The Dark Lord of CryptoWar
Open Trade
Frequent Trader
3.2 Years
To know me know me is to fly with me - hacker, crypto FX trader, innovator | follow me for coin news and security related issues x.com/h4ck3rph1ll
8 Following
18 Followers
19 Liked
6 Shared
All
Quotes
⚠️‼️WARNING‼️⚠️
TradingView Malware aims for your Cryptos
TradingView is currently heavily advatiaing their new AI features but who ever installs it has to go through a process to execute a command from gitub.
Dont fall dor it and loose your cryptos it delivers a malware!
#malware #youtube #tradingview
TradingView Malware aims for your Cryptos
TradingView is currently heavily advatiaing their new AI features but who ever installs it has to go through a process to execute a command from gitub.
Dont fall dor it and loose your cryptos it delivers a malware!
#malware #youtube #tradingview
Bitcoin ’s August pullback arrived as predicted
What does this mean for the latest price drop? It could be the end, as it broke the daily bands for the first time, but considering where we are in the cycle, August could be a 0% moving month (+-3%). However, I believe September to December will be extremely hot, with the final top arriving in December.
#bitcoin $BTC
What does this mean for the latest price drop? It could be the end, as it broke the daily bands for the first time, but considering where we are in the cycle, August could be a 0% moving month (+-3%). However, I believe September to December will be extremely hot, with the final top arriving in December.
#bitcoin $BTC
The TICS scam
While normal investors received their $TICS on July 30th, the exchanges allowed trading a month earlier. According to onchain analysis over that period, the total trading volume was $12M USD.
This allowed the team to cash out, in addition to the nearly $20M they received from investors, while promoting their scam coin to launch 20% above the previous sale phase, which would have been around $0.50.
Guess what happened? On July 30th, the token became worthless, dropping to $0.05.
It’s likely that the token won’t recover anytime soon, leaving some late investors with massive losses.
#tics #qubetics
While normal investors received their $TICS on July 30th, the exchanges allowed trading a month earlier. According to onchain analysis over that period, the total trading volume was $12M USD.
This allowed the team to cash out, in addition to the nearly $20M they received from investors, while promoting their scam coin to launch 20% above the previous sale phase, which would have been around $0.50.
Guess what happened? On July 30th, the token became worthless, dropping to $0.05.
It’s likely that the token won’t recover anytime soon, leaving some late investors with massive losses.
#tics #qubetics
The TICS scam
While normal investors received their $TICS on July 30th, the exchanges allowed trading a month earlier. According to onchain analysis over that period, the total trading volume was $12M USD.
This allowed the team to cash out, in addition to the nearly $20M they received from investors, while promoting their scam coin to launch 20% above the previous sale phase, which would have been around $0.50.
Guess what happened? On July 30th, the token became worthless, dropping to $0.05.
It’s likely that the token won’t recover anytime soon, leaving some late investors with massive losses.
While normal investors received their $TICS on July 30th, the exchanges allowed trading a month earlier. According to onchain analysis over that period, the total trading volume was $12M USD.
This allowed the team to cash out, in addition to the nearly $20M they received from investors, while promoting their scam coin to launch 20% above the previous sale phase, which would have been around $0.50.
Guess what happened? On July 30th, the token became worthless, dropping to $0.05.
It’s likely that the token won’t recover anytime soon, leaving some late investors with massive losses.
The price of $TICS plummeted sharply after the start of distributing 10% of holder Qubetics. This is a stark contrast to their promise during the presale phase, where they offered 0.33$ and a 20% increase on listing. Experienced traders were aware of this potential outcome.
Source - ChatGPT
TICS a scam? Ask AI
Common Crypto Scam Red Flags
• Empty or Minimal GitHub Activity
Legitimate blockchain projects maintain active, open-source repositories with frequent commits, issue tracking, and pull requests. An empty or near-idle GitHub often signals that the code may not exist or is not maintained .
• Anonymous or Unverified Team
Projects where team members can’t be identified or verified are high-risk, since anonymity prevents accountability and proper due diligence .
• Unrealistic Return Promises
Guarantees of high or “guaranteed” returns without a grounded technical roadmap are hallmark tactics of pump-and-dump or Ponzi schemes .
• Lack of Independent Security Audits
Reputable projects undergo third-party code audits and build in standard security checks (like re-entrancy protection). Absence of formal reviews suggests potential vulnerabilities or malicious code .
• Poor or Missing Whitepaper
A clear, detailed whitepaper outlining technical specs, tokenomics, and roadmap is essential; a vague, missing, or plagiarized whitepaper undermines credibility .
⸻
Applying These Red Flags to Qubetics
• GitHub Activity
Qubetics’ GitHub organization hosts only six public repositories. Five of these show exactly one initial commit on January 23, 2025, with no further updates, and only qubetics-testnet-script has five commits (last on April 10, 2025). There is no issue backlog, pull-request history, or significant community engagement .
• Team Anonymity
The org lists zero public members, and neither the official website nor blog discloses real-world names—only pseudonymous handles—making identity verification impossible .
• Marketing Hype & Unrealistic Promises
Official announcements portray Qubetics as the “ultimate solution” for blockchain fragmentation, tout AI-powered low-code tools, seamless multi-chain interoperability, and “300%” presale returns—claims unsupported by independent benchmarks or prototypes .
• Security Audits
Although repos like qubetics-evm-api include a placeholder SECURITY.md, there are no published audit reports, bug-bounty results, or third-party vulnerability disclosures—heightening the risk of hidden flaws or backdoors .
• Whitepaper Transparency
A 50+ page whitepaper is available outlining architecture and tokenomics, which mitigates this red flag somewhat, but it has not undergone community or academic review, leaving its technical claims unverified .
⸻
Likelihood of Scam
Given the concentration of critical red flags—near-absent GitHub maintenance, full team anonymity, aggressive marketing hype, lack of independent audits, and unvetted technical claims—Qubetics falls into a high-risk category. While this does not prove outright fraud, the project exhibits the classic warning signs of a scam or an abandoned codebase. Anyone considering involvement should proceed with extreme caution, insist on independent code audits, and demand verifiable team credentials before engaging.
#Tics #qubetics #SCAMalerts
• Empty or Minimal GitHub Activity
Legitimate blockchain projects maintain active, open-source repositories with frequent commits, issue tracking, and pull requests. An empty or near-idle GitHub often signals that the code may not exist or is not maintained .
• Anonymous or Unverified Team
Projects where team members can’t be identified or verified are high-risk, since anonymity prevents accountability and proper due diligence .
• Unrealistic Return Promises
Guarantees of high or “guaranteed” returns without a grounded technical roadmap are hallmark tactics of pump-and-dump or Ponzi schemes .
• Lack of Independent Security Audits
Reputable projects undergo third-party code audits and build in standard security checks (like re-entrancy protection). Absence of formal reviews suggests potential vulnerabilities or malicious code .
• Poor or Missing Whitepaper
A clear, detailed whitepaper outlining technical specs, tokenomics, and roadmap is essential; a vague, missing, or plagiarized whitepaper undermines credibility .
⸻
Applying These Red Flags to Qubetics
• GitHub Activity
Qubetics’ GitHub organization hosts only six public repositories. Five of these show exactly one initial commit on January 23, 2025, with no further updates, and only qubetics-testnet-script has five commits (last on April 10, 2025). There is no issue backlog, pull-request history, or significant community engagement .
• Team Anonymity
The org lists zero public members, and neither the official website nor blog discloses real-world names—only pseudonymous handles—making identity verification impossible .
• Marketing Hype & Unrealistic Promises
Official announcements portray Qubetics as the “ultimate solution” for blockchain fragmentation, tout AI-powered low-code tools, seamless multi-chain interoperability, and “300%” presale returns—claims unsupported by independent benchmarks or prototypes .
• Security Audits
Although repos like qubetics-evm-api include a placeholder SECURITY.md, there are no published audit reports, bug-bounty results, or third-party vulnerability disclosures—heightening the risk of hidden flaws or backdoors .
• Whitepaper Transparency
A 50+ page whitepaper is available outlining architecture and tokenomics, which mitigates this red flag somewhat, but it has not undergone community or academic review, leaving its technical claims unverified .
⸻
Likelihood of Scam
Given the concentration of critical red flags—near-absent GitHub maintenance, full team anonymity, aggressive marketing hype, lack of independent audits, and unvetted technical claims—Qubetics falls into a high-risk category. While this does not prove outright fraud, the project exhibits the classic warning signs of a scam or an abandoned codebase. Anyone considering involvement should proceed with extreme caution, insist on independent code audits, and demand verifiable team credentials before engaging.
#Tics #qubetics #SCAMalerts
TICS a scam? Ask AI
Common Crypto Scam Red Flags
• Empty or Minimal GitHub Activity
Legitimate blockchain projects maintain active, open-source repositories with frequent commits, issue tracking, and pull requests. An empty or near-idle GitHub often signals that the code may not exist or is not maintained .
• Anonymous or Unverified Team
Projects where team members can’t be identified or verified are high-risk, since anonymity prevents accountability and proper due diligence .
