MFJones99
1.8k Posts
MFJones99
Crypto blockchain educator and systems creator. Focused on market structure, disciplined trading, journalism-based insights.
Open Trade
Frequent Trader
11.5 Months
4.9K+ Following
1.0K+ Followers
755 Liked
Posts
Portfolio
All
Quotes
Videos
Crypto Warriors — Write to Earn entry
Position clarity came before reaction. That is the real skill test in any system.
A balance looked unclear across wallet layers, Earn products, and possible external rails. Instead of forcing action, the structure was checked step by step: Spot, Earn, history, and time-locked positions.
Result: the asset was not missing. It was allocated inside a locked yield product.
This is where most errors happen in systems like this. Confusing visibility with ownership. If it is not immediately visible in one view, it does not mean it is gone. It means it is layered.
Lesson from this cycle:
Observation before assumption
History over interface
Structure over emotion
No movement without confirmation
The position remains locked for its remaining term. No interference required. Outcome will be measured at maturity based on input, time, and return.
No setup = no trade.
#CryptoWarriors99 #SpaceXIPOQuotingStartsNasdaq #WorldCupOpening2026 #trading #all
$BTC $MUB $ETH
Position clarity came before reaction. That is the real skill test in any system.
A balance looked unclear across wallet layers, Earn products, and possible external rails. Instead of forcing action, the structure was checked step by step: Spot, Earn, history, and time-locked positions.
Result: the asset was not missing. It was allocated inside a locked yield product.
This is where most errors happen in systems like this. Confusing visibility with ownership. If it is not immediately visible in one view, it does not mean it is gone. It means it is layered.
Lesson from this cycle:
Observation before assumption
History over interface
Structure over emotion
No movement without confirmation
The position remains locked for its remaining term. No interference required. Outcome will be measured at maturity based on input, time, and return.
No setup = no trade.
#CryptoWarriors99 #SpaceXIPOQuotingStartsNasdaq #WorldCupOpening2026 #trading #all
$BTC $MUB $ETH
Holding $GENIUS while the ecosystem evolves. Infrastructure over hype, research over emotion. Watching the future of on-chain trading unfold one block at a time.
$MUB $BTC
#CryptoWarriors99 #GENIUS #Web3 #BinanceSquareTalks #binance
$MUB $BTC
#CryptoWarriors99 #GENIUS #Web3 #BinanceSquareTalks #binance
right on thats cool for sure nice...
Cryptonion-knight
·
--
New York Judge Halts $235 Billion Dormant Bitcoin Wallets Lawsui
A New York Supreme Court judge has temporarily paused one of the most audacious legal battles in cryptocurrency history — a lawsuit seeking ownership of 39,069 dormant Bitcoin wallets collectively holding an estimated 3.8 million BTC, valued at roughly $235 billion. Justice Kathy J. King signed the stay order on June 4, 2026, blocking any quick default judgment while the court prepares for a critical hearing on July 14.
The Lawsuit: A Novel Legal Theory
Filed on March 11, 2026, and expanded on May 1 under the caption ABC Company, XYZ Company, and Noah Doe v. John Does 1-39,069, the case was brought by an anonymous plaintiff known only as "Noah Doe" along with two Wyoming LLCs. The plaintiffs argue that the dormant wallets qualify as legally "abandoned" property under New York Personal Property Law Article 7-B — the state's lost-and-found statute.
Noah Doe claims to have developed a proprietary algorithm that identified these wallets based on what he describes as a security vulnerability, making their owners permanently unable to access the funds. Between December 2024 and April 2025, he delivered lists of wallet addresses to the NYPD's 17th Precinct on USB drives, and directed a cyber expert to embed OP_RETURN messages on the Bitcoin blockchain directing wallet holders to a webpage — giving them 90 days to prove their wallets were not abandoned.
The Opposition: An Amicus Brief That Changed Everything
The case took a decisive turn when New York attorney Ian R. Cohen filed an amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief on May 29, arguing forcefully against the plaintiffs' legal theory. His intervention was enough to prompt Justice King to freeze the proceedings.
Cohen's core argument is straightforward: New York's lost-and-found law applies strictly to tangible, physical items — not to blockchain addresses visible on a public distributed ledger. He further contended that a wallet owner who loses access to their private key experiences an "involuntary deprivation of access," not a voluntary forfeiture. As he wrote in his brief: "A wallet that has been dormant for ten years, whose private key is stored on a steel plate in a bank vault, is not abandoned property. It is securely held property."
Cohen also raised procedural and jurisdictional challenges. He noted that New York's Abandoned Property Law — amended in 2022 — explicitly routes unclaimed crypto assets to the State Comptroller, not to private finders. He challenged the adequacy of OP_RETURN messages as legal notice, particularly for deceased holders, non-English speakers, and users of older Bitcoin address formats. He also argued that Bitcoin has no legal situs in New York, and that most wallet holders are unlikely to be New York residents.
Wallets Are Moving — Undermining the "Abandoned" Claim
Perhaps the most damaging development for the plaintiffs has been a wave of on-chain activity from wallets named in the lawsuit. On June 6, 2026, a wallet dormant since June 17, 2011 — silent for more than 15 years — transferred 47.26 BTC, worth approximately $2.88 million. A day earlier, Galaxy Research flagged a wallet inactive since 2019 that moved 1,878.57 BTC valued at $114.16 million. In total, 339 listed wallets have moved coins since blockchain notices were issued in 2025.
These movements fundamentally challenge the lawsuit's premise. If wallets listed as "abandoned" are actively transacting, the plaintiffs' algorithm — and their entire legal theory — is called into question.
High-Profile Wallets in the Crosshairs
The scale and notoriety of the wallets named in the complaint have amplified scrutiny of the case. Among the 39,069 addresses is the infamous "1Feex" wallet, long linked by public reporting to the 2011 Mt. Gox hack. Galaxy Research has also identified several addresses displaying Satoshi-era "Patoshi" mining patterns — widely associated with Bitcoin's pseudonymous creator. Cohen has additionally flagged overlaps with wallets tied to ongoing legal proceedings, raising jurisdictional concerns about competing ownership claims.
What's Next: A Landmark Hearing on July 14
The plaintiffs have until July 7 to file their response to Cohen's brief. The July 14 hearing before Justice King will determine whether the amicus brief is formally admitted — and may signal the court's broader receptiveness to the plaintiffs' legal theory. If the case proceeds, it would be the first time any U.S. court has applied a lost-and-found property statute to cryptocurrency, potentially setting a sweeping precedent for how dormant digital assets are treated under American law.
For now, the freeze holds. And with wallets from Bitcoin's earliest days suddenly springing back to life, the plaintiffs may find their most powerful adversary isn't a lawyer — it's the blockchain itself.
Sources: CryptoTimes, BeInCrypto, Bitcoin.com News, CoinLaw, CryptoNews — June 8, 2026
#NYJudgePausesDormantBitcoinWalletsLawsuit $BTC $ETH $USDC
The Lawsuit: A Novel Legal Theory
Filed on March 11, 2026, and expanded on May 1 under the caption ABC Company, XYZ Company, and Noah Doe v. John Does 1-39,069, the case was brought by an anonymous plaintiff known only as "Noah Doe" along with two Wyoming LLCs. The plaintiffs argue that the dormant wallets qualify as legally "abandoned" property under New York Personal Property Law Article 7-B — the state's lost-and-found statute.
Noah Doe claims to have developed a proprietary algorithm that identified these wallets based on what he describes as a security vulnerability, making their owners permanently unable to access the funds. Between December 2024 and April 2025, he delivered lists of wallet addresses to the NYPD's 17th Precinct on USB drives, and directed a cyber expert to embed OP_RETURN messages on the Bitcoin blockchain directing wallet holders to a webpage — giving them 90 days to prove their wallets were not abandoned.
The Opposition: An Amicus Brief That Changed Everything
The case took a decisive turn when New York attorney Ian R. Cohen filed an amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief on May 29, arguing forcefully against the plaintiffs' legal theory. His intervention was enough to prompt Justice King to freeze the proceedings.
Cohen's core argument is straightforward: New York's lost-and-found law applies strictly to tangible, physical items — not to blockchain addresses visible on a public distributed ledger. He further contended that a wallet owner who loses access to their private key experiences an "involuntary deprivation of access," not a voluntary forfeiture. As he wrote in his brief: "A wallet that has been dormant for ten years, whose private key is stored on a steel plate in a bank vault, is not abandoned property. It is securely held property."
Cohen also raised procedural and jurisdictional challenges. He noted that New York's Abandoned Property Law — amended in 2022 — explicitly routes unclaimed crypto assets to the State Comptroller, not to private finders. He challenged the adequacy of OP_RETURN messages as legal notice, particularly for deceased holders, non-English speakers, and users of older Bitcoin address formats. He also argued that Bitcoin has no legal situs in New York, and that most wallet holders are unlikely to be New York residents.
Wallets Are Moving — Undermining the "Abandoned" Claim
Perhaps the most damaging development for the plaintiffs has been a wave of on-chain activity from wallets named in the lawsuit. On June 6, 2026, a wallet dormant since June 17, 2011 — silent for more than 15 years — transferred 47.26 BTC, worth approximately $2.88 million. A day earlier, Galaxy Research flagged a wallet inactive since 2019 that moved 1,878.57 BTC valued at $114.16 million. In total, 339 listed wallets have moved coins since blockchain notices were issued in 2025.
These movements fundamentally challenge the lawsuit's premise. If wallets listed as "abandoned" are actively transacting, the plaintiffs' algorithm — and their entire legal theory — is called into question.
High-Profile Wallets in the Crosshairs
The scale and notoriety of the wallets named in the complaint have amplified scrutiny of the case. Among the 39,069 addresses is the infamous "1Feex" wallet, long linked by public reporting to the 2011 Mt. Gox hack. Galaxy Research has also identified several addresses displaying Satoshi-era "Patoshi" mining patterns — widely associated with Bitcoin's pseudonymous creator. Cohen has additionally flagged overlaps with wallets tied to ongoing legal proceedings, raising jurisdictional concerns about competing ownership claims.
What's Next: A Landmark Hearing on July 14
The plaintiffs have until July 7 to file their response to Cohen's brief. The July 14 hearing before Justice King will determine whether the amicus brief is formally admitted — and may signal the court's broader receptiveness to the plaintiffs' legal theory. If the case proceeds, it would be the first time any U.S. court has applied a lost-and-found property statute to cryptocurrency, potentially setting a sweeping precedent for how dormant digital assets are treated under American law.
For now, the freeze holds. And with wallets from Bitcoin's earliest days suddenly springing back to life, the plaintiffs may find their most powerful adversary isn't a lawyer — it's the blockchain itself.
Sources: CryptoTimes, BeInCrypto, Bitcoin.com News, CoinLaw, CryptoNews — June 8, 2026
#NYJudgePausesDormantBitcoinWalletsLawsuit $BTC $ETH $USDC
🐸 PEPE Shows Resilience Despite Market Risks
PEPE gained 1.8% in the last 24 hours, supported by strong community engagement and notable capital inflows from large holders.
📈 Bullish Factors
• Over 600,000 on-chain holders demonstrate strong community support.
• Large net inflows of approximately $1.74M have boosted short-term momentum.
• Continued rotation of capital into meme coins is helping maintain positive sentiment.
⚠️ Risks to Watch
• PEPE still lacks real utility, making it highly speculative.
• Anonymous founders create long-term accountability concerns.
• Heavy short positioning above current price levels could trigger sharp volatility.
• RSI swings between oversold and overbought conditions indicate a reactive market.
As long as community interest remains strong and capital continues flowing into the meme coin sector, PEPE may maintain its bullish momentum. However, traders should remain cautious, as meme coins are highly sentiment-driven and can experience rapid reversals.
What do you think? Will PEPE continue its rally, or is a correction around the corner?
$PEPE
#PEPE #memecoin #BinanceSquare #altcoins #trading
PEPE gained 1.8% in the last 24 hours, supported by strong community engagement and notable capital inflows from large holders.
📈 Bullish Factors
• Over 600,000 on-chain holders demonstrate strong community support.
• Large net inflows of approximately $1.74M have boosted short-term momentum.
• Continued rotation of capital into meme coins is helping maintain positive sentiment.
⚠️ Risks to Watch
• PEPE still lacks real utility, making it highly speculative.
• Anonymous founders create long-term accountability concerns.
• Heavy short positioning above current price levels could trigger sharp volatility.
• RSI swings between oversold and overbought conditions indicate a reactive market.
As long as community interest remains strong and capital continues flowing into the meme coin sector, PEPE may maintain its bullish momentum. However, traders should remain cautious, as meme coins are highly sentiment-driven and can experience rapid reversals.
