Exploring the future of real-world asset (RWA) lending just got more exciting with @Huma Finance š£ leading the way! š Their innovative protocol bridges DeFi with traditional finance, unlocking new liquidity opportunities for users around the globe. Whether youāre a builder, borrower, or believer in decentralized credit markets, Huma is shaping whatās next. šš” Iām particularly impressed by their mission to support underbanked regions while staying secure and scalable. Keep an eye on this one ā itās not just a platform, itās a movement. š„
Exploring the future of real-world asset (RWA) lending just got more exciting with @Huma Finance š£ leading the way! š Their innovative protocol bridges DeFi with traditional finance, unlocking new liquidity opportunities for users around the globe. Whether youāre a builder, borrower, or believer in decentralized credit markets, Huma is shaping whatās next. šš” Iām particularly impressed by their mission to support underbanked regions while staying secure and scalable. Keep an eye on this one ā itās not just a platform, itās a movement. š„
Exploring the future of real-world asset (RWA) lending just got more exciting with @Huma Finance š£ leading the way! š Their innovative protocol bridges DeFi with traditional finance, unlocking new liquidity opportunities for users around the globe. Whether youāre a builder, borrower, or believer in decentralized credit markets, Huma is shaping whatās next. šš” Iām particularly impressed by their mission to support underbanked regions while staying secure and scalable. Keep an eye on this one ā itās not just a platform, itās a movement. š„
Exploring the future of real-world asset (RWA) lending just got more exciting with @Huma Finance š£ leading the way! š Their innovative protocol bridges DeFi with traditional finance, unlocking new liquidity opportunities for users around the globe. Whether youāre a builder, borrower, or believer in decentralized credit markets, Huma is shaping whatās next. šš” Iām particularly impressed by their mission to support underbanked regions while staying secure and scalable. Keep an eye on this one ā itās not just a platform, itās a movement. š„
Exploring the future of real-world asset (RWA) lending just got more exciting with @Huma Finance š£ leading the way! š Their innovative protocol bridges DeFi with traditional finance, unlocking new liquidity opportunities for users around the globe. Whether youāre a builder, borrower, or believer in decentralized credit markets, Huma is shaping whatās next. šš” Iām particularly impressed by their mission to support underbanked regions while staying secure and scalable. Keep an eye on this one ā itās not just a platform, itās a movement. š„
1. Pressure on U.S. Businesses ⢠A recent AP analysis estimates U.S. employers will absorb around $82.3āÆbillion in costs due to tariffs, not foreign producersālikely passed to consumers via price hikes, layoffs, or margin cuts, particularly in retail and wholesale sectors ļæ¼. ⢠The Congressional Budget Office projects tariffs will lift inflation by 0.4āÆpercentage points in both 2025 and 2026, modestly dent GDP, but reduce the federal deficit by an estimated $2.8āÆtrillion over the next decade ļæ¼.
2. Macroeconomic & Market Reactions ⢠The U.S. dollar dropped 10.8% in H1 2025āthe worst performance in over 50 yearsāamid investor worries about trade and policy instability ļæ¼. ⢠Despite trade pressures, U.S. inflation remained subdued in May 2025, with core CPI up just 0.1% MoM, as companies mitigated effects by using inventory buffers ļæ¼. ⢠Federal Reserve Chair Powell admitted tariffs are a factor delaying interest rate cuts, citing inflation pressures ļæ¼.
3. Sectoral and Household Effects ⢠The Penn & Wharton Budget Model estimates tariffs could reduce longārun GDP by ~6% and wages by ~5%, costing a middle-income household around $22,000 over its lifetime ļæ¼. ⢠A Tax Foundation report calculates tariff hikes amounting to nearly $1,200 per household in 2025 ļæ¼. ⢠Retail example: A $30 cotton sweater could jump to ~$35.80 with current tariffs, and to ~$57.97 with full implementation of high-tier rates ļæ¼.
4. Trade Strategy & Legal Challenges ⢠The second Trump administrationās tariff policy raised the average U.S. import duty from ~2.5% in January to roughly 27% by April, later easing to around 15.8% by mid-June ļæ¼. ⢠Tariffsāincluding 50% on steel/aluminum and 25% on carsāwere implemented under national emergency and trade laws. Courts have blocked some under IEEPA, with rulings going through appeal ļæ¼. ⢠A tariff tracker shows new reciprocal tariffs affecting dozens of countries, often delayed ahead of a JulyĀ 9 deadline, with U.S. threatening even steeper duties on BRICS-aligned
1. Pressure on U.S. Businesses ⢠A recent AP analysis estimates U.S. employers will absorb around $82.3āÆbillion in costs due to tariffs, not foreign producersālikely passed to consumers via price hikes, layoffs, or margin cuts, particularly in retail and wholesale sectors ļæ¼. ⢠The Congressional Budget Office projects tariffs will lift inflation by 0.4āÆpercentage points in both 2025 and 2026, modestly dent GDP, but reduce the federal deficit by an estimated $2.8āÆtrillion over the next decade ļæ¼.
2. Macroeconomic & Market Reactions ⢠The U.S. dollar dropped 10.8% in H1 2025āthe worst performance in over 50 yearsāamid investor worries about trade and policy instability ļæ¼. ⢠Despite trade pressures, U.S. inflation remained subdued in May 2025, with core CPI up just 0.1% MoM, as companies mitigated effects by using inventory buffers ļæ¼. ⢠Federal Reserve Chair Powell admitted tariffs are a factor delaying interest rate cuts, citing inflation pressures ļæ¼.
3. Sectoral and Household Effects ⢠The Penn & Wharton Budget Model estimates tariffs could reduce longārun GDP by ~6% and wages by ~5%, costing a middle-income household around $22,000 over its lifetime ļæ¼. ⢠A Tax Foundation report calculates tariff hikes amounting to nearly $1,200 per household in 2025 ļæ¼. ⢠Retail example: A $30 cotton sweater could jump to ~$35.80 with current tariffs, and to ~$57.97 with full implementation of high-tier rates ļæ¼.
4. Trade Strategy & Legal Challenges ⢠The second Trump administrationās tariff policy raised the average U.S. import duty from ~2.5% in January to roughly 27% by April, later easing to around 15.8% by mid-June ļæ¼. ⢠Tariffsāincluding 50% on steel/aluminum and 25% on carsāwere implemented under national emergency and trade laws. Courts have blocked some under IEEPA, with rulings going through appeal ļæ¼. ⢠A tariff tracker shows new reciprocal tariffs affecting dozens of delayed ahead of a JulyĀ 9 deadline, with U.S. threatening even steeper duties on BRICS-aligned nations ļæ¼.
1. Pressure on U.S. Businesses ⢠A recent AP analysis estimates U.S. employers will absorb around $82.3āÆbillion in costs due to tariffs, not foreign producersālikely passed to consumers via price hikes, layoffs, or margin cuts, particularly in retail and wholesale sectors ļæ¼. ⢠The Congressional Budget Office projects tariffs will lift inflation by 0.4āÆpercentage points in both 2025 and 2026, modestly dent GDP, but reduce the federal deficit by an estimated $2.8āÆtrillion over the next decade ļæ¼.
2. Macroeconomic & Market Reactions ⢠The U.S. dollar dropped 10.8% in H1 2025āthe worst performance in over 50 yearsāamid investor worries about trade and policy instability ļæ¼. ⢠Despite trade pressures, U.S. inflation remained subdued in May 2025, with core CPI up just 0.1% MoM, as companies mitigated effects by using inventory buffers ļæ¼. ⢠Federal Reserve Chair Powell admitted tariffs are a factor delaying interest rate cuts, citing inflation pressures ļæ¼.
3. Sectoral and Household Effects ⢠The Penn & Wharton Budget Model estimates tariffs could reduce longārun GDP by ~6% and wages by ~5%, costing a middle-income household around $22,000 over its lifetime ļæ¼. ⢠A Tax Foundation report calculates tariff hikes amounting to nearly $1,200 per household in 2025 ļæ¼. ⢠Retail example: A $30 cotton sweater could jump to ~$35.80 with current tariffs, and to ~$57.97 with full implementation of high-tier rates ļæ¼.
