Recently asked about the progress of several projects
The project party said: we are cooking
I am really fed up, how can the project party be cooking every day? Can't they hire a maid? If that's not possible, they could at least order some takeout.
It's like when I asked my sister in college, and she said she was taking a shower.
I could only tell her that showering frequently every day is not good for the skin.
P small trader sweeps the chain, traders sweep the market, $saros may have a similar exit path as deep.
One of the happiest things in recent days is trading $deep, and this is not me feeding the community, but community members discovering it themselves.
In more than a year, the community has evolved from waiting for handouts from Brother Xin to now members being able to find good trading opportunities themselves, creating a purely money-making atmosphere, which is quite interesting.
A few days ago, the handouts I provided did not turn into hindsight, and I also had a good return. After resting for a few days to look at projects, as a trader who enjoys looking at projects, I have many fishing ponds. Compared to P small trader sweeping the chain, my daily job is to see if the fish in the pond are jumping.
Today $saros moved:
The standard for saros entering the pond is that it is one of the only two DLMM mechanism projects in the Solana ecosystem. In this round, I all-in on SUI, and next is Sol. As for E, I directly spit.
Here we need to ponder a question: Does the Solana ecosystem need the DLMM mechanism, and what does it bring to Sol?
The DLMM mechanism was born to solve the disadvantages of Uniswap v3. This mechanism is inspired by the Liquidity Book mechanism of the DEX project Trader Joe, which was subsequently forked to Solana and named DLMM.
There are not many who can explain the v3 mechanism clearly, let alone the upgraded DLMM.
In simple terms: V3 allows you to enter little by little, while the DLMM mechanism lets you enter with lubricant.
✅ Uniswap v3, due to design issues, cannot customize price ranges, hence the price range granularity is large, leading to high slippage. (This can be understood as the minimum price digit of the contract.)
DLMM allows LPs to customize price ranges and finely deploy liquidity, which not only improves capital utilization but also reduces trading slippage.
✅ Uniswap v3 must adhere to the iron law of AMM, x⋅y=k. DLMM liquidity is allocated to multiple fixed price ranges (Bins), and trading is executed within fixed price ranges without changing the asset ratio in the liquidity pool, meaning it does not need to follow the x⋅y=k formula, achieving zero slippage trading.
This is its significance, and I think I have simplified it enough. Some smart people might ask, you mentioned the only two, so what is the other one, as it holds reference significance for trading.
The other one is Meteora, and the $LIBRA scam used this. The president's token issuance also borrowed from this; he doesn't issue tokens, he just empowers $jup.
At the very least, the president thinks it is very useful.
DLMM adjusts transaction fees in real-time according to market volatility, raising rates during high volatility periods to provide higher returns for LPs and reducing the risk of impermanent loss.
Less impermanent loss, improved LP returns, suitable for volatile assets, what comes to your mind?
This is very suitable for meme projects to act as the main force.
And it is backed by the Solana Foundation, able to serve as a native liquidity engine for Sol, and is suitable for token issuance (with meme permissionless launch and liquidity deployment features).
This is merely the reason I initially included it in my fishing pond, and in the last month, its K-line has moved, and trading volume has changed.
I bought 20k, and I will exit together with the Solana Foundation. I want to play with my friends who often act as the main force.
@saros_xyz, you need to start operating now; you give me a like, and I won't tell others.
Recently, there are many deposit-related projects, and I have seen many people promoting StandX, especially since it has the endorsement of the Binance contract bigshot.
But @StandX_Official, I have a few questions:
1. The official website has only a deposit and swap interface. 2. Then it will mint a stablecoin $DUSD. 3. Its contract code has only audited the deposit contracts of Sol and EVM chains, and the contract audit cannot be opened. 4. If that's the case, the mechanism of $DUSD adopts extreme neutral arbitrage. Hypothetically: I deposit U to mint $DUSD, I then use the users' U to arbitrage in the same ENA, and I distribute the arbitrage profits to $DUSD holders; theoretically, this is feasible. 5. There is a personal factor: the founder is called @Justin734420450, and personally, I feel a bit scared when I see the name Justin.
This is not FUD, just a question. I am timid as a mouse, afraid of offending big shots, afraid of lawyer letters. I am just a promoter who can't afford lawyer fees and dare not FUD.
I am not the dealer, the dealer won't be like me and not play the after-game. After being confirmed deflated, the win rate seems to have strengthened a bit. $alpaca should come to an end.