• Unrealistic Return Promises
Guarantees of high or “guaranteed” returns without a grounded technical roadmap are hallmark tactics of pump-and-dump or Ponzi schemes .
• Lack of Independent Security Audits
Reputable projects undergo third-party code audits and build in standard security checks (like re-entrancy protection). Absence of formal reviews suggests potential vulnerabilities or malicious code .
• Poor or Missing Whitepaper
A clear, detailed whitepaper outlining technical specs, tokenomics, and roadmap is essential; a vague, missing, or plagiarized whitepaper undermines credibility .
⸻
Applying These Red Flags to Qubetics
• GitHub Activity
Qubetics’ GitHub organization hosts only six public repositories. Five of these show exactly one initial commit on January 23, 2025, with no further updates, and only qubetics-testnet-script has five commits (last on April 10, 2025). There is no issue backlog, pull-request history, or significant community engagement .
• Team Anonymity
The org lists zero public members, and neither the official website nor blog discloses real-world names—only pseudonymous handles—making identity verification impossible .
• Marketing Hype & Unrealistic Promises
Official announcements portray Qubetics as the “ultimate solution” for blockchain fragmentation, tout AI-powered low-code tools, seamless multi-chain interoperability, and “300%” presale returns—claims unsupported by independent benchmarks or prototypes .
• Security Audits
Although repos like qubetics-evm-api include a placeholder SECURITY.md, there are no published audit reports, bug-bounty results, or third-party vulnerability disclosures—heightening the risk of hidden flaws or backdoors .
• Whitepaper Transparency
A 50+ page whitepaper is available outlining architecture and tokenomics, which mitigates this red flag somewhat, but it has not undergone community or academic review, leaving its technical claims unverified .
⸻
Likelihood of Scam
Given the concentration of critical red flags—near-absent GitHub maintenance, full team anonymity, aggressive marketing hype, lack of independent audits, and unvetted technical claims—Qubetics falls into a high-risk category. While this does not prove outright fraud, the project exhibits the classic warning signs of a scam or an abandoned codebase. Anyone considering involvement should proceed with extreme caution, insist on independent code audits, and demand verifiable team credentials before engaging.
#Tics #qubetics #SCAMalerts
• Empty or Minimal GitHub Activity
Legitimate blockchain projects maintain active, open-source repositories with frequent commits, issue tracking, and pull requests. An empty or near-idle GitHub often signals that the code may not exist or is not maintained .
• Anonymous or Unverified Team
Projects where team members can’t be identified or verified are high-risk, since anonymity prevents accountability and proper due diligence .
• Unrealistic Return Promises
Guarantees of high or “guaranteed” returns without a grounded technical roadmap are hallmark tactics of pump-and-dump or Ponzi schemes .
• Lack of Independent Security Audits
Reputable projects undergo third-party code audits and build in standard security checks (like re-entrancy protection). Absence of formal reviews suggests potential vulnerabilities or malicious code .
• Poor or Missing Whitepaper
A clear, detailed whitepaper outlining technical specs, tokenomics, and roadmap is essential; a vague, missing, or plagiarized whitepaper undermines credibility .
⸻
Applying These Red Flags to Qubetics
• GitHub Activity
Qubetics’ GitHub organization hosts only six public repositories. Five of these show exactly one initial commit on January 23, 2025, with no further updates, and only qubetics-testnet-script has five commits (last on April 10, 2025). There is no issue backlog, pull-request history, or significant community engagement .
• Team Anonymity
The org lists zero public members, and neither the official website nor blog discloses real-world names—only pseudonymous handles—making identity verification impossible .
• Marketing Hype & Unrealistic Promises
Official announcements portray Qubetics as the “ultimate solution” for blockchain fragmentation, tout AI-powered low-code tools, seamless multi-chain interoperability, and “300%” presale returns—claims unsupported by independent benchmarks or prototypes .
• Security Audits
Although repos like qubetics-evm-api include a placeholder SECURITY.md, there are no published audit reports, bug-bounty results, or third-party vulnerability disclosures—heightening the risk of hidden flaws or backdoors .
• Whitepaper Transparency
A 50+ page whitepaper is available outlining architecture and tokenomics, which mitigates this red flag somewhat, but it has not undergone community or academic review, leaving its technical claims unverified .
⸻
Likelihood of Scam
Given the concentration of critical red flags—near-absent GitHub maintenance, full team anonymity, aggressive marketing hype, lack of independent audits, and unvetted technical claims—Qubetics falls into a high-risk category. While this does not prove outright fraud, the project exhibits the classic warning signs of a scam or an abandoned codebase. Anyone considering involvement should proceed with extreme caution, insist on independent code audits, and demand verifiable team credentials before engaging.