4. Trade Strategy & Legal Challenges ⢠The second Trump administrationās tariff policy raised the average U.S. import duty from ~2.5% in January to roughly 27% by April, later easing to around 15.8% by mid-June ļæ¼. ⢠Tariffsāincluding 50% on steel/aluminum and 25% on carsāwere implemented under national emergency and trade laws. Courts have blocked some under IEEPA, with rulings going through appeal
1. Pressure on U.S. Businesses ⢠A recent AP analysis estimates U.S. employers will absorb around $82.3āÆbillion in costs due to tariffs, not foreign producersālikely passed to consumers via price hikes, layoffs, or margin cuts, particularly in retail and wholesale sectors ļæ¼. ⢠The Congressional Budget Office projects tariffs will lift inflation by 0.4āÆpercentage points in both 2025 and 2026, modestly dent GDP, but reduce the federal deficit by an estimated $2.8āÆtrillion over the next decade ļæ¼.
2. Macroeconomic & Market Reactions ⢠The U.S. dollar dropped 10.8% in H1 2025āthe worst performance in over 50 yearsāamid investor worries about trade and policy instability ļæ¼. ⢠Despite trade pressures, U.S. inflation remained subdued in May 2025, with core CPI up just 0.1% MoM, as companies mitigated effects by using inventory buffers ļæ¼. ⢠Federal Reserve Chair Powell admitted tariffs are a factor delaying interest rate cuts, citing inflation pressures ļæ¼.
3. Sectoral and Household Effects ⢠The Penn & Wharton Budget Model estimates tariffs could reduce longārun GDP by ~6% and wages by ~5%, costing a middle-income household around $22,000 over its lifetime ļæ¼. ⢠A Tax Foundation report calculates tariff hikes amounting to nearly $1,200 per household in 2025 ļæ¼. ⢠Retail example: A $30 cotton sweater could jump to ~$35.80 with current tariffs, and to ~$57.97 with full implementation of high-tier rates ļæ¼.
4. Trade Strategy & Legal Challenges ⢠The second Trump administrationās tariff policy raised the average U.S. import duty from ~2.5% in January to roughly 27% by April, later easing to around 15.8% by mid-June ļæ¼. ⢠Tariffsāincluding 50% on steel/aluminum and 25% on carsāwere implemented under national emergency and trade laws. Courts have blocked some under IEEPA, with rulings going through appeal ļæ¼.
1. Pressure on U.S. Businesses ⢠A recent AP analysis estimates U.S. employers will absorb around $82.3āÆbillion in costs due to tariffs, not foreign producersālikely passed to consumers via price hikes, layoffs, or margin cuts, particularly in retail and wholesale sectors ļæ¼. ⢠The Congressional Budget Office projects tariffs will lift inflation by 0.4āÆpercentage points in both 2025 and 2026, modestly dent GDP, but reduce the federal deficit by an estimated $2.8āÆtrillion over the next decade ļæ¼.
2. Macroeconomic & Market Reactions ⢠The U.S. dollar dropped 10.8% in H1 2025āthe worst performance in over 50 yearsāamid investor worries about trade and policy instability ļæ¼. ⢠Despite trade pressures, U.S. inflation remained subdued in May 2025, with core CPI up just 0.1% MoM, as companies mitigated effects by using inventory buffers ļæ¼. ⢠Federal Reserve Chair Powell admitted tariffs are a factor delaying interest rate cuts, citing inflation pressures ļæ¼.
3. Sectoral and Household Effects ⢠The Penn & Wharton Budget Model estimates tariffs could reduce longārun GDP by ~6% and wages by ~5%, costing a middle-income household around $22,000 over its lifetime ļæ¼. ⢠A Tax Foundation report calculates tariff hikes amounting to nearly $1,200 per household in 2025 ļæ¼. ⢠Retail example: A $30 cotton sweater could jump to ~$35.80 with current tariffs, and to ~$57.97 with full implementation of high-tier rates ļæ¼.
4. Trade Strategy & Legal Challenges ⢠The second Trump administrationās tariff policy raised the average U.S. import duty from ~2.5% in January to roughly 27% by April, later easing to around 15.8% by mid-June ļæ¼. ⢠Tariffsāincluding 50% on steel/aluminum and 25% on carsāwere implemented under national emergency and trade laws. Courts have blocked some under IEEPA, with rulings going through appeal ļæ¼.