Last night I applied oil and went straight to sleep, luckily I set a stop-loss, refer to yesterday's post.
In the past few days, I've issued fewer orders, feeding too much is afraid of overstuffing, let's do a bit more research yesterday.
Many novice traders are confused about some basic knowledge of contracts. If you want to practice, you can start with Binance event contracts.
Event contracts are similar to binary options, predicting the outcome of a specific event (such as price rising or falling).
This aligns well with beginners trading based on news or information for long and short positions. For event contracts, you can try to grasp specific time points: such as macroeconomic timings, ETF inflows and outflows, Trump's speeches, candlestick indicators, options expiration, etc.
With a certain time dimension as a reference, it becomes easier to learn the principles of contracts.
Many do not realize that the order book for contracts and spot trading are two different things, and blindly entering trades can lead to significant losses.
Many novice traders are unclear about some basic knowledge of contracts. If you want to practice, you can start with Binance's time contracts.
Event contracts are similar to binary options, predicting the outcome of a specific event (such as price going up or down).
This aligns well with novices trading based on news or information for long and short positions. Event contracts can be tried by grasping timing points: Such as macroeconomic timing, ETF inflows and outflows, Trump's speeches, K-line indicators, options expiration, etc.
With a certain time dimension as a reference, it becomes easier to learn about contract principles.
Many do not realize that the order book for contracts and spot trading are two different things, and blindly entering can lead to significant losses.
Recently, several friends who invested in the KOL round asked me to teach them how to hold on.
They didn't call me when investing in the KOL round, and when they felt they couldn't hold on after the opening, they wanted me to teach them how to hold on.
I didn't expect that my skills in holding on would be widely known.
Stake Stone @Stake_Stone's trading volume on Binance Alpha is only $7?
I don't know if this is a display error or something, it's very strange. Wallet TGE + Alpha + contract, and such a good project surely has many people trading with expectations.
It's a simple principle; Brother Stone's predecessor was doing ETH re-staking. If ETH re-staking can't continue, or if ETH is not viable, he switched to Babylon to do BTC, and finally transitioned to all-chain liquidity.
His ability to pivot and the level of VC recognition are very high.
I won't discuss the more technically difficult aspects; Stake Stone is essentially an all-chain liquidity solution, utilizing a Pre-Deposit treasury method to raise the liquidity needed for early cold starts.
Therefore, his achievements are the most objective: DEFI: Berachain RWA Protocol: Plume RWA Assets: Story BTC Ecosystem: Goat
He addresses the liquidity isolation problem of emerging public chains and application chains, which is something many exchanges want to integrate in this era where liquidity is king.
You can see that exchanges like Binance and OKX have invested, and recently @animocabrands has also invested, wanting to explore an IP-based RWA ecosystem and the combination with DeFi alongside Brother Stone.
The TGE timing set the boundary conditions, and the price reflects the valuation expectations.
This project has also been unfortunate; it encountered a trade war at the time of the TGE and has not been heavily promoted. Only with the TGE of Babylon did people realize the close relationship between Brother Stone and Babylon, leading to value discovery.
Even if it was bought at $0.06 during TGE, it is now at a price of $0.1, and other exchanges' trading volumes have also surpassed ten million, making it one of the stronger coins in Binance Wallet TGE.
I contemplated the path of its value return: Babylon discovers value --- VC values at $150 million currently unable to exit liquidity --- loosening of DeFi staking policies (the recent rise of CRV) -- successful pivot of Kernel to BNB staking in the spot market --- building the expectations that are favored by major exchanges.
And you, my friend, @Stake_Stone Brother Stone, you are now ready, just lacking someone with vision in the capital market to promote it.
I bought a little, those TGE projects that are leaking urine like $shell, not as good as getting some with money, liquidity, and pivoting ability, then look like the honest Brother Stone.
Many people only summarize rules based on phenomena, but do not explore methodologies based on information. In the end, they use seemingly correct one-sided conclusions as reasons for their trading, such as:
Shorting new coins when they launch, and then shorting $bank gets liquidated. A -2 fee rate definitely means going long, yet a few days ago when I shorted $WCT, they opened a counter position against me.
As for $voxel, I went long last night when it doubled, and my trading thought process was very clear, and the result was just as @CryptoSociety42 stated.
I cast my line 100 times, and on the 100th time, I caught a fish. The results come from each cast of the line.
Trading is the same; from methodology to trading expectations to risk preference, once a system is formed, it requires countless casts.