from those programs, user interest has plummeted. It's like a once - popular attraction that has lost its charm due to a scandal. 📉🎢

## 🔍 Conclusion: Transparency Now in the Spotlight
In conclusion, although no direct evidence of misappropriation has surfaced yet, Justin Sun’s accusations have reignited concerns about the governance of stablecoin reserves. This incident serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and regulation in the cryptocurrency industry. In an ecosystem where trust is the foundation of all transactions, any hint of impropriety can have far - reaching consequences. 🤝🔍

*Disclaimer: The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses. The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile, and the events and developments described, such as the accusations against First Digital Trust and the impact on TUSD and FDUSD, are subject to change. Before making any investment decisions related to cryptocurrencies, it is advisable to conduct thorough research, consider your own financial situation and risk tolerance, and consult a qualified financial advisor.*

**, , , , **

More than 30 cryptocurrency companies and blockchain organizations have jointly signed a letter to the U.S. Congress, requesting the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to clarify how the law applies to crypto companies. The reason is that the DOJ is accused of interpreting money transmission laws in an overly broad manner, posing a risk to the industry's development.

🔥 Why Does Crypto Oppose the DOJ's Interpretation?

The DeFi Education Fund (#DEF ) – an advocacy organization for the DeFi sector – has led the opposition group, criticizing the DOJ for abusing Section 1960 of federal law to prosecute crypto developers in a manner akin to "suffocating with criminal charges."