Possible Interpretations: 1. Elon Musk Starting a Political Party? There have been rumors and speculation in the past that Elon Musk might support or start a political movement or party in the U.S., especially due to his vocal opinions on free speech, government regulation, and political bias. But as of now, no formal āMusk American Partyā exists. 2. Support for Independents or Centrists: Musk has shown support for independent or centrist views and has criticized both Democratic and Republican extremes. If he ever backs a party, it might emphasize: ⢠Free speech ⢠Innovation/technology ⢠Minimal government interference ⢠Crypto-friendly and AI-forward policies 3. Social Media Trends or Memes: The phrase could also be from Twitter/X memes or satire about Musk forming his own party ā sometimes jokingly referred to as āTechnocracy,ā āX Party,ā or āMars First.
Possible Interpretations: 1. Elon Musk Starting a Political Party? There have been rumors and speculation in the past that Elon Musk might support or start a political movement or party in the U.S., especially due to his vocal opinions on free speech, government regulation, and political bias. But as of now, no formal āMusk American Partyā exists. 2. Support for Independents or Centrists: Musk has shown support for independent or centrist views and has criticized both Democratic and Republican extremes. If he ever backs a party, it might emphasize: ⢠Free speech ⢠Innovation/technology ⢠Minimal government interference ⢠Crypto-friendly and AI-forward policies 3. Social Media Trends or Memes: The phrase could also be from Twitter/X memes or satire about Musk forming his own party ā sometimes jokingly referred to as āTechnocracy,ā āX Party,ā or āMars First.
Possible Interpretations: 1. Elon Musk Starting a Political Party? There have been rumors and speculation in the past that Elon Musk might support or start a political movement or party in the U.S., especially due to his vocal opinions on free speech, government regulation, and political bias. But as of now, no formal āMusk American Partyā exists. 2. Support for Independents or Centrists: Musk has shown support for independent or centrist views and has criticized both Democratic and Republican extremes. If he ever backs a party, it might emphasize: ⢠Free speech ⢠Innovation/technology ⢠Minimal government interference ⢠Crypto-friendly and AI-forward policies 3. Social Media Trends or Memes: The phrase could also be from Twitter/X memes or satire about Musk forming his own party ā sometimes jokingly referred to as āTechnocracy,ā āX Party,ā or āMars First.
Possible Interpretations: 1. Elon Musk Starting a Political Party? There have been rumors and speculation in the past that Elon Musk might support or start a political movement or party in the U.S., especially due to his vocal opinions on free speech, government regulation, and political bias. But as of now, no formal āMusk American Partyā exists. 2. Support for Independents or Centrists: Musk has shown support for independent or centrist views and has criticized both Democratic and Republican extremes. If he ever backs a party, it might emphasize: ⢠Free speech ⢠Innovation/technology ⢠Minimal government interference ⢠Crypto-friendly and AI-forward policies 3. Social Media Trends or Memes: The phrase could also be from Twitter/X memes or satire about Musk forming his own party ā sometimes jokingly referred to as āTechnocracy,ā āX Party,ā or āMars First.
š Excited about the future of Web3 with @WalletConnect and $WCT !
#WalletConnect is truly redefining how users interact with decentralized apps by providing secure, fast, and user-friendly wallet connections across multiple blockchains. With $WCT at the core of this ecosystem, the project is set to unlock even more powerful features ā including governance, staking, and incentives for active community members. š„
Whether you're accessing dApps, trading NFTs, or exploring DeFi protocols, WalletConnect ensures a seamless experience without compromising security. It's a major step forward in making blockchain technology more accessible and interoperable.
I believe $WCT has massive potential in driving mass adoption of Web3 by rewarding participation and enhancing the user experience.
If youāre looking for a real use-case token in the wallet connectivity space, $WCT should be on your radar. š²š
Letās build a truly decentralized future ā one connection at a time.
WalletConnect Token (WCT) is the native ERCā20 token powering the WalletConnect Network, an encrypted protocol that lets crypto wallets connect to decentralized apps (dApps) without exposing private keys ļæ¼.
