0x小白

Mudita tweeted on X that he had invested 1,800 bitcoins but did not get the rights and interests he deserved, and he wanted to defend his rights. Although the project party's information was not directly disclosed in the tweet, it said that he had sent a message to the project party, and if there was no response within a day, he would publish more information about the project and stakeholders. However, it was soon guessed that it was Solv Protocol, and there were many different opinions for a while. Some said that the Solv project party signed a guarantee with the big players for 8-10% "coin standard", and finally in order to be listed on Binance, that part of the tokens were airdropped to Binance, and the part promised to the big players was not executed. In fact, it is no secret that the so-called TVL is purchased from large investors. In addition to some spectators who helped to cheer, there are also rational viewers who analyzed that she might be doing wealth management on behalf of others and signed a guarantee with the customers. Although she pledged mBTC, she did not participate in various boosts in the later stage, which seriously diluted her points. The points in the later stage were too few, resulting in fewer tokens airdropped in the end, and the APY of the pledge was too low, making it difficult to explain to the financial backers later. In the end, she had to resort to public opinion to protect her rights. How do you think this incident will develop next?