不要挑戰人性

Low scores are first come, first served, just send them directly to the studio, no need for so much trouble. Want to deceive retail investors to continue racking up points.

Recently saw everyone in the square complaining about Alpha's new rule [First come, first served]
First: The score is set so low, 140, 160. It greatly benefits studios.
Second: Airdrop verification can be done 15 minutes in advance, isn't that just giving studios time to prepare?
Third: The previous mention of lucky number based on last digits hasn't been implemented.
It seems all conditions favor the studios. Considering just giving it directly to the studios, why deceive new users into grinding for points, no matter how high they grind, they won't get $BNB

Just send it directly to the studio, why deceive newbies into farming points?

#BinanceTurns8 Join us to participate in the #BinanceTurns8 celebration event, sharing a maximum of 888,888 USD in BNB! $BNB

Happy 8th Anniversary, hoping for 88th anniversary and 888th anniversary

$CROSS Hurry up and buy the dip, it's about to take off, the project team hasn't been continuously suppressing it.

Is the village internet connection just set up?

The higher the points $BRIC , the worse the rewards are. Luckily, I quit early and stopped grinding.

Let's chat about lighter topics this Friday afternoon. We finally have the seventh game of the NBA Finals again this year. The last time it reached a seventh game was probably in 2016. Before this series, the Thunder were the favorites to win the championship, but usually, favorites tend to underperform. I think the Pacers have a good chance to win. Which team do you think will win? Let's do a little survey. I've heard that going against the majority tends to win easily. By the way, will Binance have the opportunity to open up this kind of betting?
$BNB

Recently, I've been seeing users getting squeezed in trading competitions in the square. Trading competitions are designed to harvest, making money from your transaction fees, and squeezing your principal. Where do the minimum trading amount data come from? Daily increases of 50,000 or 80,000, with rewards of only around 50 USDT, or even less. Just a few squeezes exceed the rewards, not to mention the transaction fees. Is it really profitable? Or do people just want to have fun, aim for winning, and not care about the costs?
$ETH

That's right, everyone thinks the same as you, so it started to escalate more and more afterwards.

If you don't hurry and brush it off, hundreds of thousands of people won't notice, only you have discovered it.

After deducting costs, there's not even 50U left

Entering the anti-grinding phase, are you still grinding? Grind 16 points + a balance of over 1000 for 2 points 【18】 points, you can generally receive rewards twice in one cycle, provided that the score does not increase, once 50U 【but currently, it cannot be guaranteed to sell for 50U】, so one cycle is 80-100U, and the wear will take away 66U 【grinding 16 points a day wears 4.4U while also not being squeezed】, the probability of completing the entire process without any unexpected situations is very low, and only then can you earn 14-34U.
$BNB

Today’s score is 241, and the airdrop has been controlled at only 50U. What’s more noteworthy is that the trading competition rewards provided by the project team are greater than the airdrop, with the intention of encouraging everyone to continue competing. As long as there are participants, this model will continue. It is impossible to ask everyone to give up competing; it is human nature. If you bet 10, someone else will want to bet 11. Once you start putting in your costs, you won’t easily give up. It’s a cycle where people will continue to compete even at a loss because they always hope to earn back a little. $BNB

Alpha's trading competition is a trap. Don't be fooled by the idea that you can win rewards by being among the top 12,000. Some people see a minimum trading amount of 0 and think about giving it a try, but once they do, they fall into the trap. First, the information about the minimum trading amount is not transparent, and who knows if it's just inflated numbers. Second, once you start trading, you'll be forced to keep investing due to the costs, combined with the illusion of casually earning points [those who know how harsh the traps can be understand]. Third, trading competitions are a method devised by the project parties to harvest retail investors. Almost every few days there is a new token airdrop followed by a trading competition, and sometimes the rewards for trading competitions are even greater than those for airdrops, indicating that trading competitions are very profitable for them. Wake up, everyone is making money, who is losing money?

This score also includes what was brushed before 14:00 today, the actual score will be known tomorrow.

Today's airdrop points are 245, which is roughly as previously estimated, the score is around 240-255, while the airdrop profit has decreased to 50U-70U. The authorities have also announced that starting from the 19th, 【retail investors will continue for another 5 days】, for those who haven't collected yet, the score will be reduced to allow users to continue claiming, and it will not be redistributed to users who have previously claimed airdrops. The conclusion is that with a balance point of 2 points, brushing 16 points results in a 15-day cycle of 270 points, with a daily loss of 8-10U 【this does not include any losses incurred from being pinched】, the monthly cost is 240-300U, and each month can claim approximately 4 times, which means a profit of about 200-280U, essentially already profiting. Wake up early and exit the pit. Let the studio and project party play by themselves $BNB

The true profits of Alpha activities come from exchanges and project parties. The project releases some tokens in exchange for opportunities on Alpha, while retail investors can only roll against each other. Some project parties are just listing to cash out; there aren't that many projects to list. To put it bluntly, they are all air coins that keep being dumped once they launch. Retail investors have been forced into a prisoner's dilemma; they are not afraid of your manipulation, after all, as long as the studio makes a profit, it will continue to manipulate. From recent points, the studio probably has around 240 points and still has profit; later points might be around 245-255, maybe even higher. I know everyone has sunk costs that they're reluctant to give up, but now stopping losses might be better, unless Binance changes the rules. Otherwise, let the studio and project parties play together and keep dumping. $BNB