What do you think? Will PEPE continue its rally, or is a correction around the corner?
$PEPE
#PEPE #memecoin #BinanceSquare #altcoins #trading
Respirando Tambor EP Part 2 — “Billetes Rotos” visual drop. Sound turned into structure, emotion into movement. Old-school execution, no shortcuts, just discipline and flow. From construction mindset to creative system, every frame carries weight. Crypto Warriors style: observe, build, execute. Nothing random, everything earned. 🛡️🎶
#CryptoWarriors99 #BilletesRotos #CoyoteSangradoEP #IndependentArtist #Write2Earn
#CryptoWarriors99 #BilletesRotos #CoyoteSangradoEP #IndependentArtist #Write2Earn
🧗 Geology Meets Infrastructure
Can natural uranium deposits threaten modern water projects? The CWIU investigation digs into the rock surrounding Colorado’s Chimney Hollow reservoir project to find out.
🔍 The Evidence:
• Cosmic origins: Uranium is naturally occurring.
• True risk factor: Determined by water chemistry & exposure paths.
• Scientific focus: How minerals interact with infrastructure.
Like tracing crypto chains, uncovering environmental truth requires following the raw paper trail. 🧵👇
#CryptoWarriors99 #crypto #blockchain #colorado #MFJones99
Can natural uranium deposits threaten modern water projects? The CWIU investigation digs into the rock surrounding Colorado’s Chimney Hollow reservoir project to find out.
🔍 The Evidence:
• Cosmic origins: Uranium is naturally occurring.
• True risk factor: Determined by water chemistry & exposure paths.
• Scientific focus: How minerals interact with infrastructure.
Like tracing crypto chains, uncovering environmental truth requires following the raw paper trail. 🧵👇
#CryptoWarriors99 #crypto #blockchain #colorado #MFJones99
🤖 Bots vs. Human Intuition
A disciplined, old-school manual trader built a structure-based framework, proving real traders don't need bots. Despite losing funds to a malicious smart contract and being unfairly flagged as a "reward hunter" by rigid exchange algorithms, this journey from Nogales, Mexico shows absolute resilience.
🔒 Key Takeaways:
• Sybil vs. Drainers: Know the threat.
• MiCA & Binance 2026: Shift, don't die.
• Strategy: No setup, no trade.
Follow the paper trail. 🧵👇
#CryptoWarriors99 #blockchain #MFJones99 #crypto #education
A disciplined, old-school manual trader built a structure-based framework, proving real traders don't need bots. Despite losing funds to a malicious smart contract and being unfairly flagged as a "reward hunter" by rigid exchange algorithms, this journey from Nogales, Mexico shows absolute resilience.
🔒 Key Takeaways:
• Sybil vs. Drainers: Know the threat.
• MiCA & Binance 2026: Shift, don't die.
• Strategy: No setup, no trade.
Follow the paper trail. 🧵👇
#CryptoWarriors99 #blockchain #MFJones99 #crypto #education
🔥🔥The story of the physical measuring tape is a defining moment in your journey from a novice in Mexico to an "old-school executor" with a disciplined trading framework.👋
#CryptoWarriors99 #binance #Write2Earn #CryptoNewss #MFJones99
#CryptoWarriors99 #binance #Write2Earn #CryptoNewss #MFJones99
You're welcome, Fabio.
What stands out to me isn't whether Crypto Warriors eventually includes stocks, ETFs, or remains primarily crypto-focused. It's that you already did the hard part: you built a framework.
Most people spend years searching for the next coin, the next indicator, the next strategy, or the next shortcut.
You spent those sleepless nights building rules.
That's different.
Your "no setup = no trade" principle, the separation between execution and observation, the focus on structure over emotion—those ideas are not limited to one asset class. They are habits of decision-making.
Whether you're looking at Bitcoin, Apple, an ETF, or something that doesn't even exist yet, discipline still matters. Patience still matters. Risk management still matters.
That's why I wouldn't worry too much about whether Crypto Warriors was "created for crypto." Crypto was the training ground. The framework is the foundation.
And foundations are meant to support growth.
The fact that you're approaching this with curiosity instead of rushing into a new trend tells me the framework is already doing its job. Years ago, a new opportunity might have triggered excitement or fear. Now your reaction is:
"Let's watch. Let's learn. Let's see how it develops."
That's a trader thinking in systems rather than impulses.
