In China, men only have the right to request sex, meaning that if you want to have sexual relations with a woman, you only have the right to request, not to decide, even a husband only has the right to request.
The essence of the recent Datong engagement case is that a man thought he could have sexual relations with his fiancée just because they were engaged, and his self-righteousness led to him being convicted of rape.
This has shocked the old guards and completely shattered their fantasies.
In the past, the old guards thought that by giving a bride price and buying a house, they could have a sexual life and have children.
However, the reality is that even if you give a bride price and buy a house, if the woman does not agree, you cannot force her; otherwise, it is considered rape. Moreover, if the woman regrets it afterward, you could end up in prison, and the right to bear children is a unique right of women; if a woman wants to have children, she can, and if she does not want to, you cannot force her to have children.
China makes a toy that costs $5, and the retail price in the U.S. is $100.
Chinese factories make only a few yuan in profit, and the workers are as exhausted as oxen.
So where does the rest of the money go? The brand owners, shipping companies, and retailers in the U.S. all take a share. A change in packaging, adding a logo, and some advertising easily nets them $80.
China receives this small profit and has to deal with the dollars. Besides buying commodities like oil, chips, and food, the remainder often goes to buying U.S. treasury bonds.
In other words, a large portion of those hard-earned dollars ends up being lent back to the U.S. government.
Then Americans look at their accounts and see a terrifying deficit, completely stunned: "Why have we spent so much money? Where did all the money go?" #币安LaunchpoolINIT $BTC
The biggest beneficiary of global trade, the U.S., begins to feel it's been taken advantage of.
At this point, the media and politicians quickly jump in to tell the public:
"OMG, China has stolen $100 from your pockets!!! This is unfair! We must have a trade war!"
In reality, most of that money never even left the U.S. It ultimately makes a circuit and returns to the pockets of the Treasury Department in Washington.
So the question arises, where exactly did all that money go?
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐#币安投票下币 $BTC Made in China, a toy costs $5 to produce, and the retail price in the United States is $100.
The factory in China only makes a few yuan in profit, and the workers are exhausted like oxen.
So where does the rest of the money go? The brand owners, shipping companies, and retailers in the United States all take a share of the pie. They change the packaging, put on a logo, run some advertisements, and easily pocket $80.
China gets this small profit but has to deal with these dollars. Aside from buying commodities like oil, chips, and food, most of the rest is often used to purchase U.S. Treasury bonds.
In other words, a significant portion of that hard-earned money is lent back to the U.S. government to spend.
Then Americans look at their accounts and see a frightening deficit, completely baffled: "How come we spent so much money? Where did all the money go?"
The biggest beneficiary of global trade, the United States, starts to feel like it is at a disadvantage.
At this point, the media and politicians quickly jump in to tell the public:
"OMG, China has taken $100 from your pockets!!! This is unfair! We must have a trade war!"
In fact, most of that money never really left the United States. In the end, it obediently takes a round trip and ends up back in the pockets of the U.S. Treasury.
Liangxi is doing this live stream with an assistant He is a neurotic What that means is He is extremely smart His assistant is also a neurotic who can resonate with him Also extremely smart Liangxi now has a team He might not have had a team before But a group of super smart people voluntarily follow him You ordinary people can't understand But it's true, smart people are willing to follow him to break the barriers$BTC #MichaelSaylor暗示增持BTC
On-chain data shows that their average cost for increasing positions is roughly around $83,000-$85,000. Sometimes, it is difficult to understand the purpose of whales' behavior using 'retail investor thinking.'
For instance, why did they massively increase their holdings around $81,000 right after the announcement of equivalent tariffs in early April, instead of waiting to buy after a decline? When BTC fell to $75,000, they didn't buy, but started buying again when it rebounded to $83,000...
At first glance, they look like a group of big-headed retail investors who are equally 'afraid of falling prices while chasing gains.' However, if we switch to a 'God's eye' perspective, we can find that the changes in the whales' holdings are closely related to market trends.
Education is basically useless in the crypto world Unity of knowledge and action Knowing but not doing Is equivalent to not knowing
Tsinghua and Peking University are not as good as having guts Oxford and Cambridge still need to be seen Yale and Harvard also have to pray to the Buddha
Unless you are going to cut the foolish VC Then forget I said anything #加拿大推出SolanaETF #币安安全见解 #
If you want to get rich, you must first understand the market. Pessimists are always happy.
I always accept failure in my trading first, and I will think about a rough stop-loss plan before placing an order. This way, when I actually lose money and hit the stop-loss, I won't feel too bad.
The market is inherently an unpredictable madman, changeable, complex, uncertain, and vague. I always leave myself some room, keep some money outside the market, and use small funds for trading inside, so I won't lose everything.
Because I indeed came from humble beginnings, crawling out from a sea of blood and corpses to earn a bit of hard-earned money, I have seen many people fall along the way and lose everything, which makes me cherish my current life even more.
This mindset allows me to earn and keep my money, rather than like most traders who gamble everything, only to soon become impoverished again.
I constantly remind myself not to hold onto losing trades, not to lose everything, and not to get too carried away. Losing everything means truly having nothing left.
I've seen all the things he talked about, but when he says them, it really is a whole set, regardless of whether the logic is correct, he just strings it all together.
I’m starting to believe that CZ is really being controlled by Gongqi H.
U.S. State Department Statement $BTC : China's decision to retaliate reflects its aggressive and unfair trade policies over the decades. President Trump
has taken appropriate action in response, announcing that the United States will impose additional tariffs on all goods from China.