#Tics #qubetics #SCAMalerts
Bitcoin was so much better better before big money got involved
Cointelegraph
--
Bitcoin up 33% since 2024 halving as institutions disrupt cycle
Bitcoin holders are celebrating one year since the 2024 Bitcoin halving by praising BTC’s resilience amid a global trade war and suggesting an accelerated market cycle due to a growing institutional presence.
The 2024 Bitcoin halving reduced block rewards from 6.25 Bitcoin (BTC) to 3.125 BTC, slashing new BTC issuance in half.
Despite rising concerns over a global trade war and escalating tariff tensions between the United States and China, BTC has climbed more than 33% since April 2024, Cointelegraph Markets Pro data shows.
BTC/USD, 1-year chart. Source: Cointelegraph Markets Pro
“So, even though Bitcoin’s showing resilience, I think the mix of past experiences, economic uncertainty, and this selling pressure is keeping investors on the sidelines, waiting for a stronger green light before they jump in,” said Enmanuel Cardozo, a market analyst at asset tokenization platform Brickken.
Cardozo added that institutional investment from firms such as Strategy and Tether could speed up Bitcoin’s traditional four-year halving cycle. He added:
“For the 2024 halving in May, that puts the bottom around Q3 this year and a peak mid-2026, but I think we might see things move it a bit sooner because the market’s more mature now with more liquidity.”
However, Bitcoin’s trajectory remains tied to broader monetary policy, the analyst added. He said a US Federal Reserve rate cut in May or June may “pump more money into the system and push Bitcoin up faster.”
The halving is a built-in feature of the Bitcoin network that assures Bitcoin’s scarcity, which is considered one of BTC’s defining monetary characteristics.
ETFs and institutions fuel faster cycle
Institutional adoption and Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) may be contributing to a shorter market cycle, according to Vugar Usi Zade, chief operating officer at Bitget exchange.
Continued institutional buying, including by Bitcoin ETFs, paired with Bitcoin’s rising scarcity, may accelerate Bitcoin’s rise to new highs, he told Cointelegraph.
“With growing scarcity triggered by the halving, Bitcoin will likely retest its all-time high if it breaches the $90,000 mark in the coming weeks,” Usi Zade said. “While the halving offers a good basis for growth based on demand and scarcity, the timeline for impact on price can vary over time.”
He noted that Bitcoin’s growth remains closely tied to traditional financial markets and investor sentiment.
Bitcoin reached a new all-time high above $109,000 on Jan. 20, 273 days after the 2024 Bitcoin halving, signaling an accelerated market cycle.
Source: Jelle
In comparison, it took Bitcoin 546 days to reach an all-time high after the 2021 halving, and 518 days after the 2017 halving, according to data shared by popular crypto trader Jelle, in an April 8 X post.
Magazine: Bitcoin’s odds of June highs, SOL’s $485M outflows, and more: Hodler’s Digest, March 2 – 8
The 2024 Bitcoin halving reduced block rewards from 6.25 Bitcoin (BTC) to 3.125 BTC, slashing new BTC issuance in half.
Despite rising concerns over a global trade war and escalating tariff tensions between the United States and China, BTC has climbed more than 33% since April 2024, Cointelegraph Markets Pro data shows.
BTC/USD, 1-year chart. Source: Cointelegraph Markets Pro
“So, even though Bitcoin’s showing resilience, I think the mix of past experiences, economic uncertainty, and this selling pressure is keeping investors on the sidelines, waiting for a stronger green light before they jump in,” said Enmanuel Cardozo, a market analyst at asset tokenization platform Brickken.
Cardozo added that institutional investment from firms such as Strategy and Tether could speed up Bitcoin’s traditional four-year halving cycle. He added:
“For the 2024 halving in May, that puts the bottom around Q3 this year and a peak mid-2026, but I think we might see things move it a bit sooner because the market’s more mature now with more liquidity.”
However, Bitcoin’s trajectory remains tied to broader monetary policy, the analyst added. He said a US Federal Reserve rate cut in May or June may “pump more money into the system and push Bitcoin up faster.”
The halving is a built-in feature of the Bitcoin network that assures Bitcoin’s scarcity, which is considered one of BTC’s defining monetary characteristics.
ETFs and institutions fuel faster cycle
Institutional adoption and Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) may be contributing to a shorter market cycle, according to Vugar Usi Zade, chief operating officer at Bitget exchange.