āø»
š Core Details ⢠Ticker & Network: WCT on the Optimism Layerā2 Ethereum network ļæ¼. ⢠Total Supply: 1 billion tokens, with about 186.2āÆmillion (~18.6%) currently circulating ļæ¼. ⢠Current Price: Roughly $0.33 USD, with a market cap around $61ā63 million ļæ¼. ⢠ATH/ATL: ⢠All-time high: $1.37 (May 31, 2025) ļæ¼ ⢠All-time low: $0.278 (April 15, 2025) ļæ¼
āø»
š ļø Token Utility 1. Governance: Holders can vote on protocol changesālike fee structures and upgrades ļæ¼. 2. Staking & Rewards: Stake WCT (locked for 1āÆweek to 2āÆyears) to earn passive rewards from network fees, node performance, and wallet usage ļæ¼. 3. Network Fees: While currently free for users, fees paid by dApps and node operators may be implemented via governance voting ().
WalletConnect Token (WCT) is the native ERCā20 token powering the WalletConnect Network, an encrypted protocol that lets crypto wallets connect to decentralized apps (dApps) without exposing private keys ļæ¼.
āø»
š Core Details ⢠Ticker & Network: WCT on the Optimism Layerā2 Ethereum network ļæ¼. ⢠Total Supply: 1 billion tokens, with about 186.2āÆmillion (~18.6%) currently circulating ļæ¼. ⢠Current Price: Roughly $0.33 USD, with a market cap around $61ā63 million ļæ¼. ⢠ATH/ATL: ⢠All-time high: $1.37 (May 31, 2025) ļæ¼ ⢠All-time low: $0.278 (April 15, 2025) ļæ¼
āø»
š ļø Token Utility 1. Governance: Holders can vote on protocol changesālike fee structures and upgrades ļæ¼. 2. Staking & Rewards: Stake WCT (locked for 1āÆweek to 2āÆyears) to earn passive rewards from network fees, node performance, and wallet usage ļæ¼. 3. Network Fees: While currently free for users, fees paid by dApps and node operators may be implemented via governance voting ().
(This includes both public debt and intragovernmental holdings.)
āø»
š Breakdown: ⢠Debt held by the public: ~$28 trillion ⢠Treasury securities bought by individuals, corporations, foreign governments (e.g., China, Japan), and the Federal Reserve. ⢠Intragovernmental holdings: ~$6.9 trillion ⢠Debt the government owes to itself (e.g., Social Security Trust Fund, Medicare).
āø»
š Why is the debt growing? 1. Interest payments: Rising interest rates mean higher payments on existing debt. 2. Budget deficits: The government spends more than it collects in taxes. 3. Mandatory spending: Programs like Social Security, Medicare, and defense consume a large share. 4. Pandemic relief and stimulus programs (legacy impact from 2020ā2022).
āø»
šŗšø Debt-to-GDP Ratio (2025): ⢠Around 123% of GDP A level considered high historically. For context:
⢠Post-WWII peak was ~119% (1946). ⢠2007 (pre-crisis): ~62%
āø»
š Why does it matter? ⢠Higher interest payments: Crowds out other spending. ⢠Investor confidence: Impacts bond yields and dollar strength. ⢠Inflation risk: If financed by money creation. ⢠Political pressure: On programs, taxes, and borrowing limits.
(This includes both public debt and intragovernmental holdings.)
āø»
š Breakdown: ⢠Debt held by the public: ~$28 trillion ⢠Treasury securities bought by individuals, corporations, foreign governments (e.g., China, Japan), and the Federal Reserve. ⢠Intragovernmental holdings: ~$6.9 trillion ⢠Debt the government owes to itself (e.g., Social Security Trust Fund, Medicare).
āø»
š Why is the debt growing? 1. Interest payments: Rising interest rates mean higher payments on existing debt. 2. Budget deficits: The government spends more than it collects in taxes. 3. Mandatory spending: Programs like Social Security, Medicare, and defense consume a large share. 4. Pandemic relief and stimulus programs (legacy impact from 2020ā2022).
