不吃香菜的小徐
Open Trade
Frequent Trader
1.8 Months
5 Following
3 Followers
29 Liked
1 Shared
All
Quotes
See original
#我的策略演变 My Strategy Evolution and Key Turning Points:
At the beginning, as a novice, I relied heavily on technical indicators, characterized by being obsessed with MACD golden crosses and dead crosses, RSI overbought and oversold, and Bollinger Bands contractions and breakouts, trying to predict the market with a single indicator.
Pain Point: False signals from the channel led to repeated stop losses, and I discovered that indicators collectively fail in extreme market conditions.
After trading more, I realized that indicators are just derivatives, not causal laws, no longer chasing the 'holy grail indicator,' but instead studying the market psychology and liquidity logic behind the indicators.
At the beginning, as a novice, I relied heavily on technical indicators, characterized by being obsessed with MACD golden crosses and dead crosses, RSI overbought and oversold, and Bollinger Bands contractions and breakouts, trying to predict the market with a single indicator.
Pain Point: False signals from the channel led to repeated stop losses, and I discovered that indicators collectively fail in extreme market conditions.
After trading more, I realized that indicators are just derivatives, not causal laws, no longer chasing the 'holy grail indicator,' but instead studying the market psychology and liquidity logic behind the indicators.
See original
Isn't it said that with low scores you can't get it? When the scores are really high, no one is talking anymore 🙊 Binance planning must be a headache too
See original
New starting point, new beginning, let's go!
See original
That's right 👍
Alpha Ecology, the more rules, the more confused users?
Once upon a time, participating in the Alpha project guaranteed an airdrop,
Now, it has turned into a game of speed, scripts, and 'studio efficiency'.
We begin to wonder:
Are these layers of points and changing rules optimizing fairness, or causing frustration?
The root of the problem lies in the competition between 'real users vs. group-controlled studios'.
When rules are too loose, studios exploit benefits in bulk, diluting user rewards.
When rules are too strict, ordinary people are forced to 'grind points' to qualify.
'Grinding for the sake of grinding' has become the norm, losing the original value of contribution to the ecosystem.
The real breakthrough point may lie in making the rules a bit 'smarter', rather than 'more complex'.
We don’t need more and more operational thresholds,
Instead, we need the system to accurately identify the true characteristics of 'wool gatherers':
Abnormal device information, bulk registrations
Unnatural trading logic, single active behavior
Provide basic rewards to truly active users,
Link large incentives to 'real contributions', such as:
Retention time
Real interaction frequency
Feedback and promotional actions towards the ecosystem
Let’s not allow those who can 'grind enough points' to take the biggest piece of the cake.
Points should be redeemable for core services, not become an arbitrage tool.
Airdrops should target those who truly wish to stay, not traffic speculators.
The reward logic should be transparent and clear, even if it includes anti-cheat rules, some details should be made public.
The long-term value of Web3 relies not on 'grinding points', but on 'real retention'.
We are not afraid of difficulty, nor of many tasks,
But what we want is a participation logic that is 'solidly done, and安心 (peace of mind) received'.
Don’t let the rules scare away real users, leaving only 'smart studios' and 'silent on-chain data'.
Once upon a time, participating in the Alpha project guaranteed an airdrop,
Now, it has turned into a game of speed, scripts, and 'studio efficiency'.
We begin to wonder:
Are these layers of points and changing rules optimizing fairness, or causing frustration?
The root of the problem lies in the competition between 'real users vs. group-controlled studios'.
When rules are too loose, studios exploit benefits in bulk, diluting user rewards.
When rules are too strict, ordinary people are forced to 'grind points' to qualify.
'Grinding for the sake of grinding' has become the norm, losing the original value of contribution to the ecosystem.
The real breakthrough point may lie in making the rules a bit 'smarter', rather than 'more complex'.
We don’t need more and more operational thresholds,
Instead, we need the system to accurately identify the true characteristics of 'wool gatherers':
Abnormal device information, bulk registrations
Unnatural trading logic, single active behavior
Provide basic rewards to truly active users,
Link large incentives to 'real contributions', such as:
Retention time
Real interaction frequency
Feedback and promotional actions towards the ecosystem
Let’s not allow those who can 'grind enough points' to take the biggest piece of the cake.
Points should be redeemable for core services, not become an arbitrage tool.
Airdrops should target those who truly wish to stay, not traffic speculators.
The reward logic should be transparent and clear, even if it includes anti-cheat rules, some details should be made public.
The long-term value of Web3 relies not on 'grinding points', but on 'real retention'.
We are not afraid of difficulty, nor of many tasks,
But what we want is a participation logic that is 'solidly done, and安心 (peace of mind) received'.
Don’t let the rules scare away real users, leaving only 'smart studios' and 'silent on-chain data'.
See original
This is really inedible
Big hair, no one is eating??? Why are all the brothers so picky?
Login to explore more contents