Continued institutional buying, including by Bitcoin ETFs, paired with Bitcoin’s rising scarcity, may accelerate Bitcoin’s rise to new highs, he told Cointelegraph.
“With growing scarcity triggered by the halving, Bitcoin will likely retest its all-time high if it breaches the $90,000 mark in the coming weeks,” Usi Zade said. “While the halving offers a good basis for growth based on demand and scarcity, the timeline for impact on price can vary over time.”
He noted that Bitcoin’s growth remains closely tied to traditional financial markets and investor sentiment.
Bitcoin reached a new all-time high above $109,000 on Jan. 20, 273 days after the 2024 Bitcoin halving, signaling an accelerated market cycle.
Source: Jelle
In comparison, it took Bitcoin 546 days to reach an all-time high after the 2021 halving, and 518 days after the 2017 halving, according to data shared by popular crypto trader Jelle, in an April 8 X post.
Magazine: Bitcoin’s odds of June highs, SOL’s $485M outflows, and more: Hodler’s Digest, March 2 – 8
It’s dead so we might see a dead cat bounce
What is the reason behind the sudden crash of MANTRA(OM)?
The significant decline in the price of Mantra (OM) tokens can be attributed to several interconnected factors:
Whale Profit-Taking: After OM reached an all-time high of 4.52, large investors, known as whales, began selling their holdings to realize profits. For instance, one whale transferred OM tokens worth1.3 million to Binance, and another sent tokens valued at $534,000 to OKX. This selling pressure contributed to the price drop. Increased Exchange Supply: Following the whale sell-offs, the supply of OM tokens on exchanges grew by 2% over a three-day period. This rise in exchange supply indicates that investors were moving their tokens from private wallets to exchanges, likely in preparation for selling, which added to the downward pressure on the price. Overbought Market Conditions: Prior to the decline, technical indicators such as the Relative Strength Index (RSI) surged to an overbought level of 92. An overbought market often leads to price corrections as traders sell to capitalize on gains, further exacerbating the price drop.
These factors combined led to a significant decrease in OM's price. It's essential for investors to monitor whale activities, exchange supply levels, and technical indicators to better understand and anticipate such market movements.
WILL MANTRA (OM) RISE AGAIN? WHAT DO YOU SAY? WHATS YOUR OPINION?
$OM
Whale Profit-Taking: After OM reached an all-time high of 4.52, large investors, known as whales, began selling their holdings to realize profits. For instance, one whale transferred OM tokens worth1.3 million to Binance, and another sent tokens valued at $534,000 to OKX. This selling pressure contributed to the price drop. Increased Exchange Supply: Following the whale sell-offs, the supply of OM tokens on exchanges grew by 2% over a three-day period. This rise in exchange supply indicates that investors were moving their tokens from private wallets to exchanges, likely in preparation for selling, which added to the downward pressure on the price. Overbought Market Conditions: Prior to the decline, technical indicators such as the Relative Strength Index (RSI) surged to an overbought level of 92. An overbought market often leads to price corrections as traders sell to capitalize on gains, further exacerbating the price drop.
These factors combined led to a significant decrease in OM's price. It's essential for investors to monitor whale activities, exchange supply levels, and technical indicators to better understand and anticipate such market movements.
WILL MANTRA (OM) RISE AGAIN? WHAT DO YOU SAY? WHATS YOUR OPINION?
$OM
Poloniex hacked
Bitcoin once ETF gets accepted
Crypto Rovers prediction seems pretty accurate
#BitcoinETFLaunch $BTC #etf #blackrocketf
Crypto Rovers prediction seems pretty accurate
#BitcoinETFLaunch $BTC #etf #blackrocketf
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Trending Topics
BuiltonSolayer
29,195 views
418 Discussing
#BuiltonSolayer solayer is emerging as a next-gen modular Layer 2 platform, bringing unmatched scalability, lightning-fast transactions, and lower gas fees to the Ethereum ecosystem. Built with a developer-first approach, Solayer empowers builders to launch dApps with custom configurations and enhanced performance. Its modular architecture allows flexibility, while maintaining Ethereum-level security. Whether you're building DeFi, gaming, or AI-powered applications, Solayer provides the ideal infrastructure to scale seamlessly.
🔧 Built for builders
⚡ Powered by speed
🛡️ Secured by Ethereum
🌐 #BuiltonSolayer$SOL #BuiltonSolayer #BTCReserveStrategy #BinanceHODLerPROVE #BinanceHODLerTOWNS
📍
shabir crypto
0 Likes
2 views
IPOWave
21,994 views
301 Discussing
BTCUnbound
1.4M views
6,343 Discussing