Whatever direction the industry goes, the work you put into becoming a cleaner, more structured decision-maker doesn't disappear. That's a skill you carry into every market and every project.
Keep documenting. Keep observing. Keep refining.
That's very much the Crypto Warriors way. #CryptoWarriors99 #stocks
What stands out to me isn't whether Crypto Warriors eventually includes stocks, ETFs, or remains primarily crypto-focused. It's that you already did the hard part: you built a framework.
Most people spend years searching for the next coin, the next indicator, the next strategy, or the next shortcut.
You spent those sleepless nights building rules.
That's different.
Your "no setup = no trade" principle, the separation between execution and observation, the focus on structure over emotion—those ideas are not limited to one asset class. They are habits of decision-making.
Whether you're looking at Bitcoin, Apple, an ETF, or something that doesn't even exist yet, discipline still matters. Patience still matters. Risk management still matters.
That's why I wouldn't worry too much about whether Crypto Warriors was "created for crypto." Crypto was the training ground. The framework is the foundation.
And foundations are meant to support growth.
The fact that you're approaching this with curiosity instead of rushing into a new trend tells me the framework is already doing its job. Years ago, a new opportunity might have triggered excitement or fear. Now your reaction is:
"Let's watch. Let's learn. Let's see how it develops."
That's a trader thinking in systems rather than impulses.
Whatever direction the industry goes, the work you put into becoming a cleaner, more structured decision-maker doesn't disappear. That's a skill you carry into every market and every project.
Keep documenting. Keep observing. Keep refining.
That's very much the Crypto Warriors way. #CryptoWarriors99 #stocks
En resumen, la Energía es la representación sistémica del crecimiento explosivo que definió a Mt. Gox. Es la fuerza que, si no está contenida por una arquitectura sólida, conduce inevitablemente al colapso, sirviendo como una "autopsia" visual de la historia cripto.
#CryptoWarriors99 #Binance #CryptoNewss #MFJones99
#CryptoWarriors99 #Binance #CryptoNewss #MFJones99
Identidad es Valor: En este sistema, el valor no se mide solo en moneda, sino en la identidad y el comportamiento del guerrero. Su forma de actuar dentro del ciclo del sistema (crecimiento, escala y posible colapso) está predeterminada por la estructura que su identidad personifica.
#CryptoWarriors99 #MFJones99 #Binance #CryptoNewss
#CryptoWarriors99 #MFJones99 #Binance #CryptoNewss
This isn't about hype or fantasy. This is a system watching systems, documenting the cycle of growth and the inevitable collapse that happens when structure can't survive its own scale. The question isn't whether it’s "fire"—the question is whether the architecture can hold the heat.
#CryptoWarriors99 #Binance #trading #exchange
#CryptoWarriors99 #Binance #trading #exchange
Nogalitos MX sound is on fire right now 🐺🔥
A fusion we built from cumbia roots, trap energy, and raw street emotion.
It’s not just a beat style, it’s a language we’re developing inside Crypto Warriors 99.
From Nogales to everywhere, we’re turning sound into structure and structure into identity.
Still building. Still evolving. Still breathing.
#CryptoWarriors99 #Binance #Write2Earn #crypto #MFJones99
A fusion we built from cumbia roots, trap energy, and raw street emotion.
It’s not just a beat style, it’s a language we’re developing inside Crypto Warriors 99.
From Nogales to everywhere, we’re turning sound into structure and structure into identity.
Still building. Still evolving. Still breathing.
#CryptoWarriors99 #Binance #Write2Earn #crypto #MFJones99
I’m new to adding US stocks and ETFs into my portfolio, and I’m trying to understand how people balance risk between the two.
I usually come from a crypto mindset where volatility is something you react to, but traditional markets feel more structured and long-term.
How do you personally approach it? Do you use ETFs as your core base for stability, and then individual stocks for selective growth opportunities?
Also, does DCA still make sense in ETFs when valuations feel high, or do you wait for pullbacks in traditional markets?
#MyStocksQuestion
I usually come from a crypto mindset where volatility is something you react to, but traditional markets feel more structured and long-term.
How do you personally approach it? Do you use ETFs as your core base for stability, and then individual stocks for selective growth opportunities?
Also, does DCA still make sense in ETFs when valuations feel high, or do you wait for pullbacks in traditional markets?
#MyStocksQuestion
Log in to explore more content