āø»
šŗšø Debt-to-GDP Ratio (2025): ⢠Around 123% of GDP A level considered high historically. For context:
⢠Post-WWII peak was ~119% (1946). ⢠2007 (pre-crisis): ~62%
āø»
š Why does it matter? ⢠Higher interest payments: Crowds out other spending. ⢠Investor confidence: Impacts bond yields and dollar strength. ⢠Inflation risk: If financed by money creation. ⢠Political pressure: On programs, taxes, and borrowing limits.
(This includes both public debt and intragovernmental holdings.)
āø»
š Breakdown: ⢠Debt held by the public: ~$28 trillion ⢠Treasury securities bought by individuals, corporations, foreign governments (e.g., China, Japan), and the Federal Reserve. ⢠Intragovernmental holdings: ~$6.9 trillion ⢠Debt the government owes to itself (e.g., Social Security Trust Fund, Medicare).
āø»
š Why is the debt growing? 1. Interest payments: Rising interest rates mean higher payments on existing debt. 2. Budget deficits: The government spends more than it collects in taxes. 3. Mandatory spending: Programs like Social Security, Medicare, and defense consume a large share. 4. Pandemic relief and stimulus programs (legacy impact from 2020ā2022).
āø»
šŗšø Debt-to-GDP Ratio (2025): ⢠Around 123% of GDP A level considered high historically. For context:
⢠Post-WWII peak was ~119% (1946). ⢠2007 (pre-crisis): ~62%
āø»
š Why does it matter? ⢠Higher interest payments: Crowds out other spending. ⢠Investor confidence: Impacts bond yields and dollar strength. ⢠Inflation risk: If financed by money creation. ⢠Political pressure: On programs, taxes, and borrowing limits.
(This includes both public debt and intragovernmental holdings.)
āø»
š Breakdown: ⢠Debt held by the public: ~$28 trillion ⢠Treasury securities bought by individuals, corporations, foreign governments (e.g., China, Japan), and the Federal Reserve. ⢠Intragovernmental holdings: ~$6.9 trillion ⢠Debt the government owes to itself (e.g., Social Security Trust Fund, Medicare).
āø»
š Why is the debt growing? 1. Interest payments: Rising interest rates mean higher payments on existing debt. 2. Budget deficits: The government spends more than it collects in taxes. 3. Mandatory spending: Programs like Social Security, Medicare, and defense consume a large share. 4. Pandemic relief and stimulus programs (legacy impact from 2020ā2022).
āø»
šŗšø Debt-to-GDP Ratio (2025): ⢠Around 123% of GDP A level considered high historically. For context:
⢠Post-WWII peak was ~119% (1946). ⢠2007 (pre-crisis): ~62%
āø»
š Why does it matter? ⢠Higher interest payments: Crowds out other spending. ⢠Investor confidence: Impacts bond yields and dollar strength. ⢠Inflation risk: If financed by money creation. ⢠Political pressure: On programs, taxes, and borrowing limits.
See my returns and portfolio breakdown. Follow for investment tips š° $34.9 trillion
(This includes both public debt and intragovernmental holdings.)
āø»
š Breakdown: ⢠Debt held by the public: ~$28 trillion ⢠Treasury securities bought by individuals, corporations, foreign governments (e.g., China, Japan), and the Federal Reserve. ⢠Intragovernmental holdings: ~$6.9 trillion ⢠Debt the government owes to itself (e.g., Social Security Trust Fund, Medicare).
āø»
š Why is the debt growing? 1. Interest payments: Rising interest rates mean higher payments on existing debt. 2. Budget deficits: The government spends more than it collects in taxes. 3. Mandatory spending: Programs like Social Security, Medicare, and defense consume a large share. 4. Pandemic relief and stimulus programs (legacy impact from 2020ā2022).
āø»
šŗšø Debt-to-GDP Ratio (2025): ⢠Around 123% of GDP A level considered high historically. For context:
⢠Post-WWII peak was ~119% (1946). ⢠2007 (pre-crisis): ~62%
āø»
š Why does it matter? ⢠Higher interest payments: Crowds out other spending. ⢠Investor confidence: Impacts bond yields and dollar strength. ⢠Inflation risk: If financed by money creation. ⢠Political pressure: On programs, taxes, and borrowing limits.