Binance Square

physicality

Open Trade
ETH Holder
ETH Holder
Frequent Trader
4.2 Years
ido 打新/NFT早期项目研究/alpha/不构成任何投资建议
2 Following
22 Followers
28 Liked
0 Shared
All Content
Portfolio
--
See original
Recently关注了 @WalletConnect and its token $WCT to be honest, I wasn't optimistic about this project from the beginning. Because it is too 'backend', unlike those flashy on-chain games or NFT projects, it doesn't even have a UI. But as I looked deeper, I found that this might actually be the protocol worth paying attention to in the long term. In these years of Web3, everyone has been talking about 'decentralized identity', but in the end, **who is responsible for the 'connection'?** It's not the wallet, it's not the DApp, but rather underlying protocols like WalletConnect that have almost no presence. Just like in the early days of the internet, no one paid attention to TCP/IP, but without it, we couldn't even open web pages. WalletConnect is the same; it makes connecting wallets a 'common practice', but behind this, there is a whole set of communication standards running. Then there's $WCT. It's not the kind of coin that is going to take off immediately upon launch, and I haven't seen any 'hype script' for it. But one interesting point is that it attempts to assign value to the 'act of connecting' itself. In other words, you are not just signing with your wallet, but you are participating in the 'governance' of this connection ecosystem. In the future, you might be able to use $WCT to decide the standards for which wallets get priority access, or who can use certain protocol features. For me, this is a shift of underlying power. You are not a consumer of Web3, but the connector itself. If Bitcoin grants you the 'right to control assets', then #Walletconnecet + $WCT tells you: 'You can also define the rules of connection.' This line of thinking is much more digestible than those projects that frequently airdrop, form groups, or wash images.
Recently关注了 @WalletConnect and its token $WCT to be honest, I wasn't optimistic about this project from the beginning. Because it is too 'backend', unlike those flashy on-chain games or NFT projects, it doesn't even have a UI. But as I looked deeper, I found that this might actually be the protocol worth paying attention to in the long term.

In these years of Web3, everyone has been talking about 'decentralized identity', but in the end, **who is responsible for the 'connection'?** It's not the wallet, it's not the DApp, but rather underlying protocols like WalletConnect that have almost no presence. Just like in the early days of the internet, no one paid attention to TCP/IP, but without it, we couldn't even open web pages. WalletConnect is the same; it makes connecting wallets a 'common practice', but behind this, there is a whole set of communication standards running.

Then there's $WCT . It's not the kind of coin that is going to take off immediately upon launch, and I haven't seen any 'hype script' for it. But one interesting point is that it attempts to assign value to the 'act of connecting' itself. In other words, you are not just signing with your wallet, but you are participating in the 'governance' of this connection ecosystem. In the future, you might be able to use $WCT to decide the standards for which wallets get priority access, or who can use certain protocol features.

For me, this is a shift of underlying power. You are not a consumer of Web3, but the connector itself. If Bitcoin grants you the 'right to control assets', then #Walletconnecet + $WCT tells you: 'You can also define the rules of connection.'

This line of thinking is much more digestible than those projects that frequently airdrop, form groups, or wash images.
WCT/USDT
Buy
Price
0.3127
See original
$NEWT has everyone received it? The system shows heavy load, but it has actually been received. Please check in the wallet.
$NEWT has everyone received it? The system shows heavy load, but it has actually been received. Please check in the wallet.
See original
Recently, more and more people have started discussing @WalletConnect and its token $WCT . I also spent some time delving into it. To be honest, many projects talk about 'changing the world', but WalletConnect has made me feel a kind of 'quietly changing the underlying logic' power. We are used to opening wallets and connecting to DApps, and many people may not have noticed that the WalletConnect protocol is actually running behind the scenes. It is like the 'Bluetooth' of Web3—unobtrusive, but without it, many experiences simply cannot happen. As for $WCT, my opinion may differ from most people's. I don’t see it as a coin used to 'pump prices'; on the contrary, I prefer to view it as a kind of value attribution to the act of connection itself. In the past, connections were free and tool-like; but in the future, connection may represent a kind of power, a priority, or even a reputation. $WCT is more like your 'voice' in this connection network. In other words, if a wallet is your identity card to Web3, then #walletconecct + $WCT may be the key to whether you can be 'trusted' and whether you can 'gain priority access to certain circles'. It is an invisible underlying protocol that is now starting to 'speak up', and I think it is worth continuous attention. {spot}(WCTUSDT)
Recently, more and more people have started discussing @WalletConnect and its token $WCT . I also spent some time delving into it. To be honest, many projects talk about 'changing the world', but WalletConnect has made me feel a kind of 'quietly changing the underlying logic' power.

We are used to opening wallets and connecting to DApps, and many people may not have noticed that the WalletConnect protocol is actually running behind the scenes. It is like the 'Bluetooth' of Web3—unobtrusive, but without it, many experiences simply cannot happen.

As for $WCT , my opinion may differ from most people's. I don’t see it as a coin used to 'pump prices'; on the contrary, I prefer to view it as a kind of value attribution to the act of connection itself. In the past, connections were free and tool-like; but in the future, connection may represent a kind of power, a priority, or even a reputation. $WCT is more like your 'voice' in this connection network.

In other words, if a wallet is your identity card to Web3, then #walletconecct + $WCT may be the key to whether you can be 'trusted' and whether you can 'gain priority access to certain circles'. It is an invisible underlying protocol that is now starting to 'speak up', and I think it is worth continuous attention.
See original
In the Web3 world, the power of connection is gradually shifting from platforms to users, and WalletConnect is the key engine of this trend. As a decentralized protocol, it is not a wallet, but a 'bridge between wallets', allowing hundreds of wallets to communicate securely with DApps, forming a true 'digital identity gateway'. Compared to those super wallets or platforms fighting for user traffic, WalletConnect's value lies in its choice to not be the main character, but instead become an indispensable supporting role for every main character. The potential of $WCT (WalletConnect Token) may not lie in its 'market value', but in its future role as a governance and permission distribution tool within the connection ecosystem. Imagine a future where every connection, every authorization, and every verification can be incentivized or filtered through WalletConnect, marking a transformation that commodifies 'connection behavior'. Connection is no longer a simple operation, but a measurable, valuable, and governable asset. WalletConnect is the medium that transforms 'user connection behavior' from a technical act into an economic act. Therefore, if we view $WCT through the traditional logic of 'token = project profit rights', we may underestimate its true role. It is more like a ticket to a world where 'identity equals asset'.
In the Web3 world, the power of connection is gradually shifting from platforms to users, and WalletConnect is the key engine of this trend. As a decentralized protocol, it is not a wallet, but a 'bridge between wallets', allowing hundreds of wallets to communicate securely with DApps, forming a true 'digital identity gateway'. Compared to those super wallets or platforms fighting for user traffic, WalletConnect's value lies in its choice to not be the main character, but instead become an indispensable supporting role for every main character.

The potential of $WCT (WalletConnect Token) may not lie in its 'market value', but in its future role as a governance and permission distribution tool within the connection ecosystem. Imagine a future where every connection, every authorization, and every verification can be incentivized or filtered through WalletConnect, marking a transformation that commodifies 'connection behavior'. Connection is no longer a simple operation, but a measurable, valuable, and governable asset. WalletConnect is the medium that transforms 'user connection behavior' from a technical act into an economic act.

Therefore, if we view $WCT through the traditional logic of 'token = project profit rights', we may underestimate its true role. It is more like a ticket to a world where 'identity equals asset'.
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number

Latest News

--
View More

Trending Articles

DeCrypto TokenTalks
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs